407:
213:
During this period, prizes will be awarded to the best article improvement of a large/broad/important article. Improvement will be quantified and compared – in cases of similar levels of improvement, articles in a worse state to begin with will be deemed more valuable, all other parameters being
113:(TCC) is a short, intensive competition where participants focus on improving Knowledge (XXG)'s most important articles, particularly those in the worst state of disrepair. Winners are chosen based on the "best additive encyclopedic value", and awarded cash prizes; this year, the prize money is
163:
As
Knowledge (XXG) has evolved and become more detailed and polished, its criteria for featured and good-article status have become more rigorous. This is a good thing as we are now producing an ever-expanding portfolio of material that actually looks like it could appear in a published tome.
145:
236:
are, but you might have a tough time showing radical improvement in a GA, which would most likely be dwarfed by massive improvement in a start-class article. The good- and featured-article process are not considered part of the Core
164:
However, one side effect is the rigour of the process favours the production of more esoteric/narrow/specialised good and featured content. What to do? Carrots are always preferred to sticks, and so this competition fills a niche...
209:
for inspiration), as some important and broad articles are missing from the list above. Any editor is welcome to nominate any article and if they can put a good case as to why it should be considered; we'll certainly
415:
368:
362:
356:
350:
344:
314:
184:
The article improvement process takes place over one and a half months, during which time an editor or editors knuckle down and improve an article, and submit a diff of their work at
332:
326:
320:
308:
303:
141:
137:
389:
385:
338:
240:
The judges will weigh up the improvement of the article, combined with its "core-ness", to come up with a "best additive encyclopedic value" to
Knowledge (XXG).
393:
380:
178:
Editors are also welcome to improve any broad or important article which lies outside this list as long as they explain why their article should be considered.
406:
384:), held from September until October 7, 2006, was a precursor to the Core Contest. A total of $ 170 of Amazon vouchers were awarded to three editors. The
437:
214:
equal. Thus an article that has gone from (say) 10–50% sourced with reliable sources, will be valued more highly than one from (say) 50–90% sourced.
180:
The list provided is a guide only. Furthermore, a priority is to improve those core articles in the worst state of disrepair, expanded upon below:
37:
296:
185:
158:
433:
196:
81:
421:
47:
255:
191:
The broader or more "core" an article is, the greater weight it will be given in scoring. The general pool should come from
375:
467:
283:
269:
133:
192:
173:
32:
472:
449:
217:
As judges review entries, they will post feedback on the improvements and areas still to improve before future
430:
competition run over the course of a year tallying up improvements across the wiki, run every year since 2007.
172:
The aim of the contest is to encourage a short, sharp burst of activity and article improvement in the
55:
203:
427:
249:
440:
for improvements every month since 2009 (although the prize has never been won by en.wp so far).
444:
424:, Discord channel that tries to bring a vital article up to B-class each week, started 2021.
222:
218:
277:
263:
127:
95:
233:
229:
199:
will gain much kudos for it. Other broad articles can be nominated (see other lists of
461:
245:
17:
102:
273:
259:
123:
90:
418:, had a similar goal but no cash prize. It was active between 2006 and 2008.
405:
410:
Knowledge (XXG)’s poor treatment of its most important articles
323:, which saw £250 in Amazon vouchers shared by three editors
317:, which saw £250 in Amazon vouchers shared by seven editors
347:, which saw £250 in Amazon vouchers shared by three editors
341:, which saw £250 in Amazon vouchers shared by five editors
335:, which saw £250 in Amazon vouchers shared by three editors
329:, which saw £250 in Amazon vouchers shared by five editors
359:, which saw £250 in Amazon vouchers shared by four editors
311:, which saw £250 in Amazon vouchers shared by six editors
295:
The Core
Contest proper has run on twelve occasions (see
63:
392:incarnations focussed on new articles while the
434:Meta — List of Wikipedias by sample of articles
371:, which saw £250 in cash shared by four editors
365:, which saw £250 in cash shared by five editors
353:, which saw £250 in cash shared by five editors
87:Keep an eye out for next year's competition! –
8:
27:Contest to improve Knowledge (XXG) articles
186:Knowledge (XXG):The Core Contest/Entries
159:Knowledge (XXG):The Core Contest/Winners
122:A noble pursuit originally organised by
195:. Anyone willing to tackle one of the
84:! Thank you to all the participants.
7:
304:November 25, 2007 – December 9, 2007
80:has finished and the winners have
25:
396:looked at building core content.
297:winners from previous contests
193:Knowledge (XXG):Vital articles
1:
450:Knowledge (XXG):Reward board
117:split between the winners.
489:
327:10 February – 9 March 2014
223:featured article candidacy
156:
53:
416:Core Topics Collaboration
103:23:31, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
333:1 March – 14 April 2015
219:good article nomination
197:top-tier vital articles
468:Knowledge (XXG) awards
411:
409:
339:15 May – 30 June 2016
140:, TCC was revived in
422:Discord/Team-B-Vital
436:competition offers
18:Knowledge (XXG):TCC
412:
244:Panel of judges –
232:are not eligible.
82:now been announced
309:March 10–31, 2012
290:Past competitions
230:featured articles
16:(Redirected from
480:
473:The Core Contest
438:"virtual prizes"
208:
202:
116:
100:
98:
93:
66:
43:The Core Contest
21:
488:
487:
483:
482:
481:
479:
478:
477:
458:
457:
456:
403:
398:
381:3rd incarnation
376:Danny's contest
292:
206:
200:
170:
161:
155:
149:
144:, and again in
118:
114:
106:
96:
91:
89:
70:
69:
62:
58:
52:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
486:
484:
476:
475:
470:
460:
459:
455:
454:
453:
452:
441:
431:
425:
419:
404:
402:
399:
373:
372:
369:April–May 2024
366:
363:April–May 2023
360:
357:April–May 2022
354:
351:June–July 2021
348:
342:
336:
330:
324:
318:
312:
306:
293:
291:
288:
242:
241:
238:
226:
215:
211:
189:
174:vital articles
169:
166:
154:
151:
121:
108:
74:
72:
68:
67:
59:
54:
51:
50:
45:
40:
35:
29:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
485:
474:
471:
469:
466:
465:
463:
451:
448:
447:
446:
442:
439:
435:
432:
429:
426:
423:
420:
417:
414:
413:
408:
400:
397:
395:
391:
387:
383:
382:
377:
370:
367:
364:
361:
358:
355:
352:
349:
346:
345:May–June 2017
343:
340:
337:
334:
331:
328:
325:
322:
319:
316:
313:
310:
307:
305:
302:
301:
300:
298:
289:
287:
285:
282:
279:
275:
271:
268:
265:
261:
257:
254:
251:
247:
239:
235:
234:Good articles
231:
227:
224:
220:
216:
212:
205:
198:
194:
190:
187:
183:
182:
181:
179:
175:
167:
165:
160:
152:
150:
147:
143:
139:
135:
132:
129:
125:
119:
112:
105:
104:
101:
99:
94:
85:
83:
79:
73:
65:
61:
60:
57:
49:
48:#team-b-vital
46:
44:
41:
39:
36:
34:
31:
30:
19:
379:
374:
294:
280:
266:
252:
243:
177:
171:
162:
130:
120:
111:Core Contest
110:
107:
88:
86:
78:Core Contest
77:
75:
71:
42:
443:Other cash
315:August 2012
204:core topics
38:WikiProject
462:Categories
321:April 2013
157:See also:
153:Background
142:March 2012
146:June 2021
76:The 12th
33:Main page
401:See also
284:contribs
270:contribs
256:contribs
246:Casliber
237:Contest.
228:Current
134:contribs
56:Shortcut
428:WikiCup
210:listen.
390:second
272:) and
97:(talk)
64:WP:TCC
445:lures
394:third
386:first
274:Aza24
260:Femke
168:Rules
136:) in
124:Danny
92:Aza24
388:and
299:):
278:talk
264:talk
250:talk
138:2007
128:talk
115:£300
109:The
258:),
221:or
464::
286:)
207:}}
201:{{
176:.
378:(
281:·
276:(
267:·
262:(
253:·
248:(
225:.
188:.
148:.
131:·
126:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.