134:
45:
119:
185:
that have been the subject of so much fighting that even a brilliant, earth-shattering work of genius would face significant opposition just because it's proposal #3941. And no, your version probably isn't a brilliant, earth-shattering work of genius. Your best bet under these circumstances is to let
207:. When you see this as an argument to delete, don't give up. If you can repair the article in a timely manner, then you've neatly refuted that the article is irreparable. If you can't repair it in a timely manner, then this is the simplest argument to refute at
203:) but the title might be useful, then delete the content to help encourage a new article. If you keep the article, then you're keeping something of no value until someone replaces it with something of value, when people tend to be more inclined to fill
180:
Sometimes, the damage is beyond fixing. Although you can edit any page to fix the page content, you can't edit the associations and social history of a page, even if you delete every trace of that page on the wiki. Most often, this is common with
258:" Thus TNT might be invoked during AfD with caution: deleting articles for the purpose of cleanup can be contentious. The purpose of TNT is cleanup (to "start over"). Other relevant essays on this topic are
315:
289:
267:
225:
64:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
263:
65:
186:
the fight go and let the perennial warriors blow each other up (or at least wear each other out) and try again later, if at all.
182:
133:
279:
57:
300:
189:
Sometimes, the damage is fixable but the effort in doing so dwarfs the effort involved in merely starting over.
31:
259:
219:
284:
204:
69:
200:
162:
79:
173:
are frequently blown up. Anyone can start over as long as their version isn't itself a copyright or
158:
138:
294:
53:
249:
245:
174:
166:
253:
231:
215:
208:
170:
241:
237:
309:
72:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
30:"Knowledge (XXG):STARTOVER" redirects here. For "Clean start" policy for users, see
17:
151:
199:
argument: if the article's content is useless (including all the versions in
127:
For pages that are beyond fixing, it may be better to start from scratch.
145:
A page can be so hopelessly irreparable that the only solution is to
192:
This logic may also be applied to sections or parts of an article.
132:
211:; after all, they said it couldn't be fixed and you fixed it.
113:
39:
218:
process is grounded in established policy. According to
101:
94:
87:
224:Reasons for deletion include 14. Any other content
177:violation, or a total copy of the deleted content.
214:Deleting severely deficient articles through the
285:WP:Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater!
171:extensive improper use of large language models
8:
141:seems to be the only way to save an article.
252:, or completely deleted by consensus at
66:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
316:Knowledge (XXG) essays about deletion
254:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for Deletion
7:
70:thoroughly vetted by the community
25:
248:policies, it may be reduced to a
117:
43:
37:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
1:
290:WP:Deletion to Quality Award
268:WP:Using deletion as cleanup
195:With articles, this is the
167:undisclosed paid sock farms
32:Knowledge (XXG):Clean start
332:
264:WP:Deletion is not cleanup
183:perennial policy proposals
77:
29:
240:topic severely fails the
147:blow it up and start over
125:This page in a nutshell:
161:, extensive cases of
142:
246:neutral point of view
136:
68:, as it has not been
228:for an encyclopedia.
159:Copyright violations
139:nuking it from orbit
236:If an article on a
18:Knowledge (XXG):TNT
280:WP:Delete the junk
270:(opposing views).
149:, i.e., create it
143:
197:TNT tipping point
131:
130:
112:
111:
16:(Redirected from
323:
301:WP:NPOV deletion
297:, a counterpoint
121:
120:
114:
104:
97:
90:
47:
46:
40:
21:
331:
330:
326:
325:
324:
322:
321:
320:
306:
305:
276:
118:
108:
107:
100:
93:
86:
82:
74:
73:
58:deletion policy
44:
38:
35:
28:
27:Wikimedia essay
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
329:
327:
319:
318:
308:
307:
304:
303:
298:
292:
287:
282:
275:
272:
129:
128:
122:
110:
109:
106:
105:
98:
91:
83:
78:
75:
63:
62:
50:
48:
36:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
328:
317:
314:
313:
311:
302:
299:
296:
293:
291:
288:
286:
283:
281:
278:
277:
273:
271:
269:
265:
261:
260:WP:NOTCLEANUP
257:
255:
251:
247:
243:
242:verifiability
239:
233:
230:" Similarly,
229:
227:
221:
220:WP:DEL-REASON
217:
212:
210:
206:
202:
198:
193:
190:
187:
184:
178:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
154:
153:
148:
140:
135:
126:
123:
116:
115:
103:
99:
96:
92:
89:
85:
84:
81:
76:
71:
67:
61:
59:
55:
49:
42:
41:
33:
19:
235:
226:not suitable
223:
213:
196:
194:
191:
188:
179:
157:
150:
146:
144:
124:
51:
102:WP:BLOWITUP
95:WP:DYNAMITE
52:This is an
137:Sometimes
295:WP:TNTTNT
234:states: "
205:red links
80:Shortcuts
310:Category
274:See also
163:advocacy
238:notable
201:history
175:WP:PAID
152:de novo
56:on the
232:WP:ATD
216:WP:AFD
209:WP:DRV
169:, and
88:WP:TNT
54:essay
266:vs.
262:and
250:stub
244:or
222:, "
312::
165:,
155:.
256:.
60:.
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
