116:
290:
341:
305:
31:
101:
279:
If a page needs significant work, especially if it's a new page, then don't tag a page for every single problem. Add a tag for the one or two most urgent problems. When those have been resolved, then future editors can look for less urgent issues. Don't distract from major problems by adding tags
144:
Adding tags to articles should be accompanied by sufficient reasoning on the tagged article's talk page (or in a "reason" parameter where one exists) to explain why the tags are needed. However, tag bombing does not apply to the moderate use of tags that are self-explanatory because having the same
155:
says "This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed." There is nothing more to say about an unreferenced article. The article either has sources or it does not have
259:
tag to group them together. This is one thing that robot-assisted tagging does. This should not become a "check-all-that-apply" exercise, in which the human operator checks off every single tag that applies, even if some of the tags apply only tenuously.
272:
If you can tag an article, you can also edit it in other potentially more helpful ways. Maybe you don't have the scientific expertise to edit an article on rocket science, but surely you can do something to fix the spelling of plain
English
446:
347:
An editor thinks something might be wrong with this section. They can't be bothered to fix it, but can rest assured that they've done their encyclopedic duty by sticking on a tag.
200:, which contains myriad possible issues. The use of these tags may be enhanced by the use of an argument of what points in the Manual of Style need to be addressed.
504:
418:. Once you press the "Publish changes" button, you can find that the screen is exploded full of maintenance templates. After successful tag bombing,
196:, on the other hand, say only a little more than "This may require cleanup to meet Knowledge (XXG)'s quality standards" and direct an editor to the
467:
452:
130:
351:
Please allow this tag to languish indefinitely at the top of the page since nobody knows exactly what the tagging editor was worked up about.
46:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
316:
47:
462:
141:. While some tag bombing may be a well-intended request for clarification, tag bombing can be used as a way to promote a point of view.
430:
457:
412:
358:
To tag-bomb, simply get a bunch of useless maintenance templates and place them right at the top. You may group them into a
16:
This page is about tags that users can put in articles. For information on tags that robots can put on edit histories, see
382:
494:
478:
197:
499:
312:
372:
362:
253:
160:
392:
293:
419:
327:
51:
239:
170:
149:
61:
472:
134:
120:
180:
39:
229:
138:
423:
17:
219:
190:
289:
115:
133:
to pages or unjustified addition of one tag to multiple pages. Tag bombing is a form of
437:, which had a maintenance template saying that it had too many maintenance templates.
488:
402:
54:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
296:
is what tag-bombing looks like. Does this "bomb" your screen with maintenance tags?
368:
template or you may not group them. You can also spread inline cleanup tags like
447:
Knowledge (XXG):Database reports/Pages containing too many maintenance templates
245:; they might be enough. Avoid vague and redundant tags. When several tags
422:. Use other articles. Remember: you can do it up to 6,883,890 times and
304:
137:. Editors who engage in tag bombing after being asked to stop may be
145:
information on the talk page is a redundancy. For example, the tag
288:
114:
315:. It is not, has never been, nor will ever be, a Knowledge (XXG)
109:
Adding multiple tags without explaining the reason is disruptive.
322:
Rather, it illustrates standards or conduct that are generally
335:
299:
95:
25:
166:
tags to numerous unreferenced statements in an article when
479:
How people feel when everyone else says they did it wrong
475:, a type of editor frequently engaged in drive-by tagging
468:
Knowledge (XXG):Tagging pages for problems § Over-tagging
426:! Just make sure the admins don't find out about this.
83:
76:
69:
212:
Consider applying only the most specific, helpful tags
429:An extreme example of tag bombing was found at
276:Focus attention on the most important problems
249:apply to a single article, consider using the
186:would state equivalent information. Tags like
8:
453:Knowledge (XXG):Template messages/Cleanup
129:is the unjustified addition of numerous
48:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
505:Knowledge (XXG) essays about templates
449:, for actual examples of over-tagging
7:
139:blocked from editing Knowledge (XXG)
463:User:Ritchie333/Hit and run editors
458:Knowledge (XXG):Responsible tagging
52:thoroughly vetted by the community
14:
156:sources. There is no need to add
339:
303:
99:
29:
23:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
264:can still be used to tag-bomb.
1:
420:repeat it as much as you want
328:the Knowledge (XXG) community
311:This section is intended as
521:
481:at the Stack Overflow blog
225:if you're also putting on
215:For example, don't put on
59:
15:
119:Tag bombing is a form of
107:This page in a nutshell:
473:Knowledge (XXG):WikiImp
495:Knowledge (XXG) essays
297:
208:To avoid tag-bombing:
123:
500:Knowledge (XXG) humor
413:Self-published inline
292:
118:
50:, as it has not been
433:Magic: The Gathering
18:Knowledge (XXG):Tags
317:policy or guideline
269:Improve it yourself
262:{{Multiple issues}}
424:this is really fun
383:Unreliable source?
298:
135:disruptive editing
124:
121:disruptive editing
356:
355:
352:
334:
333:
280:for trivial ones.
204:Avoiding problems
113:
112:
94:
93:
512:
417:
411:
407:
401:
397:
391:
387:
381:
377:
371:
367:
361:
350:
343:
342:
336:
307:
300:
263:
258:
252:
244:
238:
234:
228:
224:
218:
195:
189:
185:
179:
175:
169:
165:
159:
154:
148:
103:
102:
96:
86:
79:
72:
33:
32:
26:
520:
519:
515:
514:
513:
511:
510:
509:
485:
484:
443:
415:
409:
405:
399:
395:
389:
385:
379:
375:
373:Citation needed
369:
365:
363:Multiple issues
359:
340:
287:
285:How to tag-bomb
261:
256:
254:Multiple issues
250:
242:
236:
232:
226:
222:
216:
206:
198:Manual of Style
193:
187:
183:
177:
173:
167:
163:
161:citation needed
157:
152:
146:
100:
90:
89:
82:
75:
68:
64:
56:
55:
30:
24:
21:
12:
11:
5:
518:
516:
508:
507:
502:
497:
487:
486:
483:
482:
476:
470:
465:
460:
455:
450:
442:
439:
354:
353:
349:
344:
332:
331:
321:
308:
286:
283:
282:
281:
277:
274:
270:
266:
265:
213:
205:
202:
111:
110:
104:
92:
91:
88:
87:
80:
73:
65:
60:
57:
45:
44:
36:
34:
22:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
517:
506:
503:
501:
498:
496:
493:
492:
490:
480:
477:
474:
471:
469:
466:
464:
461:
459:
456:
454:
451:
448:
445:
444:
440:
438:
436:
434:
427:
425:
421:
414:
404:
394:
393:Better source
384:
374:
364:
348:
345:
338:
337:
329:
325:
320:
318:
314:
309:
306:
302:
301:
295:
291:
284:
278:
275:
271:
268:
267:
255:
248:
241:
231:
221:
214:
211:
210:
209:
203:
201:
199:
192:
182:
172:
162:
151:
142:
140:
136:
132:
128:
122:
117:
108:
105:
98:
97:
85:
81:
78:
77:WP:TAGBOMBING
74:
71:
67:
66:
63:
58:
53:
49:
43:
41:
35:
28:
27:
19:
432:
428:
357:
346:
326:accepted by
323:
310:
246:
240:cleanup-list
207:
171:unreferenced
150:unreferenced
143:
126:
125:
106:
37:
127:Tag bombing
38:This is an
489:Categories
181:refimprove
84:WP:TAGFARM
70:WP:TAGBOMB
230:copy edit
62:Shortcuts
441:See also
435:keywords
431:List of
220:cleanup
191:cleanup
273:words?
313:humor
40:essay
408:and
294:This
235:and
131:tags
403:Or?
324:not
176:or
491::
416:}}
410:{{
406:}}
400:{{
398:,
396:}}
390:{{
388:,
386:}}
380:{{
378:,
376:}}
370:{{
366:}}
360:{{
257:}}
251:{{
247:do
243:}}
237:{{
233:}}
227:{{
223:}}
217:{{
194:}}
188:{{
184:}}
178:{{
174:}}
168:{{
164:}}
158:{{
153:}}
147:{{
330:.
319:.
42:.
20:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
