Knowledge:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1011

1071:

defects, and fix things, and make things better. Each person hopefully will have a natural sense of what they can do well. In the case of the particular editor giving the imperative tone, from the one person alone (with no concurrence from any other editor that it needs to be done), I'm getting stuff like "we have to take this down", "the article will be really cut down", "this has to go". The grounds are "neutrality" and "original research", which I really don't see as existing, at this stage of the two articles. (There may, however, be subtle issues that have the article needing adjusting or removal of small parts, in my mind.) The qualifications stuff is that I'm feeling the editor in question is declaring everything original research because the editor is unfamiliar with the details of the ACA, perhaps not willing take the time to learn the details (which are in references and text in the two articles), and

1873:

the source for his cause of death and found it actually said something completely different. So, changed that and gave the reason. Then this editor came and reverted my edit and added a new source. I checked the source. It was a recent article that had copied from the wikipedia article... SO, obviously I changed it back because oh my god. Then the editor changed it again to a 'heart attack'! Again, the article cited does not say he had a heart attack. It just says 'natural causes'. I thought 'whatever, it probably WAS a heart attack'. Then I reorganised the page because it was not very standard. I just added some new headings (Early life, Death) and a couple sentences more detail. Changed a detail about his residence that was wrong (based on the article being cited). Then the same editor just came and reverted it without giving any reason.

986:. High school students who understand this can be outstanding editors and those with PhDs who fail to understand how Knowledge works can be very poor editors indeed. There are no "authority levels" among editors working on content. Everyone is equal as long as they comply with policies and guidelines. And everyone can issue warnings if an editor strays from policies and guidelines. No special authority is needed to issue warnings. Only administrators can delete or protect pages, or block other editors, but administrators have no special powers when it comes to determining content. I am an administrator and I have never seen a userpage of an administrator that did not say that the person was an administrator somewhere on that page. Sometimes the only mention is in the categories at the bottom of the page. 2524:(please don't think of it as a "page", because that suggests the kind of thing you get in social media, not an encyclopaedia) should be based almost entirely on outside sources - that is to say, sources wholly unconnected with the subject (and not based on interviews or press releases), and published by someone with a reputation for fact-checking and editorial control, such as a major newspaper, or a reputable book publisher. The subject's own publications may be used in a very limited way, to verify uncontroversial factual information like places, but the bulk of the article should be based on independent published material. See 3033:. I'm sorry that it's taken a while for you to receive a response to this query. My instinct is that the existing article should simply be updated to reflect the new ownership. Even if Apollo Munich Health Insurance will cease to exist under that name, the article title can be changed and the content can reflect the change of ownership and name. Incidentally, you write that you are "not the editor", but anyone can edit any article on Knowledge. However, if you have some sort of relationship with the company, you should avoid editing it directly and instead request changes on its talk page by following the instructions at 1091:(Also, I noted on your page you indicate you have a doctorate. I'm keeping mine, so far, off of my page, because of my own feeling that there should not be rank here at Knowledge, or in general, except where really needed. (My page only indicates that I have a mathy background.) Anyway, I think you should keep the detail you have on your page. It helps in the job of doing a better article, when generally what happens is that all sorts of fully anonymous editors come by and make deep changes and deep comments. And nothing about what there role is, what their background is, what their interests are. 2627:

the first athlete to jump over someone’s head during a basketball game, but 20 years earlier 2,000 people in a stadium firsthand witness another athlete do that but there was no recording or no one wrote about it. Wiki seems like the perfect platform to address lost history. Can i recommend we do something about that or form a team that has a section that deals with that. We can even refer to it as LOST HISTORY. This helps our users understand that its without written recorded sources...I promise this is my last question. :)

3128:. There are plenty of various alternative ways to code a reference, but for a physical newspaper not available online, you should include as much information as possible. Specifically, that should include the full title of the article, author(s), name of newspaper, date of publication, city of publication if not part of the newspaper name, page number, section letter and so on. If you have most but not all of that information, give what you can. Many newspaper articles are unsigned, for example. 1075:(only possibly) may not have a good head for for understanding the content technically. My guess is the editor may be declaring the stuff "original research" by looking at superficial signs, not taking the time, and possibly (only possibly) lacking the skills, to do the job properly. This is where issues of qualifications are coming up. (Thus, I clicked on your page, and I see you have a Ph.D. in nutrition. I would tend to see that as something fairly (not perfectly) 2325:! Just a follow-up question, if I have a conflict of interest, is my only option to add a description with citations to the appropriate section of the appropriate "Knowledge:Requested_articles" page? In other words, since there are so many articles waiting to be reviewed, can you advise on the most expedient way to get a new page/article created? (I haven't written a page in my Sandbox, because of my COI. Perhaps I should go ahead and write one in my Sandbox - with 1347:. The binary choice seems fishy to me, since the optimal resolution is by line by line handling, though apparently the resources are not available. Note that one of my added sections is "Problems", detailing 5 problems with the ACA, including "Subsidy cliff" and "Family Glitch" "Excessive Copays", in article that is extremely pro ACA, and a year ago, in the talk section, a commenter indicated the article was inappropriately pro ACA. Thus, would any one, perhaps 1173:, but the Teahouse is not it. Finally, if you would keep your comments succinct and to the point, it would help uninvolved editors to be able to easily catch up and participate. On a cursory glance, immediately after this post was initiated, I had actually been impressed by Newslinger's patience in reading and replying to your walls of text. But, if you are only complying not collaborating and they are unaware of it, you are wasting both your times. Regards! 35: 1958:'illnesses relating to drug and alcohol addiction'. So, I read the article referenced. It said he died of natural causes and they were waiting on the autopsy results. I couldn't find an article with the autopsy results so I changed COD to 'natural causes'. This other editor seems to have really poor reading comprehension because they keep writing things that are clearly at odds with the articles they cite to back it up. The article, 1924:). However if you have verifiable copies of legal documents or other third-party research to correct inaccuracies, I would suggest as a new Knowledge editor that you contact the respective project team. Each article has a talk page, where you can also create a new section to discuss any misinformation with other editors. (Also, it general policy to sign your posts on talk or help pages (like this) using four tildes ~~~~ (See 965:

they do or don't. So, a degree in economics or health economics would reassure me that the editor at least understands the technical details. It's not necessary at all (I don't have economics degree--mine is math), but it's more like seeing such a resume would be more or less sufficient, and keep me from worrying if the editor understands the subject of the article.

1429:, out, for reasons of your own political opinions. (I'm not saying you actually are doing it for that reason.) So my exact question for the Teahouse, where users learn about the software and procedures at Knowledge, is, "is it standard to use such a coarse, leading "keep it in" or "take it out" question in the phrasing for RFC"?? ( 1691:

so("because I want to significantly expand the scope of the article, read my draft to see what I want to do"). You might also want to seek the involvement of any members of the WikiProjects listed on the existing article's talk page; I suspect at least the broad Religion project might have some members who can offer advice.

982:, you seem to have a misunderstanding of the role of Knowledge editors. What we do is accurately and neutrally summarize what reliable published sources say about a topic. No more and no less than that. An individual editor's level of education is irrelevant. Far more important is the editor's understanding of Knowledge's 1209:. I tend to state things as I see them (especially when interpreting policy), but I'm not asserting authority when I do so. To be absolutely clear, I am not an administrator on Knowledge. In content disputes, all editors (including administrators) have equal voices and work together to determine article content through 2711:: Newspapers, magazines, and books have been around for centuries, so if it was notable, someone should have written about it. There are many projects that have digitized and made available a lot of these older materials, but, as someone else said, an offline source is fine – it just takes more leg work to find. 1413:"For the articles which we disagree on, we can start a request for comment on the respective talk pages to ask the whole Knowledge community whether your changes should be kept or removed. Editors who participate in the discussion might suggest other solutions, but they will usually choose one or the other." 3423:

in their own time. If you have chosen to write about yourself, which it seems that you have, and reviewers have deemed you not to be sufficiently notable as to meet Knowledge's guidelines, then I am afraid that you are very unlikely to be able to get that decision overturned here, or anywhere else. I

1087:

But I do believe each person needs to have a sense of what they can do correctly in reviewing articles. (Like you, I am not an MD. If a person is sufficiently sick, with more than like an obvious cold, I have the self-understanding to send them to someone who is an MD, and I won't try to cure them

501:

Hi my name is Raman Sharma and I am an illusionist. I would like to create my own Knowledge page. I am already mentioned under the “Tamil Movie - Mersal” which is under Knowledge as (one of the three magicians that trained Actor Vijay Joseph) I just don’t know how to go about it? Would appreciate any

420:

Note that it's common to insert increasing numbers of colons in front of responses to break them up, as has been done here (this one has four colons in front, the next should have five, etc., cycling back to none when it gets to be too far to the right to be useful. If you have multiple paragraphs in

3439:

and lack of references. References are not created by putting links in the text. Facebook and Youtube are not valid references. Knowledge is not social media, with profiles. Rather, it is an encyclopedia, with references being what people not connected to the subject (in this case, you) have written

2043:

Except the articles they're citing are the ones *I'm* citing. The Knowledge article was saying completely different things to what the news articles were saying. Except of course the one news article that was ripped from Knowledge. If someone is to get banned for reverting edits, shouldn't it be the

1220:

I apologize for the delay in responding to your comments, but the volume of your comments is high enough that I wouldn't have time to do anything else on Knowledge if I attended only to your edits. Unfortunately, no editors responded to the invitations I sent to the WikiProjects listed at the top of

1044:

Background: NormSpier has made more than 100 edits to the two articles in question, increasing length of one more than 10X. An editor put template tags at the top. There are already lengthy discussions (well monologues) on the relevant Talk pages. NormSpier's position is that only experts on a topic

964:

Thanks for "credentials don't factor in". That's actually how I conduct myself personally, as well, never disclosing credentials unless asked. In the case in question, I just have no idea whether the editor in question understands the details of the stuff the article is about. I have no idea that

3235:

In the process of updating, for free, a page about a performer with whom I have worked with on occasion. "Gerrianne Raphael". Her page did not report most of her career accomplishments. I understand that while I am only citing details that appear elsewhere on the net (and will footnote the thing

2897:

So recently Apollo Munich Health Insurance company has been acquired by HDFC Ergo, then what is the solution for the Apollo Munich's wikipedia page. Should the Apollo Munich's page be deleted and hence create a new page for HDFC Ergo when the merger completely happens in future or we add a write up

2731:

I have entered your site to edit content because my family has articles. I've edited my father's article, because right now it is very short and very vague. Somebody called Lugnuts, changed the article back to the short form right away. How can I keep the correct information, how can I contact this

2656:

Knowledge summarizes what independent reliable sources state, as noted in your prior question. We can't write about things for which there are no sources that discuss them in depth(though how would you know about something that occurred 2000 years ago if it was not written down?). What you want to

2626:

What about events witnessed by many people prior to the internet? Events that took placed before the camera phone and YouTube and no reporting or records from magazines or newspapers. I am not talking about UFO sitings...Take for example Vince Carter is a great athlete that goes down in history as

1872:

So, I made my first edit on wikipedia after looking up my mum's cousin and finding his birthday was completely wrong. made some minor edits about his parents' death dates and nobody interfered with them. His article was still pretty small and poorly written so I wanted to improve it more. I checked

1517:

I'm not a beginner to Knowledge, but I've never really gone into full-style editing and I would like to ask if there is a faster way to check a music artist's chart history? It seems troublesome to manually go and check if the artist charted in every country. Are there any editors out there who are

807:

Note: This is no particular complaint about the one editor that the issue is coming up with for me. The editor seems attempting to be helpful throughout my interaction. I sent, today, an email through the system to the editor suggesting he add his authority level, and other relevant information,

803:

How do we found out an editor's authority level, and any other information (like what their field of study is, experience duration) so we don't waste a lot of time? (And so you don't lose a lot of content creators. That is, you try to contribute, and all kinds of people with names that don't mean

775:

In other cases, a person comes in, and makes demands of removal (in a peremptory tone). Then, when I click on the person's name, I don't find sufficient detail on what the authority level of the person within the Knowledge authority structure is, or the person's experience level, or anything about

1070:

that only experts on a topic should be allowed to edit articles on that topic, and I regret any impression I have created that I feel otherwise. Rather, it's that people editing should restrain themselves, using self-knowledge, to what they can do effectively. I'm delighted when people point out

3060:

I have an article in a physical newspaper that I'd like to use as a source. However, I'm not sure what the best practice is for doing this? I can't find the same article online so the physical newspaper is the only thing that I have. I've had a look on the Wiki source recommendation pages etc but

1957:

Hi, thank you for your response. The only thing I didn't source was his birth date, because there wasn't a source given for the wrong one either. The other changes I've made have been based on the news articles already referenced in the article. Like, the cause of death on wikipedia was listed as

1690:

I am not an expert on editing in religious topics, so feel free to wait for additional opinions, but it sounds to me like the existing article you refer to would be a subsection of the version you created. If it were me I might try to get the page moved first, explaining your reasoning for doing

898:

it is confusing to most new users, but authority on Knowledge is bottom up. There are editors called administrators that have a set of tools to enable them to carry out the decisions of the community, but they only have limited authority to use them unilaterally. I would guess that the Affordable

546:

several people, wholly unconnected with you, have chosen to write at length about you and been published somewhere with a reputation for fact checking and editorial control, then it is possible for Knowledge to have an article about you, which should be based almost entirely on what those writers

1876:

What do I do? I don't really know how to use wikipedia, but the page looked way more like your usual biographical entry after I edited it than before.. This person seems weirdly possessive over this page. It's not a big page.. Do I just let them keep all the misinformation up?? I don't feel like

954:

Thanks both of you for additional information. Can you tell me (a) how to tell if the editor in question is an administrator? (I don't see it on the user's page.) How to tell definitively if a page is under "discretionary sanctions"? (ACA apparently is: I had to wait a week and do 100 edits

247:

Wiktionary, but most words are already there. Any new words need at least three citations spanning at least a year and more than one author. There are lots of definitions there that need improving, but it takes a while to learn the format, so don't be discouraged if some edits get reverted.

1424:

I'm questioning whether this is the standard way things are done. It's a course question, "keep it all in", or "take it all out". Is this standard? Is this how it's supposed to be done? Again, one could be suspicious that you're trying to get out the 5 problems with the ACA that I put in,

790:

That deletions are coming, if they are coming from the official legitimate hierarchy of editors at Knowledge, or by whatever legitimate consensus, is not a problem for me. But for new creators of content experiencing similar issues, the authority structure really should be exposed.

3182:

Was just reading Ruth Pfau's biography. Her 'early history' said that she met often with a Dutch Christian woman who was a concentration camp survivor, and who had dedicated her life to speaking about 'love and forgiveness'. Wouldn't that be Corrie Ten Boom (The Hiding Place)?

931:

they should not be using their admin tools at all. (as an aside, there is a user script you can use that automatically shows you extra details when you look at someone's user or talk page, such as how long they've been ending and what user rights they have. More information is at

1962:

is only part of two projects - Biography and Ireland. It's listed as low importance in the latter. So, I don't think they would be interested? I also feel like this other editor is going to ignore anything I put on the talk page since they don't put any comments when they edit?

1359:

has had any comments that anything in the "Problems" section is biased, or incorrect. Some people seem to have passed over the sections, making at least corrections of grammer, spelling, or where I have written "the the", but there has been no comment that anything is biased,

878:

No authority? The person in question really sounds like they have the authority. Thus, I had thought they had authority. (I have addressed, already, the issues extensively on the talk pages for the articles involved, so we'll see what happens.) Thank you for the helpful

3236:

within an inch of it's life before I'm done), there is no doubt some unconscious level of curating going on. I would be happy to post a notice somewhere on the page that this page was created by a professional colleague, even use my name. Where and how do I do this?

1877:

checking all the time to make sure they've not reverted it. I guess I have a minor COI because I'm related to the subject, but he died before I was born and I never knew him - it's more of a genealogical interest - unsigned comment at 13:46 (UTC), 8 September 2019 by

1457:

Content that is added at once is generally treated as a unit if contested. Once a consensus is reached for whether the version with all of the added content or without it is preferable, further edits can be discussed to either reintroduce/remove individual portions.

958:(Right now, the status is it's just me debating the one editor. No one else has chimed in. Hopefully, other people who understand the topic will come in. The editor in question has sought people from working groups, but I don't know that they'll come in.) 3239:

Along those lines, I am posting her professional resume picture, which is all over the net, and is clearly in "public domain" in terms of use. I will get permission from the owner of the picture (the actress) if necessary - what form should that take?

2044:

person who gives no reason and adds poorly sourced articles? I saw in the edit history that someone had previously corrected an error on this page and Pajokie reverted it. Again, the article says one thing and Knowledge says different. The article says

205:

Thank you for the Reply, and Helpful directions, I am making note of everything, As well as checking the Wiktionary, this makes absolute sense. Again thanks for the Help, Good thing i double checked before creating, and posting on the wrong place.

902:

Second, what an individual's qualifications are is irrelevant. It doesn't matter. We determine content by consensus formed from arguments based in reliable sources and informed by Knowledge policies and guidelines. One's resume doesn't factor in.

1588:

Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. For something major like an extensive addition to an article, it's probably a good idea to go to the article talk page to seek consensus from other editors that might be following that article. You could

209:

If you have a moment, I wanted to know am i using the Reply or talk correctly by replying this way ( modifying post ) I would like to make sure i am seeing everything correctly, certainly would be funny to view a forum or html as an app.

595:

Hi, on 7th of september I created 2 pages, that were "Konjuksioni" , "Disjuksioni" , and I edited a page named "Negacioni" , at 13.00pm - 18: and when I logged in at 21:30pm all my activities from today are not showing, can you help me?

478:

Hi AlanM1, Thanks again for all the pointers, This is becoming a very interesting journey back to the basics of it all. Perhaps, Remembering Dialup and knowg Knowledge and our conversations would still load, is pleasant in itself.

547:

have published about you. The article will not belong to you, you will have no control over its contents, and almost nothing it in should be referenced to what you say or want to say. You are not forbidden from trying to create an

390:

You got it – on "Talk pages" (those that have the word "Talk" or "talk" before a colon in the title), you continue a conversation by editing the section it's in and adding to the end of it, just like you did. If you start it with

3269:

Do not add the photo. The short version is that what is required is that the photographer follow image contribution procedure, acknowledging that once completed, anyone can use the photo for any purpose, not limited to Knowledge.

1478:

makes a decision on a starting point for the article (before or after the content additions). Whether specific portions of the content should be included or removed can then be debated on the article's talk page (in this case,

2196:

What applies is a subset of COI that is for paid editing. Per what LPS recommended, the process is to describe a proposed change on the Talk page of the article, with the idea that a non-involved editor will implement or not.

1553:

and found its scope quite narrow. Considering there's many other Modern Pagan belief systems besides Wicca, it thought it would be more apt to expand the scope, reorganize, and rewrite. I've done some of that on my own via

3368:, which in theory is the place for structured data like this. I can't speak for the accuracy or completeness of the information they hold, but the project's goals seem to be in line with what you're seeking. Cheers! -- a 811:

In fact, if there is no place else to get that information, I might suggest each person giving imperatively-expressed instructions should be required by Knowledge rules to post that information prominently on their page.

834:

Welcome to Knowledge. We do not operate with ranks or levels of authority. Knowledge is built by consensus between editors. If someone makes a change you don't agree with, discuss it on the article's talk page. See

551:, but if you do so, you will be taking the already difficult task of creating a Knowledge article, and making it much more difficult by trying to write neutrally about yourself. I earnestly advise you not to try it. -- 158:

that must be properly cited. While there is some room for some creativity in writing, it is a lot more like technical writing. An editor's opinions, knowledge, synthesis of sources, etc., should not come into play per

153:

Cheers and thanks for your interest in editing Knowledge, though I'm afraid it might not be your "cup of tea". Knowledge presents and summarizes, in accessible, neutral language what has already been written about in

955:

before being allowed to edit it, and further, something pops up for me now about it when I start editing.) I assume the other article is not, since nothing pops up, but it might be nice to know how to know for sure.

1045:

should be allowed to edit articles on that topic, or at a minimum, should be required to first declare their expertise. Knowledge cautions against editors individually or in cadres acting as if they "own" articles.

2104:

Pajokie created the article in 2017, but that does not convey ownership. Pajokie has been cautioned on Talk page to not participate in an edit war. As Gwenhope recommended, the best place to resolve this in at

1799:

Can Dr Kay be more consultative in approach instead of just wiping out my writings and removing my attachments and threatening to block me out? I have been one of the consistent contributors to wikipedia.

1217:, and editors regularly refer to applicable rules during discussion. There is no editor hierarchy in content discussions, and factors such as an editor's education level are not considered on Knowledge. 1668:

What would I do about the existing page? Do I edit to completely change the content, then try to get the page renamed, or do I just create the new replacement page and try to get the old one deleted?

120:

Perhaps continuously add lost grammar of the highest caliber to continuously feed our brains, I am not new to Knowledge, I have been a Fan, reader, follower, and donation support for over a decade.

1083:, to indicate that you wouldn't tend to overstep the bounds of what you can do effectively on the technically involved parts of a nutritional biochemistry article.) Let me state: most definitely, 2158:. Editing with a COI is frowned upon, but allowed as long as it is declared. You cannot edit your company’s page, but you are welcome to propose changes on the talk page. Hope this helps out. 1263:, ask the whole community sounds fine. (Do note that are only two articles now under discussion, ACA and Medicaid estate recovery. I removed my content from the other 4, as discussed prior.) 3158:

template including fields that are relevant for an offline source, like title, author (last, first), date, etc. and leaving out those intended for online sources, like url, accessdate, etc.

1739:

tags to the two pages. Perhaps another more experienced editor from WikiProject Religion could complete the process, as having another opinion is considered to be a "Good Thing™" here on WP.

1614:

Thank you, I did leave a thing on the talk page for the article, but it's been months and nobody has replied. Heck the article hasn't received any edits or talk action for months. Is this a

2048:

died in a house he bought himself. The wikipedia article said he died in an inherited house. I don't know why anyone would be invested in the latter, against what the source actually says.

1169:. Talking about a user's competence here, is inappropriate. If any user's incompetence is disrupting the building of this encyclopedia, there are appropriate fora to raise the issue, as 2849:, which includes some helpful links. However, you will be contacted soon by an administrator regarding your username, which is a violation of Knowledge's policy against shared use (see 772:

In certain cases, I see the violation, and have attempted to correct. And in certain cases, didn't find the assertion of violations expressed in an imperative or non-collegial way.

3424:

strongly advise you to stop attempting to create a page about yourself, and contribute to Knowledge in more helpful ways - such as by finding other articles that need improvement.

3383:

SanilGaikwad Profile Created thrice but not accepted from your end. Kindly, provide the helpline number, where we will have a conversation and sort out this on a priority basis.

2657:

do would not be possible on Knowledge for this reason. There are places where such a thing would be permitted, such as a personal website where you control what appears there.

2812:

Hi there, I'm in the process of creating a wikipedia page and I can't figure out how to create those hyperlinks that lead to other wikipedia pages. Any advice? Thank you!

1153:, PhD or no, your last comment reads self-contradictory to me. At any rate, you have said enough in it that I would want to be pinged if it was about me. So, I am pinging 1161:

who seems to be who this is about (just as a courtesy notification). If you think the other editor doesn't get it, tell them so frankly, and seek a third opinion, go to

769:

Various other editors have come in making changes, sometimes small like spelling or grammer, but sometimes large, "like this violates policy x, policy y, and policy z."

3324:

For research purposes, is there a way to extract a list of names & surnames of famous people from Knowledge? I'm guessing it will have the most comprehensive list.

1647:. Yeah, if you've left a comment and no one has replied, I think you would be fine to do it. Maybe just leave an additional note on the talk page explaining that. 1311:

I need to check now on whether the process for the above has been appropriate. (I am continuing the question above with a question about the procedure used here by

2604:

without any citations in support. The content was removed. Any editor can add (or subtract) content - not just the original creator - but references are essential.

2352:. Yes, if you want to write an article on a topic you have a conflict of interest about, the best way is to first declare your COI, and then submit it through AfC. 1555: 1480: 2678:

It does not need to be published on the Internet, but it does need to be published in reliable sources such as newspapers or books even if those are offline. See

1104:, when I started to expand it, said "This article is just a stub. Please help and expand it ..." It was only maybe 6 lines at the start, and I did what it said. 1558:

but I really don't know how to get to the next step of actually implementing this change and how to reach consensus to do so. Assistance would be appreciated

804:

anything come at you with criticisms, sometimes imperative, and you have no idea if they have authority, or they're just someone pretending to be in charge.)

2926: 2010:

that you don't understand the method to the madness or that more senior editors (like Pajokie) won't give you the time of day. However, we always try to

1344: 1340: 1324: 784: 2732:

person? How can I make sure that my father has correct representation on Knowledge? All the information I have wrote can be found and confirmed online.

2827: 101: 93: 88: 76: 71: 63: 776:

their education, or how much they are able to comprehend technical matters under discussion. This is problematic, and is causing a lot of wasted.

213:

I clicked the link with your name, and well as talk link, one lead me to your page, awesome by the way, and the talk button lead me else where.

1706: 538:. I'm afraid the answer is that you shouldn't. Knowledge is an encyclopaedia, not social media or a business directory. Any attempt to use it for 1233:(i.e. asking the entire Knowledge community whether your content additions should remain in the articles). Please let me know (preferably in the 1382:

To clarify the question I am asking now, it is about procedure, which I am new to here. I see you have put down the Request for Comments here,

2976: 523: 2481:

Could a page be published if there are outside sources as well as the person's personal business page that verifies the information stated? --

787:, and an editor, who appears to have some authority in the official Knowledge structure has indicated deletions of what I wrote are coming. 2645: 2169: 691: 614: 444:

P.S. There are a few pages without "Talk:" in the title that are nevertheless "talk pages" also, like this page itself (Knowledge:Teahouse).

3290:" does not mean public domain. Unless we have evidence to the contrary, we have to assume that the photographer still holds the copyright. 899:

Care Act might be under discretionary sanctions for American politics, so on that article, administrators do have some unilateral authority.

1535: 3190: 3006: 2548:

I would like to contact the creator(s) of the page on Elizabeth Sneddon in order to offer information that might be useful. Thank you.

2007: 3401: 3218: 3165: 2877: 2753: 1180: 1018: 3098:

tags to format a newspaper source. Just click the template I linked to see examples on how to use it. Alternatively, you can use the

3345: 2450: 2307: 132:

Q: I would like to essentially ask before i start, so there is no time or effort wasted on a misunderstanding of technicalities.

2128:

I’m worried that I could be blocked since I am employed by a large corporation. Just asking here first to see if it’s ok. Thanks.

927:. Removing vandalism or whatever is one thing but when an admin is editing an article, they are just another user, and if they are 2221:

Hi, I'm new (obviously). I have written a new page for Knowledge in my Sandbox, but how do I make that a new page/article? Thanks

1824:. I am sorry that you are feeling frustrated, but I think that the other editor is trying to improve the encylopedia. Please read 126:

I intent to deliver quality Wiki's with relevant, and truthful content, which does entail time and effort as all the pros know.

630: 2187: 2143: 1124: 3327:

Name Surname Country Known For (Actor/Politician/Artist/Scientist etc) Pronunciation of the name (IPA & sound clip file)

3002: 2972: 2777: 2086: 2027: 1941: 1902: 1770: 1722: 1681: 1631: 1571: 1355:, who seem to be alert on issues or editor overstep, explain how the binary choice could be given? (So far, no one besides 2006:

instead of edit warring. That might get your banned or restricted from the page. I understand that it's easy to feel, as a

343:

I'll certainly remember your considerate heads up in regards to the format, and especially your advice in encouragement.

129:

Essentially contribute to what Knowledge has been accomplishing, I wanted to respectfully ask for word, grammar, etc, etc.

117:

Topic: I WOULD LIKE TO CONTRIBUTE NEW VOCABULARY, GLOSSARY, DEFINITIONS TO UNKNOWN WORDS, LITERATURE, GRAMMAR ETIQUETTE.

3261: 2846: 2823: 2781: 2563: 2362: 2266: 1995: 1888: 1531: 1222: 216:

Hence, responding through article modifications. Making sure i get it right, well anyhow, see you around, thanks again.

1916:

Thank you for being interested in contributing to the Wiki! Knowledge takes biographical information very seriously (See

2866:

To answer the actual question, put the title of the article between two pairs (nested) of square brackets. ] renders as

1829: 1008: 340:

Thank you very much for the Clear and Concise directions, as well as the warm welcome to a Subject such as vocabulary.

21: 123:

Since i am, new to creating any post, I would like to ask if this is Kosher with Knowledge Rules, and the community.

1550: 661:

Hi. The IP address 81.200.82.123 has been making unconstuctive edits lately. Is there any way to stop that? Thanks!

637:. Each language has its own logs so it doesn't show up in searches or contributions here at the English Knowledge at 2789: 2069:

I know you're frustrated. Please, we need to talk this out. That's how Knowledge works. Just start a new thread in

933: 908: 519: 42: 3001:. If, like in this case, both subjects already have articles, just update the article for the taken-over company ( 2903: 2641: 2165: 687: 610: 187:

I've left a welcome message with a more complete set of links to information about Knowledge and editing on your

2578:. Every Knowledge article has its own talk page to discuss improvements. I. This case, make your suggestions at 3042: 2898:

in Apollo munich's page and then redirect people to HDFC Ergo's page initially and then later merge the pages?

2797: 2400: 1336: 1328: 1101: 780: 762:

Determining official Knowledge editor role and authority of editors coming in commenting on a persons additions

289: 2840: 2819: 2765: 1795:

Editors are editing and removing my articles and demanding quotations of sources when they are already quoted.

3194: 2845:

I don't see anything in your contribution history. I've added a welcome message to your "user talk page" at

2773: 666: 548: 487: 361: 229: 188: 143: 568: 535: 515: 3419:- I'm afraid there is no helpline number; Knowledge is a community of volunteers who write articles about 3397: 3030: 2992: 2899: 2764:

I have added a section heading before your question to separate it from the previous topic. Your edit to

2749: 2579: 1016: 715: 626: 606: 3445: 3341: 3275: 2609: 2505: 2466: 2446: 2303: 2226: 2202: 2114: 2106: 2070: 2003: 1855: 1050: 1035: 961: 904: 646: 483: 385: 357: 240: 225: 182: 139: 3414: 3393: 2745: 2002:

seems to be one of the pages Pajokie watches. I would suggest that you start a discussion with them in

1383: 1320: 3359: 3337: 2997:

There is no need to delete a subject just because it ceased to exist as a separate entity. After all,

2442: 2333:

in there and a note disclosing my COI - for the best chances at the quickest page creation? Signed by

1426: 3389: 3333: 3249: 3186: 3071: 3010: 2815: 2741: 2702: 2673: 2653: 2637: 2633: 2551: 2525: 2438: 2295: 2159: 2131: 1493: 1295: 1247: 1112: 941: 681: 602: 511: 3449: 3430: 3405: 3369: 3349: 3313: 3279: 3222: 3198: 3169: 3141: 3119: 3075: 3046: 3024: 2983: 2907: 2881: 2861: 2831: 2801: 2757: 2715: 2691: 2666: 2613: 2595: 2567: 2537: 2509: 2490: 2470: 2454: 2420: 2379: 2342: 2311: 2283: 2230: 2206: 2191: 2179: 2173: 2147: 2135: 2118: 2090: 2057: 2031: 1972: 1945: 1859: 1845: 1814: 1774: 1748: 1726: 1700: 1685: 1656: 1635: 1602: 1575: 1500: 1469: 1447: 1374: 1343:. Then, all are asked to vote on the binary choice. Effective delete or keep all contributions to 1302: 1272: 1254: 1184: 1145: 1128: 1054: 1039: 1020: 999: 974: 945: 912: 890: 873: 852: 821: 808:

to his page, so that people will understand the authority to give imperative-sounding instructions.

751: 733: 719: 695: 670: 650: 618: 584: 560: 527: 491: 448: 425: 365: 321: 293: 271: 233: 195: 175: 147: 3134: 3038: 2850: 2793: 2769: 2687: 2588: 2533: 2183: 2139: 1838: 1519: 1443: 1370: 1268: 1141: 1120: 992: 970: 886: 869: 848: 817: 580: 556: 539: 285: 2575: 2555: 1593:

and just change it, but the more extensive the change, the more likely it would just be reverted.

3153: 3091: 2942: 2486: 2412: 2408: 2392: 2338: 2082: 2023: 1937: 1896: 1825: 1821: 1806: 1766: 1744: 1718: 1677: 1627: 1567: 928: 463: 51: 17: 662: 1522:

for a new music artist, but I'm kind of unsure on how to go about doing it. Thanks in advance!

3436: 3257: 3213: 3160: 2872: 2601: 2559: 2396: 2371: 2275: 2256:

1,299 pending submissions articles waiting to be reviewed, so it will probably take a while.)

2053: 1989: 1968: 1882: 1527: 1195: 1175: 1011: 711: 3013:

for an example of another company that was taken over but still has its own article. Regards

1100:

Otherwise, those interested, please note that the one article I expanded by a factor of 10x,

1030:

Editors can choose to indicate credentials on their User pages, but there is no requirement.

3441: 3271: 3034: 2662: 2605: 2501: 2462: 2322: 2299: 2237: 2222: 2198: 2110: 2045: 1999: 1959: 1851: 1810: 1696: 1652: 1598: 1063: 1046: 1031: 747: 729: 642: 1007:

You might find this useful. It describes the permissions that different editors can have.

3147: 3125: 3114: 3083: 3067: 3019: 2998: 2958: 2854: 2328: 2243: 1736: 1546: 1486: 1399: 1395: 1387: 1356: 1348: 1332: 1316: 1312: 1288: 1282: 1260: 1240: 1234: 1226: 1156: 937: 1920:). You also can't use your personal research without a third-party, reliable source (See 1384:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Requests_for_comment

1321:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Requests_for_comment

421:

your posting, each new paragraph should have the (same number of) colons to indent it.

3129: 2785: 2683: 2583: 2529: 1925: 1833: 1615: 1590: 1439: 1391: 1366: 1352: 1278: 1264: 1202: 1150: 1137: 1116: 1004: 987: 979: 966: 895: 882: 865: 859: 844: 829: 813: 703: 576: 552: 167:

for what Knowledge is and is not. Note that, if you're focused on words in particular,

3425: 3420: 2517: 2482: 2404: 2386: 2349: 2334: 2249: 2155: 2074: 2038: 2015: 2011: 1952: 1929: 1921: 1917: 1892: 1758: 1754: 1740: 1735:, as your draft is already good enough for mainspace I moved it, then added suitable 1732: 1710: 1669: 1642: 1619: 1583: 1559: 1513:

Is there a way to find out a music artist's chart history across different countries?

1475: 1462: 1230: 1214: 1210: 1170: 1166: 983: 836: 766:

I'm quite new at Knowledge editing (1 month), and did a few additions to articles.

677: 471: 394: 164: 3253: 3208: 3099: 2679: 2497: 2354: 2318: 2289: 2258: 2064: 2049: 1985: 1979: 1964: 1911: 1878: 1523: 1162: 840: 160: 155: 110:

WOULD LIKE TO CONTRIBUTE NEW VOCABULARY, DEFINITIONS TO UNKNOWN WORDS, LITERATURE.

1705:

I understand. However I have moved my draft from userspace into draftspace here -

3291: 3088:

Hi and welcome to the Teahouse. Newspapers are a common source. You can use the

2658: 1692: 1663: 1648: 1609: 1594: 743: 739: 725: 707: 352: 333: 299: 281: 249: 50:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3109: 3014: 168: 2867: 2682:

for more information on what is usable as a reliable source for Knowledge.

1427:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act#Problems

676:

Hello. If they have vandalized past the 4th warning, you can report them at

702:

Basically needs a mass revert. Need to find someone that can do that. Like

629:, welcome to the Teahouse. This is a help page for the English Knowledge. 3365: 1868:

edited my first article and someone reverted it without giving any reason

3108:. (It has a "URL" field but you don't have to specify an URL). Regards 575:, which is suitable for your purpose. I hope that I could help you. –– 2399:. If you are being paid in relation to the draft that you write, then 1394:, based on their familiarity with procedure and editor oversteps, and 2776:. As the article is about your father, you also need to read about 1225:. If you are no longer interested in the review plan I proposed in 572: 2461:

Speedy deletion done on autobiographical content on User page.

1803:

Can you please show me the guideline for removing my account?

1323:, which in the context of the now only 2 articles in question 1085:

I do not believe credentials are necessary to edit an article.

29: 3376:

SanilGaikwad Profile Created but not accepted from your end.

298:

Thank you. That is what I meant to write. Now corrected.

3005:) to past tense and add a sentence that it was acquired by 1850:

Accounts cannot be removed. You can stop using an account.

1339:(the minor article) and delete all of my contributions to 1213:. Arguments are still expected to be backed by Knowledge's 1433:

to possibly just get rid of a whole load of user content?)

1512: 3105: 2894:

How do i delete a company page when am not the editor?

3104:

News and it will show you a form to fill out. You can

1227:

WP:NPOVN § Medicaid estate recovery and User:NormSpier

1518:

specialised in this field? I'm also trying to create

1474:

Rosguill explains the process concisely. The initial

2709:

no reporting or records from magazines or newspapers

2927:"HDFC buys Apollo Munich Health for Rs 1,347 crore" 2784:) to suggest improvements, but you need to provide 1398:and whoever else wants to handle the question), is 779:The issues are coming in over work on the articles 3246:Jon JLONOFFJLonoff 17:07, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 284:meant to write "very welcome over at Wiktionary". 1998:) when undoing your revisions. They hold weight. 346:Live, and Learn Right, no losing in a win, win. 3207:Hello there! This question is better put to the 2768:was reverted because the material you added was 2738:Eli Laszlo Berger formerly Kézdi Kovács László 599:Sincerely, Donat Balaj from Tech Media Online. 1556:User:Gwenhope/Modern Pagan views on LGBT people 1481:Talk:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 403:(as I've done here), the user will be notified. 2500:. Instagram not considered a reliable source. 2248:in your sandbox to submit your article to the 1386:and my resulting question about procedure (to 638: 171:might be more appropriate. I hope this helps. 3061:can't seem to find anything on this subject. 2600:Back in May you added content to the article 2124:Am I allowed to edit if I work for a company? 1281:Okay. I'll continue this conversation at the 8: 2544:Providing additional information for a page. 634: 3435:The rejection is based on a combination of 3053:How to use a physical newspaper as a source 923:to be perfectly clear, administrators have 633:shows you edited the Albanian Knowledge at 3387: 3331: 3247: 3184: 2813: 2739: 2631: 2549: 2436: 2293: 2129: 1345:Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act 1341:Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act 1325:Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act 1229:, we can resolve this entire dispute with 1110: 785:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 600: 509: 2780:. You can use the article's talk page ( 2918: 2240:, welcome to the Teahouse. You can put 1707:Draft:Modern Pagan views on LGBT people 1402:has phrased the question in the RFC as: 631:sq:Speciale:Kontributet/Techmediaonline 2977:Apollo Munich Health Insurance Company 2954: 2950: 2940: 2708: 2622:Lost In History Because of No Internet 1206: 48:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2808:Adding links to other wikipedia pages 243:. You would be very welcome over at 7: 2014:. Don't knock it until you try it!~ 3007:HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company 1315:, so that you can enlighten me.) 1285:to keep everything in one place. — 1237:) if this works for you. Thanks. — 1205:. I'm sorry if my writing style is 2979:, which are probably duplicative. 2630:What can we do about lost history? 1757:! I quite agree with other input! 1066:. My position is most definitely 28: 925:no authority over article content 163:. You should also have a look at 3096:template within the <ref: --> 2477:question about reliabile sources 33: 3364:You probably want to check out 3231:COI questions from a new editor 2792:independent of the subject. -- 3003:Apollo Munich Health Insurance 2973:Apollo Munich Health Insurance 497:Would like to make my own page 1: 3450:11:54, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 3431:11:31, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 3406:11:21, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 3370:11:49, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 3350:10:01, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 3314:09:14, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 3280:18:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 3223:08:44, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 3199:07:23, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 3170:08:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 3142:08:37, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 3120:08:25, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 3076:08:09, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 3047:08:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 3025:08:30, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 2984:08:31, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 2908:06:56, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 2882:07:12, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 2862:06:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 2847:User talk:Marketing at sygnum 2832:06:31, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 2802:06:06, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 2758:04:13, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 2716:05:33, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 2692:20:06, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 2667:12:16, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 2614:00:24, 9 September 2019 (UTC) 2596:20:38, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 2568:20:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 2538:20:24, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 2510:20:20, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 2491:18:46, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 2471:20:15, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 2455:17:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 2421:20:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 2380:20:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 2343:18:15, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 2312:18:54, 3 September 2019 (UTC) 2284:17:04, 3 September 2019 (UTC) 2231:15:37, 3 September 2019 (UTC) 2207:18:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 2192:17:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 2174:17:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 2148:16:57, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 2119:18:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 2091:15:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 2058:14:56, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 2032:14:39, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 1984:I read the articles cited by 1973:14:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 1946:14:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 1860:18:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 1846:03:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 1815:01:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 1775:15:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 1749:14:57, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 1727:12:26, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 1701:11:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 1686:11:47, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 1657:11:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 1636:11:21, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 1603:11:15, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 1576:10:59, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 1536:08:19, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 1501:04:20, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 1470:01:52, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 1448:01:26, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 1375:20:53, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 1303:19:33, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 1273:19:29, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 1255:19:16, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 1223:Talk:Medicaid estate recovery 1185:18:42, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 1146:17:18, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 1129:17:01, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 1055:11:12, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 1040:03:25, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 1021:22:24, 5 September 2019 (UTC) 1000:21:57, 5 September 2019 (UTC) 975:21:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC) 946:21:24, 5 September 2019 (UTC) 913:21:14, 5 September 2019 (UTC) 891:20:58, 5 September 2019 (UTC) 874:20:53, 5 September 2019 (UTC) 853:20:53, 5 September 2019 (UTC) 822:20:40, 5 September 2019 (UTC) 752:23:47, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 734:12:44, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 720:12:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 696:12:29, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 671:12:07, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 651:21:24, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 619:19:43, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 585:21:18, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 573:https://en.EverybodyWiki.com/ 561:21:09, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 528:20:58, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 492:17:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 449:23:53, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 426:23:49, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 366:17:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 322:19:56, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 294:19:53, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 272:19:41, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 234:19:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 196:17:37, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 176:17:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 148:17:18, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 2890:Deleting an old company page 2853:) as well as promotion (see 2391:, I would recommend reading 1830:Knowledge:Courtesy vanishing 1283:NPOVN noticeboard discussion 1235:NPOVN noticeboard discussion 1009:Knowledge:User access levels 571:. There is a website called 3386:Thanks and Regards, Sonal 2999:notability is not temporary 2435:How can i verified my bio 1551:Wiccan views on LGBT people 3468: 2772:; you need to read about 934:User:PleaseStand/User info 3029:Welcome to the Teahouse, 2574:Welcome to the Teahouse, 2154:You need to declare your 1820:Welcome to the Teahouse, 797:So, my question is--: --> 724:It's been taken care of. 706:or an administrator like 2407:would apply rather than 1549:, I discovered the page 1337:Medicaid estate recovery 1329:Medicaid estate recovery 1102:Medicaid estate recovery 781:Medicaid estate recovery 639:https://en.wikipedia.org 635:https://sq.wikipedia.org 135:Thank you for reading, 3106:try that in the Sandbox 2782:Talk:Zsolt Kézdi-Kovács 1215:policies and guidelines 984:policies and guidelines 3102:and select Cite =: --> 2580:Talk:Elizabeth Sneddon 1891:), signature added by 1171:competence is required 468:Behold ! the power of 2250:articles for creation 2107:Talk:Bernard Lafferty 2071:Talk:Bernard Lafferty 2004:Talk:Bernard Lafferty 1194:Thanks for the ping, 46:of past discussions. 3064:Thanks in advance! 3011:Continental Airlines 2778:conflict of interest 2321:and great question, 1545:While going through 1231:requests for comment 929:editorially involved 591:My edits are deleted 114:Good Day Every One, 3440:about the subject. 3150:, you just use the 2841:Marketing at sygnum 2820:Marketing at sygnum 1826:Knowledge: Retiring 1709:- in the meantime. 1476:request for comment 1167:request for comment 2766:Zsolt Kézdi-Kovács 2724:Zsolt Kézdi-Kovács 2178:Oh, ok. Thank you 1832:for your options. 1335:has proposed keep 1163:dispute resolution 246: 18:Knowledge:Teahouse 3408: 3392:comment added by 3352: 3336:comment added by 3265: 3252:comment added by 3201: 3189:comment added by 2834: 2818:comment added by 2760: 2744:comment added by 2649: 2636:comment added by 2602:Elizabeth Sneddon 2570: 2554:comment added by 2457: 2441:comment added by 2401:WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE 2314: 2298:comment added by 2166:Littlest Pet Shop 2150: 2134:comment added by 2012:assume good faith 1498: 1300: 1252: 1131: 1115:comment added by 688:Littlest Pet Shop 621: 605:comment added by 530: 514:comment added by 244: 107: 106: 58: 57: 52:current main page 3459: 3421:notable subjects 3418: 3363: 3311: 3288:all over the net 3216: 3163: 3157: 3139: 3137:Let's discuss it 3117: 3112: 3097:...</ref: --> 3095: 3087: 3068:Avalon of Sussex 3022: 3017: 2996: 2982: 2971:Courtesy links: 2963: 2962: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2946: 2938: 2936: 2934: 2929:. Economic Times 2923: 2910:Shashanksinha93 2875: 2860: 2844: 2790:reliable sources 2728:Dear Knowledge, 2714: 2706: 2677: 2593: 2591:Let's discuss it 2418: 2415: 2390: 2378: 2376: 2368: 2360: 2332: 2282: 2280: 2272: 2264: 2252:process. (There 2247: 2078: 2068: 2046:Bernard Lafferty 2042: 2019: 2000:Bernard Lafferty 1983: 1960:Bernard Lafferty 1956: 1933: 1915: 1843: 1841:Let's discuss it 1762: 1741:Roger (Dodger67) 1714: 1673: 1667: 1646: 1623: 1613: 1587: 1563: 1496: 1492: 1489: 1298: 1294: 1291: 1250: 1246: 1243: 1178: 1160: 997: 995:Let's discuss it 962:John from Idegon 905:John from Idegon 863: 833: 569:Ramansharmamagic 536:Ramansharmamagic 516:Ramansharmamagic 475: 467: 447: 424: 402: 389: 356: 337: 319: 269: 194: 186: 174: 156:reliable sources 85: 60: 59: 37: 36: 30: 3467: 3466: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3412: 3378: 3357: 3322: 3292: 3233: 3214: 3180: 3161: 3151: 3135: 3115: 3110: 3089: 3081: 3055: 3031:Shashanksinha93 3020: 3015: 2993:Shashanksinha93 2990: 2980: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2949: 2939: 2932: 2930: 2925: 2924: 2920: 2900:Shashanksinha93 2892: 2873: 2858: 2838: 2810: 2726: 2712: 2703:Earth Country33 2700: 2674:Earth Country33 2671: 2654:Earth Country33 2638:Earth Country33 2624: 2589: 2546: 2479: 2433: 2416: 2413: 2384: 2372: 2363: 2355: 2353: 2326: 2276: 2267: 2259: 2257: 2241: 2219: 2217:Creating a Page 2161:LPS and MLP Fan 2126: 2076: 2062: 2036: 2017: 1977: 1950: 1931: 1909: 1870: 1839: 1797: 1760: 1712: 1671: 1661: 1640: 1621: 1607: 1581: 1561: 1547:Modern Paganism 1543: 1515: 1494: 1487: 1461: 1296: 1289: 1248: 1241: 1176: 1154: 1132: 993: 857: 827: 764: 683:LPS and MLP Fan 659: 627:Techmediaonline 607:Techmediaonline 593: 499: 469: 461: 445: 422: 392: 383: 350: 331: 300: 280:I presume that 250: 192: 180: 172: 112: 81: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 3465: 3463: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3377: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3321: 3320:Names Database 3318: 3317: 3316: 3283: 3282: 3232: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3209:reference desk 3179: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3144: 3054: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3039:Cordless Larry 3027: 2987: 2986: 2965: 2964: 2917: 2916: 2912: 2891: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2809: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2794:David Biddulph 2735:Best Regards, 2725: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2695: 2694: 2669: 2623: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2545: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2513: 2512: 2478: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2432: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2315: 2286: 2246:|Srcollier94}} 2218: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2170:My Little Pony 2125: 2122: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 1869: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1796: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1542: 1541:Rewrite A Page 1539: 1514: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1459: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1306: 1305: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1165:or initiate a 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1089: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1002: 959: 956: 949: 948: 920: 919: 918: 917: 916: 915: 900: 880: 876: 864:fixing ping. 843:for details. 801: 800: 799: 798: 763: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 699: 698: 692:My Little Pony 658: 655: 654: 653: 592: 589: 588: 587: 564: 563: 542:is forbidden. 498: 495: 482:Thanks Again. 460: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 452: 451: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 373: 370: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 286:Cordless Larry 275: 274: 222: 219: 201: 199: 198: 189:talk page here 178: 111: 108: 105: 104: 99: 96: 91: 86: 79: 74: 69: 66: 56: 55: 38: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3464: 3451: 3447: 3443: 3438: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3429: 3428: 3422: 3416: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3407: 3403: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3384: 3381: 3375: 3371: 3367: 3361: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3351: 3347: 3343: 3339: 3335: 3328: 3325: 3319: 3315: 3312: 3310: 3307: 3304: 3301: 3298: 3295: 3289: 3285: 3284: 3281: 3277: 3273: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3251: 3244: 3241: 3237: 3230: 3224: 3221: 3220: 3217: 3210: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3191:24.86.181.196 3188: 3177: 3171: 3168: 3167: 3164: 3155: 3149: 3145: 3143: 3140: 3138: 3133: 3132: 3127: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3118: 3113: 3107: 3103:Manual =: --> 3101: 3100:Visual Editor 3093: 3085: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3062: 3058: 3052: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3036: 3032: 3028: 3026: 3023: 3018: 3012: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2994: 2989: 2988: 2985: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2969: 2960: 2944: 2928: 2922: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2895: 2889: 2883: 2880: 2879: 2876: 2869: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2842: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2807: 2803: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2788:to published 2787: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2774:verifiability 2771: 2767: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2736: 2733: 2729: 2723: 2717: 2710: 2704: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2675: 2670: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2655: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2628: 2621: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2594: 2592: 2587: 2586: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2514: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2430: 2422: 2419: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2388: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2377: 2375: 2369: 2367: 2361: 2359: 2351: 2347: 2346: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2330: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2291: 2287: 2285: 2281: 2279: 2273: 2271: 2265: 2263: 2255: 2251: 2245: 2239: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2216: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2162: 2157: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2123: 2121: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2079: 2072: 2066: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2040: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2020: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1994: 1991: 1987: 1981: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1961: 1954: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1934: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1913: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1904: 1901: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1887: 1884: 1880: 1874: 1867: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1844: 1842: 1837: 1836: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1801: 1794: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1763: 1756: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1715: 1708: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1674: 1665: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1644: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1624: 1617: 1611: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1585: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1564: 1557: 1552: 1548: 1540: 1538: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1502: 1499: 1497: 1491: 1490: 1482: 1477: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1432: 1428: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1319:posted this: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1304: 1301: 1299: 1293: 1292: 1284: 1280: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1257: 1256: 1253: 1251: 1245: 1244: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1218: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1199: 1197: 1186: 1183: 1182: 1179: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1158: 1152: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1103: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1042: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1022: 1019: 1017: 1015: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1003: 1001: 998: 996: 991: 990: 985: 981: 978: 977: 976: 972: 968: 963: 960: 957: 953: 952: 951: 950: 947: 943: 939: 935: 930: 926: 922: 921: 914: 910: 906: 901: 897: 894: 893: 892: 888: 884: 881: 877: 875: 871: 867: 861: 856: 855: 854: 850: 846: 842: 838: 831: 826: 825: 824: 823: 819: 815: 809: 805: 796: 795: 794: 793: 792: 788: 786: 782: 777: 773: 770: 767: 761: 753: 749: 745: 741: 737: 736: 735: 731: 727: 723: 722: 721: 717: 713: 709: 705: 701: 700: 697: 693: 689: 685: 684: 679: 678:Knowledge:AIV 675: 674: 673: 672: 668: 664: 657:81.200.82.123 656: 652: 648: 644: 640: 636: 632: 628: 624: 623: 622: 620: 616: 612: 608: 604: 597: 590: 586: 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 565: 562: 558: 554: 550: 549:autobiography 545: 541: 537: 533: 532: 531: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 506: 503: 496: 494: 493: 489: 485: 484:KenMastersLee 480: 476: 473: 465: 450: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 427: 419: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 400: 396: 387: 386:KenMastersLee 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 371: 368: 367: 363: 359: 358:KenMastersLee 354: 349:Thanks again 347: 344: 341: 338: 335: 323: 320: 318: 315: 312: 309: 306: 303: 297: 296: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 278: 277: 276: 273: 270: 268: 265: 262: 259: 256: 253: 242: 241:KenMastersLee 238: 237: 236: 235: 231: 227: 226:KenMastersLee 223: 220: 217: 214: 211: 207: 203: 197: 190: 184: 183:KenMastersLee 179: 177: 170: 166: 162: 157: 152: 151: 150: 149: 145: 141: 140:KenMastersLee 136: 133: 130: 127: 124: 121: 118: 115: 109: 103: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 84: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 65: 62: 61: 53: 49: 45: 44: 39: 32: 31: 23: 19: 3426: 3415:SanilGaikwad 3394:SanilGaikwad 3388:— Preceding 3385: 3382: 3379: 3332:— Preceding 3329: 3326: 3323: 3308: 3305: 3302: 3299: 3296: 3293: 3287: 3248:— Preceding 3245: 3242: 3238: 3234: 3215:Usedtobecool 3212: 3185:— Preceding 3181: 3162:Usedtobecool 3159: 3136: 3130: 3066: 3063: 3059: 3056: 2931:. Retrieved 2921: 2913: 2896: 2893: 2874:Usedtobecool 2871: 2851:WP:NOSHARING 2814:— Preceding 2811: 2746:Elibergerdop 2740:— Preceding 2737: 2734: 2730: 2727: 2632:— Preceding 2629: 2625: 2590: 2584: 2550:— Preceding 2547: 2528:for more. -- 2521: 2480: 2437:— Preceding 2434: 2373: 2365: 2357: 2329:subst:submit 2319:user:eman235 2294:— Preceding 2290:user:eman235 2277: 2269: 2261: 2253: 2244:subst:submit 2220: 2160: 2130:— Preceding 2127: 2103: 2075: 2016: 1992: 1930: 1899: 1885: 1875: 1871: 1840: 1834: 1805: 1802: 1798: 1759: 1711: 1670: 1620: 1560: 1544: 1516: 1485: 1484: 1464: 1463: 1438: 1430: 1365: 1287: 1286: 1258: 1239: 1238: 1219: 1207:"peremptory" 1200: 1196:Usedtobecool 1193: 1177:Usedtobecool 1174: 1111:— Preceding 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1067: 1043: 1029: 1013:TimTempleton 1012: 994: 988: 924: 810: 806: 802: 789: 778: 774: 771: 768: 765: 712:Softlavender 682: 660: 601:— Preceding 598: 594: 543: 510:— Preceding 507: 504: 500: 481: 477: 459: 398: 372: 369: 348: 345: 342: 339: 330: 316: 313: 310: 307: 304: 301: 266: 263: 260: 257: 254: 251: 224: 221: 218: 215: 212: 208: 204: 200: 137: 134: 131: 128: 125: 122: 119: 116: 113: 102:Archive 1015 94:Archive 1013 89:Archive 1012 83:Archive 1011 82: 77:Archive 1010 72:Archive 1009 64:Archive 1005 47: 41: 3442:David notMD 3380:Hello Sir, 3360:VarkBiltong 3338:VarkBiltong 3272:David notMD 2606:David notMD 2502:David notMD 2463:David notMD 2443:Ankitaanshu 2409:WP:DISCLOSE 2393:WP:DISCLOSE 2331:|Wikirstn}} 2323:Srcollier94 2300:Srcollier94 2238:Srcollier94 2223:Srcollier94 2199:David notMD 2111:David notMD 1852:David notMD 1618:situation? 1064:David notMD 1047:David notMD 1032:David notMD 643:PrimeHunter 202:Hi AlanM1, 40:This is an 3437:WP:TOOSOON 3148:Avalon2828 3126:Avalon2828 3084:Avalon2828 2914:References 2870:. Cheers! 2786:references 2707:Regarding 2526:Notability 2417:SandDoctor 2397:WP:COIEDIT 2008:new editor 1753:Thank you 1488:Newslinger 1400:Newslinger 1396:Newslinger 1388:Beeblebrox 1357:Newslinger 1349:Beeblebrox 1333:Newslinger 1317:Newslinger 1313:Newslinger 1290:Newslinger 1261:Newslinger 1242:Newslinger 1201:Hi again, 1157:Newslinger 1079:, but not 1077:sufficient 938:Beeblebrox 169:Wiktionary 3286:... and " 3243:Regards, 3178:Ruth Pfau 3154:cite news 3092:cite news 3035:WP:COIREQ 2943:cite news 2868:Knowledge 2770:unsourced 2684:RudolfRed 2530:ColinFine 2345:Wikirstn 2180:Felchhole 2136:Felchhole 2077:Gwen Hope 2018:Gwen Hope 1932:Gwen Hope 1761:Gwen Hope 1713:Gwen Hope 1672:Gwen Hope 1622:Gwen Hope 1562:Gwen Hope 1440:NormSpier 1392:RudolfRed 1367:NormSpier 1353:RudolfRed 1265:NormSpier 1211:consensus 1203:NormSpier 1151:NormSpier 1138:NormSpier 1117:NormSpier 1081:necessary 1005:NormSpier 980:NormSpier 967:NormSpier 896:NormSpier 883:NormSpier 879:response. 866:RudolfRed 860:NormSpier 845:RudolfRed 830:NormSpier 814:NormSpier 704:MarnetteD 577:Handroid7 553:ColinFine 540:promotion 505:Regards 245:Knowledge 22:Questions 3402:contribs 3390:unsigned 3366:WikiData 3346:contribs 3334:unsigned 3330:Thanks 3262:contribs 3250:unsigned 3187:unsigned 2953:missing 2951:|first1= 2855:WP:PROMO 2828:contribs 2816:unsigned 2754:contribs 2742:unsigned 2646:contribs 2634:unsigned 2564:contribs 2552:unsigned 2518:Gettechy 2483:Gettechy 2451:contribs 2439:unsigned 2387:Wikirstn 2350:Wikirstn 2335:Wikirstn 2308:contribs 2296:unsigned 2288:Thanks, 2188:contribs 2144:contribs 2132:unsigned 2039:Gwenhope 1996:contribs 1953:Gwenhope 1903:contribs 1893:Gwenhope 1889:contribs 1755:Dodger67 1737:WP:MERGE 1733:Gwenhope 1643:Gwenhope 1584:Gwenhope 1532:contribs 1465:Rosguill 1460:signed, 1125:contribs 1113:unsigned 1088:myself.) 1073:possibly 738:Thanks, 615:contribs 603:unsigned 524:contribs 512:unsigned 472:Username 399:username 20:‎ | 3254:JLonoff 3124:Hello, 2955:|last1= 2933:19 June 2576:Sklaito 2556:Sklaito 2522:article 2516:Hello, 2087:contrib 2065:Oguhugo 2050:Oguhugo 2028:contrib 1986:Pajokie 1980:Oguhugo 1965:Oguhugo 1942:contrib 1926:WP:SIGN 1912:Oguhugo 1879:Oguhugo 1771:contrib 1723:contrib 1682:contrib 1632:contrib 1616:WP:BOLD 1591:be bold 1572:contrib 1524:Nahnah4 1520:a draft 663:Ȝeſtikl 567:Hello, 534:Hello, 508:Raman 43:archive 3131:Cullen 3009:. See 2659:331dot 2585:Cullen 2431:Verify 2405:WP:PAY 2156:WP:COI 1922:WP:NOR 1918:WP:BLP 1835:Cullen 1822:Saqiwa 1807:Saqiwa 1693:331dot 1664:331dot 1649:331dot 1610:331dot 1595:331dot 1431:Biased 1259:Sure, 989:Cullen 837:WP:BRD 744:Drmies 740:331dot 726:331dot 708:Drmies 502:help. 464:Alanm1 353:Dbfirs 334:Dbfirs 282:Dbfirs 165:WP:NOT 138:Ken -- 2680:WP:RS 2520:. An 2498:WP:RS 1483:). — 1360:etc.) 841:WP:DR 710:. -- 161:WP:OR 16:< 3446:talk 3398:talk 3342:talk 3276:talk 3258:talk 3195:talk 3146:(ec) 3072:talk 3057:Hi, 3043:talk 2975:and 2959:help 2935:2019 2904:talk 2824:talk 2798:talk 2750:talk 2688:talk 2663:talk 2642:talk 2610:talk 2560:talk 2534:talk 2506:talk 2496:See 2487:talk 2467:talk 2447:talk 2411:. -- 2403:and 2395:and 2374:talk 2348:Hi, 2339:talk 2317:Hi, 2304:talk 2278:talk 2236:Hi, 2227:talk 2203:talk 2184:talk 2140:talk 2115:talk 2083:talk 2054:talk 2024:talk 1990:talk 1969:talk 1938:talk 1928:).) 1897:talk 1883:talk 1856:talk 1828:and 1811:talk 1767:talk 1745:talk 1719:talk 1697:talk 1678:talk 1653:talk 1628:talk 1599:talk 1568:talk 1528:talk 1495:talk 1444:talk 1390:and 1371:talk 1327:and 1297:talk 1269:talk 1249:talk 1142:talk 1121:talk 1062:Hi, 1051:talk 1036:talk 971:talk 942:talk 909:talk 887:talk 870:talk 849:talk 839:and 818:talk 783:and 748:talk 730:talk 716:talk 680:. -- 667:talk 647:talk 611:talk 581:talk 557:talk 520:talk 488:talk 395:Ping 362:talk 290:talk 230:talk 144:talk 3427:Hug 3356:Hi 3116:Why 3021:Why 2857:). 2414:The 2358:man 2292:! 2262:man 2254:are 2168:) ( 2085:) ( 2026:) ( 1940:) ( 1769:) ( 1731:Hi 1721:) ( 1680:) ( 1630:) ( 1570:) ( 1351:or 1331:, 1068:not 690:) ( 625:Hi 239:Hi 3448:) 3404:) 3400:• 3348:) 3344:• 3278:) 3264:) 3260:• 3211:. 3197:) 3156:}} 3152:{{ 3111:So 3094:}} 3090:{{ 3074:) 3045:) 3037:. 3016:So 2981:—— 2947:: 2945:}} 2941:{{ 2906:) 2859:—— 2830:) 2826:• 2800:) 2756:) 2752:• 2713:—— 2690:) 2665:) 2648:) 2644:• 2612:) 2582:. 2566:) 2562:• 2536:) 2508:) 2489:) 2469:) 2453:) 2449:• 2366:35 2341:) 2327:{{ 2310:) 2306:• 2270:35 2242:{{ 2229:) 2205:) 2190:) 2186:| 2172:) 2146:) 2142:• 2117:) 2109:. 2089:) 2073:. 2056:) 2030:) 1971:) 1944:) 1905:) 1858:) 1813:) 1773:) 1747:) 1725:) 1699:) 1684:) 1655:) 1634:) 1601:) 1574:) 1534:) 1530:| 1446:) 1373:) 1271:) 1198:. 1144:) 1127:) 1123:• 1053:) 1038:) 973:) 944:) 936:) 911:) 889:) 872:) 851:) 820:) 750:) 742:. 732:) 718:) 694:) 669:) 649:) 641:. 617:) 613:• 583:) 559:) 544:If 526:) 522:• 490:) 446:—— 423:—— 401:}} 393:{{ 364:) 292:) 232:) 193:—— 191:. 173:—— 146:) 98:→ 68:← 3444:( 3417:: 3413:@ 3396:( 3362:: 3358:@ 3340:( 3309:s 3306:r 3303:i 3300:f 3297:b 3294:D 3274:( 3256:( 3219:✨ 3193:( 3166:✨ 3086:: 3082:@ 3070:( 3041:( 2995:: 2991:@ 2961:) 2957:( 2937:. 2902:( 2878:✨ 2843:: 2839:@ 2822:( 2796:( 2748:( 2705:: 2701:@ 2686:( 2676:: 2672:@ 2661:( 2640:( 2608:( 2558:( 2532:( 2504:( 2485:( 2465:( 2445:( 2389:: 2385:@ 2370:/ 2364:2 2356:E 2337:( 2302:( 2274:/ 2268:2 2260:E 2225:( 2201:( 2182:( 2164:( 2138:( 2113:( 2081:( 2067:: 2063:@ 2052:( 2041:: 2037:@ 2022:( 1993:· 1988:( 1982:: 1978:@ 1967:( 1955:: 1951:@ 1936:( 1914:: 1910:@ 1900:· 1895:( 1886:· 1881:( 1854:( 1809:( 1765:( 1743:( 1717:( 1695:( 1676:( 1666:: 1662:@ 1651:( 1645:: 1641:@ 1626:( 1612:: 1608:@ 1597:( 1586:: 1582:@ 1566:( 1526:( 1442:( 1369:( 1279: 1267:( 1181:✨ 1159:: 1155:@ 1140:( 1119:( 1049:( 1034:( 969:( 940:( 907:( 885:( 868:( 862:: 858:@ 847:( 832:: 828:@ 816:( 746:( 728:( 714:( 686:( 665:( 645:( 609:( 579:( 555:( 518:( 486:( 474:: 470:@ 466:: 462:@ 397:| 388:: 384:@ 360:( 355:: 351:@ 336:: 332:@ 317:s 314:r 311:i 308:f 305:b 302:D 288:( 267:s 264:r 261:i 258:f 255:b 252:D 228:( 185:: 181:@ 142:( 54:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1011 - Knowledge

Index