195:, it cannot simply be recreated without addressing the concerns that led to its deletion in the first place. If the article was deleted because the subject was not notable at the time of the debate, you must show that the subject has since become notable – usually by showing that their activities since have met the relevant notability criteria. For your politician, you show that they have won or are a major candidate in an election. For musicians, you cite the fact that their latest single hit the charts.
106:
125:, refers to the idea that an editor's recommendation is subject to change if certain external events take place. These caveats are ways to hedge one's bet, so to speak – a subject might not be notable at the time of the debate, but may become notable later. This applies in many cases where the subject is young, is at the outset of their career, or where their activities just haven't yet received the coverage necessary for an article.
35:
91:
128:
The purpose of citing these usual caveats in the deletion debate is to specifically note that the subject's notability may change in the future, and to specifically highlight (and support in advance) the idea that a new article would be welcome if and when the subject's notability changes.
145:
will center on the idea that the subject's accomplishments, or the coverage of those accomplishments, do not demonstrate notability. When recommending that the article for such a person be deleted, then, these caveats would apply.
210:) to trump this criterion. Even then, the rationale for creating a new article must be clearly stated – why is the subject notable now, when they weren't then?
244:
50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
51:
198:
Articles that are recreated where no new notability exists are likely to be deleted. This is a frequent enough occurrence that we have a
219:
173:
The core idea here is that the subject is not notable for their accomplishments, or for the coverage of those accomplishments,
239:
163:
The musician or band makes it onto the charts with a hit song, or wins a notable award for a new album or single,
55:
224:
65:
109:
Notability can change, and subjects not now notable might become notable in the far-flung days of the
122:
43:
99:
The subject of this deletion debate isn't notable – but they might become notable in the future.
156:
The athlete signs with and competes for a top-tier professional team, or participates in the
105:
207:
203:
199:
192:
142:
138:
233:
157:
17:
58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
169:
The researcher publishes additional notable papers in the appropriate journals.
153:
The actor or actress receives a high-profile role in a notable production,
110:
85:
29:
183:
notable, and in that case an article would be appropriate.
179:. For living subjects, the caveat is that they might later
73:
149:
A new article could be created for this subject if:
206:. Showing new notability is the only way (short of
8:
104:
52:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
166:The politician wins a future election.
245:Knowledge (XXG) essays about deletion
7:
220:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (people)
176:at the time of the deletion debate
56:thoroughly vetted by the community
25:
89:
33:
27:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
193:an articles for deletion debate
191:When an article is deleted via
1:
187:Recreating a deleted article
261:
63:
200:speedy deletion criterion
225:Knowledge (XXG):Too soon
97:This page in a nutshell:
240:Knowledge (XXG) essays
114:
139:articles for deletion
108:
54:, as it has not been
18:Knowledge (XXG):USUAL
121:, in the context of
202:for such articles:
115:
103:
102:
84:
83:
16:(Redirected from
252:
123:deletion debates
93:
92:
86:
76:
37:
36:
30:
21:
260:
259:
255:
254:
253:
251:
250:
249:
230:
229:
216:
208:deletion review
189:
135:
90:
80:
79:
72:
68:
60:
59:
34:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
258:
256:
248:
247:
242:
232:
231:
228:
227:
222:
215:
212:
188:
185:
171:
170:
167:
164:
161:
154:
143:living persons
134:
133:Living persons
131:
101:
100:
94:
82:
81:
78:
77:
69:
64:
61:
49:
48:
40:
38:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
257:
246:
243:
241:
238:
237:
235:
226:
223:
221:
218:
217:
213:
211:
209:
205:
201:
196:
194:
186:
184:
182:
178:
177:
168:
165:
162:
159:
158:Olympic Games
155:
152:
151:
150:
147:
144:
140:
132:
130:
126:
124:
120:
119:usual caveats
112:
107:
98:
95:
88:
87:
75:
71:
70:
67:
62:
57:
53:
47:
45:
39:
32:
31:
19:
204:criterion G4
197:
190:
180:
175:
174:
172:
148:
136:
127:
118:
116:
96:
41:
137:Generally,
42:This is an
234:Categories
141:involving
117:The term
214:See also
74:WP:USUAL
66:Shortcut
181:become
111:Future
44:essay
236::
160:,
113:.
46:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
