264:, wikiproject numbers has a pretty good, though not perfect, system, and this doesn't fall into it. I think the idea about no uninteresting numbers is "proved" false because some number would be interesting for being the smallest uninteresting number, making it interesting, and so on up the scale to infinity. Obviously wikipedia is going to cut off consecutive integers at some point and 256, as a power of 2, is as good as any, I guess. -
168:
I vaguely remember a story about Erdos (or was it someone else), who would never describe a number as uninteresting. Given any number he would immediately rattle off some bizarre (and unique) propery of the number. Unfortunately, I have nowhere near the powers of Erdos, and this number is utterly
34:
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for
Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
58:
Contains nothing that couldn't be said about ANY other number. Either needs something notable adding about this number (as a number), or a bot to create a couple of thousand other pages...
216:
111:
89:
Seriously? Every integer up to 256? That's ridiculous. And why 256? Just because it's 2^8? I fear the 257 fans will be most upset. Oh,
17:
409:
72:
101:
408:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
352:
394:
372:
339:
319:
307:
303:
290:
268:
256:
244:
207:
189:
177:
159:
134:
105:
84:
62:
46:
23:
59:
223:
148:
215:. Not interesting enough. We have to draw the line somewhere. I agree with the sentiments expressed in
253:
241:
233:
75:
want articles on all integers up to and including 256. This number is not particularily interesting.
281:
79:
386:
348:
287:
336:
299:
276:. I would vote "keep" for anything up to about 1980, but 1984 is just taking things too far.
93:
this. 1984 is notable as a year, and as the title of a book, but not in itself as a number.
220:
369:
98:
76:
43:
332:
277:
265:
183:
174:
152:
127:
52:
360:
it. I invited it over for tea and all it wanted to do was watch television and eat
204:
115:
328:
131:
110:
256 is not the upper bound used in the notability and inclusion criteria. See
365:
316:
186:
94:
361:
347:, not interesting at all and doesn't contain info unique to the number. -
232:
I'm certain that most people who type "1984" are either looking for the
143:
That'll be easy, since there's nothing of interest there to merge back.
156:
199:. What the article has to relate about 1984 is not written in the
402:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
237:
412:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
335:, as well, but that's a separate issue.) --
298:. Nothing interesting is said about 1984.
24:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/1984 (number)
280:
217:User:Uncle G/Wikipedia is not infinite
112:User:Uncle G/Wikipedia is not infinite
7:
130:, where this number is mentioned. —
71:. If I'm not mistaken, I think the
31:
364:. It's a really boring number. --
331:should probably be removed from
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
327:. It's all been said above. (
1:
126:anything of interest back to
73:Knowledge:WikiProject Numbers
38:The result of the debate was
354:07:56, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
226:16:49, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
395:11:28, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
373:19:34, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
340:23:01, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
320:22:47, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
315:. Unadulterated silliness.
308:19:26, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
291:18:12, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
269:17:53, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
257:17:09, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
245:17:06, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
208:16:47, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
190:10:38, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
178:16:02, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
160:16:15, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
135:15:27, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
106:15:17, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
85:15:06, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
63:12:53, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
47:00:18, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
429:
283:File:User dmharvey sig.png
118:15:38:17, 2005-08-16 (UTC)
380:, who needs to know this
182:The anecdote is given in
405:Please do not modify it.
219:, mentioned above. —
149:1984 (disambiguation)
410:undeletion request
104:
82:
22:(Redirected from
420:
407:
393:
391:
286:
284:
252:as per Uncle G.
97:
80:
27:
428:
427:
423:
422:
421:
419:
418:
417:
416:
403:
387:
385:
282:
254:Oleg Alexandrov
242:The Bearded One
169:uninteresting,
56:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
426:
424:
415:
414:
398:
397:
375:
355:
342:
322:
310:
293:
271:
259:
247:
227:
210:
194:
193:
192:
165:
164:
163:
162:
138:
137:
124:Merge/Redirect
121:
120:
119:
87:
60:62.173.111.114
55:
50:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
425:
413:
411:
406:
400:
399:
396:
392:
390:
384:information?
383:
379:
376:
374:
371:
367:
363:
359:
356:
353:
350:
346:
343:
341:
338:
334:
333:1000 (number)
330:
326:
323:
321:
318:
314:
311:
309:
305:
301:
297:
294:
292:
289:
285:
279:
275:
272:
270:
267:
263:
260:
258:
255:
251:
248:
246:
243:
239:
235:
231:
228:
225:
222:
218:
214:
211:
209:
206:
202:
198:
195:
191:
188:
185:
184:1729 (number)
181:
180:
179:
176:
172:
167:
166:
161:
158:
155:(or unlink).
154:
153:1000 (number)
150:
146:
142:
141:
140:
139:
136:
133:
129:
128:1000 (number)
125:
122:
117:
113:
109:
108:
107:
103:
100:
96:
92:
88:
86:
83:
78:
74:
70:
67:
66:
65:
64:
61:
54:
53:1984 (number)
51:
49:
48:
45:
41:
36:
25:
19:
404:
401:
388:
381:
377:
357:
344:
337:Arthur Rubin
324:
312:
300:Jitse Niesen
295:
273:
261:
249:
229:
212:
200:
196:
170:
151:to point to
144:
123:
90:
68:
57:
39:
37:
33:
329:1969 (film)
221:Paul August
362:Ding Dongs
147:, and fix
77:Sjakkalle
44:Redwolf24
278:Dmharvey
266:R. fiend
175:stochata
81:(Check!)
389:Thorpe
382:obvious
236:or the
205:Pilatus
116:Uncle G
378:Delete
358:Delete
345:Delete
325:Delete
313:Delete
296:Delete
274:Delete
262:Delete
250:Delete
230:delete
213:Delete
197:Delete
171:Delete
145:Delete
91:delete
69:Delete
40:Delete
366:Kooky
317:linas
187:Bluap
95:Proto
16:<
370:Talk
304:talk
288:Talk
238:year
234:book
201:Book
173:. --
349:Mgm
132:RJH
368:|
306:)
240:.
203:.
157:Hv
114:.
42:.
351:|
302:(
224:☎
102:c
99:t
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.