150:. This is the chap who in a televised debate offered to eat on-camera as much plutonium oxide as Ralph Nader could eat of caffeine. He compared the risks of such exposure to the risks associated with a six month vacation in Denver and to the risks of the average WWI draftee. A bit of a self-publicist, but at the time a self-publicising tenured professor at the
347:
Comment: I am interested, but without content, I found the page of no use. It needed to shape up or ship out. I learned something about him - no idea he offered to swallow plutonium. I wonder if he offered to live in
Chernobyl? I wonder if he offered to adopt irradiated children orphaned by Chrnobyl?
231:
would be sufficient proof of notability, which in
Australia it possibly is, but in the US people we would call Senior Lecturer or Associate Professor seem to be able to use this title automatically after retirement, so in hindsight what I left was a deletable sub-stub. I then got involved in NPOV
34:
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for
Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
348:
I wonder if his antics weren't merely sensational? As for Vanity, i think a page which serves no more purpose than a business card is a vanity page whether self-promoting or not - if i'm wrong about that - i'd be happy to use a different word.
203:. Why isn't fifteen minutes of fame enough? He's notable enough that he might show up in a history book. We've got minor actors galor, why not a tenured professor that reached national notability, if only briefly?--
187:-- completely non-notable one-time attention-getter. This is a fifteen-minutes-of-famer whose fifteen weren't that important. Do you know how many tenured professors there are in the United States?
232:
discussions and didn't get back to expand it, but others now have (thank you). Cohen is very well known for his pro-nuclear activities, we've even heard of him in
Australia. His 1990 book
357:
Chernobyl has nothing to do with missions to
Neptune that need plutonium-based power cores. Surely countering false claims about a material's danger is more than just sensational? --
311:
Comment: This is of course a change of vote by the page's nominator, leaving only one delete vote currently outstanding although that one is an
17:
402:
274:
115:
334:
Comment: There doesn't seem to have been much doubt that it would be kept. I'm a bit surprised at your mistaking this for a
319:. I think I should also point out that as I am not Professor Cohen, this wasn't ever a vanity page. No change of vote.
338:
page, as you seem to have an active interest in the particular debate in which Cohen is prominent. No change of vote.
401:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
151:
138:
122:
88:
328:
Comment: Or rather, a change in content of the article, good work, and yeah I agree, the page has been saved.
265:
236:
doesn't sell very well largely because he has made the full text of it available online, but it does sell.
387:
361:
352:
342:
323:
293:
256:
240:
219:
207:
195:
179:
162:
158:
140:
124:
104:
90:
75:
62:
46:
23:
227:
This listing is partly my fault, and I apologise. I left it as a minimal stub, thinking wrongly that
349:
329:
306:
302:
288:
135:
119:
85:
59:
384:
380:
249:
155:
253:
358:
204:
285:
101:
269:
192:
72:
52:
339:
320:
237:
176:
43:
216:
264:
Article gives relevant info. Could be also used for the discussion in the
71:
Emeritus professor, but does need a lot more to make it a good article.
395:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
175:
the article has been expanded by the time the VfD is closed.
118:. Really nothing more on this page than on that one. --
100:
unless it can be expanded into an encyclopedia article
405:). No further edits should be made to this page.
284:. Passes the average college professor test.
8:
24:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Bernard Cohen
315:, which I assume is even stronger than a
80:This needs a lot more to make it a good
7:
58:Vanity Page - nothing to see here.
31:
215:, had fifteen minutes of fame.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
116:Bernard Cohen (disambiguation)
1:
38:The result of the debate was
278:07:39, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
388:19:35, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
362:19:40, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
353:18:39, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
343:00:44, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
324:03:37, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
294:14:32, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
257:06:54, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
241:06:48, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
220:04:03, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
208:04:00, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
196:23:28, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
180:21:16, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
163:20:43, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
141:14:06, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
125:17:47, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
105:17:36, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
91:17:47, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
76:17:14, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
63:14:37, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
47:05:55, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
422:
234:The Nuclear Energy Option
398:Please do not modify it.
152:University of Pittsburgh
266:nuclear power phase-out
167:Seems notable enough.
171:as per Tony Sidaway,
403:undeletion request
229:Professor Emeritus
110:I guess I go with
291:
185:Absolutely delete
160:
130:After expansion,
22:(Redirected from
413:
400:
289:
159:
27:
421:
420:
416:
415:
414:
412:
411:
410:
409:
396:
313:absolute delete
305:on all points.
277:
56:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
419:
417:
408:
407:
391:
390:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
350:Benjamin Gatti
330:Benjamin Gatti
307:Benjamin Gatti
303:Lord Voldemort
296:
279:
273:
259:
243:
222:
210:
198:
182:
165:
145:
144:
143:
136:Lord Voldemort
120:Lord Voldemort
107:
95:
94:
93:
86:Lord Voldemort
60:Benjamin Gatti
55:
50:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
418:
406:
404:
399:
393:
392:
389:
386:
382:
378:
375:
363:
360:
356:
355:
354:
351:
346:
345:
344:
341:
337:
333:
332:
331:
327:
326:
325:
322:
318:
317:strong delete
314:
310:
309:
308:
304:
300:
297:
295:
292:
287:
283:
280:
276:
271:
267:
263:
260:
258:
255:
251:
247:
244:
242:
239:
235:
230:
226:
223:
221:
218:
214:
211:
209:
206:
202:
199:
197:
194:
190:
186:
183:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
164:
161:
157:
153:
149:
146:
142:
139:
137:
133:
129:
128:
127:
126:
123:
121:
117:
113:
108:
106:
103:
99:
96:
92:
89:
87:
83:
79:
78:
77:
74:
70:
67:
66:
65:
64:
61:
54:
53:Bernard Cohen
51:
49:
48:
45:
41:
36:
25:
19:
397:
394:
385:Hall Monitor
381:Tony Sidaway
376:
335:
316:
312:
298:
281:
261:
250:Tony Sidaway
245:
233:
228:
224:
212:
200:
188:
184:
172:
168:
156:Tony Sidaway
147:
131:
111:
109:
97:
81:
68:
57:
39:
37:
33:
301:agree with
254:Nicodemus75
359:Prosfilaes
252:, above.--
205:Prosfilaes
286:Sjakkalle
268:article.
102:Dlyons493
290:(Check!)
193:JDoorjam
112:Redirect
379:as per
340:Andrewa
321:Andrewa
248:as per
238:Andrewa
177:Uppland
336:vanity
189:Sheesh
98:Delete
44:Splash
262:Keep.
225:Keep.
217:Kappa
16:<
377:Keep
299:Keep
282:Keep
246:Keep
213:Keep
201:Keep
169:Keep
154:. --
148:Keep
134:. --
132:Keep
84:. --
82:stub
69:Keep
40:KEEP
383:.
270:Ben
114:to
73:Alf
42:. -
191:.
173:if
275:C
272:/
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.