543:
as above, these are legitimate topics (I have a couple of Burr puzzles myself). I'd also just like to remind everyone to vote on the page not the user. I'm not sure I like the fact that User:~~~~ is apparently attempting to get every article this editor has worked on deleted. Perhaps a little more
404:
because it looks like someone's pet research. All content of all the other articles is relevant information about notable subjects and I see no reason to remove it. I'm sorry if this wasn't clear from my previous post, but I suggest if you see problems with particular articles you should list them
563:
I can appreciate the frustration, I did see the other pages, but these are encyclopedic articles. I don't think these articles are in any way similar to the others, except for the involvement of one particular user. I wonder how many of the voters above read the articles prior to voting? Anyway, I
555:
Given that 130 articles out of 146 that the editor in question created were deleted in VfD by 90% majority, and the only reason these 16 were not is that I didn't notice them in time to put them in that VfD, I have increadibly good reason to doubt their worth.
644:
good article out of it. I think the topic is very interesting (and certainly notable!), but the naming scheme sounds mostly "original", and the profusion of separate articles is pointless. I'm happy to help merge if consensus supports the action.
193:
Although the history includes many other editors, careful examination reveals that they mostly performed copyediting rather than adding content (except for a picture or two of a puzzle that fits the definition in the text).
423:
and see if it needs to be VfD'd as well, it was created almost 100% by Karl
Scherer, and I'd have thought the mathematical term for anything remotely like this would have been something like
475:
look like original research, especially in the history where it credits Karl
Scherer with discoveries in this field. I would happily vote for its deletion, so please
262:
this crap was created after the end of the first vfd. I propose that this debate should be extended to include the power to delete any more crap that's been missed.
273:
The two referenced above were created waaaaay back in 2003, and it doesn't appear that any edits by KarlScherer3 or his associated IPs were made anytime recently.
405:
on VfD individually explaining your concerns rather than conducting an indiscriminate smear campaign against all articles by one author regardless of merit. —
378:
366:
206:
202:
400:
The only content I support deletion of (apart from
Zillions spam links which I have already cut from one or two articles, should be none now) is in
520:. A cursory google search reveals lots of what looks like reliable information on "Burr puzzle". I really don't understand what the problem is.
183:
171:
165:
159:
153:
147:
230:(nonobviously). They need to go because he invented the classification himself. If someone can prove he didn't, I'll change my vote.
177:
140:
115:
209:
concerning an additional 8. The only reason this was not included amongst them was because I had failed to previously notice them.
201:
articles (about 200 including images) created by
Karlscherer3 were deleted simultaneously in a single VfD, by a 90% majority (see
17:
110:
344:
296:
737:
43:
23:
736:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
591:
One may put articles up for VfD however one wishes. I put them up together, thus they are up together. Simple.
42:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
652:
460:
701:
on plate-and-ring puzzle (I've seen them; I'm not sure they're significant enough for their own article.)
681:
637:
627:
504:
685:
677:
613:
606:
540:
524:
500:
126:
62:
389:
I am not clear on your vote - do you wish to keep the content of the article or just the existance of
453:, which is original research, at best. I think it should be added to the list of deletion nominees. —
267:
469:
420:
337:
289:
235:
702:
646:
454:
623:
441:
for that matter. I don't think the phrase even makes sense; it apparently applies to a tiling
401:
137:
36:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
362:
610:
521:
508:
439:
263:
450:
190:
They are a non-standard (i.e. original research) categorisation of a class of puzzles.
322:
274:
231:
109:, that adds up to 1 vote to keep, 1 vote to "keep (or merge)", and 5 votes to merge. --
136:
These are articles, which on more careful examination than last time, were created by
480:
406:
382:
370:
245:
435:
673:
581:
565:
545:
533:
517:
493:
358:
312:
130:
55:
719:
664:
592:
580:
these articles are not connected or similar and should not be combined vfd'd--
557:
428:
394:
221:
210:
564:
didn't mean to get at you and I'm sorry if that's how it sounded (looked?).
365:
gets over 3000 hits). This is *not* original research. See my comments at
695:
255:
622:
burr puzzle and merge plate-and-ring puzzle, per
Samohyl Jan. --
730:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
434:
I've never heard of the term "convex tiling" in the context of
244:: Excessive. I want this guy gone, too, if this keeps up. --
105:, that adds up to 8 votes to keep and 1 vote to merge; for
479:
add it to this VfD which is already confusing enough. —
393:
article on the subject with possibly different content?
449:
convex polygons. A lot of the text seems to come from
544:
research should have been done before listing these.
694:
burr puzzle (for example, see the IBM Research site
663:and don't merge. Looks like a valid article to me.
361:, which is certainly notable (to my knowledge, and
46:). No further edits should be made to this page.
740:). No further edits should be made to this page.
321:per reasoning on the other VfDs for this stuff.
24:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/EvenMoreKarlScherer
8:
379:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/MoreKarlScherer
367:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/MoreKarlScherer
207:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/MoreKarlScherer
203:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Zillions games
69:6 straight votes for deletion of both
7:
377:(my commentary moved from here to
205:). There is also a current VfD at
31:
97:and finally, 1 vote to merge both
507:. These topics are legitimate.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
419:: can someone take a look at
51:The result of the debate was
445:a convex area, not a tiling
91:1 vote to "keep (or merge)"
117:01:44, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
757:
630:) 5 July 2005 18:50 (UTC)
465:July 4, 2005 22:10 (UTC)
385:4 July 2005 06:32 (UTC))'
733:Please do not modify it.
705:July 8, 2005 13:11 (UTC)
657:July 5, 2005 22:48 (UTC)
616:July 5, 2005 17:57 (UTC)
568:July 5, 2005 09:13 (UTC)
560:5 July 2005 08:31 (UTC)
548:July 5, 2005 07:21 (UTC)
527:July 5, 2005 04:39 (UTC)
431:4 July 2005 18:22 (UTC)
397:4 July 2005 18:19 (UTC)
351:July 3, 2005 23:45 (UTC)
315:July 3, 2005 23:40 (UTC)
303:July 3, 2005 23:45 (UTC)
270:3 July 2005 22:32 (UTC)
238:July 3, 2005 21:46 (UTC)
213:3 July 2005 14:19 (UTC)
197:It should be noted that
39:Please do not modify it.
722:8 July 2005 19:42 (UTC)
688:6 July 2005 06:50 (UTC)
667:5 July 2005 23:48 (UTC)
636:all of this stuff into
595:5 July 2005 18:14 (UTC)
584:5 July 2005 16:07 (UTC)
511:5 July 2005 04:34 (UTC)
483:5 July 2005 06:24 (UTC)
409:5 July 2005 06:06 (UTC)
373:4 July 2005 02:24 (UTC)
248:3 July 2005 21:48 (UTC)
224:3 July 2005 21:41 (UTC)
682:disentanglement puzzle
640:, and maybe we'll get
638:disentanglement puzzle
505:disentanglement puzzle
121:Even More Karl Scherer
678:plate-and-ring puzzle
607:plate-and-ring puzzle
541:plate-and-ring puzzle
501:plate-and-ring puzzle
127:Plate-and-ring puzzle
107:plate-and-ring puzzle
93:plate-and-ring puzzle
87:plate-and-ring puzzle
63:plate-and-ring puzzle
425:planar tessallation
72:1 vote to keep both
438:, or anywhere else
125:This vfd concerns
65:. The votes were:
402:Mechanical puzzle
348:
341:
334:
330:
326:
300:
293:
286:
282:
278:
138:User:Karlscherer3
22:(Redirected from
748:
735:
686:Andreas Kaufmann
655:
649:
463:
457:
349:
346:
342:
339:
335:
332:
328:
324:
301:
298:
294:
291:
287:
284:
280:
276:
113:
81:4 votes to keep
75:3 votes to keep
41:
27:
756:
755:
751:
750:
749:
747:
746:
745:
744:
738:deletion review
731:
653:
647:
461:
455:
345:
338:
323:
297:
290:
275:
143:, who uses IPs
123:
111:
44:deletion review
37:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
754:
752:
743:
742:
726:
725:
724:
723:
707:
706:
689:
668:
658:
631:
617:
599:
598:
597:
596:
586:
585:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
550:
549:
528:
512:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
374:
352:
316:
306:
305:
304:
260:if and only if
249:
239:
225:
188:
187:
184:222.152.25.248
181:
175:
169:
163:
157:
151:
122:
119:
99:
98:
95:
89:
79:
73:
70:
49:
48:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
753:
741:
739:
734:
728:
727:
721:
718:
716:
711:
710:
709:
708:
704:
700:
696:
693:
690:
687:
683:
679:
675:
672:
669:
666:
662:
659:
656:
650:
648:HorsePunchKid
643:
639:
635:
632:
629:
625:
621:
618:
615:
612:
608:
604:
601:
600:
594:
590:
589:
588:
587:
583:
579:
576:
575:
567:
562:
561:
559:
554:
553:
552:
551:
547:
542:
539:
535:
532:
529:
526:
523:
519:
516:
513:
510:
506:
502:
499:
495:
492:
489:
482:
478:
474:
471:
470:convex tiling
467:
466:
464:
458:
456:HorsePunchKid
452:
448:
444:
440:
437:
436:tessellations
433:
432:
430:
426:
422:
421:Convex tiling
418:
415:
408:
403:
399:
398:
396:
392:
388:
387:
386:
384:
380:
375:
372:
368:
364:
363:google search
360:
356:
353:
350:
343:
336:
320:
317:
314:
310:
307:
302:
295:
288:
272:
271:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
250:
247:
243:
240:
237:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
216:
215:
214:
212:
208:
204:
200:
195:
191:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
172:213.157.5.222
170:
167:
166:210.55.230.20
164:
161:
160:210.55.230.18
158:
155:
154:210.55.230.17
152:
149:
148:202.37.72.100
146:
145:
144:
142:
139:
134:
132:
128:
120:
118:
116:
114:
108:
104:
96:
94:
90:
88:
84:
80:
78:
74:
71:
68:
67:
66:
64:
61:
57:
54:
47:
45:
40:
34:
33:
25:
19:
732:
729:
714:
712:
698:
691:
670:
660:
641:
633:
624:Jitse Niesen
619:
602:
577:
537:
530:
514:
497:
490:
476:
472:
446:
442:
424:
416:
390:
376:
354:
318:
308:
259:
251:
241:
227:
220:(obviously)
217:
198:
196:
192:
189:
178:219.89.37.58
135:
124:
106:
102:
100:
92:
86:
82:
76:
59:
52:
50:
38:
35:
717:prior edits
697:on them).
674:burr puzzle
611:Paul August
605:(or merge)
534:Burr puzzle
522:Paul August
518:Burr puzzle
509:Samohyl Jan
494:Burr puzzle
359:burr puzzle
355:Strong keep
311:them all. -
131:Burr puzzle
103:burr puzzle
83:burr puzzle
77:burr puzzle
56:burr puzzle
676:and merge
85:and merge
713:User has
232:Superm401
481:Blotwell
407:Blotwell
383:Blotwell
371:Blotwell
246:Alex12 3
199:over 100
141:contribs
699:No vote
417:Comment
258:though
582:MarSch
566:Leithp
546:Leithp
319:Delete
313:Splash
309:Delete
256:Arbcom
252:Delete
242:Delete
228:Delete
218:Delete
112:BD2412
58:, and
703:Chuck
680:into
665:linas
634:Merge
538:merge
503:into
498:merge
477:don't
447:using
347:EMAIL
299:EMAIL
180:, and
174:, and
168:, and
162:, and
156:, and
150:, and
60:merge
16:<
720:~~~~
692:Keep
671:Keep
661:Keep
628:talk
620:Keep
603:keep
593:~~~~
578:keep
558:~~~~
536:and
531:Keep
515:Keep
491:Keep
473:does
468:Now
451:here
429:~~~~
395:~~~~
357:for
340:TALK
292:TALK
264:Dunc
236:Talk
222:~~~~
211:~~~~
129:and
101:For
53:keep
642:one
369:. —
333:01D
285:01D
254:.
715:66
684:.
609:.
496:,
443:of
427:.
391:an
234:|
133:.
654:龜
651:→
645:—
626:(
614:☎
525:☎
462:龜
459:→
381:—
331:я
329:D
327:и
325:A
283:я
281:D
279:и
277:A
268:☺
266:|
186:.
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.