162:", which is nothing less than intellectual chauvinism. Lots of people find lots of "mundane" subjects perfectly "notable", and they can and should be able to write about those subjects in Knowledge (XXG) without having their work casually dismissed by ill-informed or ignorant contributors who possess a misplaced sense of their own importance.--
324:, which already has all this information, except that it's in San Antonio, which a link to the station article will cover. I imagine the same can be said of most of the masts on that list. The article is currently a substub with a collection of external links, and I really don't see it growing. -
254:
I see no logical reason why articles about telephone directories, restaurant menus and school syllabuses should not have a place in
Knowledge (XXG). Such subjects are as much a matter of interest to lots of people as are railway rolling stock, computer games and public institutions.
229:
In answer to your questions... 1) they're not. 2. that's not a question; 3.Yes. 4.No. 5.Yes if on a list, rather than on separate articles. Of course that's my POV, but I do hold that information is more accessible and, well, informative when
457:
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.
277:
I suggest you re-read my comment. I did not say we should import the content of phone books etc. I said that we should have articles about them. A significant difference you'd do well to grasp.--
204:
Why are any of these towers noteable? Being on a list is not noteable. Is every minor league stadium noteable? Is every street noteable? Is every election district noteable?
288:. I was responding to a guy who said "everything that is verifiable belongs in Knowledge (XXG)". My point was that he was not making the very distinction you just made. ---
151:
Besides, I don't see a procedural error. "Non-notable" is just shorthand for "not important enough to escape the 'not a general knowledge base' rule". ---
338:
per R. fiend). I'd still like to hear why towers are considered more notable than, say, satellite dishes, telephone poles, or sewer sections.
138:
criterion for well over a year now. Knowledge (XXG) is not a court of law, and procedural errors are not grounds for keeping anything.
17:
247:"Everything that is verifiable"? So you advocate importing phone books, broadcast schedules, class syllabuses, restaurant menus? ---
38:
Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
127:
The part that says "Nonnotable". According to current policy "non-notability" is not listed as a valid deletion criteria.--
180:, not sure if the nomination conforms with policy or not, but things that tall are pretty much all notable in my book.
23:
88:
I agree with your comment, RJH, but does thta make it notable (in an encylopedia-inclusion or any other sense)?
289:
271:
248:
195:
152:
121:
54:
222:
Yes, every tower, every stadium, every street, everthing that is verifiable belongs in wikipedia.
238:
142:
392:
205:
34:
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below.
434:
267:
191:
448:
361:
278:
256:
216:
163:
128:
114:
266:
a general knowledge base? If so, you should be working to get that section removed from
414:
339:
424:
371:
325:
321:
311:
235:
223:
139:
78:
438:
404:
45:
382:
379:
104:
92:
89:
82:
67:
181:
241:
145:
134:
The deletion criteria are not all-inclusive, and notability has been a
194:. (Though the page itself is worth saving as a non-list page.) ---
211:
In answer to your questions: yes. This is an encyclopedia. It's
158:
On the contrary, "not notable" is shorthand for "not notable
113:. Nomination does not conform with deletion policy.--
190:. The lists of masts doesn't belong either, because
24:
Knowledge (XXG):Votes for deletion/KISS Radio Tower
437:, and because the article itself is poor. --
423:. Major physical infrastructure is notable.--
8:
360:why make the list of towers incomplete? --
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
77:— As notable as a hundred others on
447:to the list of Masts and redirect--
391:. Redirecting would be confusing.
31:
192:we're not a general knowledgebase
284:I suggest that you re-read mine
1:
262:So you think Knowledge (XXG)
103:, it's on the list of masts.
40:The result of the debate was
460:Please do not edit this page
433:, both because the topic is
36:This page is no longer live.
120:What part specifically? ---
479:
413:, not inherently notable.
403:please it seems important
234:into comprehensive lists.
374:per R. fiend. Otherwise,
354:17:39, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
281:22:50, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
274:20:16, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
259:04:15, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
251:16:04, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
244:09:04, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
226:08:27, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
208:04:15, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
155:16:04, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
148:09:04, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
131:04:23, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
124:00:36, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
117:23:35, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
85:17:39, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
70:16:20, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
50:11:12, May 2, 2005 (UTC)
451:03:20, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
441:14:50, 2005 Apr 24 (UTC)
427:09:11, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
417:05:44, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
407:00:59, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
397:11:36, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
385:18:07, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
364:17:42, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
328:14:36, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
314:08:27, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
292:23:03, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
219:04:23, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
198:00:36, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
184:00:30, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
166:04:25, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
107:18:07, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
95:18:23, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
215:to be encyclopedic.--
340:Andrew Lenahan -
22:(Redirected from
470:
435:not encyclopedic
352:
349:
346:
343:
55:KISS Radio Tower
48:
27:
478:
477:
473:
472:
471:
469:
468:
467:
466:
350:
347:
344:
341:
310:notable tower.
58:
46:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
476:
474:
465:
464:
453:
452:
442:
428:
418:
408:
398:
386:
365:
355:
329:
315:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
245:
220:
199:
185:
175:
174:
173:
172:
171:
170:
169:
168:
167:
149:
108:
98:
97:
96:
57:
52:
39:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
475:
463:
461:
455:
454:
450:
446:
443:
440:
436:
432:
429:
426:
422:
419:
416:
412:
409:
406:
402:
399:
396:
395:
390:
387:
384:
380:
377:
373:
372:List of masts
369:
366:
363:
359:
356:
353:
337:
333:
330:
327:
323:
322:list of masts
319:
316:
313:
309:
306:
291:
287:
283:
282:
280:
276:
275:
273:
269:
265:
261:
260:
258:
253:
252:
250:
246:
243:
240:
237:
233:
228:
227:
225:
221:
218:
214:
210:
209:
207:
203:
200:
197:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
176:
165:
161:
157:
156:
154:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
133:
132:
130:
126:
125:
123:
119:
118:
116:
112:
109:
106:
102:
99:
94:
90:
87:
86:
84:
80:
79:List of masts
76:
73:
72:
71:
69:
65:
64:
56:
53:
51:
49:
43:
37:
25:
19:
459:
456:
444:
430:
420:
410:
400:
393:
388:
375:
367:
357:
335:
331:
317:
307:
285:
263:
231:
212:
201:
187:
177:
159:
135:
110:
100:
74:
62:
61:
59:
41:
35:
33:
206:Vegaswikian
60:Nonnotable
362:Mattwj2002
286:in context
279:Gene_poole
257:Gene_poole
217:Gene_poole
164:Gene_poole
129:Gene_poole
115:Gene_poole
415:Megan1967
425:Centauri
368:Redirect
336:redirect
326:R. fiend
318:Redirect
312:Klonimus
224:Klonimus
213:supposed
136:de facto
439:Dcfleck
405:Yuckfoo
290:Isaac R
272:Isaac R
249:Isaac R
196:Isaac R
153:Isaac R
122:Isaac R
47:Xezbeth
431:Delete
411:Delete
383:msh210
332:Delete
268:WP:NOT
239:adiant
232:merged
202:Delete
188:Delete
143:adiant
105:Feydey
93:msh210
68:msh210
449:nixie
445:Merge
394:N-Man
182:Kappa
160:to me
16:<
421:Keep
401:keep
389:Keep
358:Keep
334:(or
308:Keep
178:Keep
111:Keep
101:Keep
75:Keep
42:keep
376:del
370:to
348:bli
320:to
270:.--
83:RJH
63:del
44:. —
351:nd
345:ar
342:St
264:is
255:--
242:_*
146:_*
81:—
462:.
381:—
378:.
236:R
140:R
91:—
66:—
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.