81:
in broken
English, from which subsequent editors have guessed the intent, but the accuracy of the present version of the translations cannot be verified without the source. It has been suggested that this should be transwikied to Wikisource but the work is inappropriate for that project because it is not simply a transcript of a source. So, as matters stand, the article is not quite encyclopedic, not quite a source and not quite original research. Perhaps it would have a home somewhere at Wikicities. I am convinced, however, that it has no place here. —
80:
This article is a mixture of translation and description of an uncited primary source: the war diary of a man identified only as
Corporal Nakamura. I have been unable to trace the source document through Google, the British Library or Nielsen Bibliographic Data. The first draft of the article was
34:
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for
Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
113:
is the historical document that is being summarized here? When performing a "touch up", how do you propose that editors be able to confirm that their summary still accurately reflects the historical document being summarized?
72:
52:
17:
163:
162:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
46:
148:
130:
101:
88:
57:
23:
85:
63:
146:
43:
97:, as a summary of a historical document it's pretty good as it stands. Could use some touch up.
98:
139:
82:
143:
127:
126:
unless it can be researched, cited, expanded, and its notability explicitly stated.
115:
156:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
73:
Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Articles on
Imperial Japan
166:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
24:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Nakamura Diary
7:
31:
71:For a related VFD discussion see
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
38:The result of the debate was
149:22:54, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
131:19:26, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
102:17:15, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
89:16:35, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
58:19:26, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
183:
118:19:53:07, 2005-08-11 (UTC)
159:Please do not modify it.
164:undeletion request
22:(Redirected from
174:
161:
27:
182:
181:
177:
176:
175:
173:
172:
171:
170:
157:
67:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
180:
178:
169:
168:
152:
151:
133:
121:
120:
119:
78:
77:
66:
64:Nakamura Diary
61:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
179:
167:
165:
160:
154:
153:
150:
147:
145:
141:
137:
134:
132:
129:
125:
122:
117:
112:
108:
105:
104:
103:
100:
96:
93:
92:
91:
90:
87:
84:
76:
74:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
56:
55:
50:
49:
45:
44:Fernando Rizo
41:
36:
25:
19:
158:
155:
135:
123:
110:
106:
94:
79:
70:
53:
47:
39:
37:
33:
99:Gateman1997
144:Scimitar
128:JDoorjam
138:as per
116:Uncle G
136:Delete
124:Delete
86:(Talk)
40:Delete
111:where
83:Theo
16:<
142:. --
140:Theo
109:and
107:What
95:Keep
42:.
75:.
54:C
51:/
48:T
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.