395:
the original wikipedia page had 45 entries (another user added The Blair Witch project to bring it up to 46, using IMDB as a reference). The list came from a variety of sources, (Listology being one of them), which were all included in the
External links section. Usually the totals reconciled, but where they didn't, I included the variants as well. Happy new year, everybody! --
394:
I don't mind if the page gets deleted, but to address the concern in the previous post by LostLeviathan and also brought up by
Galamiel -- if you look at the Listology list and look at the Knowledge (XXG) page, it will be clear that it wasn't cut and paste. The Listology page had 19 entries, while
194:
Delete. Knowledge (XXG) is not the
Guiness Book or the Video Hound. Many entries can't even decide how many times the term was used. If kept, definately at new name, but it just doesn't seem worth the person-power to maintain in an
110:
that it held this record, and I knew it was wrong, and it seemed more sporting for me to provide documentation in its own page, rather than to just remove the page on hearsay. But I would shed no tears for its deletion.
67:
282:
and re-name; wikipedia appeals to me, in part, because it is a reservoir of unusual information. Its accuracy should improve with time; if not, nobody will be killed or maimed by inaccurate "fuck" usage data.
160:. Does the MPAA tabulate these things when they rate movies? Where does the information come from? Source is essential. Possibly compilation-copyright issue if all from one source but probably not.
318:. Trivia, sure, but what's unencyclopedic about trivia? Trivia is in the eye of the beholder, anyway. What if some film studies student is doing a project about the use of profanity in film?
375:. For one thing, no one's going to type a name like that in the "go" box, or link to it for that matter. Second, copyright concerns: The list is copied and pasted from Listology
96:
Another silly list that, while moderately entertaining, probably belongs at some place like
Everything2, not here. I also question the validity/source of the information.
23:
122:
156:
if easily verifiable (i.e. by some means other than sitting through the film and paying attention for two hours while punching a tally counter). Rename as per
106:
Hello, I'm the original author of the article. I have no objection if it's deleted. I created it because I saw a reference on the page for
17:
267:
58:
378:, which is provided as an external link in the article. I would suggest adding that external link to the article on
266:. I like the idea of the list, but I don't see how the information is possibly verifiable without violating
46:
187:
Delete: Knowledge (XXG) is not the
Guiness Book or the Video Hound. (Surely "Resevoir Dogs" would win?)
24:
Knowledge (XXG):Votes for deletion/Record for most number of times the word fuck has been used in a film
34:
Please note that this is an archived discussion, which is no longer live. Please do not edit the page.
298:. An article on obscenity in film would be information; a ranked listing is barely above raw data.
284:
409:. Thoroughly interesting and encyclopedic information. Allow for organic growth and expansion.
410:
383:
346:
319:
164:
107:
97:
86:
309:
221:
204:
143:
73:
Thoroughly unencyclopedic information. Could, perhaps, be summarized somewhere in the article
376:
100:
366:
299:
54:
396:
339:
271:
253:
177:
161:
112:
82:
78:
242:
218:
211:
188:
157:
136:
126:
50:
329:
233:
356:
174:
68:
Record for most number of times the word fuck has been used in a film
382:, and perhaps even mentioning it in a paragraph in that article. --
270:. This is just cut and paste from another website with no sources.
379:
74:
152:
unless verifiable sources for the counts are provided. Weak
290:Delete. This is trivia. More importantly, it is
38:This page was nominated for deletion. There was
123:List of films that frequently use the word fuck
8:
125:, as that is what the current content is. -
173:, wikipedia is not the guinness book. --
262:Reluctantly, I'm changing my vote to
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
268:Knowledge (XXG):No original research
31:
203:, which Knowledge (XXG) is not.
1:
428:
413:\ 18:49, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
386:22:07, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
342:04:25, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
207:16:37, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
139:10:25, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
129:08:03, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
89:07:12, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
399:03:36, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
369:10:01, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
359:04:39, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
349:21:42, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
332:19:56, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
322:19:32, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
312:15:10, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
302:08:59, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
287:08:52, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
274:22:20, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
256:03:25, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
245:03:18, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
236:00:54, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
224:06:06, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
214:23:16, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
191:13:22, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
184:11:57, 2004 Dec 24 (UTC)
167:11:52, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
146:11:42, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
115:07:18, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
103:07:16, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
135:and re-name, as above.
142:Keep under new name -
328:. Very interesting.
217:Concur - delete.
108:The Last Boy Scout
61:) 29 December 2004
182:
63:
49:comment added by
22:(Redirected from
419:
232:this fuckcruft.
181:
178:
121:, but rename to
62:
43:
27:
427:
426:
422:
421:
420:
418:
417:
416:
353:Keep and rename
285:Solemnavalanche
179:
71:
44:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
425:
423:
415:
414:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
370:
360:
350:
343:
340:Nelson Ricardo
333:
323:
313:
303:
288:
276:
275:
259:
258:
246:
237:
227:
226:
225:
215:
192:
185:
168:
147:
140:
130:
116:
104:
70:
65:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
424:
412:
408:
405:
398:
393:
390:
389:
388:
387:
385:
384:LostLeviathan
381:
377:
374:
371:
368:
364:
361:
358:
354:
351:
348:
347:Mark Richards
344:
341:
337:
334:
331:
327:
324:
321:
317:
314:
311:
307:
304:
301:
297:
293:
289:
286:
281:
278:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
260:
257:
255:
251:
247:
244:
241:
238:
235:
231:
228:
223:
220:
216:
213:
209:
208:
206:
202:
198:
193:
190:
186:
183:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
145:
141:
138:
134:
131:
128:
124:
120:
117:
114:
109:
105:
102:
99:
95:
92:
91:
90:
88:
84:
80:
76:
69:
66:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
41:
36:
35:
25:
19:
406:
391:
372:
362:
352:
335:
325:
315:
310:Andre Engels
305:
295:
291:
279:
263:
249:
248:
239:
229:
205:Niteowlneils
200:
197:encyclopedia
196:
170:
153:
149:
144:David Gerard
132:
118:
93:
72:
40:no consensus
39:
37:
33:
32:
308:- trivia -
296:information
45:—Preceding
42:to delete.
367:Elf-friend
355:as above.
300:Isomorphic
201:moviepedia
199:--maybe a
210:Concur.
397:Arcadian
272:Gamaliel
254:Gamaliel
162:Dpbsmith
113:Arcadian
79:Rdsmith4
59:contribs
47:unsigned
392:Abstain
243:Yuckfoo
219:Rossami
94:Delete.
411:GRider
373:Delete
363:Delete
345:Keep.
306:Delete
294:, not
264:delete
230:Delete
222:(talk)
212:Edeans
189:Geogre
171:Rename
165:(talk)
158:SimonP
150:Delete
137:Dan100
127:SimonP
101://talk
98:Aerion
320:Bryan
240:keep'
51:Pcb21
16:<
407:Keep
380:fuck
336:Keep
330:Grue
326:Keep
316:Keep
292:data
280:Keep
250:Keep
234:Wyss
154:keep
133:Keep
119:Keep
87:Talk
75:fuck
55:talk
357:bbx
175:fvw
83:Dan
365:.
338:.
252:.
111:--
85:|
81:—
77:.
57:•
180:*
53:(
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.