243:
too valuable to sack (as is were) :-) My current rotation has a lot of down time. If screaming ladies don't need me to put big needles in their backs, or there are know cesarians to do, then well... its the
Internet... all day yesterday as it happened. But I just don't get why this stuff has any more
231:
It's been pretty firmly established that the answer to "I can't edit safely from work" is "don't do that then." If your job is so at risk, then what the fuck are you doing editing
Knowledge at work rather than, e.g., working? -
95:
I haven't seen Pecker, but the term is in common usage for the oral sex act. It's used more as a practical joke/urban legend rather than an actual sexual act I suspect. With all these references maybe it does need an article ;)
107:
a male stripper, wearing his briefs, would dance up and press his testicles against an appreciative client's face. The briefs were apparently the bag. It was a mass culture movie, so it's possible that Waters tamed it.
164:
Ah, but how many have been led astray from the paths of virtue by perusing a dictionary, sincerely seeking information, only to have their innocent young mind inflamed by a prurient definition?
211:
hospital I work at. The nuns monitor the traffic. I'm sure I'm not the only one that edits from that sort of 'watched' environment. I just question the value of this junk. (ratgurl disagrees)
268:
discuss this practice too. It's a cruel prank, about two steps above farting in someone's face while they're asleep and two below the time-honored hand-in-the-water-glass gag.
313:
discussed more often than performed). Also, if it is a common prank, isn't the prankster putting himself dangerously in harm's way, should the victim take serious umbrage?
244:
value to the world than all the recipes. except long lists of recipes wouldn't encourage some schools to remove wikipedia from their 'safe for the kids' list. best wishes
89:
IIRC, in the movie Pecker, it did not refer to dipping into the mouth, but more placing *them* on the foreheads of the customers. (please correct me if I am mistaken)
153:. How many of were first tempted into dictionaries and encyclopedias by looking up vulgarities? Oh, only me then. Valid but doesn't deserve an article.
353:
Keep. Seems fine to me, only read the new version. However, comment about braining- testicles do not look like brains in any way shape or form... :)
275:
Keep, do not redirect to oral sex, because usage is more common when referring to the prank. It is a common enough word to merit a keep as well.
182:
delete. why do we need such drivel. and why should we redirect a harmless 'safe for kids' term into an obscure adult only fetish?
207:
is peering over my shoulder so I better not. But why is
Knowledge so happy to be sexpedia? I was editing all day today from the
17:
305:
O tempora, O Moses! Or, like "mooning," is it something discussed far more often than performed? (Please tell me that
55:
It nearly kills me to do so, but the new article is not a dictdef, so I'm changing my vote to a stomach-clenched
130:
Keep, this was a common proposed prank in my college dorm. I'll expand accordingly. ] 21:50, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
23:
68:
Delete - Agree with Geogre about Pecker. Is there a mechanism for sending dictionary entries over to
269:
340:
124:
306:
298:
203:
errr.. I meant teabagging not oral sex. I'm sure I could tell you a bit about oral sex but now
196:
Worthless comment: Oral sex is obscure to puritans who don't want any fun in their life. :) --
245:
233:
212:
197:
183:
143:
282:
258:
78:
Vulgarity is not an issue, but it seems far too narrow a topic. I've incorporated it into
347:
176:
34:
354:
314:
175:
Now, I never said that this didn't sound like fun. I like the idea of a redirect. -
165:
329:
265:
224:
204:
376:
287:
279:
276:
222:. Never mind. I thought you were going to volunteer to write a related article.
154:
109:
90:
73:
60:
49:
190:
134:
72:? Because what is to stop the cycle of post - delete - post - delete - ...
361:
327:... we always used to call this activity "braining." Guess I'll rewrite.
150:
120:
97:
83:
79:
367:
Just another KEEP vote. Eventually
Knowledge will be a million
364:
14:33, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC) (one-time non-consenting teabagee)
69:
48:
got this term out to the world) would be delighted.
297:Comment. Well, query. Well, prurient question.
44:Dictdef, although I'm sure John Waters (whose
371:books rolled into one; no reason not to have
8:
257:Keep - So thats what that is called, huh. --
123:. This article could easily be expanded.
24:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Teabagging
7:
346:Agreed. The rewrite looks great. -
33:Dicdef, and a vulgar one at that. -
189:Oral sex is an 'obscure fetish'? -
31:
360:Now cleaned up and de-stubbed.
339:, been rewritten and now OK. --
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
369:The Encyclopedia of Whatever
218:She's WHAT?? Oh... you said
103:Just for clarification, in
394:
301:, is this really a common
379:20:03, Jul 13, 2004 (UTC)
290:03:11, Jul 11, 2004 (UTC)
215:12:37, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
193:02:42, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
186:05:53, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC)
133:Keep, for same reasons. -
357:05:28, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
350:03:11, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
343:23:34, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
332:12:23, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
317:22:25, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
261:08:43, Jul 9, 2004 (UTC)
248:20:50, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
236:13:25, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
227:12:43, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
200:03:50, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
168:22:29, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
157:14:29, Jul 9, 2004 (UTC)
112:04:00, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
86:17:36, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
63:13:45, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
52:17:24, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
37:16:35, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
373:The Encyclopedia of Sex
272:18:56, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
179:18:32, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
146:09:08, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
137:23:50, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
127:19:44, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
100:18:07, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
82:; delete or redirect.
119:Keep, or redirect to
375:as a part of that.
270:User:The Iconoclast
59:. (Forgot to sign)
22:(Redirected from
385:
27:
393:
392:
388:
387:
386:
384:
383:
382:
43:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
391:
389:
381:
380:
365:
358:
351:
344:
334:
321:
320:
319:
318:
292:
291:
273:
262:
255:
254:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
237:
229:
201:
180:
172:
171:
170:
169:
159:
158:
147:
140:
139:
138:
128:
117:
116:
115:
114:
113:
101:
76:
70:Wiktionary.org
66:
65:
64:
41:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
390:
378:
374:
370:
366:
363:
359:
356:
352:
349:
345:
342:
338:
335:
333:
331:
326:
323:
322:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
295:
294:
293:
289:
286:
285:
281:
277:
274:
271:
267:
263:
260:
256:
247:
242:
238:
235:
230:
228:
226:
221:
217:
216:
214:
210:
206:
202:
199:
195:
194:
192:
188:
187:
185:
181:
178:
174:
173:
167:
163:
162:
161:
160:
156:
152:
148:
145:
141:
136:
132:
131:
129:
126:
125:theresa knott
122:
118:
111:
106:
102:
99:
94:
93:
92:
88:
87:
85:
81:
77:
75:
71:
67:
62:
58:
54:
53:
51:
47:
40:
39:
38:
36:
25:
19:
372:
368:
336:
328:
324:
310:
302:
283:
266:Howard Stern
240:
234:David Gerard
223:
219:
208:
205:User:Ratgurl
198:Stevietheman
149:Redirect to
144:David Gerard
104:
56:
45:
32:
264:I've heard
191:Sean Curtin
135:Sean Curtin
307:as of 2004
299:As of 2004
348:Lucky 6.9
177:Lucky 6.9
35:Lucky 6.9
315:Dpbsmith
309:mooning
209:Catholic
166:Dpbsmith
151:oral sex
121:oral sex
80:oral sex
330:Wikisux
225:Wikisux
220:peering
142:Keep -
42:Delete:
377:jengod
355:Graham
341:Lussmu
303:prank?
259:Buster
155:Cutler
110:Geogre
105:Pecker
91:Paitum
74:Paitum
61:Geogre
50:Geogre
46:Pecker
246:Erich
239:Well
213:Erich
184:Erich
16:<
337:Keep
325:Keep
280:siro
57:keep
362:Rls
241:I'm
98:Rls
84:Rls
311:is
288:o
284:χ
278:—
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.