Knowledge

:WikiProject Knowledgens against censorship - Knowledge

Source 📝

378: 200:
through this ignorance or for some other reason, nonetheles still consider it offensive, but it there is no actual replacement term which encompasses all Inuit and Yupik peoples (nor, arguably, the Aleut). The aforesaid small group of users is concerned about political correctness, and repeatedly deletes or papers over references to the correct etymology, and removes any information connecting the false etymology to the perceived offensiveness of the word, and possible unintentional deception, i.e. appeal to ignorance (argumentum ad ignorantium).
120: 159: 32: 182:
This notice board is intended to inform project members of current Knowledge events related to censorship. Please list articles in need of attention, votes for deletion, votes for policy change, or other current and ongoing events which warrant the attention of the member base of this WikiProject.
108:
and apparently inactive), which aimed to remove images and text on Knowledge which its members considered "indecent". This WikiProject addresses censorship of materials which some may deem indecent or offensive, but which are nonetheless encyclopedic and appropriate in the context of Knowledge. It
260:
concerning what types of content are appropriate for Knowledge. Before engaging in lengthy debate with users who are attempting to censor content, it is always a good idea to first point them in the direction of the appropriate policies. Some users, however, may object to these policies. Here are
326:
Censorware programs do not target only sexual content, but also (e.g.) "cult", "extremist", and "violence" content. They also target not only images, but also words and textual content. A desire to avoid being blocked by censorware would exclude Knowledge from covering new religious movements;
199:
The article titled eskimo is being repeatedly censored by a small group of users. The word means "one who nets snoeshoes" , but there is a folk etymology that it means "eaters of raw meat", hence it was thought to be a pejorative term by a lot of people for quite awhile. Some people, whether
296:, Knowledge could display full-blown pornography on the main page 24/7 and still not be in violation of U.S. obscenity laws. As far as state and local laws in the U.S. are concerned, if they do not conform to the Miller test, they are unconstitutional. The oft-quoted 184: 190:
Note: Personal attacks are not allowed on this notice board. Any notices not conforming to Knowledge policies may be edited or removed. Discussions should be held on the relevant talk pages, not on the notice board.
133:
in the realm of article space, and occasionally in the project space. Any content, such as userboxes, in user space is considered outside the scope of this project and should not be included on the notice board.
451: 288:, which states that a work cannot be considered obscene if, taken as a whole, it has serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. Since Knowledge has literary, artistic, political, 143: 113: 105: 327:
terrorist organizations and extremist political movements; wars, weapons, and incidents of violent crime such as mass murders; and other topics of encyclopedic importance.
101: 323:
There have been no documented cases of censorware programs used by schools blocking the entire site, as opposed to merely blocking specific articles or images.
361:. Knowledge should not state whether something is moral or immoral – this judgement is left to the reader. Knowledge should only care whether something is 146:
has been moved to its own page. Please sign up there if you are interested in contributing to this project. Feel free to add the freespeech template, {{
116:
and post any ideas or suggestions on the Talk page. Also, feel free to edit this page and add any articles that need attention to the sections below.
421: 391: 71: 54: 331: 297: 292:
scientific value it would be very difficult to charge it with obscenity, no matter how graphic a particular piece of it was. According to
207: 49: 401: 307:
If Knowledge is not censored, then schoolchildren will be forbidden from using it in research, for instance by school policies, or by
257: 411: 147: 456: 396: 235: 431: 406: 446: 426: 44:
an area for focused collaboration among Wikipedians. New participants are welcome; please feel free to participate!
240: 215: 416: 320:
There have been no documented cases of school policies forbidding the use of Knowledge because of sexual content.
383: 308: 362: 211: 271:; in particular, laws of the United States, or of the state of Florida where Knowledge's servers reside. 39: 300:
has the Miller test explicitly written into it in order to avoid being overturned as unconstitutional.
358: 203: 245: 80: 311:
programs blocking the site because of "pornographic" or "adult" (e.g., sexual) content.
440: 354: 281: 130: 183:
Once votes are closed or the event is no longer current, please move notices to the
293: 285: 341:
Your article about X is sick and disgusting. Knowledge should not promote X.
373: 17: 268: 104:. It was started as a response to WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency (now 357:
encourages a dispassionate treatment of any subject. We do not write in a
158: 119: 31: 350:
Knowledge does not promote X, it simply reports the existence of X.
112:
Anyone who is interested in contributing, please sign up on the
100:
was started on August 20, 2005, to coordinate efforts to oppose
227:
Defend policies against modifications that encourage censorship
26: 118: 452:
WikiProject Wikipedians against censorship participants
88: 267:
Knowledge must be censored to conform to laws against
150:}}, to your user page once you have become a member: 261:some common objections, and appropriate responses: 109:also addresses political and religious censorship. 129:This project is primarily focused on applying our 334:Knowledge to hide the most controversial images. 106:WikiProject Wikipedians for encyclopedic merit 8: 256:Many new Knowledge users are unaware of the 252:Educate those who want to censor Knowledge 201: 98:WikiProject Wikipedians against censorship 7: 153: 65:Wikimedia subject-area collaboration 25: 284:, obscenity is defined under the 376: 157: 148:Template:User against censorship 30: 167:Wikipedians against censorship 1: 72:WikiProject Freedom of speech 241:Knowledge's image use policy 127:Important note about scope: 473: 78: 236:Knowledge is not censored 164:This user is a member of 55:Directory of WikiProjects 384:Freedom of speech portal 309:content-control software 258:policies and guidelines 216:16:45, 2 May 2022 (UTC) 131:policy of no censorship 102:censorship on Knowledge 457:Knowledge WikiProjects 123: 298:Florida Obscenity Law 122: 50:Guide to WikiProjects 370:Related WikiProjects 330:Schools are free to 185:notice board archive 447:Active WikiProjects 231:Current policies: 124: 422:Mass surveillance 392:Freedom of speech 218: 206:comment added by 174: 173: 63: 62: 16:(Redirected from 464: 386: 381: 380: 379: 161: 154: 91: 34: 27: 21: 472: 471: 467: 466: 465: 463: 462: 461: 437: 436: 382: 377: 375: 372: 359:moralising tone 355:manual of style 254: 229: 224: 197: 180: 175: 144:membership list 140: 95: 94: 87: 83: 66: 59: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 470: 468: 460: 459: 454: 449: 439: 438: 435: 434: 429: 424: 419: 414: 409: 404: 399: 394: 388: 387: 371: 368: 367: 366: 351: 336: 335: 328: 324: 321: 302: 301: 253: 250: 249: 248: 243: 238: 228: 225: 223: 220: 196: 193: 179: 176: 172: 171: 162: 152: 139: 136: 93: 92: 84: 79: 77: 76: 64: 61: 60: 58: 57: 52: 46: 45: 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 469: 458: 455: 453: 450: 448: 445: 444: 442: 433: 430: 428: 425: 423: 420: 418: 415: 413: 410: 408: 405: 403: 400: 398: 395: 393: 390: 389: 385: 374: 369: 364: 360: 356: 352: 349: 348: 347: 346: 342: 340: 333: 329: 325: 322: 319: 318: 317: 316: 312: 310: 306: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 282:United States 279: 278: 277: 276: 272: 270: 266: 262: 259: 251: 247: 244: 242: 239: 237: 234: 233: 232: 226: 221: 219: 217: 213: 209: 208:103.6.150.214 205: 194: 192: 188: 186: 177: 169: 168: 163: 160: 156: 155: 151: 149: 145: 137: 135: 132: 128: 121: 117: 115: 110: 107: 103: 99: 90: 86: 85: 82: 75: 73: 68: 67: 56: 53: 51: 48: 47: 43: 41: 36: 33: 29: 28: 19: 18:Knowledge:WAC 402:Human rights 344: 343: 338: 337: 314: 313: 304: 303: 289: 274: 273: 264: 263: 255: 230: 202:— Preceding 198: 189: 181: 178:Notice board 166: 165: 141: 126: 125: 114:members page 111: 97: 96: 69: 37: 353:Wikpedia's 294:Jimbo Wales 286:Miller test 40:WikiProject 441:Categories 412:Journalism 363:verifiable 345:Responses: 339:Statement: 315:Responses: 305:Statement: 275:Responses: 265:Statement: 222:Open tasks 70:See also: 38:This is a 397:Inclusion 332:configure 269:obscenity 246:Profanity 432:Politics 407:Internet 204:unsigned 81:Shortcut 280:In the 138:Members 195:Eskimo 89:WP:WAC 427:Media 212:talk 142:The 417:Law 290:and 443:: 214:) 187:. 365:. 210:( 170:. 74:. 42:, 20:)

Index

Knowledge:WAC

WikiProject
Guide to WikiProjects
Directory of WikiProjects
WikiProject Freedom of speech
Shortcut
WP:WAC
censorship on Knowledge
WikiProject Wikipedians for encyclopedic merit
members page

policy of no censorship
membership list
Template:User against censorship

Wikipedians against censorship
notice board archive
unsigned
103.6.150.214
talk
16:45, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Knowledge is not censored
Knowledge's image use policy
Profanity
policies and guidelines
obscenity
United States
Miller test
Jimbo Wales

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.