Knowledge (XXG)

:Content assessment - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

2098: 2047: 2088: 2258: 2222: 1891: 586: 362: 2330: 919: 221: 2294: 853: 42: 2099: 2094: 2097: 2102: 107: 2095: 2091: 2093: 2096: 200:
It is vital that editors not take these assessments of their contributions personally. It is understood that we each have our own opinions of the priorities of the objective criteria for a perfect article. If there is disagreement over the quality rating of an article, then it should be discussed on
2083:
to see that version of the article. Please note that until 2008, a C-Class rating did not exist on the project, and as such this grading is retroactive. Also, in 2006 references were much less used, and inline references were quite rare; a barely-B-Class article today would typically have many more
2100: 2703:
Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the article's talk page (or directly with the person who tagged the article). See
880:. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a 2092: 2731:
Due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
1407:
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or
2101: 1501:
Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is
653:(a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. 161: 2103: 2104: 157: 1396:
The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial
1366:
A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the
2152:
tracks assessment data (article quality and importance data for individual WikiProjects) assigned via talk page banners. If you would like to add a new WikiProject to the bot's list, please read the instructions at
2647: 1305: 885: 1497:
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are
2116: 2714:
Feel free to change it—within reason—if you think a different rating is justified; in the case of major disputes, the WikiProject as a whole can discuss the issue and come to a consensus as to the best
799: 181:
set any quality rating that they believe is appropriate, except for the GA, FA, and A-class ratings. GAs (Good Articles) are generally reviewed by a single independent editor after a nomination at
177:
Most grades are assessed by individual editors according to the criteria on this page. Generally speaking, all editors, including editors who have written or improved an article, are encouraged to
831:
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.
1614:
A topic for which details are subject to change often. The article covers a future topic, e.g., a forthcoming election or album release, and article content may change as new information arises.
152:
article assessments, offering a prediction based on structural characteristics of the page (e.g. sectioning and references) that correlate with quality, for the class tag. These tags are then
121:
The following system is used to assess the quality of a Knowledge (XXG) article. The system is based on a letter scheme that reflects principally how factually complete the article is, though
2658:, respectively. Individual WikiProjects may also have more formal procedures for rating an article, and please note that the WikiProject bears ultimate responsibility for resolving disputes. 1048:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); 862:
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
190: 1045: 2154: 166: 2650:
generally requires the agreement of at least two editors, and the "GA" and "FA" labels should be used only on articles that have been reviewed and are currently designated as
2623:
The assessment system allows a WikiProject to monitor the quality of articles in its subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. The ratings are also used by the
1782: 194: 1347: 966: 1473:
should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.
994: 772: 288:
can often reveal more topical projects. For instance, if you wrote about a Kenyan astronomer, you might want to search for "Biography", "Kenya", and "Astronomy" to find
2832: 2822: 1247: 870: 2687: 2633:
Not really; these ratings are meant primarily for the internal use of the project, and usually do not imply any official standing within Knowledge (XXG) as a whole.
2017:
Note that some WikiProjects deal exclusively with non-mainspace content and may use their own customised assessment schemes tailored to a specific purpose: see
1180: 397:
exemplifies Knowledge (XXG)'s very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the
153: 2746: 2018: 998: 990: 834:
No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.
795: 787: 567:
No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.
2079:" as an example, demonstrates the typical profile for an article's development through the levels. Hold the mouse over a number to see key events, and 2672:
parameter in the WikiProject banner template to the level's name (omitting "Class" from the end). For example, to rate an article as "B-Class", use
1315: 1264: 982: 544: 488: 329: 2827: 2812: 881: 803: 376: 186: 49: 1214:
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.
2160:
The global summary table below is computed by taking the highest quality and importance rating for each assessed article in the main namespace.
1644:(SIA) page falls under this class. These are List articles about a set of items of a specific type that also share the same (or similar) name. 2705: 1372: 1339: 1325: 768: 540: 387: 2060:. Please help update this Knowledge (XXG) page to reflect recent events or newly available information. Relevant discussion may be found on 2817: 1200: 937: 600: 524: 182: 2790: 1913: 115:
Anyone can add a quality assessment below GA-class, regardless of WikiProjects. Higher ratings require more formal processes and consensus.
2722: 2676:
in the banner. Again, the "FA" and "GA" labels should not be added to articles unless they are currently designated as such. Tools in the
2061: 1278: 65: 2721:
Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate
1711: 1447:
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
986: 611: 2784: 1251: 1120: 933: 893:
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.
442: 297: 289: 2192: 1068: 1056: 193:
have opted out of the standard quality scale, and use their own variation of the criteria more tuned for the subject area, such as
2771:, a currently maintained tool that helps fill in assessments and other parameters for WikiProject banners. A complete remake of 2202: 2197: 2187: 2025: 1967: 1818: 1694: 1664: 1352:
It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and
1172: 877: 149: 1942: 2752: 1974: 1641: 1528: 1287: 687:, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. 469: 1921: 1728: 1608: 276:
classes are fairly subjective; at those ratings, the best way to improve the article is to look at the specific criteria for
2655: 1959: 1949: 1903: 1524: 1218: 394: 372: 293: 2700:
Someone put a project banner template on an article, but it's not really within the WikiProject's scope. What should I do?
2130:
scale outlined here. Unlike the quality scale, the priority scale varies based on the project scope. See also the template
1531:, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. 2422: 1839: 1436: 2668:
above; once you have chosen the level that seems to be closest to the article, go to the article's talk page and set the
1470: 1363:
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.
1274: 1184: 1037: 764: 756: 665: 536: 532: 398: 57: 2796: 2480: 2451: 2207: 1996: 1864: 1518: 1489: 322: 133: 2758: 1907: 1551:
Some WikiProjects omit some of the standard classes, most often A-Class, especially when they lack an assessment team.
1368: 1329: 1268: 1041: 978: 718: 684: 478: 2787:, a historical initiative of the Wikimedia Foundation to engage Wikimedia readers in the assessment of article quality 1634: 455:
and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
1671: 596: 508: 2335: 2263: 2227: 2134: 1896: 1881: 1761: 1540: 923: 590: 366: 2651: 1176: 1107: 1011: 947: 554: 528: 428: 424: 17: 2772: 2393: 2364: 2299: 1391: 1237: 857: 1135: 1095: 634: 452: 432: 2221: 1734:
May be used to identify redirects that could be expanded into articles, or articles with content that could be
822:
and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
361: 2733: 1578: 897: 285: 281: 1890: 140:
tag for assessment based on other Talk tags or based on editor selected values. Editor assistance tools like
2778: 2600: 2257: 585: 315: 2003: 1850: 1441:
An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
1072: 465: 460: 208:
have been assessed. Several other languages are also using this assessment system or a derivative thereof.
2009: 1831: 2781:, a script that stylizes links on Knowledge (XXG) according to the assessed quality of the target article 2037: 1982: 1794: 1735: 1413:
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.
174:
were introduced, so editors only have to rate an article once and it applies to all associated projects.
132:
The quality assessments are mainly performed by Knowledge (XXG) editors, who tag Talk pages of articles;
1953: 1797:. The precise application of these grades may vary depending on their usage by individual WikiProjects. 1875: 1701: 1560: 819: 760: 74: 61: 704: 250:. They represent the amount of work needed to bring the article to the next rating, which depends on 235: 2765:) that finds articles' assessment information from the talk page and puts it in the article's header 2293: 1745: 1417: 1398: 852: 737: 259: 1537:
Lists should be lists of live links to Knowledge (XXG) articles, appropriately named and organized.
1534:
There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.
242:
like A/B/C/D/F or other rating systems (10-point scale, 5-star system, etc.) that you might see on
2762: 1928: 1846: 1250:. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach 1157: 1153: 752: 669: 661: 520: 227: 178: 126: 1849:
falls under this class. These are typically found in the Draft namespace, but may also be in the
1196: 1302:
The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
1161: 31: 2768: 1988: 1293: 791: 507:: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see 145: 141: 1785:
which utilises a parallel scheme of "CL-Class", "BL-Class" and "AL-Class" for list articles.
1766:
A page that does not fit into any other category. Used as a "catch-all" by all WikiProjects.
1027: 171: 1934: 1026:
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
491:
that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
2646:
In general, anyone can add or change an article's rating. However, assessing an article as
2624: 1978: 1324:
The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be
1308:, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. 680: 122: 2149: 896:
Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving.
564:
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.
1124:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. 1793:
Further grades are commonly used by WikiProjects to categorize relevant pages in other
1459:
Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
1282: 280:-Class and aim to satisfy those. Specific feedback can often be obtained on a relevant 247: 876:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in
2806: 1856: 1825: 423:: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are 700: 498: 1581:
use other assessments for mainspace content that do not fit into the above scale:
1217:
Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing
884:. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. 553:
It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses
1617:
Amount of meaningful content varies over time as the projected event draws near.
1707:
The page does not display any article content and redirects to a related topic.
2688:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Knowledge (XXG)/Assessment#Requesting an assessment
1318:
and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
1871: 1494:
A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.
1353: 733: 511:
for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
284:'s talk page. Those can usually be found on the talk page of the article, but 755:
and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Knowledge (XXG)'s
1342:
etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
417:: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; 1314:
Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a
1134:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing 1106:
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
637:
that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
243: 2775:, a script for tagging articles' talk pages with assessment information. 1221:
on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.
599:
status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from
375:
status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from
1650:
An SIA need not follow the formatting rules for disambiguation pages
1620:
Material added might be speculative and should be carefully sourced.
239: 2686:
To have an independent editor review an article, post a request at
2052:
Parts of this Knowledge (XXG) page (those related to the fact that
1680:
Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created.
401:
for all Knowledge (XXG) articles, it has the following attributes.
30:"WP:CLASSES" redirects here. For the catalogue of CSS classes, see 1466:
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.
1416:
Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve
1281:
is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of
679:(c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for 2076: 2053: 1338:
Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an
1304:
It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an
936:, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from 2041: 1677:
The page directs the reader to other pages of the same title.
215: 101: 36: 2755:, an essay on the criteria and purpose of article assessments 802:
are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize
185:. FAs (Featured Articles) are reviewed by several editors at 2086: 1336:
The article contains supporting materials where appropriate.
670:
four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations
497:: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical 2627:
to prepare for static releases of Knowledge (XXG) content.
2706:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Council/Guide#Article tagging
60:
may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect
2155:
Knowledge (XXG):Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Using the bot
1453:
Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
1783:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history/Assessment
1752: 1718: 1684: 1654: 1624: 1568: 1506: 1477: 1424: 1379: 1277:, and any important or controversial material which is 1225: 904: 838: 571: 411:: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; 195:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history/Assessment
89: 82: 2024:
For an index of all WikiProject assessment pages, see
1456:
A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
2736:
is the process designed to provide detailed comments.
699:
It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful,
2169: 740:; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. 732:It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, 523:and other media, where appropriate, with succinct 258:the depth of coverage of the topic, which greatly 18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Council/Assessment FAQ 2749:, the previous version superseded by this version 1741:Content may not yet exist for the desired topic. 967:understandable to an appropriately broad audience 2747:Knowledge (XXG):Article assessment (historical) 2090: 2084:references than this article did in late 2006. 1647:The page lists related items of the same name. 48:This page documents an English Knowledge (XXG) 2019:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Portals/Assessment 1952:page falls under this class; may also include 1354:technical terms should be explained or avoided 839:List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events 769:criteria for the inclusion of non-free content 623:It features professional standards of writing. 2680:section can help with the assessment process. 2170:All rated articles by quality and importance 323: 8: 2793:, a potential use of WikiProject assessments 2683:How can I ask for an article to be assessed? 2075:This clickable imagemap, using the article " 2833:Knowledge (XXG) article assessment criteria 2791:Knowledge (XXG):Data mining Knowledge (XXG) 2728:Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 2620:What is the purpose of article assessments? 2056:has been downgraded to B-Class) need to be 56:Editors should generally follow it, though 2823:Knowledge (XXG) project content guidelines 2166: 1710:Ensure that the redirect is appropriately 541:criteria for inclusion of non-free content 338: 330: 316: 310:WikiProject article quality grading scheme 1977:falls under this class; may also include 1874:falls under this class; may also include 2219: 1799: 1583: 1332:does not need to be followed rigorously. 359: 2291: 2201: 2196: 2191: 2186: 2117:separate scale for rating articles for 1346:The article presents its content in an 1322:The article is reasonably well-written. 850: 172:project-independent quality assessments 1888: 431:and are supported by inline citations 2785:Knowledge (XXG):Article Feedback Tool 2255: 583: 7: 2711:What if I don't agree with a rating? 2329: 2327: 2032:Evolution of an article – an example 1914:File:Felis silvestris silvestris.jpg 1625:Next United Kingdom general election 1326:of the standard of featured articles 1312:The article has a defined structure. 918: 916: 2799:– List of articles by their quality 2206: 969:; spelling and grammar are correct; 878:Knowledge (XXG):Article development 767:images and other media satisfy the 156:, which generates output such as a 2828:Knowledge (XXG) article assessment 2813:Knowledge (XXG) editing guidelines 2753:Knowledge (XXG):Assessing articles 2665: 461:Knowledge (XXG)'s copyright policy 264:Note that the differences between 64:. When in doubt, discuss first on 25: 1960:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Japan 965:the prose is clear, concise, and 818:It is not the subject of ongoing 539:images or media must satisfy the 27:Knowledge (XXG) editing guideline 2328: 2292: 2256: 2220: 2045: 2026:Category:WikiProject assessments 1889: 1748:when updating the encyclopedia. 1348:appropriately understandable way 917: 851: 584: 481:, including the provision of: 360: 219: 105: 40: 2818:Knowledge (XXG) 1.0 assessments 2759:Knowledge (XXG):Metadata gadget 2162: 451:: it is not subject to ongoing 205: 2718:Aren't the ratings subjective? 1585:Other WikiProject assessments 1046:could reasonably be challenged 377:WP:Featured article candidates 187:WP:Featured article candidates 1: 2677: 1772:Depends on the type of page. 1769:Depends on the type of page. 1674:page falls under this class. 1181:valid non-free use rationales 796:Bulleted and unbulleted lists 2797:Category:Articles by quality 2126:, which is unrelated to the 1902:Any file which has attained 886:WikiProject Military history 721:and its supplementary pages. 164:. For more information, see 2734:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review 2661:How do I assess an article? 2630:Are these ratings official? 2625:Knowledge (XXG) 1.0 program 2038:outreach:Life of an Article 1450:A useful picture or graphic 938:WP:Good article nominations 668:if they contain any of the 601:WP:Featured list candidates 529:acceptable copyright status 254:the quality of the writing 206:over eight million articles 183:WP:Good article nominations 2849: 2035: 1882:File:Flag of Australia.svg 1801:Non-mainspace assessments 1744:Editors are encouraged to 1558: 1541:List of literary movements 1028:the layout style guideline 882:featured article candidate 399:policies regarding content 232:no relationship whatsoever 72: 66:this guideline's talk page 29: 2773:User:Kephir/gadgets/rater 2179: 2174: 2165: 792:accessible to all readers 685:content-forking guideline 662:sourced where they appear 595:The article has attained 388:featured article criteria 371:The article has attained 353: 350: 347: 344: 341: 201:the article's talk page. 2643:Who can assess articles? 2006:falls under this class. 1931:falls under this class. 1828:falls under this class. 1738:off to form a new page. 1704:falls under this class. 1523:Meets the criteria of a 1469:Providing references to 1226:Discovery of the neutron 113:This page in a nutshell: 2779:User:N8wilson/AQFetcher 1279:likely to be challenged 1199:to the topic, and have 773:are labeled accordingly 683:; does not violate the 443:fairly and without bias 2107: 2021:for one such example. 2010:User:Legoktm/afcnew.js 1832:Category:George Orwell 1507:Lineage (anthropology) 1483:(as of September 2014) 1444:More detailed criteria 1404:More detailed criteria 1257:More detailed criteria 1252:good article standards 943:More detailed criteria 868:The article meets the 865:More detailed criteria 804:alternative (alt) text 612:featured list criteria 609:The article meets the 606:More detailed criteria 545:be labeled accordingly 470:too-close paraphrasing 385:The article meets the 382:More detailed criteria 2708:for more information. 2111:Importance assessment 2106: 1789:Non-mainspace content 1722:(as of October 2016) 1628:(as of October 2019) 1512:(as of December 2014) 1085:Broad in its coverage 977:it complies with the 934:good article criteria 788:uses proper formating 717:It complies with the 495:appropriate structure 427:against high-quality 298:WikiProject Astronomy 290:WikiProject Biography 1688:(as of August 2019) 1599:Editing suggestions 1596:Reader's experience 1385:(as of January 2024) 1069:copyright violations 1057:no original research 1017:no original research 531:. Images follow the 505:consistent citations 441:: it presents views 236:grading in education 230:mentioned here have 1802: 1756:(as of March 2018) 1586: 1569:WP:NONSTANDARDCLASS 1555:Non-standard grades 1265:suitably referenced 1138:or content dispute. 1044:. All content that 905:Battle of Nam River 664:, and they provide 660:(b) statements are 633:It has an engaging 351:Editing suggestions 348:Reader's experience 204:As of August 2024, 129:are also factors. 2638:Assessing articles 2108: 1800: 1753:Free City of Mainz 1719:American breakfast 1584: 1288:citation templates 1242:The article meets 1231:(as of April 2019) 1177:copyright statuses 1148:, if possible, by 999:list incorporation 928:The article meets 645:Comprehensiveness. 557:where appropriate. 286:searching for them 228:assessment ratings 154:collected by a bot 2769:User:Evad37/rater 2656:featured articles 2607: 2606: 2598: 2597: 2135:importance scheme 2081:click on a number 2073: 2072: 2069: 2015: 2014: 1989:Template:Magnapop 1779: 1778: 1658:(as of May 2018) 1642:set index article 1546: 1545: 1529:set index article 1430:(as of June 2018) 1201:suitable captions 1183:are provided for 1094:it addresses the 910:(as of June 2014) 681:stand-alone lists 577:(as of June 2018) 433:where appropriate 305: 304: 294:WikiProject Kenya 260:varies by subject 189:. Be aware that 119: 118: 100: 99: 50:editing guideline 16:(Redirected from 2840: 2761:, a script (and 2675: 2601:About this table 2333: 2332: 2331: 2297: 2296: 2261: 2260: 2225: 2224: 2167: 2163: 2139: 2133: 2089: 2065: 2049: 2048: 2042: 1935:Portal:Biography 1904:featured picture 1894: 1893: 1803: 1755: 1721: 1687: 1657: 1627: 1587: 1571: 1525:stand-alone list 1513: 1509: 1484: 1480: 1471:reliable sources 1431: 1427: 1386: 1382: 1373:style guidelines 1297: 1275:reliable sources 1269:inline citations 1248:B-Class criteria 1232: 1228: 1219:featured article 1205: 1204: 1189: 1188: 1185:non-free content 1166: 1165: 1140: 1139: 1126: 1125: 1112: 1111: 1100: 1099: 1089: 1088: 1077: 1076: 1061: 1060: 1050: 1049: 1038:reliable sources 1032: 1031: 1021: 1020: 1003: 1002: 971: 970: 960: 959: 922: 921: 920: 911: 907: 871:A-Class criteria 856: 855: 845: 844:(as of May 2018) 841: 824: 823: 808: 807: 777: 776: 759:, with succinct 742: 741: 723: 722: 709: 708: 689: 688: 674: 673: 666:inline citations 655: 654: 648: 647: 639: 638: 625: 624: 589: 588: 578: 574: 533:image use policy 499:section headings 479:style guidelines 429:reliable sources 395:featured article 373:featured article 365: 364: 339: 332: 325: 318: 223: 222: 216: 144:apply automated 123:language quality 109: 108: 102: 92: 85: 44: 43: 37: 21: 2848: 2847: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2803: 2802: 2743: 2697: 2695:Common concerns 2673: 2640: 2617: 2612: 2603: 2146: 2137: 2131: 2113: 2105: 2087: 2046: 2040: 2034: 1791: 1751: 1717: 1683: 1653: 1623: 1575: 1574: 1567: 1563: 1557: 1511: 1505: 1482: 1476: 1463: 1462: 1445: 1429: 1423: 1410: 1409: 1405: 1384: 1378: 1369:Manual of Style 1360: 1359: 1356:where possible. 1330:Manual of Style 1306:A-Class article 1291: 1263:The article is 1258: 1230: 1224: 1211: 1210: 1194: 1193: 1170: 1169: 1144: 1143: 1130: 1129: 1118: 1117: 1105: 1104: 1093: 1092: 1083: 1082: 1067:it contains no 1066: 1065: 1054: 1053: 1036: 1035: 1025: 1024: 1009: 1008: 981:guidelines for 979:Manual of Style 976: 975: 964: 963: 954: 953: 944: 909: 903: 890: 889: 866: 843: 837: 828: 827: 814: 813: 781: 780: 746: 745: 727: 726: 719:Manual of Style 713: 712: 695: 694: 678: 677: 659: 658: 652: 651: 643: 642: 629: 628: 619: 618: 607: 576: 570: 561: 560: 477:It follows the 459:compliant with 421:well-researched 383: 337: 336: 248:product reviews 220: 214: 106: 96: 95: 88: 81: 77: 69: 41: 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2846: 2844: 2836: 2835: 2830: 2825: 2820: 2815: 2805: 2804: 2801: 2800: 2794: 2788: 2782: 2776: 2766: 2756: 2750: 2742: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2729: 2726: 2723:to let us know 2719: 2716: 2712: 2709: 2701: 2696: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2684: 2681: 2662: 2659: 2644: 2639: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2631: 2628: 2621: 2616: 2613: 2611: 2608: 2605: 2604: 2599: 2596: 2595: 2590: 2585: 2580: 2575: 2570: 2565: 2559: 2558: 2553: 2550: 2547: 2544: 2541: 2538: 2532: 2531: 2526: 2523: 2520: 2517: 2514: 2511: 2505: 2504: 2499: 2496: 2493: 2490: 2487: 2484: 2476: 2475: 2470: 2467: 2464: 2461: 2458: 2455: 2447: 2446: 2441: 2438: 2435: 2432: 2429: 2426: 2418: 2417: 2412: 2409: 2406: 2403: 2400: 2397: 2389: 2388: 2383: 2380: 2377: 2374: 2371: 2368: 2360: 2359: 2354: 2351: 2348: 2345: 2342: 2339: 2324: 2323: 2318: 2315: 2312: 2309: 2306: 2303: 2288: 2287: 2282: 2279: 2276: 2273: 2270: 2267: 2252: 2251: 2246: 2243: 2240: 2237: 2234: 2231: 2216: 2215: 2210: 2205: 2200: 2195: 2190: 2184: 2183: 2178: 2172: 2171: 2145: 2142: 2112: 2109: 2071: 2070: 2050: 2033: 2030: 2013: 2012: 2007: 2000: 1992: 1991: 1986: 1971: 1963: 1962: 1957: 1946: 1938: 1937: 1932: 1925: 1917: 1916: 1911: 1908:featured sound 1900: 1885: 1884: 1879: 1868: 1860: 1859: 1854: 1851:User namespace 1843: 1835: 1834: 1829: 1822: 1814: 1813: 1810: 1807: 1790: 1787: 1777: 1776: 1773: 1770: 1767: 1764: 1758: 1757: 1749: 1742: 1739: 1732: 1724: 1723: 1715: 1708: 1705: 1698: 1690: 1689: 1681: 1678: 1675: 1672:disambiguation 1668: 1660: 1659: 1651: 1648: 1645: 1638: 1630: 1629: 1621: 1618: 1615: 1612: 1604: 1603: 1600: 1597: 1594: 1591: 1573: 1572: 1564: 1559: 1556: 1553: 1544: 1543: 1538: 1535: 1532: 1521: 1515: 1514: 1510: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1492: 1486: 1485: 1481: 1474: 1467: 1464: 1461: 1460: 1457: 1454: 1451: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1439: 1433: 1432: 1428: 1421: 1414: 1411: 1406: 1403: 1402: 1394: 1388: 1387: 1383: 1376: 1364: 1361: 1358: 1357: 1343: 1333: 1319: 1309: 1299: 1259: 1256: 1255: 1240: 1234: 1233: 1229: 1222: 1215: 1212: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1191: 1141: 1127: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1102: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1063: 1051: 1033: 1006: 1005: 1004: 991:words to watch 973: 945: 942: 941: 926: 913: 912: 908: 901: 898:WP:Peer review 894: 891: 875: 867: 864: 863: 860: 847: 846: 842: 835: 832: 829: 826: 825: 811: 810: 809: 778: 757:usage policies 743: 730:Visual appeal. 710: 692: 691: 690: 675: 656: 640: 626: 608: 605: 604: 593: 580: 579: 575: 568: 565: 562: 559: 558: 548: 514: 513: 512: 509:citing sources 502: 492: 475: 474: 473: 456: 446: 436: 418: 412: 384: 381: 380: 369: 356: 355: 352: 349: 346: 343: 335: 334: 327: 320: 312: 308: 303: 302: 224: 213: 210: 191:a few projects 117: 116: 110: 98: 97: 94: 93: 86: 78: 73: 70: 55: 54: 45: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2845: 2834: 2831: 2829: 2826: 2824: 2821: 2819: 2816: 2814: 2811: 2810: 2808: 2798: 2795: 2792: 2789: 2786: 2783: 2780: 2777: 2774: 2770: 2767: 2764: 2760: 2757: 2754: 2751: 2748: 2745: 2744: 2740: 2735: 2730: 2727: 2724: 2720: 2717: 2713: 2710: 2707: 2702: 2699: 2698: 2694: 2689: 2685: 2682: 2679: 2671: 2667: 2666:quality scale 2663: 2660: 2657: 2653: 2652:good articles 2649: 2645: 2642: 2641: 2637: 2632: 2629: 2626: 2622: 2619: 2618: 2614: 2609: 2602: 2594: 2591: 2589: 2586: 2584: 2581: 2579: 2576: 2574: 2571: 2569: 2566: 2564: 2561: 2560: 2557: 2554: 2551: 2548: 2545: 2542: 2539: 2537: 2534: 2533: 2530: 2527: 2524: 2521: 2518: 2515: 2512: 2510: 2507: 2506: 2503: 2500: 2497: 2494: 2491: 2488: 2485: 2483: 2482: 2478: 2477: 2474: 2471: 2468: 2465: 2462: 2459: 2456: 2454: 2453: 2449: 2448: 2445: 2442: 2439: 2436: 2433: 2430: 2427: 2425: 2424: 2420: 2419: 2416: 2413: 2410: 2407: 2404: 2401: 2398: 2396: 2395: 2391: 2390: 2387: 2384: 2381: 2378: 2375: 2372: 2369: 2367: 2366: 2362: 2361: 2358: 2355: 2352: 2349: 2346: 2343: 2340: 2338: 2337: 2326: 2325: 2322: 2319: 2316: 2313: 2310: 2307: 2304: 2302: 2301: 2295: 2290: 2289: 2286: 2283: 2280: 2277: 2274: 2271: 2268: 2266: 2265: 2259: 2254: 2253: 2250: 2247: 2244: 2241: 2238: 2235: 2232: 2230: 2229: 2223: 2218: 2217: 2214: 2211: 2209: 2204: 2199: 2194: 2189: 2185: 2182: 2177: 2173: 2168: 2164: 2161: 2158: 2156: 2151: 2143: 2141: 2136: 2129: 2125: 2124: 2120: 2110: 2085: 2082: 2078: 2068: 2063: 2062:the talk page 2059: 2055: 2051: 2044: 2043: 2039: 2031: 2029: 2027: 2022: 2020: 2011: 2008: 2005: 2001: 1999: 1998: 1994: 1993: 1990: 1987: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1970: 1969: 1965: 1964: 1961: 1958: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1945: 1944: 1940: 1939: 1936: 1933: 1930: 1926: 1924: 1923: 1919: 1918: 1915: 1912: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1899: 1898: 1892: 1887: 1886: 1883: 1880: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1867: 1866: 1862: 1861: 1858: 1857:Draft:Example 1855: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1842: 1841: 1837: 1836: 1833: 1830: 1827: 1823: 1821: 1820: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1808: 1805: 1804: 1798: 1796: 1788: 1786: 1784: 1774: 1771: 1768: 1765: 1763: 1760: 1759: 1754: 1750: 1747: 1743: 1740: 1737: 1733: 1731: 1730: 1726: 1725: 1720: 1716: 1713: 1709: 1706: 1703: 1699: 1697: 1696: 1692: 1691: 1686: 1682: 1679: 1676: 1673: 1669: 1667: 1666: 1662: 1661: 1656: 1652: 1649: 1646: 1643: 1639: 1637: 1636: 1632: 1631: 1626: 1622: 1619: 1616: 1613: 1611: 1610: 1606: 1605: 1601: 1598: 1595: 1592: 1589: 1588: 1582: 1580: 1570: 1566: 1565: 1562: 1554: 1552: 1550: 1542: 1539: 1536: 1533: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1520: 1517: 1516: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1493: 1491: 1488: 1487: 1479: 1475: 1472: 1468: 1465: 1458: 1455: 1452: 1449: 1448: 1440: 1438: 1435: 1434: 1426: 1422: 1419: 1415: 1412: 1400: 1395: 1393: 1390: 1389: 1381: 1377: 1374: 1370: 1365: 1362: 1355: 1351: 1349: 1344: 1341: 1337: 1334: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1320: 1317: 1313: 1310: 1307: 1303: 1300: 1295: 1289: 1285: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1270: 1266: 1261: 1260: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1239: 1236: 1235: 1227: 1223: 1220: 1216: 1213: 1202: 1198: 1192: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1168: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1142: 1137: 1133: 1128: 1123: 1122: 1116: 1109: 1108:summary style 1103: 1098:of the topic; 1097: 1091: 1090: 1086: 1081: 1074: 1070: 1064: 1058: 1052: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1034: 1029: 1023: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1013: 1007: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 984: 983:lead sections 980: 974: 968: 962: 961: 957: 952: 951: 949: 939: 935: 931: 927: 925: 915: 914: 906: 902: 899: 895: 892: 887: 883: 879: 873: 872: 861: 859: 854: 849: 848: 840: 836: 833: 830: 821: 817: 812: 805: 801: 797: 793: 789: 785: 784:Accessibility 779: 774: 770: 766: 762: 758: 754: 750: 744: 739: 735: 731: 725: 724: 720: 716: 711: 706: 703:headings and 702: 698: 693: 686: 682: 676: 671: 667: 663: 657: 650: 649: 646: 641: 636: 632: 627: 622: 617: 616: 614: 613: 602: 598: 597:featured list 594: 592: 587: 582: 581: 573: 569: 566: 563: 556: 555:summary style 552: 549: 546: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 518: 515: 510: 506: 503: 500: 496: 493: 490: 486: 483: 482: 480: 476: 471: 467: 463: 462: 457: 454: 450: 447: 444: 440: 437: 434: 430: 426: 422: 419: 416: 415:comprehensive 413: 410: 407: 406: 404: 403: 402: 400: 396: 390: 389: 378: 374: 370: 368: 363: 358: 357: 340: 333: 328: 326: 321: 319: 314: 313: 311: 307: 301: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 240:review scores 237: 233: 229: 225: 218: 217: 211: 209: 207: 202: 198: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 175: 173: 169: 168: 167:Using the bot 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 130: 128: 124: 114: 111: 104: 103: 91: 87: 84: 80: 79: 76: 71: 67: 63: 59: 53: 51: 46: 39: 38: 33: 19: 2669: 2664:Consult the 2592: 2587: 2582: 2577: 2572: 2567: 2562: 2555: 2535: 2528: 2508: 2501: 2479: 2472: 2450: 2443: 2421: 2414: 2392: 2385: 2363: 2356: 2334: 2320: 2298: 2284: 2262: 2248: 2226: 2212: 2180: 2175: 2159: 2147: 2127: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2080: 2074: 2066: 2057: 2023: 2016: 1995: 1966: 1941: 1920: 1895: 1863: 1838: 1817: 1792: 1780: 1727: 1693: 1663: 1655:USS Yorktown 1633: 1607: 1579:WikiProjects 1576: 1548: 1547: 1502:significant. 1498:significant. 1371:and related 1345: 1335: 1321: 1316:lead section 1311: 1301: 1298:is optional. 1283:<ref: --> 1262: 1243: 1149: 1145: 1131: 1119: 1096:main aspects 1084: 1055:it contains 1042:cited inline 1016: 1010: 956:Well-written 955: 948:good article 929: 869: 815: 783: 749:Media files. 748: 729: 714: 696: 644: 630: 620: 610: 550: 516: 504: 494: 489:lead section 487:: a concise 484: 464:and free of 458: 448: 438: 420: 414: 409:well-written 408: 392: 386: 309: 306: 277: 273: 269: 265: 263: 255: 251: 231: 203: 199: 176: 165: 137: 131: 120: 112: 47: 2115:There is a 2067:(July 2023) 1712:categorized 1175:with their 1146:Illustrated 707:facilities. 282:WikiProject 170:. In 2023, 2807:Categories 2536:Unassessed 2525:1,362,231 2522:5,011,744 2466:2,800,866 2437:1,616,966 2181:Importance 2150:WP 1.0 bot 2144:Statistics 2119:importance 2036:See also: 1954:help pages 1876:timed text 1795:namespaces 1380:Psychology 1195:media are 1171:media are 1073:plagiarism 1012:Verifiable 816:Stability. 705:table sort 697:Structure. 466:plagiarism 425:verifiable 162:statistics 58:exceptions 2648:"A-Class" 2593:8,064,375 2588:1,771,828 2583:5,029,010 2529:7,635,694 2473:3,879,637 2444:2,554,822 2004:user page 1983:userboxes 1809:Criteria 1781:See also 1593:Criteria 1420:problems. 900:may help. 820:edit wars 572:Cleopatra 453:edit wars 405:It is: 150:Lift Wing 134:some bots 83:WP:ASSESS 75:Shortcuts 62:consensus 2741:See also 2678:See also 2674:|class=B 2552:409,597 2519:955,928 2516:238,979 2509:Assessed 2495:193,667 2469:764,612 2463:278,375 2440:411,428 2434:415,577 2408:308,736 2405:135,115 2123:priority 1975:template 1968:Template 1910:status. 1826:category 1819:Category 1812:Example 1702:redirect 1695:Redirect 1665:Disambig 1602:Example 1561:Shortcut 1294:cite web 1290:such as 1197:relevant 1152:such as 1136:edit war 765:Non-free 761:captions 537:Non-free 525:captions 354:Example 345:Criteria 244:homework 136:set the 90:WP:1.0/A 32:WP:CLASS 2715:rating. 2615:Purpose 2578:957,157 2573:239,447 2556:428,681 2549:17,266 2513:66,812 2502:338,427 2498:68,884 2492:53,868 2489:17,145 2460:31,501 2431:92,341 2428:18,510 2415:606,557 2411:91,788 2402:54,017 2399:16,901 2386:196,247 2382:23,410 2379:68,803 2376:54,295 2373:32,816 2370:16,923 2350:19,483 2347:14,733 2176:Quality 2128:quality 2058:updated 1979:modules 1950:project 1943:Project 1878:pages. 1746:be bold 1685:Jackson 1418:cleanup 1399:cleanup 1340:infobox 1273:It has 1267:, with 1246:of the 1121:Neutral 995:fiction 932:of the 751:It has 701:section 551:Length. 519:It has 439:neutral 2763:gadget 2568:66,933 2546:1,229 2486:4,863 2457:4,283 2357:46,480 2353:1,740 2344:7,310 2341:3,214 2242:1,943 2239:2,407 2236:2,487 2233:1,574 1929:portal 1922:Portal 1806:Label 1729:Needed 1609:Future 1590:Label 1328:. The 1179:, and 1173:tagged 1154:images 1132:Stable 997:, and 987:layout 800:tables 790:to be 753:images 738:colour 736:, and 734:tables 715:Style. 621:Prose. 521:images 517:Media. 485:a lead 449:stable 272:, and 212:Grades 179:boldly 127:layout 2670:class 2563:Total 2423:Start 2321:2,507 2285:2,426 2249:8,591 2213:Total 1847:draft 1840:Draft 1736:split 1577:Some 1549:Note: 1437:Start 1408:flow. 1162:audio 1160:, or 1158:video 1150:media 1015:with 786:. It 631:Lead. 501:; and 342:Class 270:Start 142:Rater 138:class 2543:468 2540:121 2481:List 2452:Stub 2314:581 2311:789 2308:683 2305:364 2278:699 2275:769 2272:679 2269:180 2245:180 2193:High 2148:The 2077:Atom 2054:Atom 2002:Any 1997:User 1973:Any 1948:Any 1927:Any 1872:file 1870:Any 1865:File 1845:Any 1824:Any 1775:N/A 1700:Any 1670:Any 1640:Any 1519:List 1490:Stub 1478:Ball 1425:Wing 1286:and 1284:tags 1040:are 950:is: 798:and 782:(c) 771:and 747:(b) 728:(a) 635:lead 543:and 527:and 296:and 266:Stub 252:both 246:and 226:The 160:and 146:ORES 125:and 2654:or 2610:FAQ 2317:90 2281:99 2208:??? 2203:Low 2198:Mid 2188:Top 2121:or 1981:or 1906:or 1635:SIA 1527:or 1244:all 1190:and 1101:and 1071:or 1062:and 972:and 930:all 468:or 256:and 238:or 234:to 158:log 148:or 2809:: 2336:GA 2264:FL 2228:FA 2157:. 2140:. 2138:}} 2132:{{ 2064:. 2028:. 1985:. 1956:. 1897:FM 1853:. 1762:NA 1714:. 1296:}} 1292:{{ 1156:, 1110:). 993:, 989:, 985:, 946:A 924:GA 888:). 794:. 763:. 615:: 591:FL 535:. 393:A 391:: 367:FA 292:, 268:, 197:. 2725:! 2690:. 2394:C 2365:B 2300:A 1401:. 1392:C 1375:. 1350:. 1271:. 1254:. 1238:B 1203:. 1187:; 1164:: 1087:: 1075:. 1059:; 1030:; 1019:: 1001:. 958:: 940:. 874:: 858:A 806:. 775:. 672:. 603:. 547:. 472:. 445:; 435:; 379:. 331:e 324:t 317:v 300:. 278:B 274:C 262:. 68:. 52:. 34:. 20:)

Index

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Council/Assessment FAQ
WP:CLASS
editing guideline
exceptions
consensus
this guideline's talk page
Shortcuts
WP:ASSESS
WP:1.0/A
language quality
layout
some bots
Rater
ORES
Lift Wing
collected by a bot
log
statistics
Using the bot
project-independent quality assessments
boldly
WP:Good article nominations
WP:Featured article candidates
a few projects
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history/Assessment
over eight million articles
assessment ratings
grading in education
review scores
homework

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑