222:. It should be of a length that suitably covers the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. Sufficient external literature references should be provided from (preferably) reliable third-party sources. Any third-party sources should have a solid reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Should be well illustrated when appropriate and have no copyright problems. Any article be considered for
165:
243:
207:
108:
Due to the large volume of articles falling under the project, occasionally a tag is added to an article that the project does not cover. Feel free to remove the tag if the article truly is not within the scope of the project. If there is any doubt, post a note on the article's talk page and discuss
135:
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their
345:
The article is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance, or flow; or contain policy violations, such as
487:
of the article to WikiProject
Firearms, regardless of its quality. Any editor with knowledge of the subject can assign ratings following these guidelines. Articles may be assessed higher than these guidelines after reaching consensus on
377:
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack one or more key elements. For example, a Start-Class article may have much useful content but lack:
50:
No. These ratings are meant primarily for the internal use of the project to better prioritze work on the articles, and usually do not imply any official standing within
Knowledge (XXG) as a whole.
40:
The assessment system allows the
Firearms WikiProject to monitor the quality of articles that fall under its purview, and to prioritize work on these articles. The ratings are also used by the
516:
Broadly descriptive firearm or ammunition types, features or components representing at least ten percent of military or civilian firearms or ammunition inventories at some point in history.
325:
Any editor can assign this rating after having reviewed the article as per the previously mentioned guidelines. The proper banner filed should be filled out when assigning this rating.
63:
In general, anyone can add or change an article's rating. However, the "GA" and "FA" labels should only be used on articles that have been reviewed and are currently designated as
115:
Feel free to change it (within reason) if you think a different rating is justified; in the case of major disputes, the project as a whole can discuss the issue either on the
230:
465:
Any editor can assign this rating. Care should be taken to not assign this rating to articles, but only non-article pages such as project pages and templates.
219:
188:
223:
371:
489:
255:
126:
116:
412:
125:
Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to
266:
444:
Any editor can assign this rating. This rating should be used sparingly and only be used when project coverage is completely redundant.
71:, respectively. Drastic changes to an article's rating should typically be discussed on the article's talk page before making the change.
457:
248:
170:
339:
283:
212:
347:
95:
in the banner. Again, the "FA" and "GA" labels should not be added to articles unless they actually are currently designated as such.
537:
351:
311:
17:
623:
576:
509:
435:
468:
418:
The article is very short and lacks a great deal of information, or the information is incoherent or severely disorganized.
177:
68:
105:
Someone put a project banner template on an article, but it's not really within the WikiProject's scope. What should I do?
683:
297:
293:
91:
banner template to the level's name (omitting "Class" from the end). For example, to rate an article as "B-Class", use
64:
599:
421:
Any editor can assign this rating after having reviewed the article as per the previously mentioned guidelines.
398:
Any editor can assign this rating after having reviewed the article as per the previously mentioned guidelines.
357:
Any editor can assign this rating after having reviewed the article as per the previously mentioned guidelines.
164:
659:
360:
194:
649:
592:
Military cartridge calibers commercially produced for sale to civilians by more than one manufacturer.
206:
303:
B2. Adequate and correct coverage of the article topic, without obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
218:
Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in
259:
181:
562:
119:
or on the talk page of the article in question and come to a consensus as to the best rating.
447:
307:
41:
424:
88:
654:
550:
Firearms inventors and gunsmiths associated with High-importance firearms or cartridges.
289:
The article has been reviewed by an editor and accepted to meet the following criteria:
609:
83:
below; once you have chosen the level that seems to be closest to the article, set the
677:
441:
Quality ratings on this article are deferred to other projects covering the article.
664:
604:
547:
Civilian cartridges produced by more than one manufacturer for more than a decade.
642:
Firearms related legislation, court cases, organizations, and competitive events.
614:
567:
557:
328:
226:
candidacy should be an A-Class article before being submitted for FA status.
320:
B5. Adequate supporting materials such as external links and See also items.
528:
401:
633:
Civilian firearms or cartridges in production for less than a decade.
272:
523:
132:
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments on the talk page?
630:
Military firearms or cartridges not meeting above criteria.
44:
to prepare for static releases of
Knowledge (XXG) content.
544:
Civilian firearms in production for more than a decade.
176:
Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "
462:
Is not an article, and fits no other classification.
589:Military firearms with notable civilian ownership.
8:
586:Civilians notable for legal use of firearms.
37:What is the purpose of article assessments?
387:proper headings or properly named headings
490:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Firearms
229:Follow the instructions on the project's
636:Manufacturers of firearms or ammunition.
494:
258:and been granted GA status, meeting the
162:
144:
204:
182:current criteria for featured articles
7:
242:
240:
112:What if I don't agree with a rating?
18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Firearms
254:The article has passed through the
80:
24:
317:B4. Proper grammar and spelling.
306:B3. Proper structure as per the
241:
205:
163:
298:citation throughout the article
265:Follow the instructions on the
256:Good article nomination process
187:Follow the instructions on the
122:Aren't the ratings subjective?
1:
381:a useful or descriptive image
220:How to write a great article
189:Featured article candidates
76:How do I assess an article?
47:Are these ratings official?
42:Knowledge (XXG) 1.0 program
700:
600:Atchisson Assault Shotgun
469:Vickers light machine gun
60:Who can assess articles?
660:California Powder Works
361:Heckler & Koch HK21
267:Good article candidates
180:" status, and meet the
639:Individual accessories
260:good article standards
195:M249 light machine gun
650:Remington-Keene rifle
684:WikiProject Firearms
451:as of September 2009
390:proper section order
472:as of November 2019
428:as of November 2019
405:as of November 2019
364:as of November 2019
332:as of November 2019
276:as of November 2019
198:as of November 2019
154:Process for rating
117:project's talk page
312:project guidelines
55:Assessing articles
672:
671:
563:.30-30 Winchester
477:
476:
352:original research
87:parameter in the
69:featured articles
691:
655:.35 S&W Auto
583:Police firearms.
495:
480:Importance scale
448:Nighthawk Custom
246:
245:
244:
224:featured article
210:
209:
178:Featured article
168:
167:
145:
94:
699:
698:
694:
693:
692:
690:
689:
688:
674:
673:
482:
425:Beretta 1200 FP
308:Manual of Style
143:
102:
100:Common concerns
92:
57:
34:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
697:
695:
687:
686:
676:
675:
670:
669:
668:
667:
662:
657:
652:
645:
644:
643:
640:
637:
634:
631:
626:
620:
619:
618:
617:
612:
610:Swedish Mauser
607:
602:
595:
594:
593:
590:
587:
584:
579:
573:
572:
571:
570:
565:
560:
553:
552:
551:
548:
545:
540:
534:
533:
532:
531:
526:
519:
518:
517:
512:
506:
505:
502:
499:
481:
478:
475:
474:
466:
463:
460:
454:
453:
445:
442:
439:
431:
430:
422:
419:
416:
408:
407:
399:
396:
394:
392:
391:
388:
385:
382:
375:
367:
366:
358:
355:
343:
335:
334:
326:
323:
322:
321:
318:
315:
304:
301:
287:
279:
278:
270:
263:
252:
237:
236:
234:
231:A-Class review
227:
216:
201:
200:
192:
185:
174:
159:
158:
155:
152:
149:
142:
139:
138:
137:
133:
130:
123:
120:
113:
110:
106:
101:
98:
97:
96:
77:
73:
72:
61:
56:
53:
52:
51:
48:
45:
38:
33:
30:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
696:
685:
682:
681:
679:
666:
663:
661:
658:
656:
653:
651:
648:
647:
646:
641:
638:
635:
632:
629:
628:
627:
625:
622:
621:
616:
613:
611:
608:
606:
603:
601:
598:
597:
596:
591:
588:
585:
582:
581:
580:
578:
575:
574:
569:
566:
564:
561:
559:
556:
555:
554:
549:
546:
543:
542:
541:
539:
536:
535:
530:
527:
525:
522:
521:
520:
515:
514:
513:
511:
508:
507:
503:
500:
497:
496:
493:
491:
486:
479:
473:
470:
467:
464:
461:
459:
456:
455:
452:
449:
446:
443:
440:
438:
437:
433:
432:
429:
426:
423:
420:
417:
415:
414:
410:
409:
406:
403:
400:
397:
395:
389:
386:
383:
380:
379:
376:
374:
373:
369:
368:
365:
362:
359:
356:
353:
349:
344:
342:
341:
337:
336:
333:
330:
327:
324:
319:
316:
313:
309:
305:
302:
299:
295:
291:
290:
288:
286:
285:
281:
280:
277:
274:
271:
268:
264:
261:
257:
253:
251:
250:
239:
238:
235:
232:
228:
225:
221:
217:
215:
214:
208:
203:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
186:
183:
179:
175:
173:
172:
166:
161:
160:
156:
153:
150:
147:
146:
141:Quality scale
140:
134:
131:
128:
124:
121:
118:
114:
111:
107:
104:
103:
99:
90:
86:
82:
81:quality scale
78:
75:
74:
70:
66:
65:good articles
62:
59:
58:
54:
49:
46:
43:
39:
36:
35:
31:
26:
19:
665:Sullivan Act
605:Annie Oakley
484:
483:
471:
450:
434:
427:
411:
404:
393:
370:
363:
338:
331:
282:
275:
247:
211:
197:
169:
84:
79:Consult the
615:.30-40 Krag
568:Samuel Colt
558:Colt Python
294:referencing
292:B1. Proper
127:let us know
485:Importance
384:an infobox
329:Lahti L-35
136:reasoning.
27:Assessment
501:Criteria
151:Criteria
678:Category
504:Example
436:Deferred
157:Example
93:|class=B
529:Handgun
402:PP-2000
32:Purpose
498:Label
273:FN P90
269:page.
233:page.
191:page.
148:Label
89:WPGUNS
524:Rifle
372:Start
85:class
16:<
538:High
413:Stub
348:bias
310:and
296:and
624:Low
577:Mid
510:Top
350:or
109:it.
67:or
680::
492:.
458:NA
354:.
262:.
249:GA
184:.
171:FA
340:C
314:.
300:.
284:B
213:A
129:!
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
