53:
119:
We received some excellent feedback about how to improve the GA Cup in the future, including the definition of "quickfails" and the use of pools, which we'll seriously consider as we move forward. As a result of this feedback and the experience we've gained, there will be some changes to the rules
92:
articles that had languished in the queue for over 5 months (18 points). Many of these articles had languished because their nominators had left
Knowledge and had little chance of passing to GA, so our competitors provided a great service by helping remove them from the queue. Also as in Round 2,
91:
114 articles were reviewed this round, as compared to 110 in Round 2 and 117 in Round 1. The key to success in Round 3, like in Round 2, was reviewing articles with the longest nomination dates; everyone who moved forward reviewed articles from the pink nomination box (20 points) or reviewed
75:
switched places a few times in the final hours of the competition, although J Milburn edged out
Cwmhiraeth by just 9 points. Pool A was, by far, the most competitive; four out of five moved onto Round 4, and its competitors earned a cumulative 935 points and reviewed 59 articles.
62:
Monday saw the end of Round 3. Eight contestants moved forward to Round 4—the top two contestants from each of Round 3's three pools and the top two participants of all remaining users. It was an exciting competition, especially towards the end. Round 3's highest scorer was
103:
For Round 4, participants have been randomly put in 2 pools of 4 contestants each. The top two in each pool will progress to the finals, as well as the top participant (5th place) of all remaining users. The semi-finals will start on
96:
articles proved to be popular review choices, with 10% of all the articles reviewed in
December. We appreciate the competitors' continued enthusiasm, even during the busy holiday season. At least
149:
113:
123:
Good luck to all our semi-finalists! It is the judges' hope that every competitor in the GA Cup continue to have fun and be enthusiastic about reviewing and passing articles to GA!
25:
152:. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
43:
21:
17:
67:, Round 2's wildcard, with an impressive 305 points, the highest score in the GA Cup thus far. Pool B was the closest race;
59:
Happy New Year! We hope that all of our GA Cup competitors had an enjoyable and safe holiday season.
81:
148:
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to
77:
72:
88:
earned the two wildcard slots, with 184 and 154 points, respectively. Congrats to all!
85:
68:
40:
93:
97:
80:, who came in second overall with 255 points, reviewed the most articles (17).
64:
140:
134:
128:
100:
even reviewed articles while preparing for a holiday meal!
112:. Information about Round 4 and the pools can be found
8:
7:
18:Knowledge:WikiProject Good articles
32:
51:
1:
41:WikiProject Good Articles's
171:
110:January 29 at 23:59:59 UTC
120:come next years GA Cup.
106:January 1 at 0:00:01 UTC
48:
158:
157:
153:
38:
162:
150:our mailing list
147:
143:
141:Figureskatingfan
137:
131:
55:
54:
49:
34:
33:
170:
169:
165:
164:
163:
161:
160:
159:
154:
139:
133:
127:
56:
52:
37:
30:
29:
28:
12:
11:
5:
168:
166:
156:
155:
146:
98:one competitor
57:
50:
44:2014-15 GA Cup
31:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
167:
151:
145:
142:
136:
130:
124:
121:
117:
115:
111:
107:
101:
99:
95:
94:The Boat Race
89:
87:
83:
79:
74:
70:
66:
60:
47:
45:
42:
36:
35:
27:
23:
19:
126:Cheers from
125:
122:
118:
109:
105:
102:
90:
82:Peacemaker67
61:
58:
39:
135:TheQ Editor
108:and end on
78:Ritchie333
73:Cwmhiraeth
26:Newsletter
86:Wizardman
69:J_Milburn
46:- Round 4
24: |
20: |
129:Dom497
65:Jaguar
22:GA Cup
16:<
138:and
114:here
84:and
71:and
144:.
132:,
116:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.