Knowledge (XXG)

:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

376: 447: 586:
Considering the entire point of this task force is to improve and uphold the quality of Good articles, only experienced reviewers who are established (trusted) within the project should participate in this initial sweep. It is key that clearly substandard articles be removed from the GA list, while
616:
Quality is the goal here. For that reason, awards will be given out based on the quality of reviews, not solely on quantity. What awards will be given out will not all be known until the sweep is completed. Reviews should be done for the betterment of the project and the encyclopedia, not for a
540:
In the case of minor issues, or issues which can be easily addressed, try to fix as many problems as you can, list any remaining issues on the review subpage, then allow editors seven days to address them, as you would with "on hold" at GAN. Be sure to keep track of the article. You may find it
39: 627: 578: 478: 35: 327: 472: 485:
Start the review on the talk page of the article by adding {{subst:GAR}}. Save the page, and then follow the first bold link ("individual reassessment") to create the subpage for the review. Review the article against the
526:), the GAN nominator (check the article history), as well as any related WikiProjects. Give editors enough time to respond to the issues (usually a week), and if progress is being made, consider extending the deadline. 587:
those that are almost there are brought up to current GA standards. The point is to target articles that have "fallen through the cracks", so we can't have any fall through the cracks a second time during this sweep.
343: 21: 307: 566:
Do your best, remain courteous with the articles' editors (they may have spent a lot of time working on the article and may not want to hear about changes you are recommending), and have fun reviewing!
366: 42:
was kept, so if you are interested in bringing an article up to GA, this list may be helpful. Thank you to all reviewers who helped complete this monumental task of maintaining the integrity of GAs.
319: 303: 331: 315: 351: 47: 311: 323: 598:
and all GA processes. We thank everyone for their interest, but only selected individuals will be invited to participate in the sweeps. Those who have participated can use
361: 355: 522:
to meet the criteria, list what issues need to be addressed on the subpage. Leave a message on the talk pages of the main contributors of the article (using
482:
page if has already been reviewed or is currently on hold (also view the article's talk page to see if it already has been delisted, has become an FA, etc.).
392: 67:. The aim of this project is to "sweep" through the current good articles to check that they meet the criteria. To participate, pick a sub-category at 338: 298: 91: 17: 122: 400: 110: 388: 647: 384: 116: 34:
Sweeps was completed in March 2010, after initially beginning in August 2007. A list of all reviewed articles can be seen at the
396: 554:
whether the article meets the criteria, or you are not comfortable delisting it, nominate it for community review at
97: 617:
star... But you'll still get a star (maybe something better) if you make a significant impact during the sweeps.
602: 534: 509: 50:
on GA Sweeps, explaining its origins, purpose, and achievements. There are no plans to repeat the process.
591: 542: 414: 230: 76: 72: 594:. Keep in mind that we're looking for those individuals that have a very strong understanding of 595: 487: 463: 64: 266: 75:
when reviews of the sub-category have been completed. Editor's contributions can be recorded
158: 555: 495: 491: 224: 530: 68: 60: 194: 641: 523: 446: 260: 71:
and review the articles; take appropriate action, as described below, and mark the
152: 563:
If you have any questions about the process, leave a message on the talk page.
529:
In the case of a clear failure to meet the criteria, remove the article from
188: 63:
requires that all articles tagged and listed as Good articles meet the
445: 404: 590:
If you are interested in helping, please leave a message on
459: 429: 422: 289: 275: 253: 239: 217: 203: 181: 167: 145: 131: 533:
and leave a message on the review subpage, using {{
515:, add an entry and classify the action as GAR kept. 8: 537:}} with a detailed list of issues below it. 328:History of Poland during the Piast dynasty 18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Good articles 81: 476:. Before reviewing double-check on the 450:Progress as of the end of February 2010 577:Participants list and progress found 86:WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks 7: 473:full list of articles left to review 362:WikiProject Good articles newsletter 95:identifies, organizes and improves 490:as you would an article listed at 28: 46:The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost has 462:need to be reviewed against the 374: 117:Frank Butler (American football) 29: 61:Knowledge (XXG)'s Good articles 1: 460:listed before 26 August 2007 625:Keep track of your reviews 664: 412: 22:Project quality task force 648:WikiProject Good articles 556:Good article reassessment 470:Choose articles from the 382: 84: 454:For this initial sweep, 592:OhanaUnited's talk page 308:Architecture of Denmark 451: 608:on their user pages. 596:good article criteria 449: 385:Good article criteria 535:subst:GASweepsDelist 320:Battle of the Yarmuk 304:River Don Navigation 332:Mary McLeod Bethune 101:on Knowledge (XXG). 38:. A list of all of 543:subst:GASweepsHold 452: 352:GAN Backlog Drives 36:running total page 636: 635: 541:helpful to use {{ 411: 410: 316:Battle of Plataea 59:The integrity of 40:delisted articles 655: 607: 601: 514: 508: 432: 425: 401:Nominations list 378: 377: 292: 285: 284: 283: 281: 280: 272: 271: 256: 249: 248: 247: 245: 244: 236: 235: 220: 213: 212: 211: 209: 208: 200: 199: 184: 177: 176: 175: 173: 172: 164: 163: 148: 141: 140: 139: 137: 136: 128: 127: 82: 30: 663: 662: 658: 657: 656: 654: 653: 652: 638: 637: 623: 614: 605: 599: 573: 512: 506: 501:If the article 444: 436: 435: 428: 421: 417: 407: 375: 344:Project quality 288: 278: 276: 269: 267: 264: 263: 259: 252: 242: 240: 233: 231: 228: 227: 225:Wuert Engelmann 223: 216: 206: 204: 197: 195: 192: 191: 187: 180: 170: 168: 161: 159: 156: 155: 151: 144: 134: 132: 125: 123: 120: 119: 115: 102: 57: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 661: 659: 651: 650: 640: 639: 634: 633: 622: 619: 613: 610: 603:User GA sweeps 584: 583: 572: 569: 568: 567: 564: 561: 560: 559: 548: 547: 546: 538: 518:If an article 516: 510:ArticleHistory 483: 458:Good articles 443: 440: 438: 434: 433: 426: 418: 413: 409: 408: 399: 383: 380: 379: 372: 371: 370: 365:(last updated 358: 335: 295: 104: 103: 89: 88: 56: 53: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 660: 649: 646: 645: 643: 632: 630: 629: 621:Running total 620: 618: 611: 609: 604: 597: 593: 588: 582: 580: 575: 574: 571:Participation 570: 565: 562: 557: 553: 549: 544: 539: 536: 532: 528: 527: 525: 521: 517: 511: 504: 500: 499: 497: 493: 489: 484: 481: 480: 479:running total 475: 474: 469: 468: 467: 465: 461: 457: 448: 441: 439: 431: 427: 424: 420: 419: 416: 406: 402: 398: 394: 390: 386: 381: 373: 368: 364: 363: 359: 357: 353: 349: 345: 342: 340: 336: 333: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 312:Robbie Fowler 309: 305: 302: 300: 296: 293: 291: 282: 273: 262: 257: 255: 246: 237: 226: 221: 219: 210: 201: 190: 185: 183: 174: 165: 154: 149: 147: 138: 129: 118: 114: 112: 108: 107: 106: 105: 100: 99: 98:good articles 94: 93: 87: 83: 80: 78: 74: 70: 66: 62: 54: 52: 51: 49: 43: 41: 37: 32: 31: 23: 19: 626: 624: 615: 589: 585: 576: 551: 519: 502: 477: 471: 455: 453: 437: 367:January 2013 360: 347: 337: 324:Key Biscayne 299:Reassessment 297: 290:start review 287: 261:Zud Schammel 254:start review 251: 218:start review 215: 182:start review 179: 146:start review 143: 109: 96: 92:This project 90: 85: 58: 45: 44: 33: 550:If you are 505:review, in 464:GA criteria 397:Changes log 339:Task forces 153:Jug Bennett 111:Nominations 73:sweeps list 498:and save. 393:GAN Report 389:Statistics 48:an article 524:this tool 430:WP:SWEEPS 423:WP:GAPQ/S 415:Shortcuts 189:Hal Hinte 642:Category 488:criteria 65:criteria 20:‎ | 442:Process 612:Awards 552:unsure 503:passes 496:WP:GAR 492:WP:GAN 356:GA Cup 348:Sweeps 279:istory 243:istory 207:istory 171:istory 135:istory 531:WP:GA 520:fails 258:) • 222:) • 186:) • 150:) • 69:WP:GA 55:Intro 16:< 628:here 579:here 405:edit 77:here 545:}}. 494:or 456:all 294:) 270:alk 234:alk 198:alk 162:alk 126:alk 79:. 644:: 631:. 606:}} 600:{{ 513:}} 507:{{ 466:. 403:| 395:| 387:| 369:) 354:• 350:• 346:• 334:• 330:• 326:• 322:• 318:• 314:• 310:• 306:• 286:| 274:| 250:| 238:| 214:| 202:| 178:| 166:| 142:| 130:| 581:. 558:. 391:| 341:: 301:: 277:h 268:t 265:( 241:h 232:t 229:( 205:h 196:t 193:( 169:h 160:t 157:( 133:h 124:t 121:( 113::

Index

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Good articles
Project quality task force
running total page
delisted articles
an article
Knowledge (XXG)'s Good articles
criteria
WP:GA
sweeps list
here
This project
good articles
Nominations
Frank Butler (American football)
talk
history
start review
Jug Bennett
talk
history
start review
Hal Hinte
talk
history
start review
Wuert Engelmann
talk
history
start review
Zud Schammel

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.