Knowledge

:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/1740 Batavia massacre - Knowledge

Source 📝

136:
in regards to A4 (concise and accurate English) in the Aftermath, this sentence confused me (can you please try to clarify what you mean either on this review, or by rewording the article?): "Valckenier had asked to be replaced late in 1740, and in February 1741 had received a reply instructing him
296:
The alternative (and possible included anyway) is to check whether all co-authors are dead. This would help your claim in any case. Abraham van Stolk appears to have died in 1896 and Gerrit van Rijn in 1912. WorldCat mentions a "C van Ommeren" but archive.org's version doesn't actually seem to
214:
I peer-reviewed this, and find it to be significantly improved. The addition of Dutch sources (whose lack I noted in that review) has clearly added depth. A minor quibble: given its mention in the lead, I expected slightly more (a short paragraph, say) on the cultural references to the event,
232:
Thanks for the feedback, it really helped. There is a paragraph in #Effects with a bit of information. No reliable sources indicating 20th century uses, although I have seen a 2 page description of the event in Sindhunata's
88: 124:
the article seems well cited and I believe it meets the A-class referencing requirements (A1), it also seems well structured (A3) and contains appropriate images (A5), although as I said, I wasn't able to review
130:
700 injured" but the start of the Aftermath says "10,000 people were killed within Batavia's city walls, while another 500 were seriously wounded". Unless I missed something, this seems a little inconsistent;
137:
to appoint van Imhoff as his successor; alternatively, the Lords XVII informed him that his replacement by van Imhoff was his punishment for exporting too much sugar and too little coffee in 1739."
121:
I wasn't able to check the image licencing due to limited download on my plan. Please check that you are confident that they are appropriately licenced, or ask someone to post an image review here;
21: 384:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
83:
I am nominating this article for A-Class review because I think it fulfills all five criteria. It may be a little weak on prose (criteria 4), per
17: 370: 348: 322: 290: 246: 226: 201: 187: 149: 100: 53: 256: 317: 285: 39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
114:
I had a go at copy editing. Please check that you are happy with my edits. I have the following comments for the review:
118:
according to the Featured article tools, there are no dab links and all the external links work (no action required);
197: 145: 91:
last year, but I'm hoping that having extra eyes here can help clean up the prose and make the next FAC a breeze.
298: 263: 344: 242: 193: 183: 141: 96: 73: 59: 333: 223: 313: 281: 366: 340: 238: 179: 92: 69: 161:
Images are all PD-100, am fine with these. An image review would be appreciated, of course.
217: 269:– if the author cannot be put beyond reasonable doubt, which I think is a strong claim. 309: 277: 133:
A2, in the infobox "9–24 October 1740", but in the lead "came to an end on 22 October";
48: 362: 259:, say the author is unknown and use an life+70 tag. Instead, you should use 128:
in regards to A2 (comprehensive, factually accurate) the infobox says ": -->
84: 255:
The image licensing needs another approach. You cannot, on files such as
140:
if these few points can be addressed, I'd be happy to support. Regards,
237:(which I did my undergraduate thesis on; yes, I'm a literature major). 339:. Included birth and death dates for the authors. Done. 361:
Read through this at lunch time and really enjoyed it.
215:including 20th century references if possible. 8: 18:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history 7: 257:File:Chinezenmoord van stolk (2).jpg 192:No worries, happy to help. Regards, 33:The following discussion is closed. 28: 378:The discussion above is closed. 158:Thanks for the check and copyedit 1: 173:I think I've made it clearer. 101:06:52, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 401: 371:01:58, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 349:12:11, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 323:21:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC) 291:21:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC) 247:01:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC) 227:02:53, 10 March 2012 (UTC) 87:'s comments at the failed 54:09:42, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 202:12:53, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 188:08:52, 5 March 2012 (UTC) 150:02:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC) 381:Please do not modify it. 36:Please do not modify it. 178:Thanks for the review! 60:1740 Batavia massacre 129:10,000 killed, : --> 78: 392: 383: 338: 332: 321: 306: 289: 274: 268: 262: 220: 194:AustralianRupert 142:AustralianRupert 66: 51: 38: 400: 399: 395: 394: 393: 391: 390: 389: 388: 379: 336: 330: 307: 302: 275: 270: 266: 260: 218: 63: 49: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 398: 396: 387: 386: 374: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 264:PD-Netherlands 250: 249: 209: 208: 207: 206: 205: 204: 175: 174: 171: 168: 165: 162: 159: 153: 152: 138: 134: 131: 126: 122: 119: 82: 80: 79: 68:Nominator(s): 62: 57: 43: 42: 41: 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 397: 385: 382: 376: 375: 373: 372: 368: 364: 360: 350: 346: 342: 335: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 319: 315: 311: 305: 300: 297:mention one ( 295: 294: 293: 292: 287: 283: 279: 273: 265: 258: 254: 248: 244: 240: 236: 231: 230: 229: 228: 225: 222: 221: 213: 203: 199: 195: 191: 190: 189: 185: 181: 177: 176: 172: 169: 166: 163: 160: 157: 156: 155: 154: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 132: 127: 123: 120: 117: 116: 115: 113: 111: 107: 103: 102: 98: 94: 90: 86: 77: 75: 71: 65: 64: 61: 58: 56: 55: 52: 47: 40: 37: 31: 30: 23: 19: 380: 377: 358: 357: 303: 271: 252: 251: 234: 216: 211: 210: 164:Thanks again 109: 108: 105: 104: 89:FA candidate 81: 67: 45: 44: 35: 32: 341:Crisco 1492 334:PD-old-auto 329:Changed to 239:Crisco 1492 180:Crisco 1492 93:Crisco 1492 70:Crisco 1492 235:Putri Cina 22:Assessment 304:Grandiose 272:Grandiose 50:EyeSerene 363:Hawkeye7 318:contribs 286:contribs 110:Comments 46:Promoted 20:‎ | 359:Support 253:Comment 212:Support 106:Support 224:♪piano 219:Magic 170:Fixed 167:Fixed 125:them; 16:< 367:talk 345:talk 314:talk 299:here 282:talk 243:talk 198:talk 184:talk 146:talk 97:talk 85:Dank 74:talk 301:). 369:) 347:) 337:}} 331:{{ 320:) 316:, 312:, 310:me 288:) 284:, 280:, 278:me 267:}} 261:{{ 245:) 200:) 186:) 148:) 99:) 365:( 343:( 308:( 276:( 241:( 196:( 182:( 144:( 112:: 95:( 76:) 72:(

Index

Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
Assessment
EyeSerene
09:42, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
1740 Batavia massacre
Crisco 1492
talk
Dank
FA candidate
Crisco 1492
talk
06:52, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
AustralianRupert
talk
02:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Crisco 1492
talk
08:52, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
AustralianRupert
talk
12:53, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Magic
♪piano
02:53, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Crisco 1492
talk
01:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
File:Chinezenmoord van stolk (2).jpg
PD-Netherlands
me

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.