752:: This appears to be a premature nomination and the nominator is not actively involved in the article's development. Given that nobody else appears keen to adopt the article, I'm closing this review. Anybody with access to the source material who is in a position to address reviewers' commentary may renominate at any time; if you need help or advice, please don't hesitate to ask on my talk page or at
303:
G'day, AC, thanks for this. At this stage, I'm not quite sure which ones are left to find tags for. As such, I wonder if the tags would be clearer if the individual licences were included under individual headers for each file (say for instance a level 3 header under the level 2 license header). That
165:
Submitting this article for A-Class review. It is an extremely comprehensive, well written and well researched article that covers a major campaign of the First World War. It is a high traffic article, being viewed more than 800,000 times in the last year and is likely the starting point for many
707:
Thanks, Nikki, I think all of the above images issues may have been dealt with now. If not, please let me know and I will see what else I can do. The only point that I think might be outstanding is the one about the sizing of the maps. On the article talkpage, Keith had previously been concerned
355:
so I'd say this will need to be removed. Given its part of a collage someone else made I think we might need to swap the whole thing out. Does anyone have any thoughts on a suitable replacement? We will probably need to get local consensus at the article for a change like this though I'd say.
284:
Thanks for looking over these, I've made changes where I can but most I cannot address as I didn't upload them and don't know much about their provenance save what is currently available in commons. In regards to each of the concerns though:
549:
I'm not sure URAA is even relevant, both are asserted to be Crown
Copyright which has recently been confirmed to apply worldwide. At any rate I don't have the information requested and it doesn't appear at the source either that I can see.
225:
Thanks for the interest in the article
Stingray Trainer. For what its worth I am willing to assist with this review where I can but won't be able to make any guarantees due to other demands on my time and enthusiasm.
191:
Stingray
Trainer started for this article: do the editors who have worked on this article the most support the nomination, and are currently in a position to follow up on comments? I note that Stringray Trainer has
667:
I'll admit to not having any clue about freedom of panorama etc. Is anyone else able to field this one? Once again these are images that I have no connection to so probably will not be able to resolve. Thanks.
592:
I've added the information from the
Library of Congress now as best I could glean (as once again I don't have any experience with this image). The Bain Collection appears to be one of theirs.
270:
File:Gallipoli_Battlefield_(15399670914).jpg: what is the copyright status of the statue itself? Same with File:Gallipoligrave.jpg, File:Çanakkale_Martyrs_Memorial_-_panoramio.jpg.
663:
File:Gallipoli_Battlefield_(15399670914).jpg: what is the copyright status of the statue itself? Same with File:Gallipoligrave.jpg, File:Çanakkale_Martyrs_Memorial_-_panoramio.jpg.
167:
21:
188:
289:
File:G.C._18_March_1915_Gallipoli_Campaign_Article.jpg should include tags for all included images, particularly those that are not independently on
Commons
252:
File:G.C._18_March_1915_Gallipoli_Campaign_Article.jpg should include tags for all included images, particularly those that are not independently on
Commons
17:
119:
464:, who appears to have been the official Admiralty photographer during the Gallipoli campaign. Would this make it a Crown Copyright image? Regards,
115:
193:
335:. If that is the case, I don't think PD-New Zealand applies as it hasn't been 50 years since his passing, unless Crown copyright applies.
27:
435:
We probably need to replace this image given the above comment, are there any other images of French troops that might be used? Regards,
370:
I reckon we could just replace the offending image in the collage with an appropriately licensed image. I was thinking this potentially:
770:
731:
717:
691:
677:
653:
622:
608:
576:
562:
535:
501:
487:
473:
444:
397:
383:
365:
347:
327:
313:
279:
235:
220:
205:
179:
107:
72:
371:
211:
G'day, I'm sorry, but I am not really keen to work on an ACR at this time. Not sure if AC or Keith are interested, though. Regards,
196:
edited the article, nor started a discussion of these nominations on the article's talk page so this may also be out of process.
145:
353:
332:
Thanks, AC, that's a difficult one. As far as I can tell the author is
Lawrence Campbell Mackie who apparently died in 1978
722:
Thanks for all your work here AR. I know you are very busy in RL at the moment so I appreciate your assistance a lot mate.
150:
782:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
644:
As a serving RN officer who was appointed as the official
Admiralty photographer, would this be Crown Copyright? Regards,
46:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
461:
170:) that made some good changes and is ready for further analysis. Hopefully one day it may be ready for FA nomination.
682:
G'day, I believe freedom of panorama applies here, but could be wrong. I've added this tag to these images. Regards,
352:
Yes I think you are probably right about this one. Indeed the NZ National
Library lists it as "Copyright: Unknown"
713:
687:
649:
634:
File:French_75_gun_at_Cape_Helles_1915.jpg: where was this first published and what was the author's date of death?
618:
572:
469:
440:
379:
343:
309:
267:
File:French_75_gun_at_Cape_Helles_1915.jpg: where was this first published and what was the author's date of death?
216:
175:
92:
545:
File:AE2_(AWM_H17538).jpg: that URAA tag requires a publication date. Same with File:Lone_Pine_(AWM_A02025).jpg
261:
File:AE2_(AWM_H17538).jpg: that URAA tag requires a publication date. Same with File:Lone_Pine_(AWM_A02025).jpg
708:
about them being too large, so I wouldn't want to adjust at this stage without further discussion. Thank you.
293:
I've included tags where I know them but not all have been addressed. Anyone else with any clues about these?
318:
Fair point, I've clarified this now. The only one I haven't been able to add is the
Turnbull Library image.
111:
727:
673:
531:
483:
393:
361:
323:
231:
765:
709:
683:
645:
614:
568:
465:
436:
375:
339:
305:
212:
171:
88:
60:
753:
588:
File:OttomanBatteryAtGallipoli.jpg: if this was created by a news service, why is it a government work?
264:
File:OttomanBatteryAtGallipoli.jpg: if this was created by a news service, why is it a government work?
604:
558:
497:
275:
68:
304:
would make it easier to determine which images have licences, and which do not. Thoughts? Regards,
102:
78:
723:
669:
527:
479:
426:
389:
357:
319:
298:
227:
757:
201:
56:
698:
642:
600:
554:
493:
451:
271:
64:
421:
I don't have this information unfortunately. I checked the source but it was not listed.
702:
430:
641:
G'day, according to the Imperial War Museum this is another Ernest Brooks image.
197:
166:
thousands of peoples research. It has recently undergone a Peer Review process (
515:
File:Cape_Helles_landing_map.jpg: what is the source of the data in this image?
258:
File:Cape_Helles_landing_map.jpg: what is the source of the data in this image?
457:
638:
Added author details now. No idea as to when it was first published though.
28:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Gallipoli campaign
336:
522:
It appears to have been drafted using the map in General Ian Hamilton's
417:
File:Landing_French-Gallipoli.jpg: when/where was this first published?
333:
255:
File:Landing_French-Gallipoli.jpg: when/where was this first published?
519:
Unsure. I would only be guessing unfortunately as I didn't draft it.
596:
155:
553:
In that case I'd suggest simply removing the URAA tag.
127:
123:
526:Volume 1 (1920). I've added this information now.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
134:
187:I'll ask the question which doomed the
137:
388:Seems like a good replacement to me.
7:
40:The following discussion is closed.
766:
478:I think that is a fair assessment.
35:
778:The discussion above is closed.
372:File:V Beach Helles Gallipoli.jpg
771:04:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
732:08:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
718:23:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
654:03:47, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
502:13:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
488:05:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
474:03:39, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
445:03:06, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
398:05:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
384:11:11, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
366:09:21, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
73:05:30, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
1:
692:12:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
678:11:26, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
623:12:24, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
609:12:04, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
577:12:35, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
563:12:04, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
536:10:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
348:10:22, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
328:08:52, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
314:01:14, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
280:13:44, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
460:, the image was created by
249:Suggest scaling up all maps
236:12:07, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
221:11:52, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
206:02:59, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
180:17:24, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
799:
767:Penny for your thoughts?
780:Please do not modify it.
43:Please do not modify it.
492:Yep, seems reasonable.
53:No consensus to promote
168:Gallipoli Campaign
103:Gallipoli Campaign
79:Gallipoli Campaign
597:the Bain template
456:According to the
163:
162:
97:
26:(Redirected from
790:
768:
762:
750:Coordinator note
710:AustralianRupert
706:
684:AustralianRupert
646:AustralianRupert
615:AustralianRupert
613:Added. Regards,
569:AustralianRupert
466:AustralianRupert
455:
437:AustralianRupert
434:
376:AustralianRupert
340:AustralianRupert
306:AustralianRupert
302:
213:AustralianRupert
172:Stingray Trainer
135:
132:
131:
89:Stingray Trainer
85:
45:
31:
798:
797:
793:
792:
791:
789:
788:
787:
786:
758:
696:
567:Done. Regards,
524:Gallipoli Diary
449:
424:
296:
105:
101:
82:
55:at this time -
41:
33:
32:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
796:
794:
785:
784:
774:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
595:Suggest using
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
490:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
268:
265:
262:
259:
256:
253:
250:
241:
240:
239:
238:
161:
160:
159:
158:
156:External links
153:
148:
140:
139:
99:
98:
87:Nominator(s):
81:
76:
50:
49:
48:
36:
34:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
795:
783:
781:
776:
775:
773:
772:
769:
763:
761:
755:
751:
733:
729:
725:
721:
720:
719:
715:
711:
704:
700:
695:
694:
693:
689:
685:
681:
680:
679:
675:
671:
666:
665:
664:
661:
655:
651:
647:
643:
640:
639:
637:
636:
635:
632:
624:
620:
616:
612:
611:
610:
606:
602:
598:
594:
593:
591:
590:
589:
586:
578:
574:
570:
566:
565:
564:
560:
556:
552:
551:
548:
547:
546:
543:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
520:
518:
517:
516:
513:
503:
499:
495:
491:
489:
485:
481:
477:
476:
475:
471:
467:
463:
462:Ernest Brooks
459:
453:
448:
447:
446:
442:
438:
432:
428:
423:
422:
420:
419:
418:
415:
399:
395:
391:
387:
386:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
368:
367:
363:
359:
354:
351:
350:
349:
345:
341:
337:
334:
331:
330:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:
315:
311:
307:
300:
295:
294:
292:
291:
290:
287:
286:
283:
282:
281:
277:
273:
269:
266:
263:
260:
257:
254:
251:
248:
247:
246:
245:
237:
233:
229:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
210:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
195:
190:
186:
182:
181:
177:
173:
169:
157:
154:
152:
149:
147:
144:
143:
142:
141:
136:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
104:
96:
94:
90:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
74:
70:
66:
62:
58:
54:
47:
44:
38:
37:
29:
23:
19:
779:
777:
759:
749:
748:
724:Anotherclown
670:Anotherclown
662:
633:
587:
544:
528:Anotherclown
523:
514:
480:Anotherclown
427:Anotherclown
416:
390:Anotherclown
374:. Thoughts?
358:Anotherclown
338:. Thoughts?
320:Anotherclown
299:Anotherclown
288:
244:Image review
243:
242:
228:Anotherclown
184:
183:
164:
151:Citation bot
100:
86:
52:
51:
42:
39:
760:HJ Mitchell
57:HJ Mitchell
699:Nikkimaria
601:Nikkimaria
555:Nikkimaria
494:Nikkimaria
452:Nikkimaria
272:Nikkimaria
189:recent FAC
65:MilHistBot
22:Assessment
703:Keith-264
431:Keith-264
185:Question:
146:Analysis
20: |
138:Toolbox
116:history
754:WT:MHC
198:Nick-D
63:) via
194:never
124:watch
120:links
16:<
728:talk
714:talk
701:and
688:talk
674:talk
650:talk
619:talk
605:talk
573:talk
559:talk
532:talk
498:talk
484:talk
470:talk
441:talk
429:and
394:talk
380:talk
362:talk
344:talk
324:talk
310:talk
276:talk
232:talk
217:talk
202:talk
176:talk
128:logs
112:talk
108:edit
93:talk
69:talk
61:talk
458:AWM
764:|
756:.
730:)
716:)
690:)
676:)
652:)
621:)
607:)
599:.
575:)
561:)
534:)
500:)
486:)
472:)
443:)
396:)
382:)
364:)
346:)
326:)
312:)
278:)
234:)
219:)
204:)
178:)
126:|
122:|
118:|
114:|
110:|
71:)
726:(
712:(
705::
697:@
686:(
672:(
648:(
617:(
603:(
571:(
557:(
530:(
496:(
482:(
468:(
454::
450:@
439:(
433::
425:@
392:(
378:(
360:(
342:(
322:(
308:(
301::
297:@
274:(
230:(
215:(
200:(
174:(
130:)
106:(
95:)
91:(
67:(
59:(
30:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.