498:, such an Idea was suggested before and refused by the community, and now it is FORCED. I have worked on hundreds of pages on the Arabic wiki, I started as an anonymous editor and later on switched, and now I am a sysop there, so people starting with IP only edits are not that bad. What happened with the fact that any one can work and contribute, well it seems now that not any one can, only the registered users. And remember changing usernames is much easier than changing the IP, It take less time for most people. And it will only lead to a wrong conclusion that more people are interested. When the fact they are forced. (Maybe we should stop talking about a FREEEE encyclopedia, and the be BOLD stuff, and start talking about how hard it is, ...). --
73:
93:
280:
53:
422:
posts details that are false, we would know who they are, and discussion could be initiated with that person. I realise other users can edit articles to correct such misinformation, such is the nature of
Knowledge (XXG), but the point here is accountability. Most forums and messageboards require users to register with a username before they begin posting; why should here be any different? -
83:
103:
63:
113:
155:
that "as an experiment, we will be turning off new pages creation for anonymous users in the
English Knowledge (XXG)." He then quickly logged onto the IRC channel #wikipedia and discussed the issue with various Wikipedians for several hours. A considerable amount of vandalism on Knowledge (XXG) comes
456:
I think your comment would get a lot of "me too"s. Requiring registration, of course, is technically straightforward (just flip a switch, really), but just isn't considered "wiki-like", and there's probably a large number of active users who would take offense to such a change in policy – especially
435:
That's never going to happen. It's been brought up a lot before, and has always been rejected, even by Jimbo. The reason is that most editors start editing as anons. My first edits were as an anon, as a matter of fact. And if I'd have had to register, I probably would have said, "screw it", and
406:
to start off by editing with an ISP address. I did so, and created my first article in that way. I have now started at least a couple of hundred. The idea that we have vast numbers of enthusiastic contributors is just plain wrong. The conversion rate of readers into regular editors is pathetic, and
726:
Hello! Portuguese
Knowledge (XXG) is considering the implementation of similar restriction. But I would like to have statistics to present to the editors who are afraid of losing contributors and reduction of article creations... Do you people know any statistics before-and-after this restrictions
678:
put
Knowledge (XXG) in the "Stalled" category in its "Revved/Stalled" feature (a "What's Hot/What's Not") in yesterday's issue. They wrote "Online encyclopedia written by users tightens rules after entry describing prominent journalist as a Nazi involved in Kennedy assassination. Even the Internet
421:
Perhaps the restriction on article creation to registered users should be applied to all edits. That way everyone is accountable by name and not by IP address, and any problems with incorrect information being edited into an article by an unregistered user wouldn't apply. At least, if a known user
164:
Wales acknowledged that this might have some undesirable side effects. People bent on creating nonsense articles could easily use an account to do so, and the change would cause the loss of some valuable efforts in creating new articles. However, based on his personal survey of the situation and
524:
Requiring registration to create new articles is a terrific idea that will not only greatly reduce vandalism on
Knowledge (XXG), but also make it easier to deal with vandalism. It will also lessen the loads on Speedy Deletion and AFD. Indeed, this should have been implemented long ago. I fully
160:
with offensive or pointless content, and the bulk of these are created by users without registered accounts, commonly referred to as "anons" or anonymous users. The purpose of the change is "to reduce the workload on the people doing new pages patrol" and hopefully reduce the chances of a
176:
without logging in, for example. With the number of articles on the
English Knowledge (XXG) approaching one million, Vibber commented that creation of new articles "is less of a priority than it was two or three years ago, while tuning up existing articles is quite important."
203:
Wales reiterated that this experiment was not a prelude to requiring all editors to have an account: "I am a firm believer in the validity of allowing anons to edit." He later mentioned the possibility of changing to a less restrictive system, suggested by developer
495:
380:
212:, or by directly searching for the article. Starling explained that this would be a fairly straightforward thing to determine from a technical perspective, noting that many poor-quality articles are also orphans. Similarly, the
436:
done something else. It's not that registering is a big deal; it's that it's another barrier to editing that most people won't bother to jump over. The day we eliminate anonymous editing is the day I quit.
329:
246:
344:
258:
354:
266:
208:, which would only prevent the creation of "orphan" articles by users who are not logged in. Orphaned articles have no inbound links from other articles, and normally would only be reached through the
349:
262:
309:
230:
334:
250:
39:
324:
314:
242:
234:
319:
238:
141:
411:
to contribute. I am sure it will slow down the development of wikipedia significantly, and it is for the benefit of just a few people compared to the tens of millions who read wikipedia.
339:
254:
748:
291:
180:
Initial reactions included a mixture of praise, skepticism, and questions about how the change would work. Users who attempt to create an article without logging in now receive a
56:
697:
I think we should allow anons to create talk pages, so that they can explain edits, ask questions, etc. in reference to pages that don't yet already have a talk page.
800:
172:
implemented this change shortly after 19:00 UTC on 5 December. He clarified that the restriction only applies to encyclopedia articles; editors can still create
21:
776:
658:
page. Those might allow anons to resume creating articles without intervention, while reducing the chance new articles will be missed by all checkers. --
771:
766:
197:
297:
761:
505:
188:
if they still prefer not to use an account. There was some dissatisfaction from people who learned about the change from the media, as
736:
716:
701:
687:
662:
534:
512:
476:
443:
426:
415:
165:
discussions with people who regularly monitor new pages, Wales said that on balance he felt "a substantial improvement" was possible.
407:
even most registered users don't start articles. This puts a major obstacle in peoples' way when most people need no obstacle at all
756:
279:
17:
193:
185:
594:
632:
402:
This is a terrible idea but the damage it will do will be hidden. I should think that it is quite unusual for people
732:
600:
467:
782:
684:
181:
173:
213:
615:
605:
558:
728:
659:
130:
712:
698:
530:
637:
707:
Um, they can. As the article reports, "editors can still create talk pages without logging in". —
674:
620:
583:
568:
494:
I guess this is the worst Idea ever, what next, charge for editing. People don’t you check your
573:
66:
376:
205:
169:
145:), the creation of new Knowledge (XXG) articles has been restricted on an experimental basis.
126:
86:
610:
655:
578:
440:
157:
626:
152:
96:
643:
553:
216:
article, although not an orphan, had very few inbound links before the recent publicity.
116:
548:
708:
526:
209:
794:
509:
499:
463:
563:
654:
I've posted a couple of ideas for improving latency in new-article checking on the
106:
680:
437:
412:
149:
76:
423:
589:
458:
679:
needs quality control." This coming from a newspaper that still employs
457:
given the kind of "see I told you so" media coverage it would get. –
161:
problematic article such as the
Seigenthaler case slipping through.
471:
189:
278:
650:
better ideas for improving latency in new-article checking
392:
385:
365:
504:. Ok, I was convinced. Back to my sense ;). See also
138:
390:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
184:that explains the restriction and directs them to
196:about it prior to the announcement. A subsequent
34:Article creation restricted to logged-in editors
200:about the change was also widely distributed.
8:
461:
801:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2005-12
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
393:
369:
33:
7:
668:Knowledge (XXG) stalled, Freep says
186:Knowledge (XXG):Requested articles
168:Wikimedia Chief Technical Officer
28:
375:These comments are automatically
111:
101:
91:
81:
71:
61:
51:
749:putting together the next issue
544:Besides the AP story, that is.
192:reporter Daniel Terdiman wrote
386:add the page to your watchlist
1:
717:05:05, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
702:03:28, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
688:14:44, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
513:05:03, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
663:01:32, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
535:07:00, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
502:03:34, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
477:08:02, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
444:02:17, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
427:00:28, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
416:16:50, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
601:Scripps Howard News Service
817:
586:(again, the following day)
305:Page creation restrictions
31:Page creation restrictions
629:(in the Washington Times)
597:(on liability, this time)
400:==Good idea? Bad idea?==
227:Page creation limitations
737:20:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
559:San Francisco Chronicle
693:Creation of talk pages
506:Semi-protection policy
383:. To follow comments,
283:
210:random article feature
282:
214:John Seigenthaler Sr.
727:coming into place?--
640:(This week in wikis)
379:from this article's
330:Curry and podcasting
606:CBS Public Eye blog
345:Features and admins
259:Features and admins
247:Podcasting blanking
675:Detroit Free Press
569:Contra Costa Times
370:Discuss this story
355:Arbitration report
284:
685:Robert Happelberg
475:
394:purging the cache
350:Technology report
270:
243:German copyrights
225:Also this week:
808:
785:
747:needs your help
611:Internetnews.com
397:
395:
389:
368:
302:
294:
287:
223:
133:
115:
114:
105:
104:
95:
94:
85:
84:
75:
74:
65:
64:
55:
54:
816:
815:
811:
810:
809:
807:
806:
805:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
781:
779:
774:
769:
764:
759:
752:
741:
740:
729:MisterSanderson
725:
695:
670:
660:216.237.179.238
656:feature-request
652:
644:Hindustan Times
542:
525:support this. —
399:
391:
384:
373:
372:
366:+ Add a comment
364:
360:
359:
358:
310:ArbCom election
295:
292:5 December 2005
290:
288:
285:
273:
272:
271:
239:False biography
231:ArbCom election
156:in the form of
135:
134:
131:Ta bu shi da yu
124:
123:
122:
121:
112:
102:
92:
82:
72:
62:
52:
46:
43:
32:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
814:
812:
804:
803:
793:
792:
780:
775:
770:
765:
760:
755:
754:
753:
743:
742:
739:
724:
721:
720:
719:
699:Captain Zyrain
694:
691:
669:
666:
651:
648:
647:
646:
641:
635:
633:Globe and Mail
630:
624:
618:
613:
608:
603:
598:
592:
587:
581:
576:
571:
566:
561:
556:
551:
541:
538:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
449:
448:
447:
446:
430:
429:
374:
371:
363:
362:
361:
357:
352:
347:
342:
337:
335:News and notes
332:
327:
322:
317:
312:
307:
301:
289:
277:
276:
275:
274:
255:Press coverage
251:News and notes
222:
221:
219:
136:
120:
119:
109:
99:
89:
79:
69:
59:
48:
47:
44:
38:
37:
36:
35:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
813:
802:
799:
798:
796:
784:
778:
773:
768:
763:
758:
750:
746:
738:
734:
730:
722:
718:
714:
710:
706:
705:
704:
703:
700:
692:
690:
689:
686:
683:. Puh-lease.
682:
677:
676:
672:For this the
667:
665:
664:
661:
657:
649:
645:
642:
639:
636:
634:
631:
628:
625:
622:
619:
617:
614:
612:
609:
607:
604:
602:
599:
596:
593:
591:
588:
585:
582:
580:
577:
575:
572:
570:
567:
565:
562:
560:
557:
555:
552:
550:
547:
546:
545:
540:More coverage
539:
537:
536:
532:
528:
514:
511:
507:
503:
501:
497:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
478:
473:
469:
465:
460:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
445:
442:
439:
434:
433:
432:
431:
428:
425:
420:
419:
418:
417:
414:
410:
405:
396:
387:
382:
378:
367:
356:
353:
351:
348:
346:
343:
341:
338:
336:
333:
331:
328:
326:
325:DDR copyright
323:
321:
318:
316:
315:ArbCom update
313:
311:
308:
306:
303:
299:
293:
286:In this issue
281:
269:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
235:ArbCom update
232:
228:
220:
217:
215:
211:
207:
201:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
178:
175:
171:
166:
162:
159:
154:
151:
146:
144:
143:
142:related story
132:
128:
118:
110:
108:
100:
98:
90:
88:
80:
78:
70:
68:
60:
58:
50:
49:
41:
23:
19:
745:The Signpost
744:
723:Consequences
696:
673:
671:
653:
621:The Guardian
616:The Guardian
590:The Inquirer
554:The Register
543:
523:
493:
408:
403:
401:
320:Seigenthaler
304:
298:all comments
226:
224:
218:
206:Tim Starling
202:
179:
170:Brion Vibber
167:
163:
147:
139:
137:
127:Michael Snow
57:PDF download
783:Suggestions
681:Mitch Albom
623:(editorial)
549:Publish.com
459:Minh Nguyễn
377:transcluded
340:In the news
150:Jimmy Wales
148:On Monday,
107:X (Twitter)
595:CNET again
267:T.R.O.L.L.
263:B.R.I.O.N.
174:talk pages
45:Share this
40:Contribute
22:2005-12-05
777:Subscribe
709:Lowellian
584:The Times
579:The Times
527:Lowellian
381:talk page
158:new pages
153:announced
795:Category
772:Newsroom
767:Archives
564:BBC News
510:Tarawneh
500:Tarawneh
468:contribs
198:AP story
97:Facebook
87:LinkedIn
77:Mastodon
20: |
496:history
194:a story
182:message
441:(talk)
438:Ral315
413:Osomec
117:Reddit
67:E-mail
762:About
713:reply
531:reply
424:TonyW
16:<
757:Home
733:talk
638:CNET
472:blog
464:talk
190:CNET
140:see
129:and
627:UPI
574:NPR
409:not
404:not
125:By
42:—
797::
735:)
715:)
533:)
508:--
470:,
466:,
265:—
261:—
257:—
253:—
249:—
245:—
241:—
237:—
233:—
229:—
751:.
731:(
711:(
529:(
474:)
462:(
398:.
388:.
300:)
296:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.