73:
93:
226:
53:
83:
103:
63:
113:
336:
That depends on whether or not
Citizendium will be published under the GFDL or some other license. If it is, there's nothing to stop the project copying the database other than the fact that it'll make them appear as just another Knowledge mirror. From the sounds of it, Sanger is trying to build up
154:
The
Citizendium (sit-ih-ZEN-dee-um), a "citizens' compendium of everything," will be an experimental new wiki project that combines public participation with gentle expert guidance. It will begin life as a "progressive fork" of Knowledge. But we expect it to take on a life of its own and, perhaps,
326:
Is it possible to prevent
Knowledge (even though it is GFDL) to be downloaded and taken by Larry Sanger. This story is a really sad cause for Sanger. He tried for DigitalUniverse (which doesn't seem to work at all ... too complex) and now he is going to rip off wikipedia to make a citizendium, like
463:
in them. The last one seemed to just crash when i tried to load it up. Funding problem perhaps. Either way the solution is simply to ban IPs on wikipedia, not to rely on "experts" (and just where does one draw the line at what an expert is?) If only one expert with a phD in biology is around, does
361:
If
Citizendium uses Knowledge content to create a fork, it will have to be published under the GFDL due to the terms of that license: 'You may copy and distribute a Modified Version of the Document under the conditions of sections 2 and 3 above, provided that you release the Modified Version under
160:
The project would be editable only by creating an account and providing a real name. "Authors" (as
Citizendium "editors" are called) would be able to edit the site. "Editors" are experts who must provide credentials, and who resolve editing disputes on pages relating to their area of study.
421:
It is not a threat. We have reached to this level in more than five years, and it is not easy to duplicate us very fast: wikipedia has become a habit for many of us, and a shift shall be a difficult proposition for many wikipedians, including the "experts".
66:
155:
to become the flagship of a new set of responsibly-managed free knowledge projects. We will avoid calling it an "encyclopedia," because there will probably always be articles in the resource that have not been vouched for in any sense.
464:
that mean say, their controversial view on eugenics (made up example) would become fact because only they are expert enough to do it? This is just ego and desperate fumbling for recognition against mediocrity--
270:
204:
280:
212:
468:
275:
208:
306:
255:
192:
260:
196:
39:
265:
200:
482:
237:
533:
431:
Why not make "something completely different" rather than "same as
Knowledge with tweaking and components from Wikisource": will the experts be named etc.
56:
21:
509:
504:
499:
379:
According to the
Citizendium article's refs, the fork has been covered in The Register, although I haven't looked at the article myself. +
243:
494:
341:
under the GFDL, which'd allow us to copy their efforts back onto here (if the project actually gets off the ground, of course.)
138:, will be launched within the next few weeks, according to project coordinator, Knowledge co-founder, and "chief organizer"
489:
225:
17:
349:
453:
435:
426:
410:
383:
366:
355:
331:
465:
515:
363:
302:
86:
432:
406:
398:
165:
96:
390:
171:
The announcement was not accompanied by a great deal of press attention; at press time, a
116:
175:
527:
380:
459:
He's been trying different ideas based on this for a while, all fail because of no
423:
328:
139:
106:
161:"Constables" would be community managers (not like administrators on Knowledge).
450:
402:
135:
126:
76:
342:
178:
was the closest to mainstream media coverage that the project had received.
446:
394:
172:
445:
Well, damn me if
Citizendium is not exactly what I proposed
224:
401:
titty portal"; that's not something I would ever endorse.
327:
that is a really sad attempt to stay in the wiki business.
393:, because they're horribly biased. This one referred to
337:
the resource from scratch. To be honest, I hope the site
146:
318:
311:
291:
168:, a similar project with which Sanger was involved.
164:
The project is, according to Sanger, independent of
316:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
389:On principle, I try never to mention articles by
34:"Citizendium" project aims to rival Knowledge
8:
319:
295:
33:
449:. I'm more persuasive then I thought.
7:
534:Knowledge Signpost archives 2006-09
28:
481:is written by editors like you –
301:These comments are automatically
111:
101:
91:
81:
71:
61:
51:
469:22:22, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
454:22:45, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
436:16:26, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
427:19:23, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
411:23:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
384:11:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
367:20:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
356:16:23, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
332:12:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
312:add the page to your watchlist
1:
362:precisely this License.' --
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
550:
193:Simple English Knowledge
149:describes the project:
309:. To follow comments,
229:
134:A new Knowledge fork,
228:
305:from this article's
466:I'll bring the food
271:Features and admins
205:Features and admins
187:Also this week: —
296:Discuss this story
281:Arbitration report
230:
358:
320:purging the cache
276:Technology report
238:18 September 2006
216:
541:
518:
353:
345:
323:
321:
315:
294:
256:Interwiki report
248:
240:
233:
185:
166:Digital Universe
129:
115:
114:
105:
104:
95:
94:
85:
84:
75:
74:
65:
64:
55:
54:
549:
548:
544:
543:
542:
540:
539:
538:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
514:
512:
507:
502:
497:
492:
485:
475:
474:
443:
419:
391:Andrew Orlowski
377:
352:
343:
325:
317:
310:
299:
298:
292:+ Add a comment
290:
286:
285:
284:
241:
236:
234:
231:
219:
218:
217:
131:
130:
124:
123:
122:
121:
112:
102:
92:
82:
72:
62:
52:
46:
43:
32:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
547:
545:
537:
536:
526:
525:
513:
508:
503:
498:
493:
488:
487:
486:
477:
476:
473:
472:
471:
442:
439:
418:
415:
414:
413:
376:
375:Media coverage
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
348:
300:
297:
289:
288:
287:
283:
278:
273:
268:
263:
261:News and notes
258:
253:
247:
235:
223:
222:
221:
220:
201:Press coverage
197:News and notes
184:
183:
181:
158:
157:
145:Citizendium's
132:
120:
119:
109:
99:
89:
79:
69:
59:
48:
47:
44:
38:
37:
36:
35:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
546:
535:
532:
531:
529:
517:
511:
506:
501:
496:
491:
484:
480:
470:
467:
462:
458:
457:
456:
455:
452:
448:
440:
438:
437:
434:
429:
428:
425:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
387:
386:
385:
382:
374:
368:
365:
360:
359:
357:
351:
346:
340:
335:
334:
333:
330:
322:
313:
308:
304:
293:
282:
279:
277:
274:
272:
269:
267:
264:
262:
259:
257:
254:
252:
249:
245:
239:
232:In this issue
227:
215:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
182:
179:
177:
174:
169:
167:
162:
156:
152:
151:
150:
148:
143:
141:
137:
128:
118:
110:
108:
100:
98:
90:
88:
80:
78:
70:
68:
60:
58:
50:
49:
41:
23:
19:
479:The Signpost
478:
460:
444:
430:
420:
378:
338:
250:
244:all comments
188:
186:
180:
170:
163:
159:
153:
144:
140:Larry Sanger
133:
57:PDF download
516:Suggestions
433:Jackiespeel
303:transcluded
266:In the news
251:Citizendium
213:Arbitration
189:Citizendium
136:Citizendium
107:X (Twitter)
31:Citizendium
209:Technology
45:Share this
40:Contribute
22:2006-09-18
510:Subscribe
417:No threat
307:talk page
176:blog post
528:Category
505:Newsroom
500:Archives
483:join in!
381:Hexagon1
97:Facebook
87:LinkedIn
77:Mastodon
20: |
461:editing
424:Bhadani
364:Mithent
329:Lincher
147:website
451:Dev920
403:Ral315
399:Wales'
127:Ral315
117:Reddit
67:E-mail
495:About
441:Wow..
395:Bomis
344:GeeJo
173:ZDNet
16:<
490:Home
447:here
407:talk
397:as "
350:(c)
125:By
42:—
530::
422:--
409:)
354:•
339:is
211:—
207:—
203:—
199:—
195:—
191:—
142:.
405:(
347:⁄
324:.
314:.
246:)
242:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
