73:
93:
262:) and the thought process put behind his closure. On the other side, there are many comments from the parties wishing to overturn the AfD result that still attempt to show that Daniel Brandt is notable - this is not what deletion review is for, there is also very little in the way of explaining why the close was wrong, with just simple commenting that there was no consensus for for the merge. I have therefore come to the conclusion that the close is
350:
53:
83:
103:
63:
113:
244:
said, "I'm really sorry to have to do this. If this had closed as almost any form of keep or delete I wouldn't be doing this, but the current close just doesn't work." The DRV itself attracted over 300 edits and over 150KB in discussion; by the numbers, about two-thirds of commenting users endorsed
190:
I feel this compels us not to treat Brandt as a biography subject. What then, do we do about our first interest, completeness? We merge this info to the subjects we want to cover, then redirect this article somewhere. ... Hopefully, this will serve both the needs of
Knowledge (XXG) and the needs of
157:
With respect for the editors who’ve contributed these pages, it’s always been my belief that ethical decisions where good people disagree should be placed in the hands of the people who live with the consequences. No one could have more at stake in this request than these articles’ subjects. We ask
178:
This article causes Brandt distress, largely because of previous and potential coverage of minor things he'd rather not have discussed in public but which have been mentioned in minor self-published publications Brandt has mostly tried to bury. (I'm aware of some examples but I won't be mentioning
253:
The question that is asked at deletion review is simple, was the initial closure at AfD correct? Obviously there are two sides to this deletion review debate, on one side, the people wishing to endorse the closure. Many of these users would have preferred to see the article outright deleted, but
162:
The request attracted nearly 200 KB of discussion, and was edited over 500 times. Consensus was difficult to determine, with nearly equal numbers of users arguing for keeping and for deleting the articles, and a minority of users arguing for a merge or other solution. In his closure,
158:
notable people not to edit their own articles; we insist that they don’t own the content and we stand by other site policies. On a human level – setting any personal antipathies aside – it’s fair that we extend one courtesy in return.
182:
This article cannot hope to be complete, due to incomplete coverage in the sources, which largely treat him as a private figure. "Daniel Brandt, 57, of San
Antonio, who makes his living as a book indexer" in NYT is a prime
179:
them here out of respect for Brandt; they're strictly comparable to the urinary tract infection example given by 81.62.) The potential for vandalism is also a factor, but a lesser one; any WP article can be vandalized.
258:'s middleground merge, they make it clear that the AfD closure was an attempt to balance the views of both parties wanting to delete and parties wanting to keep. What it widely quoted is AMIB's closing notes (
139:
404:
389:
328:
316:
414:
336:
409:
332:
384:
374:
312:
304:
39:
394:
320:
275:
473:
399:
324:
361:
525:
291:
56:
21:
237:
501:
496:
491:
367:
486:
481:
349:
17:
259:
245:
the closure, with about one-third voting to overturn the opinion. The deletion review was closed early
Tuesday by
213:
200:
225:
507:
175:
Brandt's activities are subjects of significant commentary, and as such should be covered in this encyclopedia.
246:
279:
255:
164:
282:, also at the request of the subject. Finkelstein is a computer programmer and co-founder of the
229:
210:, a new article on the database founded by Brandt and maintained by Public Information Research;
66:
287:
274:
The AFD was actually one of two deletion requests made by Durova at the time; the other was a
86:
150:
96:
116:
519:
135:
241:
219:
106:
146:
126:
76:
222:, an existing article on the website founded by Public Information Research;
207:
196:
203:), and the content of the article was merged to the following articles:
191:
Brandt, while allowing us to move past this wasteful, internecine fight.
138:
was merged this week with a few related articles, after its 14th
149:
nominated the page for deletion, citing concerns regarding the
348:
283:
33:
456:
444:
437:
425:
228:(although it appears such content was instead moved to
171:
We have a handful of conflicting interests, namely:
442:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
251:
169:
155:
8:
195:As a result, the article was redirected to
453:No comments yet. Yours could be the first!
526:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2007-06
134:An article about Knowledge (XXG) critic
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
445:
429:
286:. That request, closed as "delete" by
34:Knowledge (XXG) critic's article merged
7:
28:
236:The closure itself was placed on
111:
101:
91:
81:
71:
61:
51:
240:almost immediately. Nominator
438:add the page to your watchlist
1:
151:biographies of living persons
290:, is also being reviewed at
226:Criticism of Knowledge (XXG)
214:CIA HTTP cookies controversy
201:Public Information Research
542:
260:User:A Man In Black/Brandt
353:
272:
193:
160:
352:
230:Knowledge (XXG) Watch
435:To follow comments,
405:Features and admins
390:Account compromised
329:Features and admins
317:Account compromised
140:deletion discussion
430:Discuss this story
415:Arbitration report
354:
284:Censorware Project
247:Ryan Postlethwaite
199:(later changed to
446:purging the cache
410:Technology report
340:
303:Also this week:
533:
510:
449:
447:
441:
428:
372:
364:
357:
301:
280:Seth Finkelstein
216:, a new article;
129:
115:
114:
105:
104:
95:
94:
85:
84:
75:
74:
65:
64:
55:
54:
541:
540:
536:
535:
534:
532:
531:
530:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
506:
504:
499:
494:
489:
484:
477:
465:
464:
459:
457:+ Add a comment
454:
451:
443:
436:
433:
432:
426:+ Add a comment
424:
420:
419:
418:
385:Board elections
375:From the editor
365:
360:
358:
355:
343:
342:
341:
313:Board elections
305:From the editor
238:deletion review
131:
130:
124:
123:
122:
121:
112:
102:
92:
82:
72:
62:
52:
46:
43:
32:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
539:
537:
529:
528:
518:
517:
505:
500:
495:
490:
485:
480:
479:
478:
467:
466:
463:
462:
461:
460:
455:
452:
434:
431:
423:
422:
421:
417:
412:
407:
402:
397:
392:
387:
382:
377:
371:
359:
347:
346:
345:
344:
309:Article merged
300:
299:
297:
256:A Man In Black
234:
233:
223:
217:
211:
187:
185:
184:
180:
176:
165:A Man In Black
132:
120:
119:
109:
99:
89:
79:
69:
59:
48:
47:
44:
38:
37:
36:
35:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
538:
527:
524:
523:
521:
509:
503:
498:
493:
488:
483:
475:
471:
458:
448:
439:
427:
416:
413:
411:
408:
406:
403:
401:
398:
396:
395:RfA withdrawn
393:
391:
388:
386:
383:
381:
380:Brandt merger
378:
376:
373:
369:
363:
356:In this issue
351:
339:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
321:RfA withdrawn
318:
314:
310:
306:
298:
295:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
271:
269:
268:complex merge
265:
261:
257:
250:
248:
243:
239:
231:
227:
224:
221:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
205:
204:
202:
198:
192:
188:
181:
177:
174:
173:
172:
168:
166:
159:
154:
152:
148:
143:
141:
137:
136:Daniel Brandt
128:
118:
110:
108:
100:
98:
90:
88:
80:
78:
70:
68:
60:
58:
50:
49:
41:
31:Brandt merger
23:
19:
469:
379:
368:all comments
362:18 June 2007
308:
302:
296:
288:Sean William
273:
267:
263:
252:
249:, who said:
235:
220:Google Watch
194:
189:
186:
170:
161:
156:
144:
133:
57:PDF download
508:Suggestions
337:Arbitration
145:On 9 June,
107:X (Twitter)
472:. You can
468:It's your
333:Technology
278:to delete
45:Share this
40:Contribute
22:2007-06-18
502:Subscribe
400:WikiWorld
325:WikiWorld
520:Category
497:Newsroom
492:Archives
470:Signpost
264:endorsed
208:NameBase
197:NameBase
183:example.
153:policy:
97:Facebook
87:LinkedIn
77:Mastodon
20: |
474:help us
276:request
254:accept
242:JoshuaZ
167:said,
147:Durova
127:Ral315
117:Reddit
67:E-mail
487:About
266:as a
16:<
482:Home
292:DRV
125:By
42:—
522::
335:—
331:—
327:—
323:—
319:—
315:—
311:—
307:—
294:.
142:.
476:.
450:.
440:.
370:)
366:(
270:.
232:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.