865:. Lists have a more rigid layout, which makes it easier in some cases to spot issues. For some very creative lists, however, an editor has to figure out how to best display the information in a way that would convey the message the best to the reader. Also, it's always important to choose the right images to add to a list, because featured lists are usually shorter than featured articles, so the images need to be extremely relevant to the list for them to be included as space is limited. Articles are similar in a way, though, in that some types of articles can all have roughly the same layout, especially articles related to entertainment like films, television episodes, and video games. When writing a list, an editor needs a good eye for structure, while for articles, a good eye for prose is necessary.
782:. I started off with lists, so they were very appealing to me. Afterward, however, I began to move more towards featured articles, perhaps because of the fact that I was still fairly inexperienced with them and wanted to be better at writing them. I now have roughly ten times as many featured lists as featured articles, so I'd like to spend more time with featured articles. However, I will always continue to submit featured list candidates, because I always find an interesting list to write. In featured topics that I work on, articles usually outnumber lists, which is another reason for why I have been working more on featured articles than lists lately. In the cases where a topic is made up entirely of lists, I am given an opportunity to go back to featured lists, which is always nice.
1081:. It definitely helps. You get to see what trends are taking place among different types of lists, and you get ideas on how to improve your own lists or what types of lists to work on. It also helps to teach yourself how to find problems in a list, which will help with your own. When reviewing other lists, it forces you to look at lists that you don't normally read or write, and so you think differently. If you work on the same types of lists for too long, then you don't have an idea of how the format could be improved, a problem which is alleviated by reviewing other lists. Finally, reviewing other lists definitely helps with nominating your own lists because it reduces the backlog, so your own nominations will need less time to wait before getting reviews!
1822:
234:. Throughout high school, I became obsessed with trivia and general knowledge (particularly hurricanes), but I usually relied on a Google search and hoped for the best. One day, I searched for something I thought would be rather obscure, and it led me to Knowledge (XXG) for the first time. At first, I was skeptical it would have other topics, but every search yielded a page. My search into hurricane articles is what got me to stay, and almost immediately I began editing, changing various hurricane articles which I thought were missing important information. After a few months of random editing, I really got into the idea of article expansion, and after I contributed to my first
1091:. I think it varies depending on what type of list you are interested in. As I said earlier, for those lists that are new and relatively rare at FLC, previous FLCs can be very important to look at. Reviewing other lists forces you to examine the pages in detail which can be very indicative for any lists that you are developing personally. For the Victoria Cross lists, there aren't really any other similar lists in development, whereas the football lists have many other lists to compare against. I know that when I was developing the statistics and records FLC for the first time, my reviewing of other lists showed me how far behind the standard my list was. So yes, it can help.
743:
months later, in
November 2008, I rewrote the entire list and included mergers made by Microsoft, in addition to the acquisitions already on the page. I also expanded the lead significantly, and found a few more acquisitions that weren't originally on the list and added them. After expanding it, the list had 229 references for 229 mergers and acquisitions made by Microsoft. It was as comprehensive as it was going to be, and it passed its second featured list nomination later that month. I am very proud of the work that I put into the list; it is also the first result in most search engines when looking for "Microsoft acquisitions", and I think, deservedly so!
962:. Models, models, models. Practically all FLs are based on one another and consistency is king when making lists. Absolute best thing for a FL writer to do when tackling a list is to look at similar examples, especially in the table. You can deviate slightly depending on the subject, but the overall structure of the table should be the same (maybe an additional column or two for material unique to the subject or expanding in the lead to cover some relevant points). The lead should also follow the same structure; however, there is much greater flexibility here for more, less, or different information depending on the subject.
944:. Compare a list that you're working on with a recently promoted featured list that's similar in subject matter and type, and then build the list similar to that. However, an important thing to remember is to use common sense; sometimes, even recently promoted featured lists use standards that don't make much sense or can be improved on. Some standards can go unquestioned, but that shouldn't be the case; it's important to change a list's formatting if you think that it's better to convey information one way rather than another. An example are lists of NFL head coaches, such as this recently promoted one:
1867:
1128:. Much, much less pressure, although that may be a consequence of going through the process so often. FAC concentrates on things that FLC tends not to have problems with (NPOV, copy-editing due to the big disparity in the actual amount of text, depth of coverage). There are shared items (sources, images), but altogether, the two processes are basically the same thing evaluating two very different types of content, so there is a natural concentration on things that have more relevance to each.
1876:
1764:
1015:. Commenting on featured list candidates is something that I also enjoy doing. At one point, I tried to comment on every new featured list candidate, but it proved to be a tiring task. Since then, I comment on lists that catch my fancy and I provide advice on how to improve them. In particular, the prose in lists could always use more work. Reviews usually focus on the layout and structure of lists, but attention should also be given to the prose, so I try to do that when I can.
1831:
1142:(FAC) is now based around finishing off, and perfecting, the prose of an article which can be a very subjective exercise and can lead to disagreements. I think FLC differs in that there is generally only one way of displaying the information, there can be tweaks in table format, but the basis remains the same across all lists. This is different from FAC where articles can develop in a number of forms. So in the main, they are the same, but FAC can get a bit more pressured.
73:
1840:
93:
1728:
1885:
787:
360:(music). Also, featured lists are great for comparing information, and are useful indexes. They are also typically focused on a very specific topic, so I can work on them without needing to write about something I'm not interested in. I also enjoy writing featured lists because they require a nice balance between writing brilliant prose and formatting information in a logical and convenient manner, both which aren't easy to do at first.
1289:
1755:
53:
686:
1782:
220:. I've used Knowledge (XXG) for general knowledge for as long as I can remember. As a web developer, I enjoy keeping up-to-date with web technologies, and since Knowledge (XXG) didn't have articles on a lot of them, I created them myself. After that, I ended up creating articles on just about anything, and have written at least 400 articles so far. Probably one of the most well known articles that I've created is
992:
1858:
1043:
821:) and both involved an excruciatingly long research and drafting process that left me exhausted after each incident. That and the difficulty of finding a copy-editor that is capable of bringing stuff to FA-quality writing gets more difficult by the day. I do work on good articles, and I admit it's a much more relaxing prospect to bring something up to GA-quality. I currently plan a good topic including
1802:
910:. If you want to improve an page within a day, then lists are the thing to do: most lists can be developed to a good standard within a day, to Featured standard within a week. With articles, it is more a labour of love; they take much longer to develop and perfect. If I want some instant gratification then I prefer lists, but if I want to watch something develop, I would have to go with articles.
875:. Structure. Lists have a pretty clear structure: lead, the actual list (usually a table, depends on the subject), a "see also" section if appropriate, references, and external links. This is probably the structure of a grand majority of lists. That and the fact you're working with tables and need to be somewhat familiar with the intricacies of table syntax (namely sortability, especially the
920:
1773:
1746:
1106:. The featured list nomination process focuses more on layout, structure, and referencing, while the featured article nomination process focuses more on prose. That makes it easier to use other featured lists as models for future ones, but the disadvantage is that some featured list candidates have prose that wouldn't be considered "professional", which is technically required in the
83:
767:. That would have to be any one of the Victoria Cross recipients list. There is so much history and courage behind each one of those lists. I think it is out of respect for their achievements that I continue to develop the lists. I think these kinds of lists are indicative of the reasons why Knowledge (XXG) was created, and is such a success; it is a great reference work.
103:
972:. Get involved! It is not nearly as scary as you might imagine. There will always be someone around to answer any questions about lists, and usually there will already be a Featured list to base your edits on. You rarely see "trail-blazing" lists at FLC, that is a type of list that has never been developed before, there is always a template to base your list on.
63:
1849:
604:
282:; I couldn't find it, so I created the article. I then began to look around Knowledge (XXG) in general and found some aspects of British Military history to be lacking in information. My feelings at the time were that these topics deserved good, accurate articles so that anyone could read acquire information about them. My first large article was
1737:
316:
560:) and make lists along those lines in order to make the topic, and most of my topics tend to be long-term projects. Outside of anime and manga, what I choose to work on varies greatly. I occasionally stumble upon lists when reading through random material, find the subject intriguing, and then bring them to FLC if I feel it is plausible.
113:
653:
university. So, after the second nomination, I ended up spending a few weeks researching people associated with the university and adding them to the list. I ended up adding over a hundred names. The third nomination finally succeeded and the list became featured—a whopping seven months after I first started working on it.
428:. I was a little tired of working on articles, so I took a stab on a list of tropical cyclones affecting my home state. I really enjoyed the process, from developing the article to someone suggesting I take it to FLC. It was a really pleasurable experience, and so I did it twice more in a two week period. ♬♩
578:
to FLC to learn more about each province's premiers. Some of my recent featured lists have been part of featured topics, including the two previously mentioned groups of lists. In a number of cases, I chose a list when I begin doing a few edits here and there, and then found myself giving the list a
637:
put up at FLC, and the opinions about what these lists needed to contain shifted during the FLC. There was a lot of work that needed to be done on it so I withdrew it. The main crux of the work was in sourcing many of the more obscure statistics and records about the club, many of which were spread
652:
took the longest time to bring to featured status. It had to go through three nominations before finally becoming a featured list. One issue that was brought up constantly throughout each nomination was that it was not comprehensive enough—it didn't include every notable person associated with the
742:
in April 2008, and nominated it as a featured list candidate the next month. The nomination, however, failed, primarily because of a lack of comments. It had 114 references at the time, for 114 acquisitions made by
Microsoft. So, I went back to the drawing board and continued to work on it. A few
378:
related lists. Generally, with most articles that I edit, I have the ultimate intention of getting it to
Featured content, be that an article, a list or as a topic as a whole. I wouldn't say I have a particular affinity with featured lists, I am more aligned to the topics that I am bringing up to
757:, which itself is more of an article, but it's the gateway to five other featured lists. I got a bit obsessed, but I really wanted to finish the topic, due to its importance. Really, who doesn't want to know which tropical cyclones have affected Florida, to what severity and at what time of year?
711:
for the bucketload of work described above, and the culmination of over a year and a half of mergers, reverting the countless upon countless edits from new or anonymous users who love the series to death, and overcoming the inertia against creating something like that. That and it was the
267:
anime and manga, so that reignited my interest and got me back into editing, and I've been editing since. At that point, I think
Knowledge (XXG)'s increasing popularity influenced my decision to return, and my desire to improve what is one of the most heavily searched areas of Knowledge
849:
changing daily which makes it harder to develop a set standard. I think the monotony of making lists can be beneficial in some circumstances but the sheer amount of hard work that goes into perfecting articles makes them enjoyable in their own right when you see the finished
224:, which I started back in December 2005 when it was an unknown video sharing website. The website—and the article—have both come a long way since then! I also think that working on articles is a great opportunity to research on things that I like and write about them.
1110:. Recently, there has been more focus on prose, which is excellent. I think that it's harder to write well than to format a table, so if nominators learn how to write better prose, then everyone wins. In addition, there are certainly less issues with regards to
1071:, but rather to read nominations from time to time to see new trends that merge in terms of what reviewers want to see in certain lists. It is especially important to do this when similar lists are at FLCs and comments made on one FLC may impact the other.
622:
717:
664:
803:. Articles. I more like working on a single subject, so I can get every last bit of information on it from every angle. I also like the writing aspect more, finding ways to incorporate and develop prose. I don't get that as much for lists.
987:. I go through spurts of activity at FLC. When I nominate an FLC, I try to review at least two other lists, and whenever a Milhist list is up for review I try to review them. When I have free time, I try to review lists from other areas.
301:. Though I usually work on straightforward articles, I enjoy switching it up with a list, particularly with making the tables. It's rewarding to organize and write on a fixed collection of items, and it's a relief having that fixed set.
1607:
675:
was definitely the hardest one to produce, as there was an enormous amount of work in merging material, finding adequate conception/reception information, sourcing the entire thing, and then finding a copy-editor to go through an 85k
626:
570:. When finding a list to bring to FLC, the most important thing that I check is whether or not its subject matter appeals to me. I sometimes also work on lists about a subject that I want to learn more about. For instance, I took
254:
at the time, and wanted to see
Knowledge (XXG)'s article on the series. After making a few edits there and there, I wondered whether there were articles on video game series that I enjoyed, so I looked up articles on the
1138:. Both types of review are as rigorous as each other and follow the same patterns and principles, but I think they differ in certain areas, mainly arising from the differences in the type of content that they review.
895:
functions). Trying to put information into an aesthetically pleasing form in a table is different from anything you're doing in an article, in which your concentration is more on the quality of the text, adhering to
348:. As someone who likes to look at graphs and statistics all day, I have a strong attraction to featured lists. Some of the things that I'm interested in have managed to find their way into my featured lists, such as
598:
was a bit difficult, as it opened my eyes for what really makes a great list. I got lazy and didn't go the extra distance; the list still isn't featured, partly as a reminder of how much effort to put into the
398:(who is also interviewed on this page) was, and still is, a very proficient featured list contributor. When I asked him what directions I could take in terms of article writing, he pointed me to a few pages:
1358:
1235:
1363:
1353:
1240:
1230:
1318:
1195:
161:
1599:
1389:
1333:
1313:
1210:
1190:
725:
690:
1338:
1215:
39:
286:, a British naval leader in the Second World War, I couldn't believe it was only a stub so I expanded it, and kept on expanding it and eventually it became a Featured article and I was hooked.
1328:
1323:
1205:
1200:
813:. Lists. I enjoy making tables and placing stuff in them. That and working on articles is much more time-consuming (largely due to the research requirements). I have two featured articles (
845:. I think they both have their positives and negatives. At the moment, I think I prefer lists, they are easier and more standardised. The criteria for articles constantly shifts with the
1348:
1225:
1412:
1269:
1254:
1164:
1158:
1152:
139:
283:
1300:
952:
column for the playoffs, but it didn't make much sense to omit that information, so recently, this column has been a requirement for lists of NFL head coaches, which makes sense.
1455:
357:
504:. If there's a subject I really get interested in, and I put a lot of work into it, I'll usually take the effort to go for FLC. I like working on inter-related lists, too. ♬♩
311:. I particularly enjoy making tables and putting information into a tabular format. And it gives me an excuse to go watch new anime or read new manga for different series.
418:. The nomination ended up with 7 Supports and 0 Opposes. Needless to say, I had a very good impression of the process, so I ended up going back with more nominations.
720:
one of my major accomplishments for getting me into film articles (I've produced eleven film FLs since), ultimately culminating in me being elected a coordinator of
1951:
1821:
668:
278:. I have always had an interest in Military History and my first article contributions were in this area. I first looked for information on the then new post of
1495:
739:
538:
and the lists of its recipients. There are a plethora of inter-related lists on
Knowledge (XXG) and I am working through the different lists within that topic.
21:
1677:
1029:, so I comment on nominations there and close them as part of my duties. Past that, I comment on FLCs from time to time and frequent the discussions at the
633:
was certainly my most difficult FLC experience; it is also the only FLC I have had that has failed. This was the one of the first list of its kind that the
1927:
548:. Depends on the type of list. For anime episode lists, it's for series that I've watched, and I tend to bring series that I particularly like up to par (
1922:
1917:
1681:
1650:
1260:
1012:
56:
1491:
1485:
649:
1306:
1657:
403:
142:, including the appointment of two directors. As of December 25, 2008, there are 1175 lists, 710 of which were promoted in 2008. Also in 2008, the
1912:
630:
1642:
671:, I received an exceptionally thorough review from the FLC regulars (many of whom were competing against me). Outside of the actual nomination,
1517:
945:
924:
595:
261:
series, and edited for a bit until I lost interest and stopped. After a couple months, I saw that
Knowledge (XXG) had articles relating to the
407:
1661:
411:
399:
171:, the most prolific nominator, with FLs in six different topics, most of them focused on awards and nominations received by musical artists.
1441:
1465:
728:, as I was able to make a list relating to the university I currently attend, as well as making a model for similar lists in the future.
415:
1107:
1711:
1685:
460:
456:
1111:
1907:
1638:
1603:
1288:
1011:. I try to stay updated with anything going on with the featured list process, which includes staying on top of whatever appears at
17:
1067:. For people that review all the time, it definitely helps them in their writing. I don't believe it's necessary to place a review
1471:
482:
1595:
1475:
791:
571:
349:
900:
in the balance of the presentation of the material, and research on the material to ensure that all your bases are covered.
1673:
999:
549:
575:
552:
for instance). Same thing for manga chapter lists, as you can't really make the list without reading the chapters first (
1611:
353:
1810:
1790:
1705:
Not sure about that last image; it's just a satellite image of
Florida, not really related to its respective article. –
832:
818:
814:
557:
553:
489:. Frankly, it was a subjective mess, so over a period of time, a few editors including myself set about improving it.
1513:
754:
579:
major overhaul. I then figured that I might as well make it into a featured list after spending so much time on it.
146:(FLR) process was rejuvenated. Prior to 2008, a mere 11 FLs were delisted between November 2005 and December 2007.
638:
around the books I used for references. It was certainly the list that needed the most work and effort to improve.
1528:"Do you think reviewing other articles at FLC helps you as you write and nominate lists yourself? If so, how?" –
1461:
822:
708:
672:
371:
1713:
1699:
1626:
1582:
1561:
1427:
515:
439:
1933:
1898:
463:
to FLC due to the model he created. I've basically used that model since with a few tweaks from there to there.
663:. Never really had an experience that was too overwhelming for my tastes. I guess the hardest was the FLC for
1694:
1615:
1051:
1038:
Do you think reviewing other articles at FLC helps you as you write and nominate lists yourself? If so, how?
510:
434:
250:
1709:
1578:
1423:
1411:
Can we get some suggested (free) images here, from the articles, maybe one favorite from each editor? See
1866:
1570:
After others put up some suggestions, we can make a selection, at most, probably one or two per editor.
716:'s first featured character list, so that was a particularly nice accomplishment. Past that, I consider
530:. I am a rather specialised editor at FLC in that I work on set topics. Intially, this was the topic of
1030:
1875:
694:
414:(GAN). So, I worked on my first featured list, which was also my first featured content of any kind:
1763:
1830:
1665:
1554:
1689:
1619:
1451:
949:
667:
because I had to make the list from scratch without any model, and as I was participating in the
505:
459:(then some weird title using the arc name) to featured list status, I felt confident in bringing
429:
395:
279:
180:
174:
1118:. Also, in order to build a featured list, it is important to be good at organizing information.
1115:
713:
634:
1839:
66:
1727:
1706:
1571:
1481:
1416:
1385:
889:
149:
126:
86:
1026:
897:
721:
574:
and its child lists to FLC to learn more about Canada's universities, and the child lists of
143:
995:
608:
531:
478:
474:
202:
1884:
1139:
846:
786:
153:
96:
1490:"Which of the featured lists to which you've contributed make you most proud? And why?" –
928:
328:
324:
235:
135:
116:
1754:
1646:
1545:
1047:
535:
375:
198:
168:
1781:
685:
1945:
1506:"What is the main difference between working on a list and working on an article?" –
879:
681:
Which of the featured lists to which you've contributed make you most proud? And why?
452:
1857:
991:
1801:
1042:
106:
370:. My contributions to lists on Knowledge (XXG) tend to revolve around two topics:
1176:
718:
List of
Japanese submissions for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film
665:
List of
Japanese submissions for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film
332:
1772:
1055:
932:
919:
855:
What is the main difference between working on a list and working on an article?
336:
257:
1745:
76:
320:
194:
1608:
List of submissions to the 79th Academy Awards for Best Foreign Language Film
1522:"Other than nominating, how much do you participate in the FLC process?" –
1415:. If each of you add a few suggestions here, I can sort and add some in.
191:, but who has also worked on various awards and Nobel Prize-related lists.
556:
for an example). Past that, I usually conceptualize featured topics (see
534:, and the several lists within that topic. My other main interest is the
34:
Dispatches: How, Why, and Huh?—Inside the minds of Featured list writers
1848:
1445:
603:
221:
1736:
1672:
Sorry for showing up late. Here's a few of mine from lists I've done.
977:
Other than nominating, how much do you participate in the FLC process?
315:
827:
263:
177:, who focuses on tropical cyclones, particularly Atlantic hurricanes.
1512:"What advice do you have about the FL process for other writers?" –
1433:
Here are some for my own answers, with the question and image links:
1450:"Why are you interested in featured lists and lists in general?" –
1534:"How do you feel the FLC process differs from the FAC process?" –
1440:"What originally attracted you to writing for Knowledge (XXG)?" –
1041:
990:
918:
785:
684:
602:
314:
188:
184:
915:
What advice do you have about the FL process for other writers?
1413:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost/2008-11-24/Dispatches
1165:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost/2008-11-24/Dispatches
1159:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost/2008-10-06/Dispatches
1153:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost/2008-05-12/Dispatches
291:
Why are you interested in featured lists and lists in general?
164:– discussed their experiences with the Featured list process:
1096:
How do you feel the FLC process differs from the FAC process?
210:
What originally attracted you to writing for Knowledge (XXG)?
1600:
List of Nobel Laureates affiliated with Princeton University
1460:"What motivated you to work on your first Featured list?" –
1287:
726:
List of Nobel Laureates affiliated with Princeton University
481:
I moved the content of the notable players section over to
680:
1401:
1394:
1374:
1161:– Interview with Matthewedwards, Featured list director
486:
384:
What motivated you to work on your first Featured list?
1480:"What has been your most difficult FLC experience?" –
284:
Andrew Cunningham, 1st Viscount Cunningham of Hyndhope
1259:
1184:
1456:
List of awards and nominations received by Radiohead
1267:
358:
List of awards and nominations received by Radiohead
1399:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
1252:
1470:"How do you choose an article to bring to FLC?" –
923:Bud Wilkinson (right)—the 26th head coach of the
724:. Aside from that, I'm particularly pleased with
584:What has been your most difficult FLC experience?
477:topics on Knowledge (XXG). As part of developing
1500:"Do you prefer working on articles or lists?" –
833:User:Sephiroth BCR/Workshop#Characters of Naruto
156:(FLC), interviewed four prolific FL writers for
948:. Previous lists of this type were missing the
1812:File:Victoria Cross Medal Ribbon & Bar.png
1792:File:Graf Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck.jpg
1639:File:Victoria Cross Medal Ribbon & Bar.png
1604:File:Graf Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck.jpg
1678:Image:Catarina 2004-03-27 1630Z (cropped).jpg
1496:List of mergers and acquisitions by Microsoft
1013:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates
740:List of mergers and acquisitions by Microsoft
494:How do you choose an article to bring to FLC?
8:
162:primary contributors to a combined 173 lists
1682:Image:Hurricane Kenna 24 oct 2002 1750Z.jpg
1618:) would be my preferences in that order. —
772:Do you prefer working on articles or lists?
1651:List of Zulu War Victoria Cross recipients
1167:– Featured article writers—the inside view
473:. To put it simply: the poor state of the
1952:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2009-01
1896:Make sure we cover what matters to you –
1809:
1789:
1492:File:Microsoft building 17 front door.jpg
1486:List of Wilfrid Laurier University people
1031:featured list candidates' discussion page
650:List of Wilfrid Laurier University people
248:. I believe it was because I was reading
1658:File:Villa Park- Trinity Road facade.jpg
1276:
1247:
1179:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
1723:
1402:
1378:
631:Aston Villa F.C. statistics and records
33:
1518:List of Arizona Cardinals head coaches
946:List of Arizona Cardinals head coaches
596:List of most intense tropical cyclones
1662:File:Villa Park, Holte End facade.jpg
1643:File:The defense of Rorke's Drift.jpg
7:
1442:File:Youtubeheadquarterssanbruno.jpg
790:Satellite image of Florida, used in
1686:Image:STS-95 Florida From Space.jpg
1466:List of autonomous areas by country
576:History of Canadian first ministers
416:List of autonomous areas by country
183:, with quite a few FLs relating to
825:and the various characters in the
461:List of Bleach episodes (season 2)
457:List of Bleach episodes (season 1)
28:
1384:These comments are automatically
134:2008 has been a big year for the
1883:
1874:
1865:
1856:
1847:
1838:
1829:
1820:
1800:
1780:
1771:
1762:
1753:
1744:
1735:
1726:
1472:File:Canada-provinces layout.png
998:to the east of New Jersey, from
483:List of Aston Villa F.C. players
238:, I have been hooked ever since.
111:
101:
91:
81:
71:
61:
51:
1674:Image:Hurricane Gloria1985.jpg
1596:File:Nassau-hall-princeton.JPG
1476:List of universities in Canada
1395:add the page to your watchlist
792:List of snow events in Florida
572:List of universities in Canada
350:List of unrecognized countries
1:
1714:01:46, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
1700:01:22, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
1627:17:00, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
1583:16:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
1562:16:10, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
1428:14:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
1000:List of New Jersey hurricanes
931:, during a 1961 visit to the
611:team of the late 19th century
550:List of Black Lagoon episodes
516:02:32, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
440:02:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
160:. These four – who have been
1612:File:Bush6NobelLaureates.jpg
354:List of premiers of Manitoba
1155:– Changes at Featured lists
1140:Featured article candidates
819:Castlevania: Dawn of Sorrow
815:Castlevania: Aria of Sorrow
714:anime and manga WikiProject
669:first featured list contest
554:List of Soul Eater chapters
404:Featured article candidates
319:Radiohead (left to right):
138:(FL) process, with several
1968:
1514:File:JFK-Bud Wilkinson.jpg
755:List of Florida hurricanes
693:have been affiliated with
1462:File:Autonomous areas.png
823:List of Naruto characters
709:List of Naruto characters
673:List of Naruto characters
408:Featured topic candidates
372:Aston Villa Football Club
1052:American Nobel Laureates
412:Good article nominations
400:Featured list candidates
1616:List of Nobel Laureates
251:The Chronicles of Amber
1392:. To follow comments,
1292:
1108:featured list criteria
1058:
1002:
935:
794:
698:
612:
339:
1637:Victoria Cross ones:
1291:
1255:← Previous Dispatches
1045:
994:
922:
789:
738:. I began working on
688:
606:
318:
154:Featured List process
152:, co-director of the
144:Featured List Removal
1645:(which is linked to
1388:from this article's
927:with U.S. President
695:Princeton University
635:football WikiProject
1666:File:AVilla1899.jpg
1359:Features and admins
1236:Features and admins
753:. That's got to be
197:, with FLs on both
1899:leave a suggestion
1656:Aston Villa ones:
1452:File:Radiohead.jpg
1379:Discuss this story
1364:Arbitration report
1354:WikiProject report
1293:
1241:Arbitration report
1231:WikiProject report
1059:
1050:with the six 2003
1003:
950:winning percentage
936:
795:
699:
613:
340:
280:Commodore-in-Chief
1697:
1482:File:LaurierU.jpg
1403:purging the cache
1281:
1280:
1025:. I'm one of the
925:Arizona Cardinals
722:WikiProject Films
513:
437:
1959:
1936:
1901:
1887:
1878:
1869:
1860:
1851:
1842:
1833:
1824:
1815:
1813:
1804:
1795:
1793:
1784:
1775:
1766:
1757:
1748:
1739:
1730:
1693:
1624:
1575:
1560:
1557:
1551:
1420:
1406:
1404:
1398:
1377:
1319:ArbCom elections
1311:
1303:
1296:
1270:Next Dispatches→
1196:ArbCom elections
1177:
996:Hurricane Gloria
894:
888:
884:
878:
532:Aston Villa F.C.
509:
479:Aston Villa F.C.
475:Aston Villa F.C.
433:
356:(politics), and
236:featured article
203:Aston Villa F.C.
129:
115:
114:
105:
104:
95:
94:
85:
84:
75:
74:
65:
64:
55:
54:
1967:
1966:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1932:
1930:
1925:
1920:
1915:
1910:
1903:
1897:
1893:
1892:
1888:
1879:
1870:
1861:
1852:
1843:
1834:
1825:
1816:
1811:
1805:
1796:
1791:
1785:
1776:
1767:
1758:
1749:
1740:
1731:
1722:
1620:
1573:
1555:
1546:
1544:
1418:
1408:
1400:
1393:
1382:
1381:
1375:+ Add a comment
1373:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1334:Drug comparison
1314:From the editor
1304:
1299:
1297:
1294:
1282:
1211:Drug comparison
1191:From the editor
1186:Also this week:
1149:
1098:
1046:U.S. President
1040:
979:
929:John F. Kennedy
917:
892:
886:
882:
876:
857:
847:Manual of Style
831:franchise (see
774:
691:Nobel Laureates
683:
586:
496:
451:. After seeing
386:
329:Colin Greenwood
325:Jonny Greenwood
293:
212:
201:recipients and
131:
130:
124:
123:
122:
121:
112:
102:
92:
82:
72:
62:
52:
46:
43:
32:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1965:
1963:
1955:
1954:
1944:
1943:
1931:
1926:
1921:
1916:
1911:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1895:
1894:
1891:
1890:
1889:
1882:
1880:
1873:
1871:
1864:
1862:
1855:
1853:
1846:
1844:
1837:
1835:
1828:
1826:
1819:
1817:
1808:
1806:
1799:
1797:
1788:
1786:
1779:
1777:
1770:
1768:
1761:
1759:
1752:
1750:
1743:
1741:
1734:
1732:
1725:
1721:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1670:
1669:
1654:
1647:Victoria Cross
1634:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1565:
1564:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1532:
1526:
1520:
1510:
1504:
1498:
1488:
1478:
1468:
1458:
1448:
1435:
1434:
1383:
1380:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1366:
1361:
1356:
1351:
1346:
1341:
1339:News and notes
1336:
1331:
1326:
1321:
1316:
1310:
1301:3 January 2009
1298:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1274:
1273:
1266:
1258:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1238:
1233:
1228:
1223:
1218:
1216:News and notes
1213:
1208:
1203:
1198:
1193:
1188:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1174:
1171:
1169:
1168:
1162:
1156:
1148:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1130:
1129:
1120:
1119:
1097:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1083:
1082:
1073:
1072:
1048:George W. Bush
1039:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1027:FLRC directors
1017:
1016:
989:
988:
978:
975:
974:
973:
964:
963:
954:
953:
916:
913:
912:
911:
902:
901:
867:
866:
856:
853:
852:
851:
837:
836:
805:
804:
784:
783:
773:
770:
769:
768:
759:
758:
745:
744:
730:
729:
682:
679:
678:
677:
655:
654:
640:
639:
601:
600:
585:
582:
581:
580:
562:
561:
540:
539:
536:Victoria Cross
521:
519:
518:
495:
492:
491:
490:
465:
464:
443:
442:
420:
419:
385:
382:
381:
380:
376:Victoria Cross
362:
361:
313:
312:
303:
302:
292:
289:
288:
287:
270:
269:
240:
239:
226:
225:
211:
208:
207:
206:
199:Victoria Cross
192:
178:
172:
132:
120:
119:
109:
99:
89:
79:
69:
59:
48:
47:
44:
38:
37:
36:
35:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1964:
1953:
1950:
1949:
1947:
1935:
1929:
1924:
1919:
1914:
1909:
1900:
1886:
1881:
1877:
1872:
1868:
1863:
1859:
1854:
1850:
1845:
1841:
1836:
1832:
1827:
1823:
1818:
1814:
1807:
1803:
1798:
1794:
1787:
1783:
1778:
1774:
1769:
1765:
1760:
1756:
1751:
1747:
1742:
1738:
1733:
1729:
1724:
1719:
1715:
1712:
1710:
1708:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1696:
1691:
1690:Hurricanehink
1687:
1683:
1679:
1675:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1635:
1628:
1625:
1623:
1622:sephiroth bcr
1617:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1584:
1580:
1576:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1563:
1558:
1552:
1550:
1543:
1542:
1537:
1533:
1531:
1527:
1525:
1521:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1509:
1505:
1503:
1499:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1414:
1405:
1396:
1391:
1387:
1376:
1365:
1362:
1360:
1357:
1355:
1352:
1350:
1347:
1345:
1342:
1340:
1337:
1335:
1332:
1330:
1329:Editing stats
1327:
1325:
1324:Virgin Killer
1322:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1312:
1308:
1302:
1295:In this issue
1290:
1275:
1271:
1265:
1263:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1234:
1232:
1229:
1227:
1224:
1222:
1219:
1217:
1214:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1206:Editing stats
1204:
1202:
1201:Virgin Killer
1199:
1197:
1194:
1192:
1189:
1187:
1183:
1178:
1175:
1172:
1166:
1163:
1160:
1157:
1154:
1151:
1150:
1146:
1141:
1137:
1136:
1132:
1131:
1127:
1126:
1125:Sephiroth BCR
1122:
1121:
1117:
1114:, especially
1113:
1109:
1105:
1104:
1100:
1099:
1095:
1090:
1089:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1079:
1075:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1065:
1064:Sephiroth BCR
1061:
1060:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1044:
1037:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1023:
1022:Sephiroth BCR
1019:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1009:
1005:
1004:
1001:
997:
993:
986:
985:
981:
980:
976:
971:
970:
966:
965:
961:
960:
959:Sephiroth BCR
956:
955:
951:
947:
943:
942:
938:
937:
934:
930:
926:
921:
914:
909:
908:
904:
903:
899:
891:
881:
874:
873:
872:Sephiroth BCR
869:
868:
864:
863:
859:
858:
854:
848:
844:
843:
839:
838:
834:
830:
829:
824:
820:
816:
812:
811:
810:Sephiroth BCR
807:
806:
802:
801:
800:Hurricanehink
797:
796:
793:
788:
781:
780:
776:
775:
771:
766:
765:
761:
760:
756:
752:
751:
750:Hurricanehink
747:
746:
741:
737:
736:
732:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
710:
706:
705:
704:Sephiroth BCR
701:
700:
696:
692:
687:
674:
670:
666:
662:
661:
660:Sephiroth BCR
657:
656:
651:
647:
646:
642:
641:
636:
632:
628:
624:
620:
619:
615:
614:
610:
605:
597:
593:
592:
591:Hurricanehink
588:
587:
583:
577:
573:
569:
568:
564:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
546:
545:Sephiroth BCR
542:
541:
537:
533:
529:
528:
524:
523:
522:
517:
512:
507:
506:Hurricanehink
503:
502:
501:Hurricanehink
498:
497:
493:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
471:
467:
466:
462:
458:
454:
453:User:Erachima
450:
449:
448:Sephiroth BCR
445:
444:
441:
436:
431:
430:Hurricanehink
427:
426:
425:Hurricanehink
422:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
396:Sephiroth BCR
393:
392:
388:
387:
383:
377:
373:
369:
368:
364:
363:
359:
355:
352:(geography),
351:
347:
346:
342:
341:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
317:
310:
309:
308:Sephiroth BCR
305:
304:
300:
299:
298:Hurricanehink
295:
294:
290:
285:
281:
277:
276:
272:
271:
266:
265:
260:
259:
253:
252:
247:
246:
245:Sephiroth BCR
242:
241:
237:
233:
232:
231:Hurricanehink
228:
227:
223:
219:
218:
214:
213:
209:
204:
200:
196:
193:
190:
186:
182:
181:Sephiroth BCR
179:
176:
175:Hurricanehink
173:
170:
167:
166:
165:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
145:
141:
137:
136:Featured List
128:
118:
110:
108:
100:
98:
90:
88:
80:
78:
70:
68:
60:
58:
50:
49:
41:
23:
19:
1707:Juliancolton
1671:
1621:
1548:
1535:
1529:
1523:
1507:
1501:
1410:
1409:==Images ==
1343:
1307:all comments
1261:
1220:
1185:
1173:
1170:
1134:
1133:
1124:
1123:
1116:undue weight
1102:
1101:
1087:
1086:
1077:
1076:
1068:
1063:
1062:
1021:
1020:
1007:
1006:
983:
982:
968:
967:
958:
957:
940:
939:
906:
905:
871:
870:
861:
860:
841:
840:
826:
809:
808:
799:
798:
778:
777:
763:
762:
749:
748:
734:
733:
703:
702:
659:
658:
644:
643:
617:
616:
590:
589:
566:
565:
544:
543:
526:
525:
520:
500:
499:
469:
468:
447:
446:
424:
423:
390:
389:
366:
365:
344:
343:
307:
306:
297:
296:
274:
273:
262:
256:
249:
244:
243:
230:
229:
216:
215:
158:The Signpost
157:
150:Scorpion0422
148:
133:
127:Scorpion0422
57:PDF download
1934:Suggestions
1386:transcluded
1349:In the news
1226:In the news
1056:Oval Office
933:White House
689:Thirty-two
609:Aston Villa
558:my workshop
410:(FTC), and
337:Phil Selway
258:Castlevania
140:big changes
107:X (Twitter)
1344:Dispatches
1221:Dispatches
1112:neutrality
627:second FLC
333:Ed O'Brien
321:Thom Yorke
45:Share this
40:Contribute
31:Dispatches
22:2009-01-03
1928:Subscribe
1390:talk page
1103:Gary King
1078:Gary King
1008:Gary King
941:Gary King
862:Gary King
779:Gary King
735:Gary King
645:Gary King
567:Gary King
487:this edit
391:Gary King
345:Gary King
217:Gary King
169:Gary King
1946:Category
1923:Newsroom
1918:Archives
1264:archives
1262:Signpost
1147:See also
1069:yourself
890:sortname
850:article.
97:Facebook
87:LinkedIn
77:Mastodon
20: |
1720:Gallery
1688:. --♬♩
1574:Georgia
1446:YouTube
1419:Georgia
1054:in the
406:(FAC),
402:(FLC),
222:YouTube
969:Woody:
907:Woody:
842:Woody:
828:Naruto
764:Woody:
621:. The
618:Woody:
599:lists.
527:Woody:
470:Woody:
455:bring
367:Woody:
275:Woody:
268:(XXG).
264:Naruto
117:Reddit
67:E-mail
1913:About
1572:Sandy
1547:Gary
1516:from
1494:from
1484:from
1474:from
1464:from
1454:from
1444:from
1417:Sandy
1135:Woody
1088:Woody
984:Woody
676:list.
623:first
485:with
195:Woody
189:manga
185:anime
16:<
1908:Home
1695:talk
1649:and
1579:Talk
1556:talk
1549:King
1536:none
1530:none
1524:none
1508:none
1502:none
1424:Talk
898:NPOV
885:and
880:sort
817:and
625:and
607:The
511:talk
435:talk
374:and
335:and
187:and
1610:),
1602:),
629:of
379:FT.
125:By
42:—
1948::
1698:)
1684:,
1680:,
1676:,
1664:,
1660:,
1641:,
1581:)
1426:)
1272:)
893:}}
887:{{
883:}}
877:{{
835:).
707:.
648:.
594:.
514:)
438:)
394:.
331:,
327:,
323:,
1902:.
1692:(
1668:.
1653:)
1614:(
1606:(
1598:(
1577:(
1559:)
1553:(
1422:(
1407:.
1397:.
1309:)
1305:(
1268:(
1257:)
1253:(
1033:.
697:.
508:(
432:(
205:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.