211:, with editors endorsing or rejecting them by adding their signature. Popular rules would be written up on separate pages, with anyone free to amend and suggest simply by editing the text. These rules were drafted in order to ensure the project could meet its stated goal of creating "a 💕--indeed, the largest encyclopedia in history, both in terms of breadth and in terms of depth. We also want Knowledge (XXG) to become a reliable resource."
1070:
117:
107:
33:
127:
87:
137:
97:
346:
Your writer has trawled the deletion debates opened and closed in the last week and presents these debates for your edification. Either they generated larger than average response, centred on policy in an illuminating way, or otherwise just jumped out as of interest. Feel free to suggest interesting
419:
pointing out in an impassioned argument to keep that "t the same time as one group of editors is effusing over these articles and awarding them coveted featured article status, another group of editors is 'policy wonking' i.e. trying to get the pages deleted on fine nuances of guidelines. Bizarre!
199:
countered "that a change to POLICY and some major guidelines can often cause widespread troubles that the few people making the change don't consider or foresee." While
Blueboar argued that 'he point of "discuss first" is that you can often avoid rigidity in the first place' M stated the opposite,
804:
proposes we make it clear that it "is conventionally not capitalized, even when it is (or could be regarded as) part of a proper name: the United
Kingdom, the Hebrides, the President of the United States." While there is consensus on some sort of standard, there is no consensus as to appropriate
1184:
I think there should be some sort of mention that the Naming
Convention debate is almost completely centered on a debate growing vitriolic by a few users who have taken some deep-seated issues (of unclear origins, to be honest) against the naming convention adopted by WP:PLANTS.
364:
792:
like the proposal, adding that
Anxietycello was "absolutely right about the hodgepodge of the current interface. It needs developing but it's a good start." Further revisions based on suggestions at the village pump were made to the draft before it was posted to the
420:
What we have here is a unique set of pages; informative, accurate, well sourced, objective, and tolerably well written. If all the time spent on this discussion was spent on writing new material how much better would the project be?" Attempting to remain neutral,
1165:
Just like to say that I find this column incredibly useful in keeping me informed of all the stuff going on around WP without having to spend hours a day reading them all. It has to be a lot of working writing this section, so thank you!
238:
was that "Knowledge (XXG) articles are given the name that the greatest number of
English-speaking readers would expect in a reliable source. Naming is for the benefit of readers over editors, and for a general audience over specialists."
447:
910:
519:
382:
we aren't creating an article for every season for every player in every sport. These are 15 articles on the most important season for the most important players for one sport. Entire books have been published on this one
278:
opened a discussion about the best way to "save" an article listed for deletion, noting that "ome editors claim that they would be better able to improve articles if they didn't have to defend them against deletion."
1145:
330:
326:
1114:
1109:
1119:
1057:
1048:
348:
319:
157:
768:
415:, expressing the view that the articles should be kept as they are, said "hese are as I understand it the most notable players of the most notable team of the most notable year in cricket" with
1094:
73:
254:
Where a particular WikiProject reaches a consensus on some particular naming convention, is is de facto the case that their naming convention supersedes the general principle of WP:COMMONNAME.
616:
597:
258:
Debate now continues as to whether there is a logical loop in the relationship between the Naming
Convention policy and separate Naming Convention guidelines. This loop is caused by text at
503:
952:
819:
affected requests for user talk pages to be deleted. MZMcBride felt there "some sort of consistency. Currently it seems to depend entirely on who the admin going through the category is."
293:
offering anecdotal evidence that "at least one admin ... does not look at the articles under discussion when he closes AfDs, but only the discussion." GTBacchus responded strongly, stating
1099:
674:
657:
904:
315:
371:
seemed most concerned with "the precedent being set here", noting that "the level of detail here is excruciating and absolutely astonishing" and would therefore seem to contradict
1081:
52:
41:
516:
is subject to a deletion debate, although during the debate the article was moved such that the title, topic and contents are now completely different from the nominated version.
410:, who has argued for a merger of the articles, felt that "eing a featured article doesn't necessarily mean that something is an appropriate article to keep in the encylopedia."
334:
437:
750:
argues for a re-listing, stating the "present page is not a BLP violation nor an attack page. That it might 'easily venture into BLP problems' can be said of any BLP."
1278:
809:
1012:
867:
21:
738:, a user page which was deleted three times on 4 September and the subject of a deletion debate and a thread at the administrators noticeboard. A shortcut,
569:
1253:
1248:
1243:
156:
The following is a brief overview of new discussions taking place on the
English Knowledge (XXG). For older, yet possibly active, discussions please see
627:
195:
disagreed with what they depicted as an "extra hoop for people to go through in order to edit any project pages that happen to be policies", to which
191:
debated whether mistakes in policy should be corrected immediately or whether a discussion over the nature of the mistake was more appropriate first.
1087:
201:
970:
1238:
735:
271:
204:
a similar debate is playing out, as a rewrite of the page has foundered over whether to remove guidance that editors can edit policy directly.
982:
898:
372:
824:
259:
248:
235:
212:
823:
regarded the general consensus to be that "user talk pages shouldn't be speedied; where deletion is required, they should be referred to
633:
794:
314:. You can suggest a poll for inclusion, preferably including details as to how the poll will be closed and implemented, either on the
1233:
1069:
46:
32:
17:
890:
874:
843:
513:
590:
958:
946:
612:
400:
230:
There is much debate over the purpose of our policy on Naming
Conventions, largely initiated by attempts to revise the wording.
507:
427:
On the one hand, this is a horrendous precedent, but on the other, enough sources exist that four of the articles are featured.
781:
994:
461:
454:
855:
546:
542:
283:
suggested adding "a statement at the top of all AFDs: All articles which are deleted can be userfied by request by admin."
1212:
1194:
1179:
604:
243:
felt "he name of an article should be optimised to be as acceptable as possible to as much of its audience as possible."
608:
576:
762:
623:
530:
311:
181:
395:
is trying to develop a featured topic on the 1948 'Invincibles' cricket team". WikiProject
Cricket is also listing
300:
help you stop them, if you bring it to my attention. It's unacceptable; someone doing that should not have the mop.
934:
396:
839:
739:
1259:
881:. Consensus among administrators who rely on the section is that the change does not detail current practises.
721:
711:
650:
496:
1203:
I hadn't noticed that, apologies. Which section of the page should I look to for this portion of the debate?
440:
has seen a
Facebook campaign by the subject in order to keep the article. The article has been nominated by
176:
Currently, across Knowledge (XXG) there are a number of discussions regarding the ability of editors to make
1000:
964:
928:
758:
287:
suggested "some sort of an 'AFD reset' button if someone has changed a certain percentage of an article".
667:
742:, has been created for the debate, such is the interest in the nuances of policy this user page raises.
681:
489:
475:
310:
A round up of polls spotted by your writer in the last seven days or so, bearing in mind of course that
835:
788:. Anxietycello described their proposal as "simpler, clearer and prettier than the current situation".
482:
387:
Debating the fact that some of the articles nominated are amongst Knowledge (XXG)'s Featured Content,
1038:
988:
940:
554:
550:
220:
526:, given "the potential this AfD has to become a massive time sink, generating more heat than light".
365:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Sam Loxton with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948
922:
878:
376:
615:? Similar debates have been opened for the Scottish and English versions of this category, all at
1024:
1018:
976:
916:
596:
The renaming of categories related to bilateral relations to use a longdash has been proposed at
337:. The poll runs from 13:50, 3 September 2009 (UTC) and concludes 13:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC).
754:
534:
200:
that '"discuss first" does not avoid rigidity, it condones and offers support for it'. Over at
90:
1190:
1141:
1006:
862:
rejected after finding no discussion. In the same edit Kim Bruning marked the page a policy,
785:
441:
416:
412:
392:
216:
208:
120:
177:
1208:
866:. A merge with Knowledge (XXG):Three revert rule was finally achieved on 21 June 2009 after
859:
231:
215:
noted that our policies are ever evolving and changing from its start on 1 November 2001 by
184:
800:
There is a debate at T(t)he Manual of Style over when to capitalise the definite article.
207:
Historically, Knowledge (XXG)'s rules to follow, as they were then known, were proposed at
100:
1173:
805:
wording as yet, and there is some discussion over possible exceptions such as band names.
368:
360:
130:
812:
275:
244:
240:
782:
Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (all)#Making our editing interface more clear and helpful
1272:
851:
746:
believes that "there was no possible way this article could ever be NPOV compliant."
562:
468:
421:
407:
290:
284:
192:
188:
1186:
1032:
847:
789:
743:
538:
223:, one of only two edits this account has made, the other being to their talk page.
110:
598:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion/Log/2009 September 5#Bilateral relations
448:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of stock characters in science fiction
140:
1204:
842:. The page was initially created on 26 April 2003 as a redirect to what is now
388:
196:
150:
1168:
877:
a change to the wording of the Indefinite block section has been suggested by
820:
801:
558:
523:
520:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Norton Canes services (2nd nomination)
280:
747:
579:
has been re-listed due to lack of comments. Your writer takes offence!
694:
622:
Crater categories are discussed again with the proposed renaming of
331:
Reports of organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China
850:
wrote a brief description on 4 October 2003. On 29 October 2005
771:
is nominated for deletion as being an "irrelevant useless essay".
769:
Knowledge (XXG):Comparison to Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
816:
784:, a proposed change to the editing interface was put forward by
698:
327:
Talk:Organ harvesting in the People's Republic of China/FG poll
51:
617:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion/Log/2009 September 4
478:
make Knowledge (XXG) creep slowly closer to being a directory?
953:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Arbitration Committee/Audit Subcommittee
450:
debates whether such a list is warranted as a navigation aid.
1068:
31:
736:
User:Stevertigo/Obama and accusations of National Socialism
172:: Your writer has participated in some of these discussions
504:
Communist Party candidates, 2006 Canadian federal election
296:
Admins who close AfDs by nose-count need to be stopped. I
289:
The discussion also took in administrator behaviour, with
471:"statistically skewed, incomplete, and even inaccurate"?
1157:
1150:
1130:
893:
have been made in the week of 31 August – 6 September:
863:
828:
716:
706:
689:
658:
based on irredentist views of a particular ethnic group
404:
905:
Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses and congregational discipline
453:
Opinion is split on whether to keep, merge or delete
438:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Wayne Herschel
1155:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
335:Organ harvesting in the People's Republic of China
68:Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
810:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Criteria for speedy deletion
634:Category:Victims of American political repression
1013:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Naming conventions (Hebrew)
568:This week's too long didn't read award goes to
565:is discussed in the respective deletion debates.
570:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Kuvaputki
425:
380:
294:
252:
636:pushing a point of view in its categorisation?
827:" and edited Knowledge (XXG):Right to vanish
575:Mentioned in last week's round-up, debate on
514:Graphical methods of finding polynomial roots
8:
202:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Policies and guidelines
724:misleading or are they useful search terms?
373:Knowledge (XXG):What Knowledge (XXG) is not
613:Category:British civil servants from Wales
272:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for deletion
1279:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2009-09
983:Knowledge (XXG) talk:No original research
628:Category:Possible impact craters on Earth
971:Talk:2009 Honduran constitutional crisis
485:an acceptable stub or original research?
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
1158:
1134:
825:Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion
403:, having done so since the 19 May 2008.
266:Defense is not the best form of defense
260:Knowledge (XXG):Policies and guidelines
213:Knowledge (XXG):Policies and guidelines
67:
547:The Greatest BBC Children's Video Ever
543:Tea and Biscuits with Maggie Pritchard
911:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Non-free content
641:Files, templates, redirects and stubs
347:deletion debates for future editions
164:Do you have the right to edit policy?
7:
899:Talk:Denial of the Armenian Genocide
875:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Blocking policy
844:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment
795:Knowledge (XXG) Usability initiative
363:have been nominated for deletion at
753:After the sixth deletion debate of
401:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Cricket
359:A number of articles, amongst them
609:Category:Civil servants from Wales
227:Why do we have naming conventions?
53:
28:
1140:These comments are automatically
856:Knowledge (XXG):Three revert rule
729:Deletion review and miscellaneous
355:
734:Currently at deletion review is
624:Category:Possible impact craters
591:Category:Directorial debut films
522:was closed the day it opened by
135:
125:
115:
105:
95:
85:
1228:: doing it for free since 2005.
763:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
607:be deleted, kept or renamed to
508:Canadian federal election, 2006
399:as its Featured Topic drive at
219:until an edit on 6 May 2006 by
1151:add the page to your watchlist
995:Talk:Smiley face murder theory
684:greater than a thousand words?
593:be deleted, listified or kept?
529:The notability of articles on
506:be kept separate or merged to
455:List of books by Ian Stevenson
182:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Consensus
1:
1213:20:25, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
1195:15:42, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
1180:05:10, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
757:is closed as "no consensus",
717:Geology of the United Kingdom
605:Category:Welsh civil servants
462:List of Britney Spears' songs
251:, based on experience, that:
840:Knowledge (XXG):Edit warring
707:Geology of the British Isles
577:Nan You're a Window Shopper
531:Cassius Marcellus Clay, Sr.
391:noted that "their creator,
318:or by directly editing the
274:, editor and administrator
1295:
935:Talk:Classical liberalism
497:Third Sikh Holocaust 1984
836:Knowledge (XXG):Edit war
722:Geology of Great Britain
712:Geology of Great Britain
444:as lacking "notability".
1001:Talk:Conversion therapy
965:Talk:Communist genocide
929:Talk:Galveston Bay Area
467:Staying with lists, is
1148:. To follow comments,
1073:
943:3 September 2009 (UTC)
907:4 September 2009 (UTC)
854:proposed a merge with
759:User:Crotalus horridus
499:point of view pushing?
464:be kept or redirected?
429:
385:
356:It's just not cricket!
333:should be merged into
302:
256:
247:offered a view on the
36:
1072:
1061:"Discussion report" →
697:or be re-targeted to
490:Collapse of Socialism
476:List of zombie novels
329:is a poll on whether
249:fundamental objective
35:
1144:from this article's
1041:31 August 2009 (UTC)
1039:Talk:Kenny MacAskill
989:Talk:Mail forwarding
941:Talk:Modern Buddhism
891:Requests for comment
885:Requests for comment
761:lists the debate at
551:Ten Little Dinosaurs
180:edits to policy. At
1053:"Discussion report"
959:Talk:Severe weather
947:Talk:Severe weather
923:Talk:United Kingdom
879:User:Atomic blunder
815:questioned how the
377:User:NuclearWarfare
234:suggested that the
158:last week's edition
1135:Discuss this story
1115:Arbitration report
1110:WikiProject report
1074:
1025:Talk:Bernard Foing
977:Talk:Timewave zero
917:Talk:Copper Scroll
834:After discussion,
460:Similarly, should
367:. In nominating,
42:← Back to Contents
37:
1211:
1159:purging the cache
1120:Technology report
1105:Discussion report
1029:
1007:Talk:Power ballad
786:User:Anxietycello
483:Language fragment
442:User:Darrenhusted
417:User:Bridgeplayer
413:User:Juliancolton
393:User:YellowMonkey
379:pointed out that
361:Featured Articles
341:Deletion round-up
217:User:Larry Sanger
209:Rules to consider
65:Discussion report
47:View Latest Issue
1286:
1262:
1207:
1176:
1171:
1162:
1160:
1154:
1133:
1092:
1084:
1082:7 September 2009
1077:
1060:
1052:
1027:
1021:1 September 2009
1015:1 September 2009
1009:1 September 2009
1003:1 September 2009
997:1 September 2009
991:2 September 2009
985:2 September 2009
979:2 September 2009
973:2 September 2009
967:3 September 2009
961:3 September 2009
955:3 September 2009
949:3 September 2009
937:3 September 2009
931:3 September 2009
925:4 September 2009
919:4 September 2009
913:4 September 2009
901:5 September 2009
860:User:Kim Bruning
719:
709:
692:
672:
666:
655:
649:
153:
139:
138:
129:
128:
119:
118:
109:
108:
99:
98:
89:
88:
59:
57:
55:
54:7 September 2009
1294:
1293:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1258:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1241:
1236:
1229:
1221:
1220:
1174:
1169:
1164:
1156:
1149:
1138:
1137:
1131:+ Add a comment
1129:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1085:
1080:
1078:
1075:
1064:
1063:
1058:
1055:
1050:
1044:
1019:Talk:Aiko Yanai
887:
864:6 November 2005
817:right to vanish
778:
731:
715:
705:
688:
670:
664:
653:
651:Northern Epirus
647:
643:
586:
555:Thomas A. Edson
492:a content fork?
434:
397:The Invincibles
375:. In response,
369:User:Hammersoft
358:
343:
307:
268:
229:
221:User:Wereareyou
170:Full disclosure
166:
154:
148:
147:
146:
145:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
86:
80:
77:
66:
62:
60:
50:
49:
44:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1292:
1290:
1282:
1281:
1271:
1270:
1257:
1252:
1247:
1242:
1237:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1223:
1222:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1198:
1197:
1139:
1136:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1122:
1117:
1112:
1107:
1102:
1097:
1095:News and notes
1091:
1079:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1056:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1043:
1042:
1036:
1035:31 August 2009
1030:
1028:31 August 2009
1022:
1016:
1010:
1004:
998:
992:
986:
980:
974:
968:
962:
956:
950:
944:
938:
932:
926:
920:
914:
908:
902:
895:
886:
883:
813:User:MZMcBride
777:
774:
773:
772:
766:
751:
730:
727:
726:
725:
702:
685:
678:
661:
642:
639:
638:
637:
630:
620:
601:
594:
585:
582:
581:
580:
573:
566:
527:
517:
511:
500:
493:
486:
479:
472:
465:
458:
451:
445:
433:
430:
357:
354:
342:
339:
312:voting is evil
306:
303:
276:User:GTBacchus
267:
264:
245:User:GTBacchus
241:User:Hesperian
236:main principle
228:
225:
165:
162:
144:
143:
133:
123:
113:
103:
93:
82:
81:
78:
72:
71:
70:
69:
64:
63:
61:
58:
45:
40:
39:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1291:
1280:
1277:
1276:
1274:
1261:
1255:
1250:
1245:
1240:
1235:
1227:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1178:
1177:
1172:
1161:
1152:
1147:
1143:
1132:
1121:
1118:
1116:
1113:
1111:
1108:
1106:
1103:
1101:
1098:
1096:
1093:
1089:
1083:
1076:In this issue
1071:
1062:
1054:
1040:
1037:
1034:
1031:
1026:
1023:
1020:
1017:
1014:
1011:
1008:
1005:
1002:
999:
996:
993:
990:
987:
984:
981:
978:
975:
972:
969:
966:
963:
960:
957:
954:
951:
948:
945:
942:
939:
936:
933:
930:
927:
924:
921:
918:
915:
912:
909:
906:
903:
900:
897:
896:
894:
892:
884:
882:
880:
876:
871:
869:
865:
861:
857:
853:
852:User:Radiant!
849:
845:
841:
838:was moved to
837:
832:
830:
826:
822:
818:
814:
811:
806:
803:
798:
796:
791:
787:
783:
775:
770:
767:
764:
760:
756:
752:
749:
745:
741:
740:WP:DRV/SV/ONS
737:
733:
732:
728:
723:
718:
713:
708:
703:
700:
696:
691:
686:
683:
679:
676:
669:
662:
659:
652:
645:
644:
640:
635:
631:
629:
625:
621:
618:
614:
610:
606:
602:
599:
595:
592:
588:
587:
583:
578:
574:
571:
567:
564:
563:Diane Schuler
560:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
525:
521:
518:
515:
512:
509:
505:
501:
498:
494:
491:
487:
484:
480:
477:
473:
470:
469:List of riots
466:
463:
459:
456:
452:
449:
446:
443:
439:
436:
435:
431:
428:
423:
422:User:Resolute
418:
414:
411:
409:
408:User:Calathan
405:
402:
398:
394:
390:
384:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
353:
352:
350:
340:
338:
336:
332:
328:
324:
323:
321:
317:
313:
304:
301:
299:
292:
291:User:A Nobody
288:
286:
285:User:Jclemens
282:
277:
273:
265:
263:
261:
255:
250:
246:
242:
237:
233:
226:
224:
222:
218:
214:
210:
205:
203:
198:
194:
193:User:Ohms law
190:
189:User:Blueboar
186:
183:
179:
174:
173:
171:
163:
161:
159:
152:
142:
134:
132:
124:
122:
114:
112:
104:
102:
94:
92:
84:
83:
75:
56:
48:
43:
34:
23:
19:
1225:
1167:
1104:
1088:all comments
1033:Talk:Virtual
889:Twenty-four
888:
872:
848:User:Ed Poor
833:
807:
799:
790:User:Noisalt
779:
744:User:Sceptre
693:redirect to
682:this picture
539:Doctor Steel
426:
386:
381:
345:
344:
325:
309:
308:
297:
295:
269:
257:
253:
206:
175:
169:
168:
167:
155:
1260:Suggestions
1142:transcluded
1100:In the news
829:accordingly
389:User:Nick-D
197:User:Xandar
868:discussion
858:, a merge
821:User:Rd232
802:User:Boson
755:Ashida Kim
668:Coming out
584:Categories
535:Jose Fadul
424:commented
320:next issue
79:Share this
74:Contribute
22:2009-09-07
1254:Subscribe
1146:talk page
846:, before
559:FAIL Blog
524:User:Nick
406:However,
281:User:Ikip
1273:Category
1249:Newsroom
1244:Archives
1226:Signpost
1051:Previous
748:User:DGG
675:bad idea
432:Articles
316:tip line
121:LinkedIn
101:Facebook
20: |
1187:Circeus
776:Briefly
687:Should
603:Should
589:Should
502:Should
305:Polling
111:Twitter
1205:Hiding
695:Prison
232:User:M
185:User:M
151:Hiding
131:Reddit
91:E-mail
1239:About
474:Does
383:team.
16:<
1234:Home
1224:The
1191:talk
1170:Pres
1059:Next
714:and
704:Are
699:Jail
690:Gaol
561:and
349:here
298:will
187:and
178:bold
141:Digg
873:At
808:At
780:At
680:Is
663:Is
646:Is
632:Is
626:to
611:or
495:Is
488:Is
481:Is
270:At
149:By
76:—
1275::
1193:)
1166:--
1049:←
870:.
831:.
797:.
720:→
710:→
673:a
671:}}
665:{{
660:"?
654:}}
648:{{
557:,
553:,
549:,
545:,
541:,
537:,
533:,
262:.
160:.
1209:T
1189:(
1175:N
1163:.
1153:.
1090:)
1086:(
765:.
701:?
677:?
656:"
619:.
600:.
572:.
510:?
457:.
351:.
322:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
