473:, nominating articles that he regards as having potential and encouraging editors to adopt the articles and take them to GA status. I'm not sure the drive has been a roaring success, but I've tried to do my part by creating or improving articles that I'm interested in and nominating them for DYK or GA status. An interesting project that J.L.W.S. is keen on pursuing is to have a special Knowledge (XXG) presence for Singapore on its National Day (9 August) in 2010. This will involve getting a Singapore-related article to GA, having Singapore mentioned in OTD and nominating a few articles to appear on DYK on that day. I'm pretty busy at the moment and expect to be this year, but will do what I can to help.
1148:
assumption that contributing edits is, by definition, communicating itself. "I'm writing all of this content about X," the editor thinks. "So why is no one responding to my communications?" Introversion is confused with extroversion, & the silence is wrongly interpreted as a lack of approval -- or even disapproval -- leading to isolation & so forth. (This dynamic is not unique to
Knowledge (XXG): I know from experience that one's first encounter of honest criticism in a creative writing class can be quite devastating. But online media seems to strengthen this effect.) --
929:
1111:
that when a
Wikipedian is in need of some help for any number of reasons -- looking for assistance in a conflict with other Wikipedians, needing some careful advice with writing or research, or simply to talk with someone else who shares the Knowledge (XXG) experience -- it's hard to find another person. Wikipedians end up feeling isolated, become more discouraged & enter a vicious cycle that may lead them to leave. --
123:
113:
202:, about our Singapore coverage and the efforts of WikiProject Singapore. These two SGpedians tell us what brought them to Knowledge (XXG), how they ended up focusing on Singapore (serendipity, as always, plays an important role), and give us some insights into the project itself. With several thousand articles on Singapore, it is hard to imagine what more could be said about the
33:
133:
93:
143:
103:
680:, an online resource of over 200 historic and current Singapore and Malaya newspapers digitized from its microfilm collection. Although the most recent articles are not available – the coverage is currently from 1831 up to 2006 – I hope we will see better Singapore articles resulting from more use of the database.
228:", and I have to say it hasn't really changed much since I created it. I've stuck around because I find the process of researching and writing articles very fulfilling. It probably appeals to some innate need of mine to create some order out of chaos, and I suspect I am unconsciously using it as a form of
1088:
Personally, I don't think that "in
Singapore, photography is banned in many places and people taking photos in public sometimes receive unwanted attention from security personnel" are the reasons why we sometimes lack good photographs. I think it is more likely that the smaller population means there
335:
much, though from time to time I have received responses to messages that I've left, usually after a while. I don't really know the reason for this. Perhaps members of the project just beaver away at articles that they are interested in on their own without feeling the need to get in touch with other
431:
and other SGpedian pioneers were still active. Unfortunately, I do not remember much about the meetup, except that we walked around the central area of
Singapore and chatted about Knowledge (XXG). I am not aware of any off-wiki collaborations. I certainly hope we can organise some, but we would need
301:
awaiting review. I hope my GAs are read by thousands of people, unlike my blog posts (which only a few friends read) and essay assignments (which only my teacher reads). Yes, I have a strong passion for writing and aspire to be a professional writer. I also enjoy doing research and finding out more
232:
to avoid getting "real" work done! I also feel that since so many people use
Knowledge (XXG) as their first port of call for information, there should be accurate facts available on topics that I'm interested in. I used to challenge myself by writing articles that I know nothing about, and am proud
1110:
JackLee brings up a point which may prove to be
Knowledge (XXG)'s greatest weakness: we all tend to "beaver away at articles that they are interested in on their own without feeling the need to get in touch with other" Wikipedians. While writing has always been a solitary activity, the downside is
651:
Like it or not, many
Knowledge (XXG) editors rely on free sources of information on the Internet to reference the articles they work on. This may not be too much of an issue in countries like the United Kingdom and the United States where there are currently a lot of reliable free websites such as
700:
With our population of only 4.5 million (few of which are native speakers of
English), there is a shortage of regular contributors. Thankfully our regular editors, past and present, include some very prolific article writers, such as (only Singapore-related articles are included in the following
1126:
I feel there are numerous avenues available to
Wikipedians to want to get in touch with other editors for advice, support and other reasons, including user talk pages, Knowledge (XXG) policy and WikiProject talk pages, and general fora such as the Village Pump. It is really a matter of how much
735:
Some policies are unintentionally biased. For example, our restrictive image policies fail to consider that in
Singapore, photography is banned in many places and people taking photos in public sometimes receive unwanted attention from security personnel. As mentioned above, articles on notable
1147:
What I am pointing out involves more than simply "wanting to get in touch". Based on my experience, there is a tendency for a Wikipedian who adds a lot of content -- but interacts relatively little with other Wikipedians -- to wonder why her/his work receives so little comment, based on the
891:
of all types. If you have the interest and expertise in any of these activities, or have access to references on Singapore related topics, do try to stop by and help increase our coverage on Singapore. Photographs, copy editing, reviewing, and referencing are some of the many ways that all
1170:
Interesting... It's certainly true that it can be hard to gauge people's attitudes through written messages. What was intended to be friendly advice can, if not worded carefully, come across as criticism. We should all bear that in mind when posting messages. — Cheers,
617:". It could be that these topics require specialist knowledge or a fair amount of research, or that editors are daunted by their wide scope. In any case, it would be great if SGpedians or other interested editors would step forward and help to create and improve them.
544:
Just looking at the huge numbers of articles on Singapore, it seems to me that Singapore is probably one of the best covered areas on wikipedia. Could you point to some glaring gaps in our Singapore coverage? Topics you think are not covered or are
727:
Most Singaporeans are not native speakers of English. In addition, the Knowledge (XXG) commuity and culture are far more liberal than most Singaporeans, so cultural differences can cause problems. For instance, Singaporeans may prefer to
273:. At first, I mostly edited articles about websites, but I struggled to understand the policies and was frustrated by excessive anonymous vandalism. Then I started working on two articles about Singaporean movies and chanced upon the
223:
I started editing Knowledge (XXG) on 15 September 2006. I don't remember exactly why, but suspect it was because I was looking for some information, saw something erroneous, and decided to correct it. My first article was
214:
Could you share some of your history as a Wikipedian with Signpost readers? Your first edits. Your passions. Why you are willing to spend hours on an unpaid and largely unrecognized endeavor like this one. That sort of
485:– a collaboration between Jacklee and Zscout370, with some help from me – shows what SGpedians are capable of when they work together. Another example of a successful SGpedian collaboration would be our very first FA,
1004:
642:
Every project has its own special set of problems. Could you outline some of the unique issues and challenges that editors of Singapore-related articles face and give us some idea of how you go about addressing
518:
I started editing Knowledge (XXG) after these big debates, so I wasn't involved in them. There was a heated debate a while back about whether articles relating to Singapore's underground system should be called
968:
886:
for the time and thought put into answering these questions. Readers, our interviewees have shown that even a well covered topic has important gaps and that there is a perennial need for copy editors and
973:
916:
907:
895:
Next week, we'll take a look at a project that has a mighty roar (or a number of other sounds). Until then, feel free to sit back, relax, and catch up on the previous editions of WikiProject Report in
978:
302:
about things that interest me. There is also that tinge of altruism – that feeling that I am doing something good for the subjects I write about, for my country, for Knowledge (XXG) and for the world.
953:
896:
79:
685:
Another problem is that a lot of stubs are created but never developed into fuller, useful articles. C'mon guys, we've had enough "hit and runs" – stick around and improve those articles!
958:
946:
481:
With our shortage of regular contributors, collaborations are difficult. In addition, most SGpedians prefer to work alone, which explains the limited success of the GA drive. But the FA
832:
SignPost readers and all Wikipedians, your contributions are most appreciated! Of course, the best contributions would be GAs about Singaporean topics, but you could also help out by:
407:
left a message about meeting up on the project's talk page a while back and I responded with a request for more information about what happens at these meetups, but he hasn't replied.
940:
52:
41:
820:" in order. Editors can help transfer freely licensed images here at the English Knowledge (XXG) over to the Commons, and upload suitable images from external sites such as
320:
437:
WikiProjects are all about coordination and collaboration. Can you share some of the success stories, articles where the project has come together to push an article into
331:
Yes, I agree that the project seemed more active when I started editing Knowledge (XXG) in 2006. Nowadays, I don't see editors communicating with each other through the
403:
I know that some meetups were held in the past, but at the time I was studying abroad and couldn't attend. No meetups have been arranged since I returned to Singapore.
743:
Signpost readers are always ready to chip in and help out. Any message for them on how they can get involved in the project or ways that they can advance the project?
1330:
323:, for example, seems to have been inactive since sometime in 2007. Is that because it is hard to write something 'new' about Singapore or are there other reasons?
21:
1305:
1300:
1295:
332:
732:
and may follow the letter, rather than the spirit, of policies. But, being Singaporeans, we will rise to the challenge and learn what we need to learn!
658:, is largely subscription-only, and even the limited free content expires after a while. The latter is true of the websites of the free tabloid daily
614:
1290:
869:
Note that these suggestions are not exhaustive; feel free to contribute to Singapore-related articles in other ways that benefit the encyclopedia.
824:. If they are not sure how to categorize such images, they can place them in the main category and someone (probably me) will come along to do so.
751:
Sure! Apart from the the above articles, I think our articles on notable Singaporeans need beefing up, copyediting or referencing. Examples are "
1278:
858:
558:
539:
and have caused conflict between SGpedians and non-SGpedians. This could be avoided if nominators would first do a quick search for sources.
470:
633:, but there are others. Besides addressing the most obvious cases, we have to improve the depth of coverage. For example, most articles on
469:, also known as J.L.W.S. The Special One, has been active in trying to get SGpedians to collaborate on projects. He started the project's
1240:
634:
502:
Speaking of contentious issues, are there any major unresolved issues regarding Singapore related articles? I recall, for example, the
705:(63 DYKs), Aldwinteo (15 GAs) and Jacklee (1 FA and 18 GAs, with more to come). With 5 GAs to my name, I still have a long way to go!
535:
Occasionally, articles on notable Singaporean topics were nominated for deletion (or even speedy deleted). Such deletions exacerbate
316:
308:
180:
1285:
1236:
928:
637:
are stubs or non-existent. But it is up to us to address these gaps through article writing, instead of complaining about said gaps.
582:
277:, which inspired me to focus on Singapore-related articles to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of the Lion City. On 15 July 2007,
46:
32:
17:
626:
207:
352:, have left, possibly because they became disillusioned with Knowledge (XXG) or busy with real life. Then there are editors like
312:
225:
720:. Remember, Singapore is a multiracial, multilingual, multicultural and multireligious society. The solution? Print sources and
625:
Is Singapore "one of the best covered areas of Knowledge (XXG)"? I doubt so. The two most glaring omissions I can think of are
562:
524:
486:
736:
Singaporean topics are sometimes nominated for deletion (or even speedy deletion) by editors who fail to search for sources.
1263:
1248:
1200:
1182:
1157:
1138:
1120:
1100:
1077:
1060:
1033:
570:
234:
1225:
predominant among them, which actively encourage ignoring other policy where it obstructs improving the encyclopedia. --
1221:
to "follow the spirit, rather than the letter, of policies" - this is certainly supported by policies and guidelines,
1050:
768:
673:
660:
395:! Have there been any off-wiki meetups or attempts for off-wiki collaboration that you've participated in or know of?
586:
784:
1254:
Ooops! Corrected to "may follow the letter, rather than the spirit, of policies". Thanks for pointing that out! --
804:
536:
598:
578:
249:" to FA status. But these days I tend to stick to articles that relate to Singapore law (one of my longest was "
1311:
507:
253:") and Singapore personalities (particularly artists and writers, for some reason – recent examples include "
1244:
362:
888:
668:. Therefore, to write quality Singapore articles, one has to have access to subscription databases such as
1259:
1196:
1029:
796:
610:
590:
380:
206:
but, as Jacklee and Hildanknight point out, there is more work to do and some important gaps in coverage (
1230:
1072:
229:
170:
817:
1024:
I suggest you add a question about the challenges faced by editors of Singapore-related articles. ----
566:
416:
1056:
857:
Copyediting and reviewing Singapore-related articles, especially those which SGpedians are trying to
844:
788:
594:
554:
250:
630:
792:
652:
those run by newspapers. However, in Singapore the website of the main English-language newspaper,
602:
574:
729:
606:
520:
503:
490:
424:
384:
298:
708:
Due to our small size and the nature of our media, good sources are scarce. Some sources are in
561:", and noticed that we do not yet have articles on some major topics, including the following: "
96:
1255:
1192:
1153:
1116:
1025:
1000:
883:
654:
527:", but I don't think there have been any other contentious issues since then (thank goodness).
482:
466:
454:
199:
126:
165:
are known for taking on major tasks with great efficiency, from building the world's largest
1226:
1067:
713:
665:
294:
270:
156:
1222:
1187:
Prolific GA writers are our most valuable resource and ought to be given more support, not
1089:
aren't as many people taking photographs and uploading them under free licences. — Cheers,
274:
106:
1046:
812:
Quality photographs relating to Singapore are always welcome. I can often be found at the
764:
353:
242:
166:
442:
438:
348:, most SGpedians edit infrequently. Some of our best contributors, such as the legendary
136:
356:, who are prolific GA writers but prefer not to work on Singapore-related articles. Our
717:
497:. I believe that Jacklee and I can make the National Day collaboration a great success.
458:
404:
367:
357:
349:
282:
238:
68:
892:
Wikipedians of whatever stripe can chip in and show the Singaporean "can can" spirit!
1324:
780:
772:
756:
702:
807:
rating in 2007, but nobody has come forward to try and bring it back to that status.
1172:
1149:
1128:
1112:
1090:
879:
760:
752:
494:
428:
420:
278:
195:
116:
146:
776:
462:
345:
290:
286:
258:
254:
246:
162:
1039:
376:
203:
169:, to converting a tiny island into an economic powerhouse and creating a new
800:
392:
184:
840:
709:
510:
battles, but they seem to have died down. Are there other similar issues?
175:
721:
669:
388:
851:
850:
Adding references to an unsourced Singapore-related article (such as
1217:
Maybe I'm wrong, but it has always been my impression that we are
453:
As I mentioned, I tend to work alone on articles, but did expand "
565:" (the original article was deleted as a copyright violation), "
51:
269:
My first edit, on 11 February 2006, was creating the article
927:
445:
status or helped resolve a difficult and contentious issue.?
31:
672:
and be willing to research print sources. Fortunately, the
677:
187:
one of the most comprehensive topics on Knowledge (XXG).
1127:
contact each editor wants to have with others. — Cheers,
821:
1188:
1016:
1009:
989:
379:
and I expect most SGPedians live somewhere between the
297:
have attained GA status, taking my GA tally to 5, with
693:
Major challenges the SGpedian community faces include:
415:
I attended a meetup several years back. That was when
1037:
Someone left out tha capitalisation in 'Wikipedian'.
1014:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
864:Fighting vandalism to Singapore-related articles.
813:
489:, which was co-written by two pioneer SGpedians:
319:. Yet, the project seems curiously moribund. The
173:rage in the United States. Displaying that same
366:says, perhaps we need foreign talent, such as
8:
839:Expanding a Singapore-related stub (such as
194:interviewed two Wikipedians from Singapore,
1331:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2010-02
336:members. That's what I do mostly, anyway.
799:" needs serious work. The main article "
730:defer to authority instead of being bold
615:Water supply and sanitation in Singapore
333:talk page of the SGpedians' notice board
315:, one would expect to see a very active
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
1017:
993:
67:
7:
275:Countering Systemic Bias WikiProject
775:" (former Deputy Prime Minister), "
53:
28:
999:These comments are automatically
795:" are largely unreferenced, and "
635:Singaporean Members of Parliament
583:Environmental issues in Singapore
387:and run into each other often at
461:, who has a special interest in
281:became my first GA. Since then,
226:Declaration of Religious Harmony
141:
131:
121:
111:
101:
91:
1066:That someone has fixed it :) --
1010:add the page to your watchlist
587:Ethnic minorities in Singapore
563:2009 flu pandemic in Singapore
525:Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore)
487:Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore)
1:
1264:10:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
1249:00:34, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
1213:Spirit and letter of policies
1201:14:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
1183:18:45, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
1158:17:22, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
1139:07:47, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
1121:17:59, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
1101:17:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
1078:14:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
1061:13:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
1034:18:36, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
847:) stub into a decent article.
674:National Library of Singapore
571:Economic history of Singapore
360:is short of talent. Like our
311:and thousands of articles on
235:Edward Wright (mathematician)
627:Singapore–Malaysia relations
208:Singapore–Malaysia relations
179:spirit, Wikipedians on our
1347:
785:Chief Justice of Singapore
579:Energy policy of Singapore
779:" (Judge of Appeal) and "
599:Oil industry in Singapore
1256:J.L.W.S. The Special One
1193:J.L.W.S. The Special One
1084:Photography in Singapore
1026:J.L.W.S. The Special One
664:and the TV news channel
508:Singapore Airlines fleet
321:collaboration department
313:Singapore related topics
210:being a prime example).
559:SGpedians' notice board
1007:. To follow comments,
932:
920:"WikiProject report" →
797:Eurasians in Singapore
759:" (Judge of Appeal), "
755:" (Judge of Appeal), "
591:Festivals in Singapore
381:Bukit Timah Expressway
307:With a 151 registered
36:
1273:What do you think of
931:
874:On behalf of all our
375:Singapore is a small
317:Singapore Wikiproject
230:displacement activity
181:Singapore WikiProject
73:WikiProject Singapore
35:
1279:Share your feedback.
1003:from this article's
912:"WikiProject report"
845:Sikhism in Singapore
789:Chinese Singaporeans
611:Theatre in Singapore
595:Geology of Singapore
555:Outline of Singapore
251:Pedra Branca dispute
969:Features and admins
878:readers, thank you
793:Malays in Singapore
603:People of Singapore
575:Energy in Singapore
994:Discuss this story
974:Arbitration report
964:WikiProject report
933:
818:Category:Singapore
787:). Articles like "
676:has just launched
607:Radio in Singapore
521:Mass Rapid Transit
504:Singapore Airlines
432:more participants!
385:East Coast Parkway
299:Murder of Huang Na
65:WikiProject report
42:← Back to Contents
37:
1189:treated like this
1076:
1073:sticks and stones
1059:
1018:purging the cache
979:Technology report
859:push to GA status
814:Wikimedia Commons
655:The Straits Times
553:I had a look at "
483:Flag of Singapore
465:, took it to FA.
457:". Subsequently,
455:Flag of Singapore
47:View Latest Issue
1338:
1314:
1180:
1175:
1136:
1131:
1098:
1093:
1070:
1055:
1053:
1042:
1021:
1019:
1013:
992:
951:
943:
941:15 February 2010
936:
919:
911:
666:Channel NewsAsia
567:Art in Singapore
295:I Not Stupid Too
159:
145:
144:
135:
134:
125:
124:
115:
114:
105:
104:
95:
94:
59:
57:
55:
54:15 February 2010
1346:
1345:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1310:
1308:
1303:
1298:
1293:
1288:
1281:
1270:
1269:
1215:
1176:
1173:
1132:
1129:
1108:
1094:
1091:
1086:
1051:
1040:
1023:
1015:
1008:
997:
996:
990:+ Add a comment
988:
984:
983:
982:
944:
939:
937:
934:
923:
922:
917:
914:
909:
765:Minister Mentor
243:Richard Hakluyt
233:to have taken "
160:
154:
153:
152:
151:
142:
132:
122:
112:
102:
92:
86:
83:
66:
62:
60:
50:
49:
44:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1344:
1342:
1334:
1333:
1323:
1322:
1309:
1304:
1299:
1294:
1289:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1272:
1271:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1214:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1142:
1141:
1107:
1106:Editing habits
1104:
1085:
1082:
1081:
1080:
998:
995:
987:
986:
985:
981:
976:
971:
966:
961:
956:
954:News and notes
950:
938:
926:
925:
924:
915:
906:
905:
904:
902:
873:
871:
870:
867:
866:
865:
862:
855:
848:
834:
833:
826:
825:
809:
808:
769:Prime Minister
740:
739:
738:
737:
733:
725:
706:
695:
694:
687:
686:
682:
681:
639:
638:
631:Racial harmony
619:
618:
541:
540:
529:
528:
499:
498:
475:
474:
434:
433:
409:
408:
372:
371:
358:Little Red Dot
338:
337:
304:
303:
283:Homerun (film)
263:
262:
239:Emery Molyneux
190:This week the
150:
149:
139:
129:
119:
109:
99:
88:
87:
84:
78:
77:
76:
75:
69:Singapore Math
64:
63:
61:
58:
45:
40:
39:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1343:
1332:
1329:
1328:
1326:
1313:
1307:
1302:
1297:
1292:
1287:
1280:
1276:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1241:67.58.229.153
1238:
1235:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1212:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1181:
1179:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1140:
1137:
1135:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1105:
1103:
1102:
1099:
1097:
1083:
1079:
1074:
1069:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1049:
1048:
1044:
1043:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1020:
1011:
1006:
1002:
991:
980:
977:
975:
972:
970:
967:
965:
962:
960:
957:
955:
952:
948:
942:
935:In this issue
930:
921:
913:
903:
900:
898:
893:
890:
885:
881:
877:
868:
863:
860:
856:
853:
849:
846:
842:
838:
837:
836:
835:
831:
830:Hildanknight:
828:
827:
823:
819:
815:
811:
810:
806:
802:
798:
794:
790:
786:
782:
781:Wee Chong Jin
778:
774:
773:S. Rajaratnam
770:
766:
762:
758:
757:Chao Hick Tin
754:
750:
747:
746:
745:
744:
734:
731:
726:
723:
719:
715:
711:
707:
704:
699:
698:
697:
696:
692:
691:Hildanknight:
689:
688:
684:
683:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
662:
657:
656:
650:
647:
646:
645:
644:
636:
632:
628:
624:
623:Hildanknight:
621:
620:
616:
612:
608:
604:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
552:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:undercovered?
538:
537:systemic bias
534:
533:Hildanknight:
531:
530:
526:
522:
517:
514:
513:
512:
511:
509:
505:
496:
492:
491:Mailer diablo
488:
484:
480:
479:Hildanknight:
477:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
449:
448:
447:
446:
444:
440:
430:
426:
425:Mailer diablo
422:
418:
414:
413:Hildanknight:
411:
410:
406:
402:
399:
398:
397:
396:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
369:
365:
364:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
342:Hildanknight:
340:
339:
334:
330:
327:
326:
325:
324:
322:
318:
314:
310:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
267:Hildanknight:
265:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
231:
227:
222:
219:
218:
217:
216:
211:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
188:
186:
182:
178:
177:
172:
168:
164:
158:
148:
140:
138:
130:
128:
120:
118:
110:
108:
100:
98:
90:
89:
81:
74:
70:
56:
48:
43:
34:
23:
19:
1275:The Signpost
1274:
1233:
1218:
1216:
1177:
1133:
1109:
1095:
1087:
1045:
1038:
1036:
963:
947:all comments
901:
894:
884:Hildanknight
875:
872:
829:
805:Good Article
761:Lee Kuan Yew
753:Andrew Phang
748:
742:
741:
690:
678:NewspapersSG
659:
653:
648:
641:
640:
622:
550:
543:
542:
532:
515:
501:
500:
478:
467:Hildanknight
450:
436:
435:
412:
400:
374:
373:
361:
341:
328:
306:
305:
279:I Not Stupid
266:
220:
213:
212:
200:Hildanknight
191:
189:
174:
167:ferris wheel
163:Singaporeans
161:
72:
71:: Report on
1312:Suggestions
1227:Dinoguy1000
1068:RegentsPark
1001:transcluded
959:In the news
897:the archive
803:" lost its
777:V. K. Rajah
767:and former
557:" and the "
463:vexillology
417:Terence Ong
346:90-9-1 rule
291:Yip Pin Xiu
287:Denise Phua
259:Rex Shelley
255:Han Sai Por
247:Robert Hues
171:mathematics
157:RegentsPark
889:Wikignomes
783:" (former
577:" and/or "
377:city state
354:Chensiyuan
204:city state
183:have made
85:Share this
80:Contribute
22:2010-02-15
1306:Subscribe
1005:talk page
816:keeping "
801:Singapore
701:tallies)
459:Zscout370
405:InfernoXV
393:Boat Quay
368:Zscout370
350:Aldwinteo
309:SGPedians
185:Singapore
1325:Category
1301:Newsroom
1296:Archives
1237:contribs
1219:supposed
910:Previous
876:Signpost
841:Medisave
749:Jacklee:
710:Singlish
703:Sengkang
649:Jacklee:
551:Jacklee:
516:Jacklee:
471:GA drive
451:Jacklee:
401:Jacklee:
383:and the
344:Per the
329:Jacklee:
221:Jacklee:
192:Signpost
127:LinkedIn
107:Facebook
20: |
1150:llywrch
1113:llywrch
880:Jacklee
791:" and "
722:Factiva
714:Chinese
670:Factiva
613:" and "
495:Huaiwei
429:Huaiwei
421:Tdxiang
389:Dempsey
257:" and "
245:" and "
196:Jacklee
176:can can
117:Twitter
1223:WP:IAR
1047:Voting
1041:Kayau
852:Xinyao
822:Flickr
523:" or "
363:gahmen
271:GTalkr
215:thing!
137:Reddit
97:E-mail
1291:About
1239:) as
718:Malay
661:Today
643:them?
16:<
1286:Home
1260:talk
1245:talk
1231:talk
1197:talk
1191:. --
1174:Jack
1154:talk
1130:Jack
1117:talk
1092:Jack
1057:evil
1030:talk
918:Next
882:and
771:), "
629:and
609:", "
605:", "
601:", "
597:", "
593:", "
589:", "
585:", "
581:", "
573:", "
569:", "
506:and
493:and
293:and
241:", "
237:", "
198:and
147:Digg
1178:Lee
1134:Lee
1096:Lee
843:or
763:" (
716:or
441:or
391:or
261:").
155:By
82:—
1327::
1277:?
1262:)
1247:)
1199:)
1156:)
1119:)
1052:IS
1032:)
908:←
899:.
854:).
712:,
443:FA
439:GA
427:,
423:,
419:,
289:,
285:,
1258:(
1243:(
1234:·
1229:(
1195:(
1152:(
1115:(
1075:)
1071:(
1028:(
1022:.
1012:.
949:)
945:(
861:.
724:.
519:"
370:!
224:"
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
