410:. In parallel to the headline catchers is a body of contributions on uncontroversial subjects that can easily go unnoticed. Frequently these can be by the same editors that are under topic bans or the threat of community ban owing to disputes on topics at the intersection between Ireland and Britain. I think the GA and FA list (with some notable exceptions) epitomises that otherwise unseen work. I think the project offers a focus for work aside from the headline catching disputes. The dog's work put into writing and maintaining uncontroversial subjects is very meaningful in terms of a project like WikiProject Ireland.
569:
and south of
Ireland (or specifically, between the nationalist and unionist Irish). In fact, in my experience, there are few such tensions. Northern Ireland has its own WikiProject but the two "Ireland" WikiProjects are overlapping both in terms of their remit and participants. There is no dividing line between the two, both projects are one in many respects. (Of course from a UK perspective, WikiProject Northern Ireland is a component part of WikiProject UK and a sister project to WikiProjects England, Scotland and Wales whereas WikiProject Ireland is not.)
743:, we have a great deal of ground to cover as a project with few people to cover it. Only through co-operation can we do it effectively. On the aspects of the project that I am actively involved in, I think the most pressing need facing us now is to overcome the tensions arising from the Ireland-naming question and to build a sense of common purpose again. I think we need to become stronger as collaborators. New contributors could do a lot to heal those tensions - coming as they would without any memory of them.
655:, where pro-republican and anti-republican editors regularly involve themselves in edit-wars and talk page slanging matches, but very little of that spills over onto the project. The Ireland naming debate raised a lot of passion among a quite small number of editors (including myself and a couple of the above posters), but again I think it had very little impact on the great majority of Irish editors, and hardly featured at all on the WikiProject Ireland pages.
856:
117:
107:
538:(which are not coterminous and so require disambiguation of some sort). This is a question that reaches deep into the psyche of the national question in Ireland and one that the community found impossible to answer unanimously for many deeply-felt reasons involving the balancing conflicting policies and guidelines, practical concerns and opposing perspectives on history, identity and the national question.
468:, which I took from a short, poorly researched and unreferenced article to GA status. The project's greatest achievement is harder to call, because most articles are improved by individuals or groups of people who are probably all members of the project, but don't work through the project page. Probably the fact that articles are continuing to be promoted is our best achievement.
33:
547:, which has left many editors feeling they had been steamrolled. Ultimately, in trying to reach an answer, I feel the Irish community on Knowledge (XXG) has been left deeply riven by the experience. Participation, to my eyes, is visibly lower on many pages and tensions between editors involved are raw. The question itself aside, the outcome for the community was not good.
127:
87:
137:
597:
instigated a poll to try to get something to happen. What's happened is that the poll has succeeded in nothing. Contentious article names are locked until
September 2011 when the whole sorry story will start over. I quit the Collaboration Project and regret, at this point, having spent so much time trying to work for consensus -- to solve the
97:
584:
varying perspectives neutrally. An important aspect to over-coming national tensions, I believe, is self-awareness of one's own perspective and understanding that none of us come from a neutral point of view. Where tensions are most strained, in my experience, it is when editors are not conscious of the fact that they have a
651:
would have died a natural death if the "Naming Debate" hadn't moved there, simply for want of commitment. Like RA, I don't think there is tension between
Northern and Southern editors. We're all members of WikiProject Ireland anyway, and we collaborate just fine there. The obvious exception is articles related to
583:
often share comparable perspectives on history, politics and national identity and concerns about how these can be accommodated on
Knowledge (XXG). Of course, we differ too at times - sometimes in ways we find surprising - but these differences can usually be worked out in a way that accommodates the
380:
Having an interest in Irish history and geography, being half Irish and having lived there most of my life, though not for the last 18 years, Knowledge (XXG) seemed like the best place to learn about topics of interest and contribute some of my knowledge, so joining this project around five years ago
371:
I've lived in
Ireland all my life. I discovered Knowledge (XXG) about five years ago. At that time I felt that many Ireland-related articles were written by self-appointed "experts" for whom a pithy writing style was more important than things like verifiability. To a large extent I fought that on
568:
editors differing in perspective. We've dealt with those types of issues before and in most instances have learnt to amicably resolve apparently impossible-to-reconcile perspectives. I can understand editors from outside of
Ireland (and the UK) imagining tensions to be between editors from the North
726:
enthusiastic about topics such as medieval history and towns and townlands. However, I believe that even the contentious articles will become good articles with increased involvement from people with good research skills, writing skills and/or mediation skills, and I hope I will play my part there.
725:
How the project develops will depend very much on the people who take the lead. I'm not much of a visionary myself, or a leader either. I think there is much more focus generally on quality standards, and it's the momentum there that will take the articles forward. It's encouraging to see people
773:
Probably the most pressing needs are organisational. For example, a recent conversation on the talk page highlighted problems with article assessment, mostly caused by a lack of people willing to do the assessments. Other things such as the "Adopt an
Article" scheme mentioned above would be more
650:
Our own project has not always been as active as it might be, but other projects such as WikiProject
Northern Ireland have been far less active, so as a result it's hard to develop "relationships" with them. The Ireland Collaboration Project was a bold initiative on Gnevin's part, but I think it
596:
The
Collaboration project was a monumental failure. At one point, frustrated with endless endless endless repetition I appealed for Arbitration. An Arbitrator was appointed, and then quit. Another was appointed, and his remit to us was more or less "Figure it all out for yourselves". At length I
782:
More constructive editing and, to echo some of the above, perhaps a major project revamp would stimulate the cooperation, participation and communication necessary that seems to exist in other projects where article collaboration does work. Both new and existing editors just have to look at the
748:
I think we need to build common ties with the (non-Irish) UK WikiProjects. Good relations exit at present, at an individual level at least, but a mutual sense of awareness could head-off trouble happening again. However, there is a sense among Irish editors that closer co-operation with the UK
690:
I don't feel so much a member of the project as much as a person who is listed as on the project. There are very few editors working in my areas of interest, which often means minimal collaboration and thus I don't feel part of a team. As to where it will be, who knows? I write purely for the
325:
I joined WikiProject
Ireland soon after becoming active on Knowledge (XXG) (about three years ago). I'm from Ireland and a sense of community is very strong among Irish people. It seemed like the natural thing to do. At that time, I was living abroad and in many respects contributing to
817:
You might have noticed the new sidebar in last week's issue. The WikiProject Report team has started this feature to deliver weekly news about all WikiProjects in addition to the traditional interview. We hope you enjoy it and check out the listed projects. Go to the
716:
and more editors who can stay the course. It is a pity that some editors have been burned out and/or moved on, and for some the naming dispute was too much. With 23,000 Start-class and Stub-class articles there is enormous room for improvement if there is
346:
I joined the project shortly after creating my Knowledge (XXG) account. Seeing as I live in Ireland and have never lived anywhere else, I have a general interest in articles relating to Ireland. Like Evertype above, I am also a fluent speaker of the
681:
to featured status. This has been made difficult due to the dispute over the name of the article. Apart from that most articles about towns and places in Ireland are currently in a poor, unreferenced state, and need to be either improved or
663:
Unfortunately, from where I sit, no and not that I can see. Though I read most of the contentious issue stuff I now tend to avoid even bothering to comment. It all gets too heated for me and takes away from constructive editing. Roll on
637:
I no longer participate in current affairs projects because there is too much spite. I prefer to work with editors who, like myself, are prepared to agree to disagree, then get on with making the article the best it can be. There are
418:
As RA says above, it's hard to point to successes because of the adversarial attitude many editors involved in this project have. I would like to see more work done on towns and rivers and things like that. But few people seem to be
618:
Unfortunately since ArbCom gave the order that all discussion over the "Ireland naming dispute" be held at the Collaboration project, the project has become a place for endless, pointless debate. In fact the founder of the project,
544:
574:
Most times, in my experience, where tensions arise it is between editors from Ireland (North and south) and editors from the island of Great Britain - but that too it not so simple. Editors from from Ireland (North and south),
326:
Ireland-related topics was a way to keep in touch with Ireland and other Irish people. I've since moved back to Ireland but the project still provides one of the major hubs around which Knowledge (XXG) revolves for me.
931:
456:
I had minimal to zero involvement in the other 63 articles, because they all deal with current or recent subjects, and are thus well covered by fellow Irish Wikipedians. I try to build up the deeper background.
628:
An attempt could be made at relaunching this project with its' original goals, and creating another project for the "Ireland naming dispute". Until then, however, this collaboration project is just a waste of
900:
699:
As of now I don't feel much like a member of the project, as I said above. Occasionally I have looked in on some Talk pages of some articles and mostly it's the same crappy snippishness from a number of
905:
843:
834:
504:(I prefer to reduce this by about 5,500 for the assessed categories, templates and dab pages) with so few active assessors is a great achievement and a mostly thankless task done in the background.
880:
826:
819:
220:
73:
407:
885:
588:
on these matters. On those occasions, editors can be very rigid in their beliefs and assume that any perspective other than their own is unreasonable, imbalanced, POV pushing or fringe.
890:
867:
52:
41:
403:
289:
This week, we asked six members about the project's many achievements as well as the project's struggles with emotionally-charged issues. Included in the interview were
476:
Personally, because I prefer to see quality rather than quantity, I would love to see many more Irish featured and good articles and am proud of my contribution to
1029:
601:
which is a set of contentious names. Rightly or wrongly, the names are contentious to some people, even if not to all, and the only way out of that trap is to use
784:
510:
21:
757:
Probably the most pressing need for his project is to de-POV a lot of Republican-related articles and to do a rework on many articles about towns in Ireland.
530:
The main thrust of the Ireland Collaboration project so far as been on the "Ireland naming question", namely how to disambiguate between the two "Irelands":
279:
275:
1004:
999:
994:
973:
208:
182:
178:
873:
669:
What is your vision for the project? How do you see the project itself, as well as the articles within its scope, developing over the next few years?
271:
372:
the article talk pages, but joining the WikiProject gave me access to a wider forum, as well as exposure to a wider variety of articles and topics.
168:
989:
623:, recently wanted to change the name of the project to "WikiProject Ireland Naming Debate", something which caused even more argument among users.
290:
740:
501:
610:
In addition to quitting the Collaboration Project, I have pretty much focused my editing energies on other topics in the Knowledge (XXG).
394:. Which of these articles are you most proud of being involved with? Overall, what have been some of the project's greatest achievements?
497:
282:
to create a sub-project designed to resolve conflicts between editors with differing views about the political entities that share the
774:
feasible if more people were willing to get involved in running them. Trouble is, Irish people tend to enjoy talking more than doing.
391:
387:
359:
Began editing about five years ago. I was born, and live, in Ireland. Became a member to fill in the huge pre-1798 blanks, especially
240:
236:
258:
Started in September 2006, WikiProject Ireland has been host to controversy, mostly stemming from the political issues affecting the
984:
855:
212:
46:
32:
17:
192:
488:
from featured article status a couple of years ago and would like to see more participation in article improvement. To this end
248:
244:
232:
202:
825:
Have a safe and happy Saint Patrick's Day! Next week, the Report will focus on a task force of demigods. Until then, check out
440:
402:
I think that a lot of WikiProject Ireland's greatest achievements have slipped under the radar owing to headline catchers like
231:
With Saint Patrick's Day just a day away, we thought it would be nice to celebrate Irish culture and history by focusing on
962:
787:
to see how many of the popular articles viewed are of poorer quality than one might expect; that's a good place to start.
749:
WikiProject could swamp Irish perspectives (and a similar reluctance to cede British perspectives on the other side).
477:
1010:
436:
492:, as the project's lead article, should have been a featured article a long time ago but only rose to being a
485:
317:
What motivated you to become a member of WikiProject Ireland? Do you live in Ireland or have Irish heritage?
525:
interest in the broad topics of Irish nationhood. There's much to more to WikiProject Ireland than that.)
334:
I joined a while back, because I know Irish and had an interest in place-names. I have done some work on
958:
298:
522:
172:
513:
been successful in relieving tensions between editors in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland?
481:
812:
article will motivate people to join the project and become active. We're capable of great things!
565:
557:
535:
381:
was a no-brainer. At that time it seemed there were many missing, or stub articles on Irish topics.
259:
822:
to submit your own project's news and announcements for next week's issue of WikiProject Report.
90:
927:
561:
120:
509:
Has your project developed particularly close relationships with any other projects? Has the
188:
954:
553:
263:
709:
585:
223:
to submit your project's news and announcements for next week's issue of WikiProject Report
100:
302:
731:
What are WikiProject Ireland's most pressing needs? How can a new contributor help today?
713:
493:
130:
800:
Join in and talk to some of us to find out what you can do besides just going it alone.
448:
360:
348:
310:
252:
642:
few wikis working in my areas of interest, and I am always grateful to work with them.
1023:
335:
306:
294:
267:
150:
652:
435:
is about 98% my unaltered work. I contributed to the article's intro, sub-articles
432:
110:
140:
620:
351:, and am therefore a regular contributor to the Irish language Knowledge (XXG).
465:
444:
363:. To me it is an effort to dignify our history by sharing it with the world.
576:
678:
531:
489:
283:
521:(This is quite a long answer, I'm sorry. It also focuses solely on my
427:
I had no involvement in any of the 29. Of the 64, the section titled
480:
which was mostly my work. I was happy to help avoid the demoting of
580:
691:
pleasure of it, and for the occasional gratification of thanks.
51:
156:
854:
708:
We ought to improve the better articles, many of which need
31:
677:
A long-term ambition of this project has been to promote
552:
The Ireland-naming question was not one of editors from
235:. The project is home to over 31,000 articles including
943:
936:
916:
496:
for a time. Helping to bring article assessments from
543:
The substantive question was eventually resolved by
941:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
270:. In October 2008, the project collaborated with
464:The article I am personally most proud of is
8:
972:Explore Knowledge (XXG) history by browsing
251:. The project is also affiliated with the
211:could use some help with their backlog of
1030:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2010-03
451:. I am very proud of participating on it.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
944:
920:
67:
183:University Collaboration of the Month
7:
68:The Pot of Gold: WikiProject Ireland
429:Prehistoric and legendary ancestors
386:WikiProject Ireland currently has
53:
28:
953:Good job to all of you, bravo! --
926:These comments are automatically
792:Anything else you'd like to add?
135:
125:
115:
105:
95:
85:
441:Early Medieval Ireland 800-1166
280:WikiProject Unionism in Ireland
276:WikiProject Irish Republicanism
937:add the page to your watchlist
408:Ireland-naming question ArbCom
1:
765:Participation, communication.
556:set against editors from the
209:WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth
201:Editors are hoping to revive
272:WikiProject Northern Ireland
243:. The project features four
195:The Battle of the Labyrinth
169:WikiProject Musical Theatre
1046:
963:14:58, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
291:Rannpháirtí anaithnid (RA)
205:after prolonged inactivity
502:current number of 31,000+
478:Postage stamps of Ireland
191:is looking for help with
437:Early history of Ireland
189:Percy Jackson Task Force
171:needs help eliminating
934:. To follow comments,
859:
847:"WikiProject report" →
36:
858:
511:Ireland Collaboration
35:
930:from this article's
839:"WikiProject report"
482:Geography of Ireland
388:29 featured articles
237:29 Featured Articles
901:Features and admins
785:Irish popular pages
558:Republic of Ireland
404:The Troubles ArbCom
260:Republic of Ireland
233:WikiProject Ireland
213:unassessed articles
203:WikiProject Spiders
921:Discuss this story
906:Arbitration report
896:WikiProject report
860:
741:historical reasons
498:1,044 in July 2007
249:helpful categories
65:WikiProject report
42:← Back to Contents
37:
945:purging the cache
755:Footyfanatic3000:
675:Footyfanatic3000:
616:Footyfanatic3000:
344:Footyfanatic3000:
284:island of Ireland
247:and a variety of
228:
227:
175:in their articles
47:View Latest Issue
1037:
1013:
948:
946:
940:
919:
878:
870:
863:
846:
838:
820:WikiProject Desk
554:Northern Ireland
545:a community vote
392:64 good articles
299:Footyfanatic3000
264:Northern Ireland
241:64 Good Articles
221:WikiProject Desk
163:WikiProject News
157:
153:
139:
138:
129:
128:
119:
118:
109:
108:
99:
98:
89:
88:
59:
57:
55:
1045:
1044:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1009:
1007:
1002:
997:
992:
987:
980:
969:
968:
950:
942:
935:
924:
923:
917:+ Add a comment
915:
911:
910:
909:
871:
866:
864:
861:
850:
849:
844:
841:
836:
229:
197:up to GA status
154:
148:
147:
146:
145:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
86:
80:
77:
66:
62:
60:
50:
49:
44:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1043:
1041:
1033:
1032:
1022:
1021:
1008:
1003:
998:
993:
988:
983:
982:
981:
971:
970:
967:
966:
965:
925:
922:
914:
913:
912:
908:
903:
898:
893:
888:
883:
881:News and notes
877:
865:
853:
852:
851:
842:
833:
832:
831:
816:
814:
813:
802:
801:
789:
788:
776:
775:
767:
766:
759:
758:
751:
750:
745:
744:
728:
727:
719:
718:
702:
701:
693:
692:
684:
683:
666:
665:
657:
656:
644:
643:
631:
630:
625:
624:
612:
611:
607:
606:
590:
589:
571:
570:
549:
548:
540:
539:
527:
526:
506:
505:
470:
469:
458:
457:
453:
452:
449:Gaelic Ireland
421:
420:
412:
411:
383:
382:
374:
373:
365:
364:
361:Gaelic Ireland
353:
352:
349:Irish language
340:
339:
328:
327:
253:Ireland Portal
226:
225:
217:
216:
215:
206:
199:
185:
176:
165:
160:
155:
144:
143:
133:
123:
113:
103:
93:
82:
81:
78:
72:
71:
70:
69:
64:
63:
61:
58:
45:
40:
39:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1042:
1031:
1028:
1027:
1025:
1012:
1006:
1001:
996:
991:
986:
978:
976:
964:
960:
956:
952:
951:
947:
938:
933:
929:
918:
907:
904:
902:
899:
897:
894:
892:
889:
887:
884:
882:
879:
875:
869:
868:15 March 2010
862:In this issue
857:
848:
840:
830:
828:
823:
821:
811:
807:
804:
803:
799:
796:
795:
794:
793:
786:
781:
778:
777:
772:
769:
768:
764:
761:
760:
756:
753:
752:
747:
746:
742:
738:
735:
734:
733:
732:
724:
721:
720:
715:
711:
707:
704:
703:
698:
695:
694:
689:
686:
685:
680:
676:
673:
672:
671:
670:
662:
659:
658:
654:
649:
646:
645:
641:
636:
633:
632:
627:
626:
622:
617:
614:
613:
609:
608:
604:
600:
595:
592:
591:
587:
586:point of view
582:
578:
573:
572:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
550:
546:
542:
541:
537:
533:
529:
528:
524:
520:
517:
516:
515:
514:
512:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
472:
471:
467:
463:
460:
459:
455:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
423:
422:
417:
414:
413:
409:
405:
401:
398:
397:
396:
395:
393:
389:
379:
376:
375:
370:
367:
366:
362:
358:
355:
354:
350:
345:
342:
341:
337:
336:Gaelic script
333:
330:
329:
324:
321:
320:
319:
318:
314:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
287:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
268:Great Britain
265:
261:
256:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
224:
222:
214:
210:
207:
204:
200:
198:
196:
190:
186:
184:
181:for the next
180:
177:
174:
170:
167:
166:
164:
161:
159:
158:
152:
142:
134:
132:
124:
122:
114:
112:
104:
102:
94:
92:
84:
83:
75:
56:
54:15 March 2010
48:
43:
34:
23:
19:
975:The Signpost
974:
895:
874:all comments
824:
815:
809:
808:I hope this
805:
797:
791:
790:
779:
770:
762:
754:
736:
730:
729:
722:
717:involvement.
705:
696:
687:
674:
668:
667:
660:
653:The Troubles
647:
639:
634:
615:
602:
598:
593:
518:
508:
507:
494:good article
486:George Moore
473:
461:
433:Irish people
428:
424:
415:
399:
385:
384:
377:
368:
356:
343:
331:
322:
316:
315:
288:
257:
230:
218:
194:
162:
1011:Suggestions
955:Patriot8790
928:transcluded
886:In the news
827:the archive
763:Fergananim:
688:Fergananim:
635:Fergananim:
562:nationalist
425:Fergananim:
419:interested.
357:Fergananim:
245:to-do lists
891:Dispatches
798:ww2censor:
780:ww2censor:
714:references
706:ww2censor:
661:ww2censor:
532:the island
474:ww2censor:
466:Free Derry
445:Irish name
378:ww2censor:
303:Fergananim
219:Go to the
79:Share this
74:Contribute
22:2010-03-15
1005:Subscribe
932:talk page
806:Scolaire:
771:Scolaire:
723:Scolaire:
710:citations
697:Evertype:
682:expanded.
648:Scolaire:
603:different
594:Evertype:
536:the state
462:Scolaire:
416:Evertype:
369:Scolaire:
332:Evertype:
311:ww2censor
193:bringing
1024:Category
1000:Newsroom
995:Archives
977:archives
837:Previous
810:Signpost
700:editors.
577:Scotland
566:unionist
560:, or of
523:WikiOgre
406:and the
338:as well.
307:Scolaire
295:Evertype
173:fancruft
151:Mabeenot
121:LinkedIn
101:Facebook
20: |
679:Ireland
599:problem
500:to the
490:Ireland
111:Twitter
621:Gnevin
605:names.
309:, and
278:, and
266:, and
131:Reddit
91:E-mail
990:About
664:2011!
629:time.
581:Wales
16:<
985:Home
959:talk
845:Next
739:For
712:and
640:very
579:and
564:and
534:and
484:and
447:and
390:and
239:and
187:The
179:Vote
141:Digg
737:RA:
519:RA:
431:in
400:RA:
323:RA:
149:By
76:—
1026::
961:)
835:←
829:.
443:,
439:,
313:.
305:,
301:,
297:,
293:,
286:.
274:,
262:,
255:.
979:.
957:(
949:.
939:.
876:)
872:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
