852:
read books, have editing experience and have a desire to share knowledge are only a subset of the general population. It seems to me that if someone hadn't already become an editor years back based upon hearing about
Knowledge (XXG) and being interested, odds are good they just weren't all that interested. Early adopters are going to be more suited for the tasks involved, obviously, and the pool of available potential newbies will just get worse and worse as time goes on. That's not to say that we should not treat newbies with respect and welcome them, but I think we already do that to the extent we should be. As a basic philosophy we ought to do more to hang onto and encourage long time contributors who have proven themselves to the project. While Knowledge (XXG) is the encyclopedia anyone
784:, but that page doesn't appear to attract much attention any more. I'd be curious to know what the trend in the ratio of stubs:non-stub articles. If the ratio since the 2006 peak of new articles has been in favor of non-stub articles, that would support the "low-hanging fruit" hypothesis of declining new article creation -- viz., it is easier to improve an existing article than to create a new one. But if the ratio has remained roughly the same then the cause of the new article fall-off might be due to increased barriers to new article creation. (I don't know whether the XML data dumps would permit one to easily determine how the number of links to a page or template increased or decreased over time, which is the only way I can think of to arrive at this ratio.) --
295:
303:
174:
166:
349:, currently Jay Walsh), whose purpose will be to "serve the Wikimedia community and Wikimedia Foundation staff by increasing the quantity and quality of communications between and among the Wikimedia Foundation and the Wikimedia community." The list of job duties, apart from those concerning the communication of the achievements of Wikimedia projects to an external audience, also indicates planned changes to the interaction between the Foundation and volunteers:
397:
587:
117:
107:
33:
127:
87:
137:
97:
683:
The relative drop in retention is obviously worrying. I am wondering though, do we have numbers available on the net amount of editors who are still active one year later? A quick look at the chart suggests (though there is no evidence) that this number is fairly constant. If it is, or is even rising
459:
stated that as long as the debate about the corresponding clause in German law (§ 72 UrhG) was still open, it had to be assumed that such reproductions "can not be used in
Knowledge (XXG) unless the (reproduction) photographer has permitted the reuse". Another controversial conclusion was that while
875:
Knowledge (XXG) is getting big, is widely used and I would assume we could at least attract 10 times as many contributors. So why don't we? Two factors, learning to edit and motivation, of which I think the last is the most important. Most people are not self-starters and need to be told by someone
851:
The thing I don't get is why people who ought to know better are surprised that recent new editors don't stick around as long and blame it on how hard it is to use tools, that they aren't feeling welcomed, etc. Certain people are more suited for editing an encyclopedia than others. Individuals who
262:
She then went on to name "Openness Begets
Participation" as a strategy to solve the problem ("I believe we need to make editing fun again for everybody: both new editors and experienced editors. ... Quality and openness go hand in hand"), and outlined "The Year Ahead", based on the Foundation's
252:
effect, in which the existing community struggles to integrate the newbies while at the same time striving to preserve the ability to do its work. It does that by developing self-repair and defense mechanisms – which in our case, turned out to be things like bot- and script-supported reverts,
392:
who "on a day-to-day basis ... will create, mine and analyze data to help understand readers and editors of different
Wikimedia projects, especially Knowledge (XXG), across different geographies", and based on them create "reports, charts, graphs, maps and tables" to "concisely, clearly and
370:
Build strong relationships with
Wikimedia project representatives (Knowledge (XXG) and its sister projects), chapter members, and informal organizations (including student groups) to improve the quality and quantity of story-telling directed at users, contributors, media, and important
274:, "a comprehensive analysis of our product priorities" based on its 2010–15 strategic plan (with "product" being defined as "technology through which people receive and develop Wikimedia content"). The following priorities were named, some of them comprising already ongoing efforts:
327:
rose from 5,000 edits to 11,426. Since the start of last year the number of editors breaking the 100,000 barrier has jumped by more than half, from 68 to 109, whilst the number of editors who have contributed over 200,000 edits has doubled from ten to twenty. This prompted
248:"Between 2005 and 2007, newbies started having real trouble successfully joining the Wikimedia community. ... Here’s what we think is happening: As successful communities get really big, they naturally suffer growing pains. New people flood in, creating an
360:
Develop an internal, movement communications strategy for WMF that leverages pre-existing platforms (wikis, blogs, mailing lists, etc) and proposes new methods for bringing stories, mission-critical and general information to the 100,000+ strong
Wikimedia
735:, both the software used to generate the datasets from the Knowledge (XXG) XML dumps and the tools for analysis are open source. That page has step by step instructions for recreating his software platform if you want to run your own analysis -- more at
322:
recently analyzed the edit numbers of the most active editors on the
English Knowledge (XXG) (by edit count), concluding that 27% of all edits have been done by a core group of 4,000 editors. In the last three years the number of edits needed to get onto
450:
concerning the use of images on
Knowledge (XXG) under German law, commissioned from its longtime counsel, Berlin law firm JBB. Regarding the reuse of reproduction photographs of two-dimensional public domain (gemeinfrei) works – the German equivalent of
891:
Thanks for the idea. If the WMF acts on your idea, we'll likely end up seeing Jimmy Wales' mug at the top of every page for the rest of the year. And the PTB will also disable our ability to suppress these messages even for users with a login. --
253:
deletions, user warnings, and complex policies. All those mechanisms are obviously helpful ... But they’ve also made it harder and harder for new people to join us, which in turn seems to have made experienced editors' work harder as well.
876:
they respect, community leaders etc. So even though we need to have a welcoming environment and keep on trying making it easier to contributer, I think we really need to have various big-shots to recommend contributing.
468:) as long as they are attributed, it is nevertheless not possible to publish them under a free license such as the CC-BY-SA, because the same clause (§ 59 UrhG) prohibited modifications. While presenting the expertise,
552:) appeared to be exactly identical except for one word in the lead ("XYZ is a village of Uttarakhand, India"), despite being over 5000 bytes long – the rest of each article was mostly filled by a brief history of the
472:
from
Wikimedia Deutschland emphasized that it "does not have an immediate impact on current practices, e.g. on Wikimedia Commons, and should be understood as a contribution to the continued discussion within the
332:
to broaden the list from the 4,000 editors with the highest edit count to 5,000. So as of 9 March 2011, all editors with 9,168 edits or more are on the latest list (though some have opted out of being named).
662:
621:
626:
631:
860:
be editing it regularly. They can contribute what they can add of value, and as time goes on and articles are already established newbies will have less available to do. And that's a good thing.
480:
574:
565:
268:
73:
636:
616:
604:
447:
329:
781:
367:
Establish a
Foundation-wide, information broadcast schedule to enable more predictable and consistent sharing of Foundation news, activities and accomplishments with the community."
598:
52:
41:
324:
185:(commissioned in October "to help better understand the internal dynamics of our communities") was published last week. The summary lists five "early conclusions:":
977:
518:
21:
952:
342:
947:
942:
460:
photos taken from a public place of copyrighted buildings and sculptures that are permanently located in such a place may be freely reproduced under the
937:
389:
294:
452:
736:
508:
932:
586:
46:
32:
17:
739:
too. My understanding is that it's actually not in tabular format currently, since he stores everything on his server hosting
732:
490:
182:
807:
jumped from 10,000 to 100,000 entries in the space of five months with entries copied verbatim from other wikis, such as "
381:
255:
212:
465:
354:
244:
190:
224:
901:
885:
869:
844:
826:
793:
761:
726:
717:
It was an interesting read. I'm wondering though where I could find the tabular data from these charts, if available.
712:
693:
302:
755:
have it in CSV form though in order to generate the graphs, so you should ask on the talk page of the March Update.
307:
744:
722:
689:
821:
541:
958:
836:
for recognizing the value in providing useful quality content over junk stub farms. I applaud his decision. --
298:
The 4,000 most active Wikipedians compared to the rest of the EN Knowledge (XXG) community as of March 2, 2011.
803:
Article count inflation happens all the time with (what should be) the smaller Wikimedia wikis. Recently, the
346:
199:
The retention of New Wikipedians dropped dramatically from mid 2005 to early 2007, and has since remained low.
405:
469:
154:
264:
718:
685:
228:
416:
for family reasons at the end of June, after completing the development of the 2011–12 business plan.
220:
337:
Foundation staff: New positions for "Movement Communications" and data analysis, chief officer leaving
504:
494:
173:
881:
842:
461:
165:
684:
slightly, there is less to worry about. Does anyone know if and where these numbers can be found?
433:
865:
549:
521:
on data from the pilot project exploring the use of the Article feedback tool has been published
177:"The beginning of the retention drop in 2005 coincides with the explosion of active editors ."
90:
897:
789:
757:
708:
703:. Even if that's not what you're looking for, it is an interesting & informative read. --
658:
534:
by CEDRO, a Spanish author's rights society, concerning a link on the Spanish Knowledge (XXG).
531:
249:
120:
437:
393:
meaningfully convey information for a lay audience, Wikimedia community and the foundation."
396:
319:
232:
100:
429:
413:
409:
130:
804:
202:
This trend cannot be simply attributed to increased newbie experimentation or vandalism.
877:
837:
971:
861:
833:
817:
548:) reported that over 9450 of its articles (nearly one seventh of all articles of the
545:
893:
785:
704:
110:
140:
748:
553:
236:
700:
456:
408:, who has been the Foundation's Chief Financial and Operating Officer (CFOO)
311:
150:
68:
Foundation reports editor trends, technology plans and communication changes
808:
812:
920:
444:
Legal concerns about freedom of panorama and 2D reproductions in Germany
290:
Create a delightful experience for contributing and reviewing multimedia
740:
436:
on his recent trip to India as the Wikimedia Foundation's fellow for
924:
161:
Citing editor statistics, Foundation presents upcoming product plans
916:
169:
Age (in "wiki-years") of editors who made at least 50 edits in 2010
395:
301:
293:
377:
Actively monitor and participate in discussions on mailing lists.
528:
341:
Last week, the Wikimedia Foundation posted a job opening for a
51:
782:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Modelling Knowledge (XXG) extended growth
527:: The Wikimedia Foundation recently received and acted upon a
351:
241:
239:
presented the study's results, interpreting them as follows:
187:
542:
Quantity over quality: The sad story of Hindi Knowledge (XXG)
507:, mentioning among other things ongoing work on the upcoming
585:
538:
More than 9000 articles deleted on the Hindi Knowledge (XXG)
491:
Amical Viquipèdia ("Friends of Knowledge (XXG)") association
205:
Editor retention has not worsened over the past three years.
31:
306:
Edit distribution for the 4,000 most active Wikipedians (
208:
The retention rate of long-time editors is about 75–80%.
777:
674:
667:
647:
325:
List of 4,000 Wikipedians who have done the most edits
672:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
235:), the Wikimedia Foundation's Executive Director
479:: The Hungarian Wikimedia chapter published its
284:Support community growth in developing countries
8:
556:state. The articles have since been deleted.
183:Wikimedia Foundation's "Editor Trends Study"
440:(collaboration with cultural institutions).
493:of Catalan Wikipedians has published its
231:– the English version has so far received
978:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2011-03
446:: The German Wikimedia chapter recently
172:
164:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
699:I think the information you want is at
675:
651:
196:Knowledge (XXG) communities are aging .
67:
503:: Wikimedia Nederland published their
388:Another job opening was posted for a
7:
345:, a new position (reporting to the
509:Europe-wide "Wiki Loves Monuments"
53:
28:
657:These comments are automatically
135:
125:
115:
105:
95:
85:
495:report for December to February
400:Outgoing CFOO Veronique Kessler
343:Movement Communications Manager
310:indicates that might satisfy a
776:I'll repeat here a suggestion
668:add the page to your watchlist
287:Serve audiences on all devices
1:
515:New article feedback analysis
281:Improve the newbie experience
219:In a letter to Wikimedians ("
733:Editor Trends Study/Software
501:Wikimedia Netherlands report
390:Data Analyst and Researcher
701:Editor_Trends_Study/Results
466:Commons:Freedom of panorama
994:
902:22:46, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
886:19:22, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
870:14:42, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
845:08:22, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
827:08:08, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
794:17:44, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
762:22:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
727:21:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
713:17:07, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
694:09:15, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
540:: In a blog post titled "
448:published a legal opinion
751:who worked on the study
481:report for February 2011
477:Wikimedia Hungary report
414:announced she will leave
544:", Utkarshraj Atmaram (
758:Steven Walling at work
665:. To follow comments,
590:
401:
347:Head of Communications
315:
299:
278:Create a visual editor
178:
170:
36:
589:
550:Hindi Knowledge (XXG)
404:In other staff news,
399:
305:
297:
176:
168:
35:
661:from this article's
856:edit, not everyone
805:Malagasy Wiktionary
622:Features and admins
505:report for February
462:freedom of panorama
410:since February 2008
731:As you can see at
652:Discuss this story
627:Arbitration report
591:
578:"News and notes" →
453:Bridgeman v. Corel
432:) has published a
426:GLAM trip to India
402:
316:
300:
265:Product Whitepaper
179:
171:
42:← Back to Contents
37:
825:
745:document-oriented
676:purging the cache
632:Technology report
470:Mathias Schindler
464:clause (see also
406:Veronique Kessler
386:
385:
318:In related news,
308:previous research
260:
259:
250:Eternal September
221:March 2011 Update
217:
216:
155:WereSpielChequers
47:View Latest Issue
985:
961:
840:
815:
760:
719:Martijn Hoekstra
686:Martijn Hoekstra
679:
677:
671:
650:
609:
601:
594:
577:
570:"News and notes"
569:
519:further analysis
352:
320:Kevin Rutherford
242:
233:over 18000 views
188:
157:
139:
138:
129:
128:
119:
118:
109:
108:
99:
98:
89:
88:
59:
57:
55:
993:
992:
988:
987:
986:
984:
983:
982:
968:
967:
966:
965:
964:
963:
962:
957:
955:
950:
945:
940:
935:
928:
908:
907:
838:
756:
681:
673:
666:
655:
654:
648:+ Add a comment
646:
642:
641:
640:
602:
597:
595:
592:
581:
580:
575:
572:
567:
532:takedown notice
457:controversially
430:User:Witty lama
422:
339:
163:
158:
148:
147:
146:
145:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
86:
80:
77:
66:
62:
60:
50:
49:
44:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
991:
989:
981:
980:
970:
969:
956:
951:
946:
941:
936:
931:
930:
929:
910:
909:
906:
905:
904:
873:
872:
848:
847:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
656:
653:
645:
644:
643:
639:
634:
629:
624:
619:
614:
612:News and notes
608:
596:
584:
583:
582:
573:
564:
563:
562:
560:
558:
557:
535:
522:
512:
498:
487:Catalan report
484:
474:
441:
428:: Liam Wyatt (
421:
418:
384:
383:
380:
379:
378:
375:
372:
368:
365:
362:
356:
338:
335:
292:
291:
288:
285:
282:
279:
258:
257:
254:
246:
215:
214:
211:
210:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
192:
162:
159:
144:
143:
133:
123:
113:
103:
93:
82:
81:
78:
72:
71:
70:
69:
65:News and notes
64:
63:
61:
58:
45:
40:
39:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
990:
979:
976:
975:
973:
960:
954:
949:
944:
939:
934:
926:
922:
918:
914:
911:Keep up with
903:
899:
895:
890:
889:
888:
887:
883:
879:
871:
867:
863:
859:
855:
850:
849:
846:
843:
841:
835:
834:User:Utcursch
831:
830:
829:
828:
823:
819:
814:
810:
806:
795:
791:
787:
783:
779:
775:
774:
773:
772:
771:
770:
763:
759:
754:
750:
746:
742:
738:
734:
730:
729:
728:
724:
720:
716:
715:
714:
710:
706:
702:
698:
697:
696:
695:
691:
687:
678:
669:
664:
660:
649:
638:
637:Editcountitis
635:
633:
630:
628:
625:
623:
620:
618:
615:
613:
610:
606:
600:
599:14 March 2011
593:In this issue
588:
579:
571:
561:
555:
551:
547:
546:User:Utcursch
543:
539:
536:
533:
530:
526:
525:DMCA takedown
523:
520:
516:
513:
510:
506:
502:
499:
496:
492:
488:
485:
482:
478:
475:
471:
467:
463:
458:
454:
449:
445:
442:
439:
435:
431:
427:
424:
423:
419:
417:
415:
411:
407:
398:
394:
391:
376:
373:
371:stakeholders.
369:
366:
363:
359:
358:
357:
353:
350:
348:
344:
336:
334:
331:
326:
321:
313:
309:
304:
296:
289:
286:
283:
280:
277:
276:
275:
273:
271:
266:
251:
247:
243:
240:
238:
234:
230:
229:CentralNotice
226:
222:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
194:
193:
189:
186:
184:
175:
167:
160:
156:
152:
142:
134:
132:
124:
122:
114:
112:
104:
102:
94:
92:
84:
83:
75:
56:
54:14 March 2011
48:
43:
34:
23:
19:
913:The Signpost
912:
874:
857:
853:
832:Hats off to
802:
752:
747:). However,
682:
611:
605:all comments
559:
537:
524:
514:
500:
486:
476:
443:
425:
403:
387:
340:
317:
269:
261:
218:
180:
151:Tilman Bayer
959:Suggestions
813:Minh Nguyễn
737:Methodology
659:transcluded
617:In the news
554:Uttarakhand
237:Sue Gardner
743:(which is
473:projects."
361:community.
330:a proposal
225:advertised
79:Share this
74:Contribute
22:2011-03-14
953:Subscribe
878:Ulflarsen
663:talk page
312:power law
972:Category
948:Newsroom
943:Archives
925:Mastodon
921:Facebook
862:DreamGuy
822:contribs
568:Previous
511:campaign
272:coverage
270:Signpost
121:LinkedIn
101:Facebook
20: |
917:Twitter
894:llywrch
786:llywrch
741:MongoDB
705:llywrch
455:-, it
420:Briefly
111:Twitter
858:should
778:I made
489:: The
434:report
131:Reddit
91:E-mail
938:About
811:". –
753:might
749:Howie
438:GLAMs
16:<
933:Home
898:talk
882:talk
866:talk
818:talk
809:stop
790:talk
723:talk
709:talk
690:talk
576:Next
529:DMCA
517:: A
227:via
181:The
153:and
141:Digg
923:or
915:on
854:can
780:at
374:...
267:" (
223:",
149:By
76:—
974::
919:,
900:)
884:)
868:)
820:,
792:)
725:)
711:)
692:)
566:←
412:,
382:”
364:..
355:“
256:”
245:“
213:”
191:“
927:.
896:(
880:(
864:(
839:œ
824:)
816:(
788:(
721:(
707:(
688:(
680:.
670:.
607:)
603:(
497:.
483:.
314:)
263:"
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
