610:
of the archives that was downloaded and is now being selectively released. This looks like it will happen for the foreseeable future until those posting the extracts at
Knowledge (XXG) Review get bored. Are you going to say every week that the leaks are 'continuing'? You might also want to note that the person claiming to be the original leaker ('Wikileaker') is now posting what they have, so you have the bizarre situation of rival leakers 'competing' for attention.
359:
117:
107:
33:
127:
87:
137:
97:
479:
is not sophisticated enough to do this, but it's not "bad faith" - in some cases, phrasing like the above often is used to convey a connection, an implicit nudge-and-wink. This is usually done in a situation where there is evidence, but it wouldn't hold up in court and stating the connection outright
456:
For clarity, this report (and its author) are observing that the email leaks issue has not been resolved when the resignation occurred; the resignation occurred at a time where/while the emails continue to be published. This is not a statement or suggestion regarding who is responsible for the leaks
266:
Nabla is aware from the relevant admin noticeboard discussion, as well as the arbitration case request, that some editors' trust in his ability to serve as an effective admin has been eroded, both because of his IP edits and because of his period of inactivity. If Nabla intends to resume active work
262:
Nabla's conduct in admittedly making several unproductive edits while editing as an IP has been subject to significant, and justified, criticism. The
Committee joined in disapproving of this behavior, but accepted Nabla's assurance that he will not repeat it in the future, even to express good-faith
609:
from a previous wording similar to that suggested above. My issue with the wording 'while mailing list leaks continue' is that is it just plain inaccurate. It appears (though it is not certain) that this was a one-time leak and that the drip-drip of postings on
Knowledge (XXG) Review is from a copy
258:
will observe all applicable policies, avoid inappropriate edits, and behave with maturity and professionalism throughout their participation on
Knowledge (XXG). While admins are not expected to be perfect, severe or repeated violations of policies and Community norms may lead to appropriate
632:
that the phrasing "leaks continue" is misleading (and that's generous). I also think the timing of the resignation and the leaks is not coincidental, but I disagree that the
Signpost should imply this absent evidence. I do not see the admission of the connection that
185:
for background about this case.) During the week, the evidence which was submitted on-wiki by the filer of the case (now blocked as a sockpuppet of a banned user) was collapsed. Other parties made modifications and additions to their on-wiki
274:
216:
434:
393:
346:
337:
204:
178:
408:
461:
is specifically limiting itself to the statements from the earlier coverage linked in the report. Should further information about the source of the leak be identified, we will let our readers know.
398:
515:
The leaks are mentioned under the heading of "Arbitrator resigns" and the two are linked, if only temporally, within one sentence. Regardless of the writer's intent, this gives the very strong
383:
324:
73:
187:
388:
376:
370:
52:
41:
195:
309:
169:
267:
as an admin, he should first refamiliarize himself with all applicable policies. The
Committee recommended that he initially focus on less controversial admin tasks.
748:
565:
that her resignation was connected with the leaks - not in the sense of any wrongdoing on her part, but I can't see that assertion in the report either. Regards,
293:
247:
21:
300:
resigned from her position as an arbitrator. A few hours before the announcement was made official, Shell Kinney put a "retired" tag on her userpage with an
723:
494:
I'd prefer the title to be “Arb resigns; mailing list leaks continue; Motion re: admin” so that it doesn't appear to imply what it's not actually saying.
718:
713:
708:
277:
regarding inactive admin accounts. The
Committee indicated that it stands ready to play its part if necessary once consensus has been determined.
211:
for background about this case.) During the week, 11 of the 15 active arbitrators voted on the principles and findings of fact drafted by
157:
703:
358:
46:
32:
17:
682:
667:
650:
619:
596:
574:
546:
532:
510:
489:
470:
270:
The
Committee noted that to an extent, the recommendations in 3. apply to any admin after a long period of inactivity.
243:
219:; currently, proposals concerning three individual editors and a discretionary sanctions scheme are being considered.
673:
I think you're referring to a different leaker - there are two different people (I assume) leaking documents now --
678:
592:
485:
316:
542:
729:
694:
674:
588:
481:
562:
212:
663:
466:
644:
615:
538:
528:
320:
503:
637:
sees, but I'm not good at penumbras, so perhaps I just don't know how to parse the tea leaves.--
480:
would be cause for a libel lawsuit. Again, this isn't at the level, it's just poor phrasing. --
255:
90:
430:
297:
273:
Although not directly relevant to Nabla's situation, the
Committee expressed its awareness of
120:
659:
462:
150:
100:
639:
629:
611:
457:(and it would be unfair to interpret it as a suggestion or attempt at aspersion-casting).
237:
130:
570:
524:
254:
The
Committee reaffirmed its expectation (along with the Community's expectation) that
742:
497:
110:
140:
233:
634:
566:
215:. In the coming week, arbitrators are expected to submit more votes in the
583:, rather, poor phrasing, which in different circumstances could be an
658:
Information about the leaker has appeared on Knowledge (XXG) Review.
319:, the Committee's non-public mailing list, continue to be leaked on
246:) was declined. Instead, the Committee enacted a motion, which was
315:
The resignation has come at a time where several email threads of
68:
Arb retires while mailing list leaks continue; Motion re: admin
51:
357:
31:
263:
concerns or frustrations regarding aspects of the project.
606:
446:
439:
419:
305:
301:
229:
310:
list of current members of the Arbitration Committee
444:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
160:opened no new cases. Two cases are currently open.
605:It is worth noting that the subtitle was changed
8:
259:sanctions, up to and including desysopping.
749:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2011-07
692:Make sure we cover what matters to you –
217:remedies section of the proposed decision
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
447:
423:
67:
304:that said "update". Her name was also
7:
53:
28:
429:These comments are automatically
275:the ongoing community discussion
135:
125:
115:
105:
95:
85:
440:add the page to your watchlist
1:
250:13 to 1 (with 1 abstention):
475:1) Nobody reads comments 2)
561:Note: Shell Kinney has now
519:of innuendo. It is at best
765:
683:15:56, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
668:01:16, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
651:17:32, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
620:03:03, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
597:23:38, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
575:23:06, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
547:02:16, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
533:20:09, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
511:17:00, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
490:16:16, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
471:15:50, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
232:regarding administrator
501:
437:. To follow comments,
362:
350:"Arbitration report" →
321:Knowledge (XXG) Review
36:
361:
158:Arbitration Committee
35:
433:from this article's
342:"Arbitration report"
695:leave a suggestion
424:Discuss this story
404:Arbitration report
394:WikiProject report
363:
287:Arbitrator resigns
65:Arbitration report
42:← Back to Contents
37:
523:poor phrasing. ~
448:purging the cache
409:Technology report
213:Elen of the Roads
47:View Latest Issue
756:
732:
697:
675:Seth Finkelstein
649:
647:
642:
589:Seth Finkelstein
509:
482:Seth Finkelstein
451:
449:
443:
422:
399:Featured content
381:
373:
366:
349:
341:
220:
191:
153:
139:
138:
129:
128:
119:
118:
109:
108:
99:
98:
89:
88:
59:
57:
55:
764:
763:
759:
758:
757:
755:
754:
753:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
733:
728:
726:
721:
716:
711:
706:
699:
693:
689:
688:
645:
640:
638:
539:Tim Landscheidt
506:
495:
453:
445:
438:
427:
426:
420:+ Add a comment
418:
414:
413:
412:
374:
369:
367:
364:
353:
352:
347:
344:
339:
289:
284:
228:An arbitration
226:
202:
200:
176:
174:
166:
154:
148:
147:
146:
145:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
86:
80:
77:
66:
62:
60:
50:
49:
44:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
762:
760:
752:
751:
741:
740:
727:
722:
717:
712:
707:
702:
701:
700:
691:
690:
687:
686:
685:
656:
655:
654:
653:
623:
622:
602:
601:
600:
599:
586:
582:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
502:
428:
425:
417:
416:
415:
411:
406:
401:
396:
391:
386:
384:News and notes
380:
368:
356:
355:
354:
345:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
313:
292:The Committee
288:
285:
283:
280:
279:
278:
271:
268:
264:
260:
225:
222:
199:
193:
173:
167:
165:
162:
144:
143:
133:
123:
113:
103:
93:
82:
81:
78:
72:
71:
70:
69:
64:
63:
61:
58:
45:
40:
39:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
761:
750:
747:
746:
744:
731:
725:
720:
715:
710:
705:
696:
684:
680:
676:
672:
671:
670:
669:
665:
661:
652:
648:
643:
636:
631:
628:I agree with
627:
626:
625:
624:
621:
617:
613:
608:
604:
603:
598:
594:
590:
584:
580:
578:
577:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
559:
548:
544:
540:
536:
535:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
513:
512:
508:
505:
499:
493:
492:
491:
487:
483:
478:
474:
473:
472:
468:
464:
460:
455:
454:
450:
441:
436:
432:
421:
410:
407:
405:
402:
400:
397:
395:
392:
390:
387:
385:
382:
378:
372:
365:In this issue
360:
351:
343:
330:
328:
322:
318:
314:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
290:
286:
281:
276:
272:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:
251:
249:
245:
242:
239:
235:
231:
223:
221:
218:
214:
210:
208:
197:
194:
192:
189:
184:
182:
171:
168:
163:
161:
159:
152:
142:
134:
132:
124:
122:
114:
112:
104:
102:
94:
92:
84:
83:
75:
56:
48:
43:
34:
23:
19:
657:
520:
516:
477:The Signpost
476:
459:The Signpost
458:
403:
377:all comments
326:
325:last week's
302:edit summary
298:Shell Kinney
240:
230:case request
227:
206:
201:
196:Tree shaping
180:
175:
155:
730:Suggestions
660:Count Iblis
585:implication
463:Ncmvocalist
431:transcluded
389:In the news
371:4 July 2011
323:. See also
151:Ncmvocalist
54:4 July 2011
641:SPhilbrick
630:Carcharoth
612:Carcharoth
517:appearance
170:MickMacNee
164:Open cases
79:Share this
74:Contribute
22:2011-07-04
724:Subscribe
581:assertion
563:confirmed
525:Ningauble
521:extremely
435:talk page
308:from the
294:announced
198:(Week 10)
743:Category
719:Newsroom
714:Archives
498:A. di M.
340:Previous
329:coverage
327:Signpost
317:arbcom-l
244:contribs
209:coverage
207:Signpost
205:earlier
188:evidence
183:coverage
181:Signpost
179:earlier
172:(Week 3)
121:LinkedIn
101:Facebook
20: |
537:ACK. --
306:removed
111:Twitter
256:admins
248:passed
224:Motion
131:Reddit
91:E-mail
709:About
587:. --
296:that
282:Other
234:Nabla
203:(See
177:(See
16:<
704:Home
679:talk
664:talk
635:HaeB
616:talk
607:here
593:talk
579:Not
571:talk
567:HaeB
543:talk
529:talk
486:talk
467:talk
348:Next
238:talk
156:The
141:Digg
504:plé
149:By
76:—
745::
681:)
666:)
618:)
595:)
573:)
545:)
531:)
496:―
488:)
469:)
338:←
698:.
677:(
662:(
646:T
614:(
591:(
569:(
541:(
527:(
507:
500:
484:(
465:(
452:.
442:.
379:)
375:(
331:.
312:.
241:·
236:(
190:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
