944:
the opposite direction. I could leave it at such an analysis, but since anyone following the issue knows my opinion, and might well not be as convinced as I am of my own objectivity, I will follow that section with an op-ed explaining how I reach my conclusion. I would expect this all to be fairly long, about 1000 words, but I can do it shorter. I do not see the initial or current discussion on the en
Talkpage for the referendum as showing only a small opposition, but rather quite the opposite, so I think the brief comment above was indeed incorrect. (I do not intend to measure the number of participants on each side, or refer to them by name) As for the general balance between the foundation and the community, I have 3 wikifriends on the board, one a rather close wikifriend. I nonetheless am quite opposed to some of the major things that the present and past boards have done, as well as the overall trend towards increase of their general role. I think the general bias here is much less than Jarry thinks, but nonetheless present.
174:
701:
fancy signatures on talk pages, and the "Show changes" button that generates diffs that often don't clearly identify what changed, to name some major offenders. But I think hitting someone with an infobox, right off the bat when they open an editing window, is among the best ways to show someone new to
Knowledge (XXG) that they're going to need to invest significant time if they want to figure out this Knowledge (XXG) editing thing. And, of course, that's just the technical side of becoming an editor: there is also NOR and NPOV and RS and notability, and dozens more policies and a thousand and one guidelines, not to mention IAR, that one should really learn to be a first-class editor. --
561:
117:
107:
462:
166:
33:
127:
87:
137:
97:
1073:
appear to miss that such trends can be self-perpetuating; systemic bias may well be caused by a lack of editors interested in certain topics, but it also cements the lack of editors that caused it in the first place. As such, initiatives that reach out to prospective editors and encourage them to contribute are valuable and worthwhile.
830:, but never really answered, how do you vote no on the image referendum? I put 0's (and a 10 on one) for the questions it asked and fully expressed my disagreement with the image filter in the open comment section, but it would be much easier if there was just a specific question about whether you want the image filter or not.
700:
Of course there is also the virtually incomprehensible formatting of tables (as opposed to a WYSIWYG interface in tablespace, as many other wikis have), the fifteen different ways in which footnotes and notes and references can be created; the unthreaded discussions on talk pages; the html mixed into
662:
One clear message that I got from this event was that many attendees found the editing interface cumbersome, with comments such as it should be "easier to edit", "more intuitive like
Facebook or Word". I hadn't really thought about this before having been used to other wikis and early word processors
200:
At the event, after a talk about how to edit and how to avoid the pitfalls, the audience pulled laptops out and started editing. A second presentation soon followed with discussion on some of the problems new editors (both male and female) face including unexplained reversion of their changes and the
943:
directions correct, (though some of the subsidiary views presented in each direction seem otherwise), and it a question of balancing them. I have no doubt at all about where the balance lies, but it is a matter of opinion and priorities, and the same discussion can equally well convince others in
926:
controversy that might signal teh death of it. (As I say, in this case, the discussions I read were 80-20 support.) And yes, my suggest of an Op-Ed was entirely serious. If DGG (or anyone else) could write something in the next 72 hours it stands a good chance of being published in the next issue. -
901:
I apologize if I offended you with my statement. I was referring more to my view that the
Signpost is very pro-Foundation in the sense that, when there is a conflict between the Foundation and the community, the Signpost will often only cover the subject cursorily or will cover it with language that
261:
These were complete newbies. So we actually found that rather than editing during the night, we were having to familiarise them with the interface, which a lot of feedback was also focused on. However, some external links were added and a few people found WikiProjects they were interested in, so the
925:
I am aware that The
Signpost has been (is) generally quite pro-Foundation (although whether this is intentional or not I do not know, but I suspect not), and personally I would like to see more contrary, but such things are inevitably difficult to pull off without miring The Signpost in the sort of
276:
I think it's a certainty that there are other minorities on
Knowledge (XXG), and I think we not only have to reach out to these people but also take note of our own privileges in doing so. One of the best things about this event was that we didn't tell women why they didn't edit, we asked, and more
313:
are open until 7 September 2011, 23:59 (UTC). Candidates must be 18 or older, have three months of experience as administrators, and must be willing to identify themselves to the
Foundation. Stewards are empowered to intercede on local projects in need of technical and administrative assistance,
280:
From the feedback we received, the online ambassadors program and more welcoming parties need to be introduced to help with the initial editing experience - many women wanted help and someone to personally assist them in their
Knowledge (XXG) journey, and cited not having this as a main reason for
250:
The attendees were very interested in editing topics they were interested in, and agreed that general women's issues and interests should be covered more in depth and given more interest on the project. However, they were also averse to being pigeon holed. Generalisations about women and what they
1072:
You do have a point insofar as that it is at best questionable to expect people to edit in areas they aren't interested in for no other reason than that others who are interested in those areas feel these are underpresented. At the same time, your inflammatory rhetoric is not helpful, and you do
1078:
Of course, it should also go without saying that this must not be done at the expense of other editors. Every constructive contributor is appreciated, and everyone's good-faith contributions are valuable, no matter their age, nationality, sex, skin color, gender, area of expertise/interest etc.
481:
Castle, heritage site of national significance. The topic was the state and future of GLAM projects in
Switzerland, and feedback from the French chapter Wikimédia France. The speakers were Adrienne Alix, director of programs, and Benoît Evellin, former Wikimedia-in-Residence at the Palace of
884:
As the contributor of that sentence, I can truthfully say that the balance presented was my honest apparisal of the ongoing foundation-l threads. I admit, however, that it may have been wrong of me to extrapolate from that sample without checking the many other possible for outrage to be
902:
is subtly stating that the
Foundation is correct. And the current situation seems to show that there is far more than just a little opposition to the image filter. I would personally say that the support and opposition to the filter is about 50-50, from looking over discussions myself.
291:
We are hoping to collaborate with Girl Geek Dinners again in the future, and we are also hoping to set up editing days for those who express interest at the Girl Geek Dinners. So yes! I'd also like to thank Wikimedia UK and Bristol Girl Geek dinners for putting on such a wonderful
833:
Separately, I must comment that the Signpost saying "but criticised by a small number of others" is extremely inaccurate if you look at the discussions going on about the image filter, though I suppose everyone already knows that the Signpost is biased in its reporting.
244:
vs. video games. These examples are always inevitably followed by someone pointing out that it is sexist to presume that women are interested in fashion designers rather than baseball cards. Was topic choice something that women attending had any strong opinions
1105:
isn't obligatory either. It's just a nice thing to do. How to handle systemic bias: realise it is there, point it out to new contributors, share the problem with the particular affected groups, and if they are interested give them the option of participating in
962:
I have decided to wait till after the referendum. The result should give me a better idea of what needs to be said. as my opinion. If , contrary to my expectations, mine turns out to be a small minority view, what I say will be rather different.
869:"The Signpost is biased" is (to my knowledge) incorrect, although it almost certainly is biased insofar as it represents the attitudes of its writers. In any case, attributing anything to a deliberate attempt at bias almost certainly fails
197:). As with all Girl Geek Dinner events, the primary audience was women and men could attend if they accompanied a female attendee. Wikimedia UK provided food and drink including a cake decorated to look like the Knowledge (XXG) globe.
1079:
Balance can be achieved in many ways, but not all of them are beneficial in the long run, and we as a community should take care to not exclude anyone or feel anyone unwelcome, and this goes for men just as much as for women. --
327:
729:
This is long before we get into formatting references, policies, tables, etc. Just the first impressions were felt to be quite off-putting to many of the attendees who had not actually tried to edit before.
1010:, so as to clarify meaning, especially in the Knowledge (XXG) banner announcement. When I first saw this a few minutes ago, I thought it had to do with a feature to hide your personal images. I think that
636:
1136:
I really admire these folks putting this editathon together, and if any of them are reading this, hats off to you! I went through and added a bunch of additional categories to the individual articles in
1141:, and also fixed some defaultsorts. I think that adding the categories to those pages will help bring readers to those articles who might not otherwise have made it there - For instance, by editing the
605:
595:
610:
600:
348:
subdomains, it is not language specific, but includes posts by chapters in any language (or multiple languages). As of time of writing, some 19 chapters have their blogposts pooled by the service.
905:
If you are serious about the suggestion of an Op-Ed, I would prefer to defer it to someone with better writing chops than myself, but who also has the same mindset about the image filter, namely
326:
have announced their intention to abstain from confirming the outcome. The elections follow discussions on the steward mailing list and a recent request for comment from the steward ranks asking
548:
539:
410:. Most active in 2006, it is the first issue of the bulletin to be published since January, and covers the ongoing image referendum as well as linking to other major reports published recently.
385:
73:
682:
they found unintuitive, which is the take-home message for us: was it the templates (especially some of the clunkier reference templates that spread vertically)? Was it the image syntaxes?
451:
the filter project as "acting very thoughtfully and going in a direction carefully chosen to be consistent with our values"), but criticised by a small number of others (for example, Coren
590:
578:
388:
over a letter published by the Wikimedia board of trustees calling for more rigorous controls on chapter funding cooled, commentators have turned to related subjects. Gerard Meijssen
1183:
572:
52:
41:
271:
has set of increasing participation by women? And do you think the participation gap might extend to other groups like ethnic minorities, religious groups, LGBT people etc.?
173:
514:
1138:
286:
Do you know if there are any plans to have future Wikimedia events in the UK on women editing Knowledge (XXG), either through the Girl Geek Dinners or independently?
500:
of folk art, toys, and other objects. Wikipedians participated both on-site and virtually, creating four new articles, adding photographs, and translating articles.
1235:
726:
I was repeatedly asked why one could not just right click at the point where one desired to enter / amend text. Just like you do in a word-processor such as Word.
392:
the often-aired sentiment that a Wikimedia USA should be created despite concerns that it would need to cover too large an area, whilst French Wikimedian Teofilo
518:
663:
since the 1980s. A WYSIWYG editing interface may help new editors break the ice. Congrats to the organisers of this event, which was positive and interesting.
765:- you're not going to find anything when scanning a page for buttons with the default skin. Which word processors require right clicking to edit documents? --
526:
482:
Versailles. After the talks, Wikimedia CH president Mourad Ben Abdallah opened a discussion between the public, attending Wikimedians and GLAM representatives.
21:
723:
If you click at the edit button at the top of many articles, the first thing you see in the edit box is an infobox template, which can look rather daunting.
1210:
1205:
1200:
1171:
1154:
493:
310:
1195:
489:
396:
outright criticism of chapters' practices, including hiring staff, though such opinions are yet to find great support among the wider community.
213:
212:, "the Bristol Girl Geeks were almost unanimous in their criticism of the Knowledge (XXG) editing interface". The event was also written up at
888:
As a gesture of good faith, I would invite you to (re-, I presume)write up your thoughts on the image filter and referendum in the form of an
1049:(no wonder!), why should we, therefore, edit their topics? If we do not start becoming more girly will Knowledge (XXG) never get rid of its
1057:
851:
I suspect I also gave a 10 to the same question you did, Silver seren. And I would be very surprised if we were the only ones to do so. --
447:, devised by the WMF Board of Trustees, is underway. The actions of the board in creating the referendum were praised by some (Alec Conroy
318:, the election is being organised by a committee of stewards in collaboration with the Wikimedia Foundation's Head of Reader Relations,
256:
There were newbies editing at the event: how did they get on? Any new pages get created? Anyone have any particularly good experiences?
1150:
1080:
433:
There was a discussion this week on the foundation-l mailing list about the possibility of providing an English Knowledge (XXG) feed.
277:
minorities need to have the opportunity to speak out on their own behalf about what keeps them from editing and any issues they face.
1190:
560:
241:
46:
32:
17:
427:
within the Turkish Wikimedian community, which recently lost its Wikimania 2012 bid and is facing possible government censorship.
209:
281:
not editing that includes helping with layout issues, learning markup and working with new editors when their edits are reverted
1041:, and agreed that general women's issues and interests should be covered more in depth and given more interest on the project.
420:
240:) issues on Knowledge (XXG), the overall issue often gets obscured by the examples: baseball cards vs. fashion designers,
201:"excessive zeal" of some experienced Wikipedians in reverting, warning and deleting new content and tagging articles with
770:
1123:
1088:
1065:
1027:
974:
955:
935:
I will try; I expect to have the time tonight to do it. Despite my advocacy, I think I'm capable of an objective
930:
920:
896:
860:
845:
816:
785:
740:
715:
It is quite basic stuff really. Some of it so simple that it dosen't occur to experienced editors as being a problem.
710:
695:
672:
389:
1142:
1216:
993:
707:
306:
1061:
444:
355:
189:
with Wikimedia UK to try to encourage and help women edit Knowledge (XXG). The session was led by Fiona Apps (
1084:
812:
766:
68:
Girl Geeks edit while they dine, candidates needed for forthcoming steward elections, image referendum opens
1111:
1098:
474:
915:
873:: The Signpost is written to tight deadlines, by a small number of people. It is always difficult to read
840:
205:. Fiona responded by explaining to new contributors about how to resolve disputes on the discussion page.
1146:
827:
781:
736:
668:
267:
Have you got any thoughts on how the community or the Foundation might help meet the rather modest goal
186:
1119:
456:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
323:
314:
such as combating crosswiki vandalism. As a result of the departure of former Volunteer Coordinator
703:
319:
251:
were interested in, and an overall sense of patronisation, were very prevalent themes of the night.
1167:
1023:
808:
510:
407:
194:
262:
overall impression was good. 43% of those attending said they were interested in further editing
992:
On the banner announcement about the image vote - I just posted this today at Wikimedia on the
90:
910:
856:
835:
632:
497:
337:
182:
120:
530:
237:
777:
732:
664:
465:
Prangins Castle, the site of a conference hosted this week by the Swiss chapter Wikimedia CH
268:
231:
Wikimedia UK, I think it was Martin Poulter who approached the Girl Geek Dinners organisers.
1107:
1102:
522:
100:
1115:
878:
690:
452:
448:
434:
393:
150:
807:, who wasn't able to attend on the day. Fiona herself devised the format of the evening.
202:
130:
870:
1158:
927:
893:
344:, has been launched, focussing on the blogs of Wikimedia chapters. Unlike the official
154:
909:. If that is possible, I would be glad to ask him whether he would be up to doing so.
1229:
1163:
1019:
970:
951:
529:, and cleaning up redirects. She will also be able to use her new admin tools in the
406:, "an independent internal news bulletin for the members of the Wikimedia community"
315:
424:
193:, an administrator on English Knowledge (XXG)) and was supported by Martin Poulter (
852:
776:
I am just reporting what the users, new editors actually said. They said buttons!
110:
461:
140:
521:; her candidacy succeeded without opposition. Fluffernutter expects to work on
683:
190:
1110:. If they still want to go and write about Pokémon or baseball cards, again,
1038:
The attendees were very interested in editing topics they were interested in
459:
by not including an option to signal dislike of the whole idea of a filter).
165:
965:
946:
906:
478:
473:
On Saturday the Swiss chapter Wikimedia CH organised a French-speaking
309:, preparations are underway for this year's second steward elections.
330:, centering on tenure and granting of permissions of responsibility.
939:
of the discussion without bias. I consider the basic arguments in
892:, and I will personally make every effort to have it published. -
889:
460:
172:
164:
341:
226:
Whose idea was having a Knowledge (XXG)-related Girl Geek Dinner?
877:
thread on the topic. A better rule would therefore be to accept
804:
51:
803:
been my idea, but it was actually my Wikimedia UK colleague
559:
31:
169:
The Girl Geeks had a Knowledge (XXG) globe-shaped cake...
1047:
more interested in editing topics they are interested in
720:
Which of the many edit buttons on a page should be used?
648:
641:
621:
1157:, you might get readers who started out reading about
1006:
Let me suggest that as soon as possible, we hyphenate
646:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
437:
a list of currently available micro-blogging feeds.
354:: Several chapters announced publication of their
1131:
527:Category:Knowledge (XXG) protected edit requests
345:
1139:Category:The Children's Museum of Indianapolis
8:
757:May reduce confusion if referred to as edit
1132:Children's Museum of Indianapolis editathon
1013:...opt-in personal image-hiding feature...
1236:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2011-08
1001:...opt-in personal image hiding feature..
1155:Category:Natural history of South Dakota
496:on Saturday, August 20, focusing on its
328:How to make your Wikimedian life easier?
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
649:
625:
419:: Ayhan Aytes, one of the Foundation's
161:Bristol hosts "Girl Geeks vs. Wikimeet"
67:
1053:? Let them go f-ck themselves, I say.
322:. In a departure from elections past,
490:The Children's Museum of Indianapolis
7:
1151:Category:Specific fossil specimens
236:In discussions of gender gap (and
53:
28:
1182:is written by editors like you –
1112:Knowledge (XXG) is not obligatory
1099:Knowledge (XXG) is not obligatory
631:These comments are automatically
414:WikiHistories – Turkish 'Vikipedi
336:A new blog aggregation service ('
222:spoke to Fiona about the event:
135:
125:
115:
105:
95:
85:
1045:It turns out that men are also
471:GLAM conference in Switzerland:
642:add the page to your watchlist
486:Backstage pass and edit-a-thon
453:accused the referendum writers
358:last week: Wikimedia Hungary (
342:http://www.chaptersplanet.org/
208:According to a writeup on the
177:...which was quickly consumed.
1:
786:17:34, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
421:WikiHistories summer fellows
185:hosted a joint event at the
1172:02:03, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
1124:11:28, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
1089:11:15, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
1066:07:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
1028:01:36, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
975:06:09, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
956:17:35, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
931:09:53, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
921:09:29, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
897:07:58, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
861:05:22, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
846:03:47, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
817:22:11, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
741:09:48, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
711:01:48, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
696:01:31, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
673:00:15, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
346:http://planet.wikimedia.org
1252:
881:and assume ignorance here.
449:described those overseeing
1143:Bucky (Tyrannosaurus rex)
431:More content on Twitter?:
374:) and Wikimedia Denmark (
303:Steward candidates wanted
678:It's unclear above just
435:The thread also included
242:Mexican feminist writers
1145:article to put it into
658:Girl Geeks vs. Wikimeet
445:image filter referendum
639:. To follow comments,
564:
466:
402:The latest edition of
334:New Chapters 'Planet':
178:
170:
36:
1147:Category:Tyrannosaurs
994:page for this project
563:
464:
425:on his investigations
370:), Wikimedia Sweden (
311:Candidate submissions
210:Bristol Wireless blog
187:University of Bristol
181:On Thursday, Bristol
176:
168:
35:
635:from this article's
457:begging the question
533:work that she does.
376:second quarter 2011
214:thefreshoutlook.com
626:Discuss this story
606:Arbitration report
596:WikiProject report
565:
552:"News and notes" →
504:New administrator:
467:
441:Referendum ongoing
408:has been published
372:June and July 2011
320:Philippe Beaudette
195:User:MartinPoulter
179:
171:
42:← Back to Contents
37:
799:I wish the event
650:purging the cache
611:Technology report
498:Caplan Collection
386:the public debate
324:Board of Trustees
183:Girl Geek Dinners
47:View Latest Issue
1243:
1219:
1016:does the trick.
918:
913:
843:
838:
822:Image referendum
706:
693:
688:
653:
651:
645:
624:
601:Featured content
583:
575:
568:
551:
544:"News and notes"
543:
417:
157:
139:
138:
129:
128:
119:
118:
109:
108:
99:
98:
89:
88:
59:
57:
55:
1251:
1250:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1215:
1213:
1208:
1203:
1198:
1193:
1186:
1176:
1175:
1134:
1035:
1004:
916:
911:
841:
836:
824:
702:
691:
684:
660:
655:
647:
640:
629:
628:
622:+ Add a comment
620:
616:
615:
614:
576:
571:
569:
566:
555:
554:
549:
546:
541:
415:
382:Wikimedia USA?:
356:regular reports
352:Chapter reports
299:
163:
158:
148:
147:
146:
145:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
86:
80:
77:
66:
62:
60:
50:
49:
44:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1249:
1247:
1239:
1238:
1228:
1227:
1214:
1209:
1204:
1199:
1194:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1178:
1177:
1174:
1159:Sue (dinosaur)
1133:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1092:
1091:
1075:
1074:
1069:
1068:
1058:187.113.193.31
1034:
1031:
998:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
977:
903:
886:
882:
879:Hanlon's razor
864:
863:
823:
820:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
730:
727:
724:
721:
717:
716:
704:John Broughton
659:
656:
630:
627:
619:
618:
617:
613:
608:
603:
598:
593:
588:
586:News and notes
582:
573:22 August 2011
570:
558:
557:
556:
547:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
501:
483:
468:
438:
428:
411:
397:
379:
349:
331:
298:
295:
294:
293:
283:
282:
278:
264:
263:
253:
252:
233:
232:
162:
159:
144:
143:
133:
123:
113:
103:
93:
82:
81:
78:
72:
71:
70:
69:
65:News and notes
64:
63:
61:
58:
54:22 August 2011
45:
40:
39:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1248:
1237:
1234:
1233:
1231:
1218:
1212:
1207:
1202:
1197:
1192:
1185:
1181:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1162:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1077:
1076:
1071:
1070:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1052:
1051:systemic bias
1048:
1043:
1042:
1039:
1032:
1030:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1015:
1014:
1009:
1003:
1002:
997:
995:
976:
972:
968:
967:
961:
960:
959:
958:
957:
953:
949:
948:
942:
938:
934:
933:
932:
929:
924:
923:
922:
919:
914:
908:
904:
900:
899:
898:
895:
891:
887:
883:
880:
876:
872:
871:Occam's razor
868:
867:
866:
865:
862:
858:
854:
850:
849:
848:
847:
844:
839:
831:
829:
826:As discussed
821:
819:
818:
814:
810:
809:MartinPoulter
806:
802:
787:
783:
779:
775:
774:
772:
768:
764:
760:
756:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
742:
738:
734:
731:
728:
725:
722:
719:
718:
714:
713:
712:
709:
705:
699:
698:
697:
694:
689:
687:
681:
677:
676:
675:
674:
670:
666:
657:
652:
643:
638:
634:
623:
612:
609:
607:
604:
602:
599:
597:
594:
592:
589:
587:
584:
580:
574:
567:In this issue
562:
553:
545:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
511:Fluffernutter
508:
505:
502:
499:
495:
491:
487:
484:
480:
476:
472:
469:
463:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
439:
436:
432:
429:
426:
422:
418:
412:
409:
405:
401:
400:New Wikizine:
398:
395:
391:
387:
383:
380:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
350:
347:
343:
339:
335:
332:
329:
325:
321:
317:
312:
308:
304:
301:
300:
296:
290:
289:
288:
287:
279:
275:
274:
273:
272:
270:
260:
259:
258:
257:
249:
248:
247:
246:
243:
239:
238:systemic bias
230:
229:
228:
227:
223:
221:
217:
215:
211:
206:
204:
198:
196:
192:
188:
184:
175:
167:
160:
156:
152:
142:
134:
132:
124:
122:
114:
112:
104:
102:
94:
92:
84:
83:
75:
56:
48:
43:
34:
23:
19:
1180:The Signpost
1179:
1135:
1081:88.70.193.14
1050:
1046:
1044:
1040:
1037:
1036:
1033:Girly things
1018:
1012:
1011:
1008:image-hiding
1007:
1005:
1000:
999:
991:
964:
945:
940:
936:
874:
832:
825:
805:Steve Virgin
800:
798:
769:, 2011-08-31
762:
761:rather than
758:
685:
679:
661:
585:
579:all comments
519:newest admin
507:The Signpost
506:
503:
485:
470:
440:
430:
413:
403:
399:
394:strayed into
390:picked up on
381:
351:
333:
302:
285:
284:
266:
265:
255:
254:
235:
234:
225:
224:
220:The Signpost
219:
218:
207:
203:cleanup tags
199:
180:
1217:Suggestions
778:Jezhotwells
733:Jezhotwells
665:Jezhotwells
633:transcluded
591:In the news
423:, reported
269:Sue Gardner
1116:Tom Morris
885:presented.
492:hosted an
475:conference
191:User:Panyd
151:Tom Morris
79:Share this
74:Contribute
22:2011-08-22
1211:Subscribe
928:Jarry1250
894:Jarry1250
637:talk page
517:) as our
509:welcomes
494:editathon
316:Cary Bass
307:Meta-Wiki
155:Skomorokh
1230:Category
1206:Newsroom
1201:Archives
1184:join in!
1164:KConWiki
1020:KConWiki
937:analysis
907:User:DGG
542:Previous
479:Prangins
404:Wikizine
368:May 2011
297:In brief
121:LinkedIn
101:Facebook
20: |
853:llywrch
773:10:49z
767:Jeandré
763:buttons
477:at the
111:Twitter
1153:, and
1108:WP:CSB
1103:WP:CSB
1101:, and
1097:Well,
912:Silver
837:Silver
692:(talk)
523:WP:AIV
443:: The
366:, and
338:planet
292:event!
131:Reddit
91:E-mail
1196:About
971:talk
952:talk
917:seren
890:Op-Ed
875:every
842:seren
759:links
364:April
360:March
305:: On
16:<
1191:Home
1168:talk
1120:talk
1085:talk
1062:talk
1024:talk
996::
941:both
857:talk
828:here
813:talk
782:talk
737:talk
708:(♫♫)
686:Tony
680:what
669:talk
550:Next
531:OTRS
525:and
340:'),
153:and
141:Digg
1114:! —
966:DGG
947:DGG
801:had
515:nom
455:of
384:As
245:on?
149:By
76:—
1232::
1170:)
1161:.
1149:,
1122:)
1087:)
1064:)
1026:)
973:)
954:)
859:)
815:)
784:)
739:)
671:)
540:←
488::
378:).
362:,
216:.
1166:(
1118:(
1083:(
1060:(
1022:(
969:(
950:(
855:(
811:(
780:(
771:t
735:(
667:(
654:.
644:.
581:)
577:(
513:(
416:'
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
