277:
247:
448:. Many other editors cooperated in ways big and small and after many months we had a very large article with almost a hundred images developed which we took to Good Article level. This proved to me that amateurs could make substantial contributions. Formal training in biology was less important here than an affinity for biology and scientific temperament in general. So yes, it was proved that an average editor like me could contribute substantially to science despite not possessing formal degrees.
236:
695:
161:
117:
107:
266:
255:
225:
33:
127:
87:
652:
dependable taxonomic work on Indian butterflies has emerged since last fifty years. We are now waiting for
Krushnamegh Kunte's Indian butterfly checklist which has been under making for a number of years. This will help us decide which articles to delete/merge/rename etc. Lack of access to resources cloistered behind paywalls has also hampered us but
137:
97:
508:. In my experience, coverage on Knowledge (XXG) is mostly influenced by distribution of the species and not if they are a butterfly or a moth. Information on Neotropical, African and especially south-east Asian species is often hard to find, while there is a lot of info available for European species.
443:
Among the things I felt deprived as a child were good books informing us about butterfly physiology, behaviour, migration etc. I had an urge to help create just such a resource as I had coveted. Sadly, I found there were no experts willing to spare any time. So I decided that this was just the kind
382:
I joined the project because of my love for all invertebrates and thought my photographic abilities could help the project. Both my educational and professional backgrounds have lead me to work within the field of entomology. I've worked with the
Encyclopedia of Life, iNature and a few other random
504:
The number of moth articles is far greater, but this is mainly due to the fact that there are a lot more moth species (I think it was 20,000 butterflies vs. 130,000 moths). I am mainly working on moths and add about 10 new articles to
Knowledge (XXG) each day. We even have "complete coverage" for
567:
We have a lot of pictures of western
European and Australian species and quite some for North American species. In my experience it is a lot harder to find images for species from other parts of the world though. I had some success convincing someone from Taiwan to release over a 1,000 images of
431:
I am not an expert at all, but I have learned quite a bit about taxonomy down the road. In my experience, there are two crucial things (with regards to taxonomy) to keep in mind when writing an article on a living thing: 1. always include the original combination (i.e.: the genus the species was
651:
I concur with
Ruigeroeland, lack of eyeballs and minds is a serious constraint to us. Lack of up-to-date taxonomic resources is another challenge we face. For example, our work on Indian butterflies came to a halt when we realised that we were creating more dubious species than valid ones. No
394:
When I returned to the UK in 2003 after 14 years in the tropics, I restarted an "old" hobby of butterfly watching. In the intervening time, I also became seriously interested in conservation. I am an avid reader when it comes to my hobbies and a professional editor and writer. I then "found"
536:
Its not all that hard to find images of
Lepidoptera, I am one of the photographers and I am always on the look out for images that can help the project grow. There is a rather sizable list of Leps that need photos though, anything from the deep jungles and
476:
In my personal experience butterflies tend to get a lot more coverage unless the species of moth is of economic importance (invasives, silk worms, etc.). Though in general the project covers their bases pretty darn well compared to other projects in
370:
and
Shyamal helped me at first. Soon people began to join in and we had a small bunch of enthusiastic editors going about this humungous task. Being an electrical engineer, I had no formal training except for a lifelong passion for the
444:
of challenge so many
Wikipedians have faced and will face again and that it was doable. A simple framework was created and by adding fact after referenced fact and images, slowly but surely an article began to develop on the
197:
780:
464:
Which tend to be better covered by
Knowledge (XXG): butterflies or moths? In general, how does Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of Lepidoptera compare to coverage of other living things? What can be done to improve this
623:
Besides the taxon-related articles, we have a great need for well-developed
Lepidoptera biology and conservation related articles. We don't have a complete framework in place on these topics, much less developed
488:
The situation of Lepidopteran taxonomy is a bit confused and there is as yet no single global project that has reached the maturity level of say the world's birds. Even at the family level, there have been major
408:
Writing articles on the taxonomy and anatomy of living creatures can become fairly technical. What can the average editor contribute to Lepidoptera articles, even if they don't have specialized knowledge in the
611:
I would personally like to see the project take on the large scale research of deep jungle Leps. This would take a lot of work but it would be a hugely useful tool for students, teachers and for environmental
519:
I'd guess butterflies. Can we advertise for contributors within Knowledge (XXG) itself? Make it clear that the input of the most inexperienced writers who are keen is better than having a stub or no entry at
719:
749:
682:
673:
754:
734:
744:
729:
665:
73:
493:
in recent times. There are a few expert projects that have attempted to create a systematic index but this is as yet incomplete and that ambiguity spills over as a problem for Knowledge (XXG).
432:
first placed in + the name of the species) as a synonym. 2. Add all synonyms you can find. This is the only way to ensure a single species will not be added to wikipedia under various names.
724:
712:
362:
and I had an informal task force on Indian butterflies which we immediately affiliated to the WikiProject. Over time, I found the courage to set up WikiProject Lepidoptera. IronChris,
706:
52:
41:
179:
192:
889:
339:
What motivated you to join WikiProject Lepidoptera? Does your educational background or professional experience involve working with Lepidoptera or other insects?
302:
640:
There are tons of articles on species to be made. At this point, only a handful of people are active in the project and all help would be greatly appreciated.
21:
383:
sites here and there and once worked as an Aquatic Entomologist at Northern Michigan University where I finished a minor in Biology (focusing on entomology).
864:
859:
854:
420:
The project always needs help. Even if you don't have knowledge in the field you can still help with general grammar, clean up and vandalism protection.
579:
Yes and no. Maybe the Project page should have specific requests. Maybe someone should tell me to get on and upload my images of African Lepidoptera!
849:
595:
As such we have not had any notable collaboration that I can think off. We are not averse to the idea but no opportunity seems to have come about.
525:
How difficult is it to obtain images of Lepidoptera? Are there specific butterflies and moths the project could use some help photographing?
445:
844:
694:
600:
What are the project's short-term and long-term goals? How do you envision the project changing and growing over the next few years?
46:
32:
17:
293:. Started in May 2006, the project has grown to include over 45,000 pages about butterflies and moths. The project maintains a
403:
local branch. One of my fellow Wikipedians then persuaded me to take on a more active role for British butterflies in general.
813:
653:
553:
201:
870:
276:
298:
294:
289:
246:
400:
506:
216:
90:
776:
635:
562:
499:
426:
325:
229:
120:
807:
606:
531:
471:
415:
396:
377:
313:
270:
187:
235:
100:
240:
130:
490:
574:
514:
454:
389:
367:
351:
319:
265:
259:
208:
Submit your project's news and announcements for next week's WikiProject Report at the
883:
359:
281:
150:
543:
483:
355:
331:
110:
350:
When I joined up I found that there was no WikiProject for these creatures. Then
140:
803:
661:
646:
618:
590:
505:
some of the moth families. For those interested, you can see the progress here:
438:
345:
307:
548:
Many of the old works on Lepidoptera have gone into the public domain and the
363:
254:
224:
629:
What are the project's most urgent needs? How can a new member help today?
305:
showing where work still needs to be done. We interviewed project founder
552:
has done a marvellous job of making these available for harvesting (e.g.
832:
354:
came up with WikiProject Arthropods and I was intrigued. At that time,
836:
828:
568:
moths to wikimedia. I would love to see other people try the same.
584:
Does WikiProject Lepidoptera collaborate with any other projects?
250:
The Lepidoptera collection in Cherni Osam Natural Sciences Museum
51:
693:
159:
31:
792:
785:
765:
549:
459:
Yes, if they have access to relevant taxonomic works.
183:
is in full swing. Start earning your barnstar today!
68:
The Butterflies and Moths of WikiProject Lepidoptera
790:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
802:Gorgeous pics! Thanks for the treat. Regards,
8:
890:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2012-04
275:
264:
253:
245:
234:
223:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
793:
769:
656:has been able to help us in many cases.
67:
7:
287:This week, we spread our wings with
554:commons:Category:Lepidoptera Indica
664:. Until then, trust no one in the
446:external morphology of Lepidoptera
53:
28:
775:These comments are automatically
654:Knowledge (XXG):Resource request
135:
125:
115:
105:
95:
85:
786:add the page to your watchlist
395:Knowledge (XXG) and worked on
1:
662:the truth is really out there
660:Next week, we'll find out if
550:Biodiversity Heritage Library
399:as I was doing the same for
906:
814:17:07, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
260:Leopard Lacewing Butterfly
196:from now until May with
290:WikiProject Lepidoptera
271:Red Admiralty Butterfly
783:. To follow comments,
698:
686:"WikiProject report" →
401:Butterfly Conservation
284:
273:
262:
251:
243:
232:
190:in the Netherlands is
164:
36:
697:
279:
268:
257:
249:
238:
227:
163:
35:
779:from this article's
720:Arbitration analysis
678:"WikiProject report"
282:Paper Kite Butterfly
241:Six-Spot Burnet Moth
202:Teylers GLAM project
193:sponsoring a contest
303:taxonomic checklist
770:Discuss this story
750:Arbitration report
740:WikiProject report
699:
285:
274:
263:
252:
244:
233:
180:April Wikify Drive
165:
65:WikiProject report
42:← Back to Contents
37:
794:purging the cache
755:Technology report
735:Discussion report
299:helpful resources
230:Monarch Butterfly
198:real-world prizes
47:View Latest Issue
897:
873:
797:
795:
789:
768:
745:Featured content
717:
709:
702:
685:
677:
397:Heath Fritillary
217:WikiProject Desk
214:
169:
168:WikiProject news
166:
162:
153:
139:
138:
129:
128:
119:
118:
109:
108:
99:
98:
89:
88:
59:
57:
55:
905:
904:
900:
899:
898:
896:
895:
894:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
869:
867:
862:
857:
852:
847:
840:
820:
819:
799:
791:
784:
773:
772:
766:+ Add a comment
764:
760:
759:
758:
710:
705:
703:
700:
689:
688:
683:
680:
675:
320:Grmanners (GRM)
222:
221:
220:
212:
206:
200:as part of the
188:Teyler's Museum
173:
172:
167:
160:
158:
154:
148:
147:
146:
145:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
86:
80:
77:
66:
62:
60:
50:
49:
44:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
903:
901:
893:
892:
882:
881:
868:
863:
858:
853:
848:
843:
842:
841:
822:
821:
818:
817:
816:
774:
771:
763:
762:
761:
757:
752:
747:
742:
737:
732:
730:News and notes
727:
722:
716:
704:
692:
691:
690:
681:
672:
671:
670:
658:
657:
642:
641:
626:
625:
614:
613:
597:
596:
581:
580:
570:
569:
558:
557:
539:
538:
522:
521:
510:
509:
495:
494:
479:
478:
461:
460:
450:
449:
434:
433:
422:
421:
405:
404:
385:
384:
373:
372:
207:
205:
204:
184:
174:
170:
157:
156:
155:
144:
143:
133:
123:
113:
103:
93:
82:
81:
78:
72:
71:
70:
69:
64:
63:
61:
58:
45:
40:
39:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
902:
891:
888:
887:
885:
872:
866:
861:
856:
851:
846:
838:
834:
830:
826:
823:Keep up with
815:
811:
810:
805:
801:
800:
796:
787:
782:
778:
767:
756:
753:
751:
748:
746:
743:
741:
738:
736:
733:
731:
728:
726:
723:
721:
718:
714:
708:
707:16 April 2012
701:In this issue
696:
687:
679:
669:
667:
663:
655:
650:
648:
644:
643:
639:
637:
633:
632:
631:
630:
622:
620:
616:
615:
612:conservation.
610:
608:
604:
603:
602:
601:
594:
592:
588:
587:
586:
585:
578:
576:
572:
571:
566:
564:
560:
559:
555:
551:
547:
545:
541:
540:
535:
533:
529:
528:
527:
526:
518:
516:
512:
511:
507:
503:
501:
497:
496:
492:
487:
485:
481:
480:
475:
473:
469:
468:
467:
466:
458:
456:
452:
451:
447:
442:
440:
436:
435:
430:
428:
424:
423:
419:
417:
413:
412:
411:
410:
402:
398:
393:
391:
387:
386:
381:
379:
375:
374:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
347:
343:
342:
341:
340:
336:
334:
333:
328:
327:
322:
321:
316:
315:
310:
309:
304:
300:
296:
295:list of tasks
292:
291:
283:
278:
272:
267:
261:
256:
248:
242:
237:
231:
226:
218:
211:
203:
199:
195:
194:
189:
185:
182:
181:
176:
175:
171:News in brief
152:
142:
134:
132:
124:
122:
114:
112:
104:
102:
94:
92:
84:
83:
75:
56:
54:16 April 2012
48:
43:
34:
23:
19:
825:The Signpost
824:
808:
739:
725:Paid editing
713:all comments
659:
645:
636:Ruigeroeland
634:
628:
627:
617:
605:
599:
598:
589:
583:
582:
573:
563:Ruigeroeland
561:
542:
530:
524:
523:
513:
500:Ruigeroeland
498:
482:
470:
463:
462:
453:
437:
427:Ruigeroeland
425:
414:
407:
406:
388:
376:
344:
338:
337:
330:
326:Ruigeroeland
324:
318:
312:
311:and members
306:
288:
286:
209:
191:
178:
871:Suggestions
777:transcluded
607:IvanTortuga
532:IvanTortuga
472:IvanTortuga
416:IvanTortuga
378:IvanTortuga
314:IvanTortuga
371:creatures.
297:, various
79:Share this
74:Contribute
22:2012-04-16
865:Subscribe
781:talk page
624:articles.
465:coverage?
368:Kugamazog
352:IronChris
884:Category
860:Newsroom
855:Archives
837:Mastodon
833:Facebook
676:Previous
537:tundras.
491:shakeups
477:zoology.
360:VirenVaz
301:, and a
210:Signpost
151:Mabeenot
121:LinkedIn
101:Facebook
20: |
829:Twitter
666:archive
544:Shyamal
484:Shyamal
356:Shyamal
332:Shyamal
111:Twitter
647:AshLin
619:AshLin
591:AshLin
439:AshLin
409:field?
346:AshLin
329:, and
308:AshLin
131:Reddit
91:E-mail
850:About
16:<
845:Home
809:talk
684:Next
520:all!
364:Kylu
186:The
177:The
141:Digg
835:or
827:on
804:RJH
575:GRM
515:GRM
455:GRM
390:GRM
149:By
76:—
886::
831:,
812:)
674:←
668:.
556:).
366:,
358:,
335:.
323:,
317:,
280:A
269:A
258:A
239:A
228:A
215:s
839:.
806:(
798:.
788:.
715:)
711:(
649::
638::
621::
609::
593::
577::
565::
546::
534::
517::
502::
486::
474::
457::
441::
429::
418::
392::
380::
348::
219:.
213:'
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
