493:: The contest has been running for around five years. I wasn't involved in the initial set-up but I gather that part of the inspiration came from the LGBT wikiproject. Originally points were only awarded for MilHist-centric article assessments, i.e. B-Class and A-Class, however a while back I suggested that we adopt a broader scoring base and award points for GA and FA assessments as well. This has been the norm ever since, except we also include C-Class assessments since Milhist adopted that assessment level. The highest point-scorer each month is awarded the
31:
report's first article about the project and make your way forward. While many WikiProjects provide a barnstar that can be awarded to helpful contributors, WikiProject
Military History has gone a step further by creating a variety of awards with different criteria ranging from the all-purpose WikiChevrons to rewards for participating in drives and improving special topics to medals for improving articles up to A-class status to the coveted "Military Historian of the Year" award.
549:: I have never been motivated by the prospect of receiving a chevron or other prestigious award. I have been awarded one military-themed barnstar in my Knowledge (XXG) career. This little bit of micro-gratitude has been enough to show that I am a valued contributor to the project. I think every editor that has invested a considerable amount of time in the pursuit of improving a WikiProject's coverage should be shown some appreciation in the form of at least one barnstar.
675:
165:
284:
121:
111:
276:
633:: One of the main reasons for my continuing participation in the WikiProject's internal review program is the recognition: one cannot expect an editor to write 6000 words on a soldier / general and not hope for some general recognition. It doesn't have to be anything big, just a way of saying that what we do is appreciated. Carrots, not sticks: that's the way to retain editors.
295:
37:
497:, and the runner-up the Writer's Barnstar. While it's a little difficult to quantify exactly how much the contest motivates people, the number of entrants and entries continues to remain fairly constant after all these years, so it certainly seems to have its place. Personally speaking I always like to get at least one entry in each month, so I know it motivates me... ;-)
639:: Writers stop writing if readers stop reading. Although a half a billion people read Knowledge (XXG) each month, that attention isn't enough by itself to keep writers from losing interest, in my experience ... but knowing that people care enough about what you're producing to review it and give you feedback that you find useful generally is enough, at least for a while.
131:
303:
91:
141:
572:: Although the project keeps track of clean-up requirements, there have been few backlog drives directed at them. The one big exception is the B-Class assessment backlog – the project's attempt to assess all start-class articles against our B-class criteria, which will help identify what needs doing and whether any is C-class – which, spearheaded by
101:
268:
610:: Theoretically, but in reality some projects may never be able to handle it. My main project (my wife, if you will) is WikiProject Indonesia, and the project now consists of essentially four or five editors. A formal system of rewards and contests with so few editors would essentially be rearranging the deck chairs on the
426:, both of which are well represented on Knowledge (XXG). I also work on articles on articles which cover modern militaries, which unfortunately still vary widely in coverage and quality (there's lots of opportunities for editors who would like to take on a big topic to work on getting these articles up to scratch).
526:
The project's coordinators award medals for editors who develop articles to A-class status (an A-class medal is awarded for every three successful nominations, with a sliding scale of medals to acknowledge editors with an excellent track record) and medals to recognise the contributions of people who
527:
review A-class nominations and editors with a long-running history of outstanding contributions. There's also an annual military historian of the year contest (awarded through a popular vote) and editors can award one another project-specific medals as they see fit. The project's monthly newsletter (
503:: I don't take part, because of the bureaucratic overhead to my contributions. However whilst the number of contributors isn't very high it doesn't take many to make something like that successful. If it it motivates even two or three people to go out when they didn't before, it's probably worth it.
253:
469:
program which will be a contest for the masses to design and eventually build an amphibious combat vehicle for the U.S. Marine Corps. This project may even establish crowdsourcing as the solution to the military's procurement woes if all works out well. I hope to have time to participate when the
30:
In recognition of... WikiProject
Military History: This week, we're checking out ways to motivate editors and recognize valuable contributions by focusing on the awards and rewards of WikiProject Military History. Anyone unfamiliar with WikiProject Military History is encouraged to start at the
595:
The project's large assortment of awards is likely related to the sheer size of WikiProject
Military History's community. Would contests, awards, and drives like these be feasible for smaller projects? What are the best ways to motivate contributors regardless of a project's size and
555:: To me, the awards are one way (amongst others) of recognising the wide range of activities that go into creating high quality articles, especially reviewing. Across the wiki we often overlook these, and the awards are a formal way of the community saying "thanks" to those involved.
204:
590:) is in keeping track of where we are. Perhaps as the deadlines tighten the organisational element might come to the fore, but we'll have to see. I don't see any downsides; arguably other areas might lose out but that's the nature of a volunteer-based encyclopedia.
345:
with different criteria ranging from the all-purpose WikiChevrons to rewards for participating in drives and improving special topics to medals for improving articles up to A-class status to the coveted "Military
Historian of the Year" award. We interviewed
195:
244:
476:: I've been a member for a couple of years - I think I first got involved in late 2009. I tend to focus on medieval and early-modern topics. Working on content is heavily dependent on sourcing, and I can only fit so many books in my house... :)
452:
edits like adding infoboxes to armored vehicle articles. As I got more invested in the project, I took charge of documenting the
Pentagon's various ambitious and rather ignominious attempts to develop and procure a modern ground
485:. When did it start and did you take inspiration from any other WikiProjects? How are contributors rewarded for participating in the monthly contests? Has it actually helped motivate the project's members to improve articles?
604:: I think awards, contests and drives should generally help motivate people, regardless of a project's size. Given that a smaller project has templates such as MilHist to draw from, there seems little to lose by trying...
543:, which is the project's highest mark of esteem for an editor. It cannot be self-nominated, and must be approved by a majority of project coordinators (who themselves are not eligible for the award while holding office).
745:
533:) reports on all the project-level awards. I think that this has been successful in motivating contributions to articles within the project's scope, as well as encouraging participation in project-level activities.
398:) and most of my good articles. I was drawn to it as a topic area – I'd never before had an interest in Spanish history or the inter-war period in particular. My other contributions have been diverse – including
577:
438:: I've been writing content on military topics for about a year and a half, but I just became a formal (registered) member last month. Most of my military articles are related to Indonesia, especially its
576:, has reduced outstanding articles from 27,000 to around 22,000. Quite an achievement, even if that figure has proven stubborn. The Operations vary in their success – there is no doubting the success of
662:
653:
334:
331:
328:
325:
321:
709:
714:
719:
584:
699:
645:
77:
692:
188:
787:
560:
Has WikiProject
Military History hosted any backlog elimination drives like the Guild of Copyeditors and WikiProject Wikify? How do these backlog drives compare to the four ongoing
406:. I joined the project in April 2011, although I'd been contributing in the topic area since the beginning of the year. I was made a Military History co-ordinator in September 2012.
686:
56:
45:
261:
WikiChevrons (left) are the project's standard barnstar, while the project's coordinators can award modified WikiChevrons (right) based on recommendations by project members
213:
482:
614:: we'd be so busy with administration that we'd never actually write the articles. A fairly large WikiProject, or one with a more general scope, may have more success.
540:
509:
494:
342:
840:
528:
21:
412:: I thought I should join as I've been writing on this topic. However I've not been collaborating with anyone through this nor has it had any impact, really.
815:
382:
How long have you been a member of WikiProject
Military History? Do you prefer working on articles related to particular subjects, people, or time periods?
810:
805:
561:
316:
800:
583:, but ultimately that's because there's a group of editors determined to work on that area, fancy name or not. The value in the others (like
508:
The project also hands out "WikiChevrons", service awards, and a variety of other goodies throughout the year. Please describe some of
448:: I started my career as a MilHist contributor in March 2009. I compensated for my total lack of knowledge of the topic by only making
432:: I've been a member of the project for about five years, and my main focus is Australian military aviation, particularly biographies.
512:
and why the project started offering them. Are new recipients of the awards honored in the project's newsletter or in any other ways?
338:
314:
This week, we're checking out ways to motivate editors and recognize valuable contributions by focusing on the awards and rewards of
795:
674:
50:
36:
17:
307:
279:
For editors who build a large number of A-class articles, the medal can be adorned with oak leaves, swords (pictured), and diamonds
439:
774:
458:
423:
564:
hosted by WikiProject
Military History? What are the benefits and limitations to these kinds of goal-oriented activities?
520:
I got a chevron, which was nice. It's a bit like a barnstar. Someone also awarded me a red army badge which was nice too.
310:, recognizes editors who have contributed the most to Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of military history during a given year
620:: DYK has been my motivation, together with scoping out what needed to be written and reducing the number of red links.
341:
that can be awarded to helpful contributors, WikiProject
Military History has gone a step further by creating a
821:
770:
466:
399:
367:
230:
449:
287:
Barnstars exist for some special topics, like this award for contributing to content about the
94:
766:
741:
391:
351:
124:
320:. Anyone unfamiliar with WikiProject Military History is encouraged to start at the report's
363:
183:
104:
395:
134:
283:
573:
454:
347:
288:
222:
Submit your project's news and announcements for next week's WikiProject Report at the
252:
834:
371:
359:
154:
418:: I've been a member of the project since 2006. I mainly work on topics relating to
419:
403:
114:
144:
355:
275:
644:
Next week, we'll sing for our supper. Until then, listen to the advice in our
375:
306:
The "Military
Historian of the Year" award, a modification of the standard
302:
294:
271:
Editors who bring three or more articles to A-class status receive a medal
243:
267:
394:
has been my pet project and has produced my only featured article (
462:
298:
Service awards are awarded for specific project tasks and drives
55:
457:
fleet for the U.S. Army. The most recent program, called the
673:
163:
35:
765:
Mabeenot, thanks for providing another piece to my puzzle.
539:: In addition to what Nick has covered above, there's the
757:
750:
730:
202:
WikiProject Articles for Creation is hosting its first
755:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
72:In recognition of... WikiProject Military History
196:November Copy Editing Backlog Elimination Drive
467:Fast Adaptable Next-Generation Ground Vehicle
8:
841:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2012-10
301:
293:
282:
274:
266:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
758:
734:
71:
29:
7:
390:: In terms of content creation, the
337:. While many WikiProjects provide a
57:
28:
740:These comments are automatically
625:Anything else you'd like to add?
251:
242:
139:
129:
119:
109:
99:
89:
751:add the page to your watchlist
470:contest opens up this January.
208:from 22 October to 21 November
1:
424:Military history of Australia
205:AFC Backlog Elimination Drive
184:WikiProject Freedom of Speech
775:14:55, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
541:WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves
481:Tell us about the project's
317:WikiProject Military History
857:
748:. To follow comments,
678:
666:"WikiProject report" →
324:about the project and
311:
299:
291:
280:
272:
168:
40:
677:
459:Ground Combat Vehicle
400:Henry VIII of England
305:
297:
286:
278:
270:
211:WikiProject Wikify's
167:
39:
744:from this article's
658:"WikiProject report"
440:national revolution
189:looking for members
735:Discuss this story
705:WikiProject report
679:
483:contest department
312:
300:
292:
281:
273:
169:
69:WikiProject report
46:← Back to Contents
41:
759:purging the cache
710:Technology report
392:Spanish Civil War
343:variety of awards
51:View Latest Issue
848:
824:
762:
760:
754:
733:
715:Featured content
697:
689:
682:
665:
657:
646:previous reports
465:'s crowdsourced
255:
246:
231:WikiProject Desk
228:
173:
172:WikiProject news
170:
166:
157:
143:
142:
133:
132:
123:
122:
113:
112:
103:
102:
93:
92:
63:
61:
59:
856:
855:
851:
850:
849:
847:
846:
845:
831:
830:
829:
828:
827:
826:
825:
820:
818:
813:
808:
803:
798:
791:
779:
778:
764:
756:
749:
738:
737:
731:+ Add a comment
729:
725:
724:
723:
720:Recent research
690:
687:29 October 2012
685:
683:
680:
669:
668:
663:
660:
655:
547:Marcus Qwertyus
446:Marcus Qwertyus
396:Nyon Conference
368:Marcus Qwertyus
265:
264:
263:
262:
258:
257:
256:
248:
247:
236:
235:
234:
226:
220:
199:begins Thursday
177:
176:
171:
164:
162:
158:
152:
151:
150:
149:
140:
130:
120:
110:
100:
90:
84:
81:
70:
66:
64:
58:29 October 2012
54:
53:
48:
42:
32:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
854:
852:
844:
843:
833:
832:
819:
814:
809:
804:
799:
794:
793:
792:
781:
780:
777:
739:
736:
728:
727:
726:
722:
717:
712:
707:
702:
700:News and notes
696:
684:
672:
671:
670:
661:
652:
651:
650:
643:
641:
640:
634:
622:
621:
615:
605:
592:
591:
580:Majestic Titan
557:
556:
550:
544:
534:
521:
505:
504:
498:
478:
477:
471:
455:combat vehicle
443:
433:
427:
413:
407:
289:Napoleonic Era
260:
259:
250:
249:
241:
240:
239:
238:
237:
221:
219:
218:
217:ends this week
209:
200:
191:
178:
174:
161:
160:
159:
148:
147:
137:
127:
117:
107:
97:
86:
85:
82:
76:
75:
74:
73:
68:
67:
65:
62:
49:
44:
43:
34:
33:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
853:
842:
839:
838:
836:
823:
817:
812:
807:
802:
797:
789:
785:
776:
772:
768:
761:
752:
747:
743:
732:
721:
718:
716:
713:
711:
708:
706:
703:
701:
698:
694:
688:
681:In this issue
676:
667:
659:
649:
647:
638:
635:
632:
629:
628:
627:
626:
619:
616:
613:
609:
606:
603:
600:
599:
598:
597:
589:
588:
582:
581:
575:
571:
568:
567:
566:
565:
563:
554:
551:
548:
545:
542:
538:
535:
532:
531:
525:
522:
519:
516:
515:
514:
513:
511:
502:
499:
496:
492:
489:
488:
487:
486:
484:
475:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
451:
447:
444:
441:
437:
434:
431:
428:
425:
421:
417:
414:
411:
408:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
386:
385:
384:
383:
379:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
344:
340:
336:
333:
330:
327:
323:
322:first article
319:
318:
309:
304:
296:
290:
285:
277:
269:
254:
245:
232:
225:
216:
215:
210:
207:
206:
201:
198:
197:
192:
190:
186:
185:
180:
179:
175:News in brief
156:
146:
138:
136:
128:
126:
118:
116:
108:
106:
98:
96:
88:
87:
79:
60:
52:
47:
38:
23:
19:
783:
767:Ottawahitech
704:
693:all comments
642:
636:
630:
624:
623:
618:secretlondon
617:
611:
607:
601:
594:
593:
586:
579:
569:
562:"Operations"
559:
558:
552:
546:
536:
529:
523:
518:secretlondon
517:
510:these awards
507:
506:
500:
495:WikiChevrons
490:
480:
479:
473:
445:
435:
429:
420:World War II
415:
410:secretlondon
409:
404:Livonian War
387:
381:
380:
352:secretlondon
315:
313:
223:
212:
203:
194:
182:
822:Suggestions
742:transcluded
631:Crisco 1492
608:Crisco 1492
450:WikiGnomish
436:Crisco 1492
364:Crisco 1492
786:. You can
782:It's your
585:Operation
578:Operation
461:, birthed
308:Wiki Award
214:mini drive
83:Share this
78:Contribute
22:2012-10-29
816:Subscribe
746:talk page
570:Grandiose
530:The Bugle
501:Grandiose
388:Grandiose
348:Grandiose
835:Category
811:Newsroom
806:Archives
784:Signpost
656:Previous
602:Ian Rose
587:Normandy
553:Hchc2009
537:Ian Rose
491:Ian Rose
474:Hchc2009
430:Ian Rose
422:and the
402:and the
372:Hchc2009
360:Ian Rose
339:barnstar
224:Signpost
181:The new
155:Mabeenot
125:LinkedIn
105:Facebook
20: |
788:help us
612:Titanic
335:forward
115:Twitter
596:scope?
524:Nick-D
416:Nick-D
374:, and
356:Nick-D
135:Reddit
95:E-mail
801:About
463:DARPA
16:<
796:Home
771:talk
664:Next
637:Dank
574:Adam
376:Dank
329:your
326:make
193:The
145:Digg
332:way
187:is
153:By
80:—
837::
773:)
654:←
648:.
378:.
370:,
366:,
362:,
358:,
354:,
350:,
229:s
790:.
769:(
763:.
753:.
695:)
691:(
442:.
233:.
227:'
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
