279:
sorting I can make bursts of small, quick edits, and if for some reason I need to go do something else I'm not leaving anything half-way done. On the second question, sorting AfDs is helpful to the deletion process because it increases awareness over one crucial point of an article's lifecycle, as deletion marks a point where the content becomes unavailable, and thus no longer workable. I think AfD regulars may find the daily logs sufficient, but there are many editors that do not review AfD regularly that would be interested in being aware if an article within certain subject areas is nominated, or that would prefer not to have to review the whole daily logs just to find those discussions that they want to take part of.
31:
AfD discussions by various topic areas that may draw the attention of editors. The project was started in August 2005 with manual processes that are continued today by a bevy of bots, categories, and transclusions. The project took inspiration from WikiProject Stub
Sorting and some historical discussions on deletion reform. As the sheer number of AfDs continues to grow, the project is seeking better tools to manage the deletion sorting process and attract editors to comment on these deletion discussions.
395:
165:
121:
111:
37:
131:
91:
141:
101:
527:
I'm not sure if there are regularly updated statistics kept on this sort of thing, but the project's page claims that "Articles for deletion has grown far beyond human scale, with a throughput now approaching 1,000 pages per week and rising quickly." It shouldn't be difficult to find out, since there
486:
I like the idea of offering users significant projects in which to participate, like this one, which do not require a time commitment, and which give the participant a fun experience, and which gets immediate interaction from other users as a result of the participants' actions. WikiProject
Deletion
30:
Directing
Discussion: WikiProject Deletion Sorting: This week, we uncovered WikiProject Deletion Sorting, Knowledge (XXG)'s most active project by number of edits to all the project's pages. This special project seeks to increase participation in Articles for Deletion nominations by categorizing the
552:
Most active project "ranked by changes made to articles" is very misleading and irrelevant. It is not articles but projectspace logs that are being changed. Is there any work being done by this project or the WMF devs to make the delsort tools/gadgets work well in all browsers with the full list of
278:
For the first question, I started sorting debates because it is a way to assist the deletion process that I can easily fit into my everyday schedule, which tends to be a bit erratic. For participating in a discussion I need to set apart a minimum amount of time to research the subject, whereas for
339:
New
Wikipedians can simply take part on the process. Unlike mainspace categorization, which has a number of considerations and caveats when it comes to how to categorize an article, deletion sorting is a meta-process that simply aims to increase awareness, and it has minimal pitfalls. Sorting a
508:
Thanks for another great article. I am curious about this statement: "As the sheer number of AfDs continues to grow" I wonder if it is supported by statistics available somewhere (so that I am not told I am full of it next time I bring it up in discussion :-)
192:
328:. In addition to letting involved editors know that the debate has been sorted, this notice helps the closing administrator by telling them how long has the debate been advertised, which may take part in deciding whether to relist.
305:: one to sort the nomination, and one for the bot to remove it after closure. Given that most nominations are sorted in more than one list, that's 4 or 6 edits per nomination, and there are around 40-50 fresh nominations every day.
465:
253:
that may draw the attention of editors. The project was started in August 2005 with manual processes that are continued today by a bevy of bots, categories, and transclusions. The project took inspiration from
206:
198:
382:
373:
262:. As the sheer number of AfDs continues to grow, the project is seeking better tools to manage the deletion sorting process and attract editors to comment on these deletion discussions. We interviewed
434:
324:(they're the same list, only the presentation varies). The process consists in transcluding the nomination in the appropriate list(s), and then including a notice on the nomination using the template
487:
Sorting undoubtedly has a huge effect on all users' experience of
Knowledge (XXG) and the results the project delivers do a lot to increase the community consent and review in the deletion process.
429:
340:
discussion in a list that is completely off from the article's subject wouldn't be optimal, but all it would mean is that one just let people know about a discussion that they might not care about.
424:
419:
365:
77:
412:
533:
406:
56:
45:
286:
242:
321:
633:
352:
317:
250:
553:
projects? The tab tool works ok but it's annoying having to preload the projects into your .js file. Has anyone ever tried to get delsort incorporated into the
21:
294:
The amount of work required to keep all discussions sorted is by no means trivial, but I think those numbers might a bit misleading. Note that there will be
608:
603:
598:
577:
529:
334:
What kinds of editors tend to use the project's resources? Can new
Wikipedians take part or is deletion sorting more appropriate for experienced users?
237:
183:
593:
255:
311:
How is deletion sorting actually conducted? What templates, scripts, lists, and other tools are available to help sort AfD discussions?
588:
394:
50:
36:
17:
566:
545:
518:
502:
289:(second when bots are excluded). Where do these edits come from? How does the project coordinate such enormous activity?
259:
614:
514:
495:
245:
by number of edits to all the project's pages. This special project seeks to increase participation in
227:
351:
If anything, just to reiterate that editors should feel free to jump in, and to post any doubts at
562:
541:
94:
510:
488:
461:
187:, a project dedicated to all topics about the collection and preservation of cultural heritage
124:
273:
What motivated you to join WikiProject
Deletion Sorting? Why do AfD discussions need sorting?
246:
104:
554:
134:
219:
Submit your project's news and announcements for next week's WikiProject Report at the
627:
558:
537:
154:
264:
114:
144:
285:
WikiProject
Deletion Sorting is Knowledge (XXG)'s most active WikiProject when
361:
557:
afd creation tool? There is no reason why it has to be a separate step.
364:
countryside. Until then, you can locate our previous reports in the
55:
393:
163:
35:
249:
nominations by categorizing the AfD discussions by various
360:
Next week, we'll take a stroll down the vast, unspoiled
196:
and the project is accepting nominations for their next
477:
470:
450:
210:
and you could see the answer in a future issue of the
204:
Curious about WikiProjects? Ask us a question at the
475:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
72:Directing Discussion: WikiProject Deletion Sorting
298:corresponding edits under the WikiProject space
193:November Copy Editing Backlog Elimination Drive
8:
576:Explore Knowledge (XXG) history by browsing
634:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2012-11
260:historical discussions on deletion reform
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
478:
454:
322:WP:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Compact
71:
29:
7:
318:WP:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Flat
316:The sorting lists can be found at
287:ranked by changes made to articles
57:
28:
460:These comments are automatically
346:Anything else you'd like to add?
139:
129:
119:
109:
99:
89:
353:WT:WikiProject Deletion sorting
471:add the page to your watchlist
303:for each list it's included in
190:This is the final week of the
1:
503:18:01, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
567:00:25, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
546:06:57, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
532:you could sift through like
519:03:44, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
238:WikiProject Deletion Sorting
184:WikiProject Collections Care
650:
326:{{subst:delsort|ListName}}
534:this one for November 30
256:WikiProject Stub Sorting
235:This week, we uncovered
199:tranche of coordinators
468:. To follow comments,
398:
386:"WikiProject report" â
168:
40:
397:
247:Articles for Deletion
167:
39:
464:from this article's
378:"WikiProject report"
241:, Knowledge (XXG)'s
243:most active project
455:Discuss this story
440:WikiProject report
399:
181:Check out the new
169:
69:WikiProject report
46:â Back to Contents
41:
479:purging the cache
435:Technology report
51:View Latest Issue
641:
617:
500:
499:
493:
482:
480:
474:
453:
430:Featured content
417:
409:
407:26 November 2012
402:
385:
377:
327:
228:WikiProject Desk
225:
207:WikiProject desk
173:
172:WikiProject news
170:
166:
157:
143:
142:
133:
132:
123:
122:
113:
112:
103:
102:
93:
92:
63:
61:
59:
58:26 November 2012
649:
648:
644:
643:
642:
640:
639:
638:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
618:
613:
611:
606:
601:
596:
591:
584:
573:
572:
497:
496:
489:
484:
476:
469:
458:
457:
451:+ Add a comment
449:
445:
444:
443:
425:Recent research
410:
405:
403:
400:
389:
388:
383:
380:
375:
325:
233:
232:
231:
223:
217:
177:
176:
171:
164:
162:
158:
152:
151:
150:
149:
140:
130:
120:
110:
100:
90:
84:
81:
70:
66:
64:
54:
53:
48:
42:
32:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
647:
645:
637:
636:
626:
625:
612:
607:
602:
597:
592:
587:
586:
585:
575:
574:
571:
570:
569:
550:
549:
548:
522:
521:
491:Blue Rasberry
459:
456:
448:
447:
446:
442:
437:
432:
427:
422:
420:News and notes
416:
404:
392:
391:
390:
381:
372:
371:
370:
359:
357:
356:
344:
342:
341:
332:
330:
329:
309:
307:
306:
283:
281:
280:
271:
218:
216:
215:
202:
188:
178:
174:
161:
160:
159:
148:
147:
137:
127:
117:
107:
97:
86:
85:
82:
76:
75:
74:
73:
68:
67:
65:
62:
49:
44:
43:
34:
33:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
646:
635:
632:
631:
629:
616:
610:
605:
600:
595:
590:
582:
580:
568:
564:
560:
556:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
531:
526:
525:
524:
523:
520:
516:
512:
507:
506:
505:
504:
501:
494:
492:
481:
472:
467:
463:
452:
441:
438:
436:
433:
431:
428:
426:
423:
421:
418:
414:
408:
401:In this issue
396:
387:
379:
369:
367:
363:
354:
350:
349:
348:
347:
338:
337:
336:
335:
323:
319:
315:
314:
313:
312:
304:
301:
297:
293:
292:
291:
290:
288:
277:
276:
275:
274:
269:
267:
266:
261:
257:
252:
248:
244:
240:
239:
229:
222:
213:
209:
208:
203:
201:
200:
195:
194:
189:
186:
185:
180:
179:
175:News in brief
156:
146:
138:
136:
128:
126:
118:
116:
108:
106:
98:
96:
88:
87:
79:
60:
52:
47:
38:
23:
19:
579:The Signpost
578:
511:Ottawahitech
490:
485:
439:
413:all comments
358:
345:
343:
333:
331:
310:
308:
302:
300:for each AfD
299:
295:
284:
282:
272:
270:
263:
236:
234:
220:
211:
205:
197:
191:
182:
615:Suggestions
462:transcluded
251:topic areas
530:daily logs
83:Share this
78:Contribute
22:2012-11-26
609:Subscribe
538:âMabeenot
466:talk page
362:Yorkshire
258:and some
628:Category
604:Newsroom
599:Archives
581:archives
559:The-Pope
376:Previous
221:Signpost
212:Signpost
155:Mabeenot
125:LinkedIn
105:Facebook
20: |
366:archive
265:Frankie
115:Twitter
498:(talk)
135:Reddit
95:E-mail
594:About
555:WP:TW
16:<
589:Home
563:talk
542:talk
528:are
515:talk
384:Next
145:Digg
320:or
296:two
153:By
80:â
630::
565:)
544:)
536:.
517:)
374:â
368:.
268:.
226:s
583:.
561:(
540:(
513:(
483:.
473:.
415:)
411:(
355:.
230:.
224:'
214:!
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
