282:
practice as opposed to research, he says: "what doctors want and need in the rush of their everyday practice is review articles, not original research articles, which are usually too narrowly pitched for immediate applied purposes". Review articles are like information hubs that present summary context and a great number of direct references, and this publication highlights their similarity to
Knowledge (XXG) articles and the utility of both sources to working health professionals. Heilman comments that it is little wonder that Knowledge (XXG) is the world's most consulted source of health-related information, which appears to cast it already as a popular way to access the traditional function of review articles.
174:
383:
266:
318:
557:
121:
111:
37:
131:
91:
350:
written by only a small number of authors. In 2014, WikiProject
Medicine conducted a survey of all editors with more than 250 edits in health-science articles on all language Wikipedias during 2013. This revealed that about 50% of these editors are medically qualified as healthcare professionals, of which the greater proportion are qualified physicians.
141:
101:
508:: These two grant programs are funded through the Wikimedia Foundation. Proposals are reviewed by WMF staff and the volunteer grants committees for each type of grant. The total amount of requested IEGs in this round exceeds $ 500,000, and the total amount of requested APGs in this round exceeds $ 5 million.
337:
Heilman says that
Knowledge (XXG) medical articles might indeed sacrifice a consistent narrative unless they are very well looked after, but that this is not uncommon for prominent topics. He drew an analogy with featured articles; while some do lose their shine over time, others keep both polish and
333:
The third issue raised by the journal is the absence for
Knowledge (XXG) articles of "formal peer review by at least one, and often many, experts who point out conflicts, errors, redundancies, or gaps". There was a gentle warning that "should the example of the dengue article be copied, this may lead
307:
A lack of a single, authorial voice in the Wiki process means not only that strong personal recommendations are unlikely, but also that the style can be inconsistent, and the sentences and transitions between them less smooth, resulting in a paper that might be challenging to read. Some “Wikipedians”
437:
Maiman commented that "since the program’s launch in 2010, nearly 10,000 students in some 500 classes have contributed 44,000 printed pages of content, editing thousands of existing articles and creating 1,900 new ones, all of it overseen by academics while students get credit. Participating schools
209:
Despite or, perhaps, because of its "anyone can edit" approach, Knowledge (XXG) itself has always been subject to dynamic tension between amateur and expert, generalist and specialist, and those with and without formal credentials in the field in which they are editing. In the latest chapter of this
654:
The work done by James and others to advance the cause of medicine through
Knowledge (XXG) is very laudable. None other than the Duke of Manchester has been promoting awareness of this initiative, and it is clear that the Duke in question has been expressing their views on this elsewhere for a long
338:
reliability, and are continually updated, through the vigilance of proud editors. This, he says, shows one of the great advantages of
Knowledge (XXG): its ability to stay abreast of fast-moving medical topics. (In this respect, the journal has made arrangements for annual updates to be indexed with
281:
indeed essentially literature reviews by the very design of site policy. Like
Knowledge (XXG) articles, review articles in journals (a sought-after genre for career researchers because of high readerships and citations) typically contain little or no original research. But when it comes to medical
249:
article (on the basis that his contributions were the largest), with
Wikipedians Jacob de Wolff, Graham M Beards, and Brian J Basden as the other authors. All are credentialled experts in the health sciences and are listed with their institutions. The authors' roles for the English Knowledge (XXG)
244:
that a key stumbling block was the notion of credentialled authorship—something that goes against a basic ethic on
Knowledge (XXG) but which in the open research literature is central to gaining readers' trust in accuracy and balance. True to this, Heilman is listed as the primary author in the
928:
They are listed as contributors in the paper with a link. There is a certain not set in stone bar for authorship below which one is no longer an author. Was aware of the computation bio work. These articles were written off wiki than added to wiki rather than written on wiki and published in a
379:(September 23). "Gradually and informally, educators who repeatedly warned students to avoid Knowledge (XXG) like the plague began making it part of their course curriculum, assigning students to contribute content, either by writing original Knowledge (XXG) articles or editing existing ones."
349:
Knowledge (XXG) already has analogues of the traditional academic review article, he observes, with featured forums akin to peer-reviewing, and key contributors and featured nominators akin to primary authors. Most high-quality
Knowledge (XXG) articles in the health sciences, he maintains, are
293:
associate editor, James Maskalyk, wrote that Knowledge (XXG) lacks three things that are very important to research journals. The first is the identification of a single, responsible author "who acts as guarantor of the integrity of the work". Then there is review by "a trained editorial team,
30:
Knowledge (XXG) article published in peer-reviewed journal; Knowledge (XXG) in education: The argument on Knowledge (XXG) over the benefits of crowdsourcing versus the primacy of "expert" contributors stretches back to co-founder Larry Sanger's break with the project to start the alternative
202:. Sanger's hope was that the new site would gain a much higher level of credibility through the scholarly and scientific qualifications of its contributors. He has since been critical of Knowledge (XXG)'s accuracy and has questioned its credibility due to the absence of a formal
353:
Heilman's hope is "that making people aware of the expertise in the Knowledge (XXG) communities and the close relationship of our articles with traditional academic genres will attract more professional researchers to join us as editors". The publication of
239:
The article is bound to ruffle a few feathers in the medical and academic worlds, if for no other reason than it challenges the established conventions that have defined the cloistered world of research publishing for more than a century. Heilman told the
909:
What about contributors to the page that are not listed as authors on the paper? I didn't do an exhaustive survey, but it did look like there were some minor contributions by editors not among the paper's authors. Also, I just wanted to link to
840:
I had seen that, but I was under the impression that there were changes between what I see on Knowledge (XXG) and what was published in the journal, no? Are there any content differences between the two at the moment?
441:
He also writes that students find themselves challenged by peer reviews and the norm of consensus among Wikipedians, as opposed to the usual academic model of having just one professor judging the students' work.
514:: Damon Sicore has been appointed to this long-planned position. WMF is splitting the Product and Engineering department. Erik Moeller will lead the Product side. Damon's background includes experience at the
632:
787:
I'd also be curious to know what kinds of structure/style changes were needed in the reformatting—could be a useful reflection piece for the rest of the community interested in this type of publishing.
596:
232:
on that serious infectious tropical disease, with some aspects of formatting and structure adapted to comply with the journal's house style. The journal's formal peer-review appeared on the article's
606:
581:
601:
77:
308:
have little traditional experience in publishing and the editorial process that accompanies it, which can lead to frustrations about content or format that might fit a journal’s preference.
529:
574:
689:
586:
298:. They may also be surprised that the journal perceives matters of language and formatting to be such a cleft between Knowledge (XXG)'s text and that of the open research literature:
568:
56:
45:
1008:
655:
time. It is not quite clear why the Duke would not now broaden their enthusiasm to include contributing to Knowledge (XXG) as well, but perhaps we shall find out? --
1081:
21:
422:, and the Knowledge (XXG) education programs in the Arab countries such as Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia. The column mentions the work of Kevin Gorman, the
1056:
294:
attuned to publication ethics". This second point may surprise Wikipedians who know the rigours of community nitpicking, particularly in the ego-crushing
1051:
1046:
285:
However, the fact remains that the boundaries around research publishing are closely guarded, perhaps with some justification. In a provocatively titled
269:
From the review article: a 1920s photograph from the southern United States of efforts to disperse standing water and thus decrease mosquito populations
964:
Looks like the nomination for Admin process could benefit from searching out good candidates rather than relying on the dwindling number of self-noms.
434:, about its efforts to transition collegiate involvement from those individual faculty who edit Knowledge (XXG) to more formal educational programs.
733:
715:
1041:
419:
469:
883:
Right, so to my original comment, I'd be interested in knowing what exactly is more complicated about it, if such a piece were to be written
194:
The argument on Knowledge (XXG) over the benefits of crowdsourcing versus the primacy of "expert" contributors stretches back to co-founder
808:
They wanted more complicated language to be used. Most of the rest of the changes were combined into Knowledge (XXG). One can see it here
492:
411:
1036:
556:
206:
process. Nevertheless, Knowledge (XXG) seems to have flourished while Citizendium remains on the outer margins of internet history.
50:
36:
17:
255:
499:
415:
250:
are then listed under the unintuitive title of "competing interests": Heilman, Badsen, and De Wolff are board members of the
451:
987:
911:
310:
303:
942:
870:
823:
772:
707:
1015:
996:
968:
950:
923:
894:
878:
852:
831:
799:
780:
751:
685:
664:
399:
233:
1007:, that would be because someone is going on a deletion rampage of quotation templates. You may voice your thoughts
423:
914:. It's a similar program -- I'm sure the authors of this article know about it, but many readers probably don't.
519:
342:—a casual reader might be struck by how much the article has evolved since the "snapshot" was taken last year for
370:
1062:
1027:
1004:
981:
946:
874:
827:
776:
711:
540:
resulted in the resignation of the steward, and a different steward removing rights from the global sysop. The
503:
407:
495:
for the history of RfAs. Only 16 editors have been appointed to adminship in 2014 as of the end of September.
457:
431:
965:
740:
The journal credits the images to Commons, but doesn't the attribution need to be to the specific author?
681:
660:
475:
463:
427:
391:
541:
857:
Yes the published version has used more complicated language than the Knowledge (XXG) version dose.
545:
382:
366:
515:
375:
548:
says that WMF will prohibit the offending users from holding advanced permissions for one year.
449:, several diverse sources have rerun versions of the column online and in print, including the
94:
919:
656:
628:
215:
124:
938:
866:
819:
768:
703:
317:
295:
259:
104:
980:
Why is there an MfD template, linking to a nonexistent deletion discussion, on this page?
728:
395:
251:
134:
72:
Knowledge (XXG) article published in peer-reviewed journal; Knowledge (XXG) in education
403:
274:
211:
225:
1075:
1012:
537:
220:
218:
on 3 October that for the first time a Knowledge (XXG) article has been published by
158:
915:
355:
229:
195:
114:
809:
757:
286:
489:
No new administrators were appointed on English Knowledge (XXG) in September 2014
144:
930:
858:
811:
760:
695:
203:
199:
721:
154:
886:
844:
791:
743:
544:
is conducting a separate review of the incident. The Wikimedia Foundation's
265:
162:
533:
334:
to a number of rejected submissions to formally peer-reviewed journals."
358:
in the academic literature may be an important step in achieving this.
526:
Privacy violation results in a resignation and a removal of user rights
329:
article, is slightly different from the one used in the en.WP article.
390:
Maiman notes the incorporation of Knowledge (XXG) into coursework at
339:
173:
325:
that carries the disease. This Commons image, which appears in the
381:
55:
300:
277:
underlines the fact that most mature Knowledge (XXG) articles
759:. I have emailed them to correct the other version already.
555:
35:
254:, De Wolff is the founder of the English Knowledge (XXG)'s
426:
at UC Berkeley. He quotes students and faculty as well as
644:
637:
617:
289:
in the same publication—"Modern medicine comes online"—
438:
run the gamut from Ivy League to community college."
210:
dynamic flux, longtime medical editor James Heilman (
642:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
198:'s break with the project to start the alternative
371:Knowledge (XXG) has grown up on college campuses
512:WMF announces new Vice President of Engineering
226:Dengue fever: a Knowledge (XXG) clinical review
362:Knowledge (XXG) becomes part of the curriculum
169:Journal chief: "Modern medicine comes online"
8:
982:
949:) (if I write on your page reply on mine)
877:) (if I write on your page reply on mine)
830:) (if I write on your page reply on mine)
779:) (if I write on your page reply on mine)
714:) (if I write on your page reply on mine)
445:Subsequent to the column's publication in
1082:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2014-10
1025:Make sure we cover what matters to you –
694:Not sure what you mean. Can you clarify?
912:PLOS Computational Biology's Topic Pages
532:about an alleged privacy violation by a
316:
264:
172:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
645:
621:
71:
673:'s external peer-review". Is it not "
224:, a peer-reviewed academic journal. "
29:
7:
720:Fixed that blooper; thanks Cantons.
273:Heilman says the publication of the
493:User:WereSpielChequers/RFA by month
57:
28:
627:These comments are automatically
500:Individual Engagement Grant (IEG)
139:
129:
119:
109:
99:
89:
929:journal from my understanding.
638:add the page to your watchlist
430:, Director of Programs at the
386:Wiki Education Foundation logo
1:
1016:18:41, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
997:17:56, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
756:This version provides links
680:'s external peer-review" ?
260:featured article coordinator
177:Dengue distribution in 2006
969:23:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
951:03:04, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
924:21:15, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
895:23:13, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
879:22:45, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
853:20:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
832:18:56, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
800:18:24, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
781:18:13, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
752:18:09, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
734:02:49, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
716:17:43, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
690:17:17, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
665:01:15, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
530:request for comment on Meta
400:California Maritime Academy
252:Wiki Project Med Foundation
230:the Knowledge (XXG) article
1098:
506:proposals open for comment
432:Wiki Education Foundation
189:, without epidemic dengue
522:about this announcement.
504:Annual Plan Grants (APG)
408:University of California
346:external peer-review.)
458:Daily Hampshire Gazette
424:Wikipedian in Residence
635:. To follow comments,
560:
387:
330:
323:aedes aegypti mosquito
296:featured article forum
270:
191:
40:
559:
476:Savannah Morning News
392:Georgetown University
385:
320:
268:
176:
39:
631:from this article's
542:Ombudsman commission
452:Athens-Banner Herald
256:WikiProject Medicine
180:Epidemic dengue and
520:Wikimedia Blog post
470:Myrtle Beach Online
321:Dengue menace: the
1028:leave a suggestion
622:Discuss this story
597:WikiProject report
561:
546:Philippe Beaudette
516:Mozilla Foundation
447:The Sacramento Bee
388:
376:The Sacramento Bee
331:
271:
258:, and Beards is a
192:
46:← Back to Contents
41:
646:purging the cache
373:in his column in
315:
314:
228:" is essentially
51:View Latest Issue
1089:
1065:
1030:
984:
935:
893:
891:
863:
851:
849:
816:
798:
796:
765:
750:
748:
731:
726:
700:
682:Cantons-de-l'Est
649:
647:
641:
620:
607:Featured content
579:
571:
564:
301:
165:
143:
142:
133:
132:
123:
122:
113:
112:
103:
102:
93:
92:
63:
61:
59:
1097:
1096:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1061:
1059:
1054:
1049:
1044:
1039:
1032:
1026:
1022:
1021:
977:
961:
931:
887:
884:
859:
845:
842:
812:
792:
789:
761:
744:
741:
729:
722:
696:
671:Online Medicine
651:
643:
636:
625:
624:
618:+ Add a comment
616:
612:
611:
610:
582:From the editor
572:
567:
565:
562:
485:
396:Rice University
364:
344:Open Medicine's
327:Medicine Online
291:Open Medicine's
190:
184:
171:
166:
152:
151:
150:
149:
140:
130:
120:
110:
100:
90:
84:
81:
70:
66:
64:
54:
53:
48:
42:
32:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1095:
1093:
1085:
1084:
1074:
1073:
1060:
1055:
1050:
1045:
1040:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1024:
1023:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1000:
999:
976:
973:
972:
971:
960:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
835:
834:
803:
802:
785:
784:
783:
738:
737:
736:
718:
667:
626:
623:
615:
614:
613:
609:
604:
602:Traffic report
599:
594:
592:News and notes
589:
584:
578:
569:1 October 2014
566:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
523:
509:
496:
484:
481:
404:Pomona College
363:
360:
313:
312:
309:
305:
275:review article
185:
179:
178:
170:
167:
148:
147:
137:
127:
117:
107:
97:
86:
85:
82:
76:
75:
74:
73:
69:News and notes
68:
67:
65:
62:
58:1 October 2014
49:
44:
43:
34:
33:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1094:
1083:
1080:
1079:
1077:
1064:
1058:
1053:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1029:
1017:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
1001:
998:
994:
993:
992:
985:
979:
978:
974:
970:
967:
963:
962:
958:
952:
948:
944:
940:
936:
934:
927:
926:
925:
921:
917:
913:
908:
907:
896:
892:
890:
882:
881:
880:
876:
872:
868:
864:
862:
856:
855:
854:
850:
848:
839:
838:
837:
836:
833:
829:
825:
821:
817:
815:
810:
807:
806:
805:
804:
801:
797:
795:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
766:
764:
758:
755:
754:
753:
749:
747:
739:
735:
732:
727:
725:
719:
717:
713:
709:
705:
701:
699:
693:
692:
691:
687:
683:
679:
677:
672:
668:
666:
662:
658:
653:
652:
648:
639:
634:
630:
619:
608:
605:
603:
600:
598:
595:
593:
590:
588:
585:
583:
580:
576:
570:
563:In this issue
558:
547:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
524:
521:
518:. There is a
517:
513:
510:
507:
505:
501:
497:
494:
490:
487:
486:
482:
480:
478:
477:
472:
471:
466:
465:
460:
459:
454:
453:
448:
443:
439:
435:
433:
429:
425:
421:
420:San Francisco
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
384:
380:
378:
377:
372:
368:
361:
359:
357:
351:
347:
345:
341:
335:
328:
324:
319:
306:
302:
299:
297:
292:
288:
283:
280:
276:
267:
263:
261:
257:
253:
248:
247:Open Medicine
243:
237:
235:
231:
227:
223:
222:
221:Open Medicine
217:
213:
207:
205:
201:
197:
188:
183:
175:
168:
164:
160:
156:
146:
138:
136:
128:
126:
118:
116:
108:
106:
98:
96:
88:
87:
79:
60:
52:
47:
38:
23:
19:
990:
989:
975:MfD template
932:
888:
860:
846:
813:
793:
762:
745:
723:
697:
675:
674:
670:
657:Demiurge1000
591:
575:all comments
538:global sysop
525:
511:
498:
488:
474:
468:
464:eCampus News
462:
456:
450:
446:
444:
440:
436:
428:LiAnna Davis
389:
374:
367:Bruce Maiman
365:
356:Dengue fever
352:
348:
343:
336:
332:
326:
322:
290:
284:
278:
272:
246:
241:
238:
219:
208:
196:Larry Sanger
193:
186:
181:
31:Citizendium.
1063:Suggestions
629:transcluded
369:wrote that
204:peer-review
200:Citizendium
587:Dispatches
473:, and the
187:A. aegypti
182:A. aegypti
83:Share this
78:Contribute
22:2014-10-01
1057:Subscribe
933:Doc James
861:Doc James
814:Doc James
763:Doc James
698:Doc James
633:talk page
287:editorial
216:announced
212:Doc James
1076:Category
1052:Newsroom
1047:Archives
991:Hasirpad
988:call me
943:contribs
871:contribs
824:contribs
773:contribs
708:contribs
678:Medicine
669:I read "
483:In brief
412:Berkeley
242:Signpost
234:talkpage
159:Peaceray
125:LinkedIn
105:Facebook
20: |
916:Klortho
730:(talk)
534:steward
115:Twitter
959:Admins
536:and a
491:: See
455:, the
418:, and
340:PubMed
161:, and
135:Reddit
95:E-mail
1042:About
1005:הסרפד
983:הסרפד
947:email
885:czar
875:email
843:czar
828:email
790:czar
777:email
742:czar
712:email
416:Davis
155:Tony1
16:<
1037:Home
1009:here
939:talk
920:talk
867:talk
820:talk
769:talk
724:Tony
704:talk
686:talk
676:Open
661:talk
528:: A
502:and
163:Pine
145:Digg
1003:Hi
966:SFB
410:at
279:are
262:.
153:By
80:—
1078::
1013:Ed
1011:.
995:)
945:·
941:·
922:)
873:·
869:·
826:·
822:·
775:·
771:·
710:·
706:·
688:)
663:)
479:.
467:,
461:,
414:,
406:,
402:,
398:,
394:,
311:”
304:“
236:.
214:)
157:,
1031:.
986:(
937:(
918:(
889:♔
865:(
847:♔
818:(
794:♔
767:(
746:♔
702:(
684:(
659:(
650:.
640:.
577:)
573:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
