1281:
1303:(bar-graph): on average, voters supported 30.0% of candidates (up slightly from last year, but still lower than for most previous years), abstained for 35.2% (down significantly from last year's spike), and opposed 34.8% (much higher than ever). I can't for the moment explain last year's spike of absentions—it's not as though there was a huge wash of candidates last year (22 vs 20 this year). In 2014, the high average oppose may have been associated with the large tail of six candidates who attracted supports from fewer than 12% of voters, and correspondingly high levels of opposition. Interestingly, one of the two withdrawn candidates in the 2014 election did not attract relatively high numbers of oppose votes; (
1273:
943:
120:
110:
36:
130:
90:
140:
100:
1239:
not actually enjoy much support in 2014. I also think that the community would be perfectly willing to support a strong non-admin candidate if one appeared. To Chris
Troutman's point, this year I see only one guide that reflexively dismisses non-admin candidates, and several that explicitly state a willingness to consider them. —
1083:
election demonstrates a staggering drop in the number of voters while the number of participants on RfA has been increasing steadily since around 2009. This needs investigating. For example, was there something different in the publicity for this year's election? I am not suggesting for a moment that
1250:@Kudpung I wouldn't be so sure that RFA votes were rising. Remember the number of candidates has been falling, apart from a minor rally in 2013. So while !votes per successful candidate are up on 2009, I'm pretty sure total people casting one or more RFA !votes are down on a monthly or annual basis.
1219:
Huh (to the top comment)? Only 9 were elected, and all seem to be admins (as usual). I agree with
Kudpung that the fall in turn-out was the most notable & rather alarming aspect of this years elections. But then they were rather drama-free, and by and large the expected candidates came through,
1238:
I assume he meant "Nine of the twelve admins who ran were elected". This is true, though it's not terribly meaningful: last year a whole slew of candidates who were admins were resoundingly rejected. The lack of an admin reconfirmation procedure means that someone who passed at RfA in 2004 might
1084:
I am dissatisfied by the results, but I would like to see a much larger number of suitably qualified candidates to choose from - such as, for example, ones who are at least already admins or who can demonstrate truly significant experience in other sensitive areas (OTRS, CU, Oversight, etc).
1049:
I wouldn't expect the community to place any trust in an editor who hasn't already formally earned the community's trust via RfA. Typically, the election guides either outright disqualify non-admins from recommendation or mention non-admins as cranks running on perennial "reform the system"
1029:
One quick takeaway from the election results: If you're not an administrator, you're unlikely to be elected. Nine of the twelve who were elected were admins (sysops), and two admins finished tenth and eleventh. By contrast, all eight non-admins were not elected. And that makes sense - the
163:
election results for
December 2014. The election commissioners were QuiteUnusual, Mike V, and TParis. The scrutineers, who had access to SecurePoll data, were stewards Trijnstel, Matanya and Barras. The WMF technical liaison for the election was James Alexander.
915:
The number of ballots cast in this election was 643, of which 593 were determined to be valid. (When users cast multiple ballots, only the last ballot was counted.) In the 2013 elections, 1039 ballots were cast and 923 were determined to be valid.
889:
All voters were required to register a preference of either "Support", "Neutral", or "Oppose" for each candidate. The "Neutral" column is simply the total votes for which voters did not select the
Support or Oppose
1008:
1372:
The small turnout doomed non-administrative candidates, no doubt about it. The general lack of participation was largely a product of poor advertisement of the election, I feel. We should do better next time.
930:
921:
972:
1196:
982:
76:
1341:
There was an ArbCom election? This is the first I heard about it. While I'm nowhere as active as I once was, I would have expected to see an announcement in at least one of the places I lurk:
977:
954:
55:
44:
1326:
I didn't vote this year because while the election is rather drama-free, the overall organization structure of ArbCom and their decision-making leaves a lot to be desired.
1471:
1304:
1280:
21:
1446:
1441:
1436:
1387:
Just a point of clarification, the election administrators had access to the SecurePoll data as well. (This is the checkuser-like data, not the votes.)
1297:(line-graph on the right): way down from last year, and the lowest ever. Why did they surge last year, interrupting the steep downward trend since 2008?
960:
1431:
311:
1075:
where in spite of the in-your-face warning at transclusion we still get plenty of totally snow noms, but at RfA the candidates are not
725:
1426:
942:
49:
35:
17:
626:
527:
455:
275:
203:
491:
347:
1034:
is the most common way that the entire
Knowledge (XXG) community has the opportunity to evaluate an editor in some depth. --
419:
1405:
1382:
1366:
1336:
1320:
1276:
Participation in ArbCom elections, 2008–14. Voter numbers are blue (left y-axis); candidate numbers are red (right y-axis).
1266:
1243:
1229:
1212:
1187:
1173:
1065:
1043:
857:
692:
593:
383:
758:
659:
560:
1257:
791:
824:
305:
239:
1452:
1417:
1058:
1040:
160:
1050:
platforms. High voter apathy also prevents rabble-rouser candidates. Knowledge (XXG) is an insider's game.
1252:
719:
1332:
620:
521:
449:
301:
269:
197:
1052:
1036:
485:
341:
413:
1307:
was smaller and not so low-scoring in terms of supports (I've not checked their oppose rates).
1272:
93:
1378:
1362:
1225:
1183:
1004:
851:
715:
686:
587:
377:
123:
1350:
1346:
1397:
1327:
752:
653:
554:
1031:
103:
1357:. Maybe next year I'll hear of it in time to evaluate the candidates & maybe vote. --
1315:
1240:
1207:
785:
616:
517:
445:
265:
193:
1342:
133:
818:
481:
337:
1465:
409:
233:
1374:
1358:
1221:
1179:
847:
682:
583:
373:
113:
143:
1389:
748:
649:
550:
908:
Percentage = (Support / (Support + Oppose)) * 100 (rounded to 2 decimal places)
1308:
1200:
781:
814:
153:
229:
1172:
could provide us with a report as comprehensive as the one it made
1279:
30:
Arbitration
Committee election results: Scrutineers give report.
54:
941:
34:
1284:
Average support, abstain, and oppose percentages, 2009–14.
1020:
1013:
993:
1018:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
8:
1220:which may have reduced motivation to vote.
166:
1472:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2014-12
1415:Make sure we cover what matters to you –
1271:
1086:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
1021:
997:
882:
70:
71:Arbitration Committee election results
29:
7:
56:
28:
1003:These comments are automatically
159:Below is a table that shows the
138:
128:
118:
108:
98:
88:
1032:administrator selection process
1014:add the page to your watchlist
1:
1406:04:42, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
1383:14:12, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
1367:07:41, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
1337:06:29, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
1321:13:21, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
1301:Support–abstain–oppose ratios
1267:20:35, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
1244:05:56, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
1230:04:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
1213:11:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
1188:02:37, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
1066:17:52, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
1044:15:08, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
1079:for open seats. This year's
1488:
846:
813:
780:
747:
714:
681:
648:
615:
582:
549:
516:
480:
444:
408:
372:
336:
300:
264:
228:
192:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
1168:It would be nice if the
1285:
1277:
1011:. To follow comments,
946:
934:"Arbitration report" →
899:Net = Support − Oppose
39:
1283:
1275:
945:
161:Arbitration Committee
38:
1007:from this article's
926:"Arbitration report"
1418:leave a suggestion
1286:
1278:
998:Discuss this story
968:Arbitration report
947:
68:Arbitration report
45:← Back to Contents
40:
1166:
1165:
1022:purging the cache
879:
878:
50:View Latest Issue
1479:
1455:
1420:
1404:
1402:
1394:
1351:the Village Pump
1318:
1313:
1305:last year's tail
1264:
1260:
1255:
1210:
1205:
1087:
1064:
1061:
1055:
1039:
1025:
1023:
1017:
996:
973:Featured content
965:
957:
955:17 December 2014
950:
933:
925:
909:
906:
900:
897:
891:
887:
167:
156:
142:
141:
132:
131:
122:
121:
112:
111:
102:
101:
92:
91:
62:
60:
58:
57:17 December 2014
1487:
1486:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1451:
1449:
1444:
1439:
1434:
1429:
1422:
1416:
1412:
1411:
1398:
1390:
1388:
1316:
1309:
1262:
1258:
1253:
1208:
1201:
1180:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
1059:
1053:
1051:
1035:
1027:
1019:
1012:
1001:
1000:
994:+ Add a comment
992:
988:
987:
986:
958:
953:
951:
948:
937:
936:
931:
928:
923:
913:
912:
907:
903:
898:
894:
888:
884:
302:Salvio giuliano
157:
151:
150:
149:
148:
139:
129:
119:
109:
99:
89:
83:
80:
69:
65:
63:
53:
52:
47:
41:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1485:
1483:
1475:
1474:
1464:
1463:
1450:
1445:
1440:
1435:
1430:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1414:
1413:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1385:
1324:
1323:
1298:
1270:
1269:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1233:
1232:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1164:
1163:
1160:
1157:
1153:
1152:
1149:
1146:
1142:
1141:
1138:
1135:
1131:
1130:
1127:
1124:
1120:
1119:
1116:
1113:
1109:
1108:
1105:
1102:
1098:
1097:
1094:
1091:
1069:
1068:
1054:Chris Troutman
1037:John Broughton
1002:
999:
991:
990:
989:
985:
983:Traffic report
980:
975:
970:
964:
952:
940:
939:
938:
929:
920:
919:
918:
911:
910:
901:
892:
881:
880:
877:
876:
873:
870:
867:
864:
861:
844:
843:
840:
837:
834:
831:
828:
811:
810:
807:
804:
801:
798:
795:
778:
777:
774:
771:
768:
765:
762:
745:
744:
741:
738:
735:
732:
729:
712:
711:
708:
705:
702:
699:
696:
679:
678:
675:
672:
669:
666:
663:
662:) (Withdrawn)
646:
645:
642:
639:
636:
633:
630:
613:
612:
609:
606:
603:
600:
597:
580:
579:
576:
573:
570:
567:
564:
547:
546:
543:
540:
537:
534:
531:
530:) (Withdrawn)
514:
513:
512:One-year term
510:
507:
504:
501:
498:
495:
478:
477:
476:Two-year term
474:
471:
468:
465:
462:
459:
442:
441:
440:Two-year term
438:
435:
432:
429:
426:
423:
406:
405:
404:Two-year term
402:
399:
396:
393:
390:
387:
370:
369:
368:Two-year term
366:
363:
360:
357:
354:
351:
334:
333:
332:Two-year term
330:
327:
324:
321:
318:
315:
298:
297:
296:Two-year term
294:
291:
288:
285:
282:
279:
262:
261:
260:Two-year term
258:
255:
252:
249:
246:
243:
226:
225:
224:Two-year term
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
190:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
147:
146:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
85:
84:
81:
75:
74:
73:
72:
67:
66:
64:
61:
48:
43:
42:
33:
32:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1484:
1473:
1470:
1469:
1467:
1454:
1448:
1443:
1438:
1433:
1428:
1419:
1407:
1403:
1401:
1395:
1393:
1386:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1339:
1338:
1335:
1334:
1331:
1330:
1322:
1319:
1314:
1312:
1306:
1302:
1299:
1296:
1295:Voter numbers
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1282:
1274:
1268:
1265:
1261:
1256:
1249:
1245:
1242:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1218:
1214:
1211:
1206:
1204:
1198:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1176:
1171:
1161:
1158:
1155:
1154:
1150:
1147:
1144:
1143:
1139:
1136:
1133:
1132:
1128:
1125:
1122:
1121:
1117:
1114:
1111:
1110:
1106:
1103:
1100:
1099:
1095:
1092:
1089:
1088:
1085:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1067:
1062:
1056:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1042:
1038:
1033:
1024:
1015:
1010:
1006:
995:
984:
981:
979:
976:
974:
971:
969:
966:
962:
956:
949:In this issue
944:
935:
927:
917:
905:
902:
896:
893:
886:
883:
874:
871:
868:
865:
862:
859:
856:
853:
849:
845:
841:
838:
835:
832:
829:
826:
823:
820:
816:
812:
808:
805:
802:
799:
796:
793:
790:
787:
783:
779:
775:
772:
769:
766:
763:
760:
757:
754:
750:
746:
742:
739:
736:
733:
730:
727:
724:
721:
717:
713:
709:
706:
703:
700:
697:
694:
691:
688:
684:
680:
676:
673:
670:
667:
664:
661:
658:
655:
651:
647:
643:
640:
637:
634:
631:
628:
625:
622:
618:
614:
610:
607:
604:
601:
598:
595:
592:
589:
585:
581:
577:
574:
571:
568:
565:
562:
559:
556:
552:
548:
544:
541:
538:
535:
532:
529:
526:
523:
519:
515:
511:
508:
505:
502:
499:
496:
493:
490:
487:
483:
479:
475:
472:
469:
466:
463:
460:
457:
454:
451:
447:
443:
439:
436:
433:
430:
427:
424:
421:
418:
415:
411:
407:
403:
400:
397:
394:
391:
388:
385:
382:
379:
375:
371:
367:
364:
361:
358:
355:
352:
349:
346:
343:
339:
335:
331:
328:
325:
322:
319:
316:
313:
310:
307:
303:
299:
295:
292:
289:
286:
283:
280:
277:
274:
271:
267:
263:
259:
256:
253:
250:
247:
244:
241:
238:
235:
231:
227:
223:
220:
217:
214:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
195:
191:
168:
165:
162:
155:
145:
137:
135:
127:
125:
117:
115:
107:
105:
97:
95:
87:
86:
78:
59:
51:
46:
37:
23:
19:
1399:
1391:
1354:
1340:
1333:
1328:
1325:
1310:
1300:
1294:
1288:
1287:
1251:
1202:
1174:
1169:
1167:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1070:
1028:
978:In the media
967:
961:all comments
914:
904:
895:
885:
854:
821:
788:
755:
722:
716:Technical 13
689:
656:
623:
590:
557:
524:
488:
452:
416:
380:
344:
308:
272:
236:
200:
185:Percentage
158:
1453:Suggestions
1329:OhanaUnited
1289:BRIEF NOTES
1093:candidates
1005:transcluded
1241:Emufarmers
617:Stanistani
518:PhilKnight
446:Guerillero
266:Courcelles
194:Dougweller
170:Candidate
82:Share this
77:Contribute
22:2014-12-17
1447:Subscribe
1353:, or the
1077:competing
1009:talk page
482:Thryduulf
338:DeltaQuad
1466:Category
1442:Newsroom
1437:Archives
1355:Signpost
1263:Chequers
1170:Signpost
924:Previous
858:contribs
825:contribs
792:contribs
759:contribs
726:contribs
693:contribs
660:contribs
627:contribs
594:contribs
561:contribs
528:contribs
492:contribs
456:contribs
420:contribs
410:Euryalus
384:contribs
348:contribs
312:contribs
276:contribs
240:contribs
204:contribs
176:Neutral
173:Support
124:LinkedIn
104:Facebook
20: |
1375:Carrite
1359:llywrch
1347:WP:AN/I
1317:(talk)
1222:Johnbod
1209:(talk)
1096:voters
890:option.
875:10.75%
848:Calidum
842:14.59%
809:15.46%
776:16.50%
743:16.51%
710:17.74%
683:Wbm1058
677:28.18%
644:30.48%
611:39.50%
584:Kraxler
578:49.85%
545:50.38%
509:59.58%
473:62.02%
437:62.76%
401:66.17%
374:Yunshui
365:68.01%
329:71.62%
293:73.48%
257:75.58%
221:77.53%
188:Result
179:Oppose
114:Twitter
1392:Mike V
1081:Arbcom
749:Isarra
650:Hahc21
551:Ks0stm
134:Reddit
94:E-mail
1432:About
1343:WP:AN
1259:Spiel
1156:2009
1145:2010
1134:2011
1123:2912
1112:2013
1101:2014
1090:year
872:-292
839:-262
806:-277
782:Dusti
773:-264
740:-280
707:-211
674:-158
641:-155
16:<
1427:Home
1400:Talk
1379:talk
1363:talk
1311:Tony
1254:Ϣere
1226:talk
1203:Tony
1197:here
1184:talk
1175:here
1162:996
1151:850
1140:729
1129:824
1118:923
1107:593
1060:talk
1041:(♫♫)
932:Next
869:332
866:221
852:talk
836:316
833:223
819:talk
815:Geni
803:339
800:192
786:talk
770:329
767:199
753:talk
737:349
734:175
720:talk
704:269
701:266
687:talk
671:260
668:231
665:102
654:talk
638:276
635:196
632:121
621:talk
608:-75
605:216
602:236
599:141
588:talk
572:165
569:264
566:164
555:talk
539:132
536:327
533:134
522:talk
503:154
500:212
497:227
486:talk
467:139
464:227
461:227
450:talk
431:124
428:260
425:209
414:talk
398:130
395:136
392:191
389:266
378:talk
362:143
359:127
356:196
353:270
342:talk
326:195
323:128
320:142
317:323
306:talk
290:209
287:118
284:148
281:327
270:talk
254:243
251:116
248:118
245:359
234:talk
218:245
215:100
212:148
209:345
198:talk
182:Net
154:Pine
144:Digg
1195:Or
1178:.--
1159:22
1148:21
1137:17
1126:21
1115:23
1104:20
1073:RfA
1071:At
863:40
830:54
797:62
764:65
731:69
698:58
575:-1
506:73
470:88
434:85
230:DGG
152:By
79:—
1468::
1396:•
1381:)
1365:)
1349:,
1345:,
1228:)
1199:.
1186:)
922:←
860:)
827:)
794:)
761:)
728:)
695:)
629:)
596:)
563:)
542:2
494:)
458:)
422:)
386:)
350:)
314:)
278:)
242:)
206:)
1421:.
1377:(
1361:(
1224:(
1182:(
1063:)
1057:(
1026:.
1016:.
963:)
959:(
855:·
850:(
822:·
817:(
789:·
784:(
756:·
751:(
723:·
718:(
690:·
685:(
657:·
652:(
624:·
619:(
591:·
586:(
558:·
553:(
525:·
520:(
489:·
484:(
453:·
448:(
417:·
412:(
381:·
376:(
345:·
340:(
309:·
304:(
273:·
268:(
237:·
232:(
201:·
196:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
