1224:
secluded ecosystem which rather than gathering the knowledge of humanity gathers the "knowledge" of a subgroup that suffers from such massive selection bias that anyone with an understanding of statistics would discount the outcome as so skewed as to be irredeemable in the short to mid-term. And the decision merely serves to perpetuate that through leniency towards some of the mechanisms by which it is perpetuated - notably sock- and meatpuppetry in disputes. No, disputes should not be allowed to get out of hand to this degree - but that's what admins are there for. When BLP is violated wholesale and nothing is being done, it is not too surprising when people taking an interest into a topic do something to counter it with their own means. Is it right? Not by the "letter of the law". But that's like saying it's not ever right to shoot someone, even if he's just about to shoot an innocent person. The problem is NOT edit wars. The problem is selection bias and gaming the system and using bullying tactics to perpetuate the selection bias. Edit wars are merely a symptom. You can applaud each other as much as you want - as it stands, that's merely stewing in your own grease and will serve little to tackle the fundamental problems that are all too easy to close one's eyes to at the sight of almost 5 million articles. And you can say all you want that dealing with those issues was not the task of the ArbCom - that doesn't change a bit about ArbCom being very much responsible for the consequences of their decisions. --
187:, which give administrators wide latitude to block, topic-ban, or otherwise restrict editors who behave disruptively. The breadth of the topic bans and the discretionary sanctions was the subject of much discussion between arbitrators. Arbitrators were in agreement as to the need to prevent the dispute being exported to related articlesâGamerGate is part of a much larger series of controversies about gender identity and sexuality (see, for example, coverage of the Christianity and sexuality case in
855:) have been involved to varying degrees in the Knowledge (XXG) aspects of the GamerGate controversy, including in the sanctioning of Mr. Bernstein. To avoid the appearance of impropriety, HJ Mitchell did not substantively edit any part of this report related to Mr. Bernstein, and Gamaliel limited himself to providing links and background information for this article. Without their input and contributions, this piece would not have been possible. Final editorial control was exercised by
899:
121:
111:
37:
131:
91:
141:
101:
684:), who said that contentious editing disputes on Knowledge (XXG) have become a "game of provocation chicken", asserting that internal politics of Knowledge (XXG) "are poisonous," as each side tries to "work as close to the ill-defined edge of acceptable behaviour to provoke the other into crossing it." The article concluded:
218:, which was started in response to concerns about the proximity of relationships between some video game developers and the journalists reviewing their games. Those using it, however, have been severely criticised for the harassment and misogyny that has become associated with it. The related Knowledge (XXG) article,
827:, who wrote, "This is a good statement, but where is the Wikimedia Foundation? They are the people who receive the fundraiser moneyâshouldn't they be involved in supporting the community, especially when some of English Knowledge (XXG)'s most dedicated editors come under attack from unfair reporting?"
1021:
I agree. I became concerned when I started reading about this ARBCOM decision in outlets that typically don't discuss
Knowledge (XXG)'s machinations, especially with the misleading headlines that ARBCOM is banning all feminists from the site so GG-types can have their way. It sounds like this episode
837:
echoing the statement by the
Committee, reading in part that "The Committee's mandate is to uphold a civil, constructive atmosphere that furthers Knowledge (XXG)âs mission. At the Wikimedia Foundation, we support that objective and are taking active steps to create and maintain a civil atmosphere for
1131:
Great article, makes a change to have some calm sober reporting of the decision rather than the hysteria that is in most of the media. Seems like the rulings were fair on both sides. One thing I don't understand is why rylong got a topic ban as well as a site ban. Surely the former is redundant - if
1088:
I am known for being sometimes critical of Arbcom for often taking too long and being too lenient in concluding its cases; that's why I never actually participate on Arbcom cases although I read and follow them all. They have done a grand job with gamergate and it restores my
1006:
Speaking as one of the originating editors, back when gamergate was mostly known as a type of ant, I am still astounded and appalled at how much of an evil Koosh ball this subject has become. The sustained intensity and scope of the vitriol has been unique in my experience; in effect
Knowledge (XXG)
669:
The
Committee passed a site ban against one of the "Five Horsemen" at the last minute, in view of his behaviour while the case was ongoing and taking into account his long history of misconduct; topic banned two more; and admonished the remaining two. The Committee has also passed topic bans against
274:
that the case was complicated by its size and complexity. With 27 named parties and 41 editors presenting roughly 34,000 words worth of on-wiki evidence, a total that does not include email correspondence, the case was of a sort rarely seen in the committee's current era. Still, Davies observed that
1223:
I'm afraid people still haven't understood why the press was concerned, and the premature statement by the ArbCom, which ended up being wrong in fact, being sent out before the decision was actually finalized, didn't precisely help. The support here is merely another symptom of
Knowledge (XXG) as a
810:
intended for the press on its decision making process, vaguely and indirectly addressing some of the coverage on the case. "There have been a number of articles about this case in the press of late, some of which mischaracterize the
Committee, its process, and outcomes of this case," the Committee
781:
misunderstood the purpose of the
Committee: "editors are sanctioned for conduct, not their POV. This is absolutely critical to understand. There's no way the press can write a decent article about an ArbCom case without understanding this key distinction." Others echoed the central complaints of
696:
The byzantine internal processes of
Knowledge (XXG) are incomprehensible for many, but they serve to shape the content on the site, the seventh biggest on the internet. Its reportedly unpleasant internal culture and unwelcoming atmosphere for new editors has long been blamed for an overwhelmingly
1201:
That particular phrase was my doing. I think it's a reasonable way to describe the origins. Even the die-hard antis would concede that that particular hashtag emerged contemporaneously with a controversy about a relationship between a video game developer and a reviewer, even if they dismiss the
263:, promptly became another front in the battle, with editors on both sides ranging from throwaway single-purpose accounts to long-established editorsâseveral of whom had lengthy track records of edit-warring or misconduct in controversial topic areas.
195:
consolidated the options into proposals for a "standard topic ban", the committee reached agreement to define the scope as "(a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed".
30:
Thirteen editors sanctioned in mammoth GamerGate arbitration case: The
English Knowledge (XXG)'s Arbitration Committee has closed the colossal GamerGate arbitration case, whose sizeâinvolving 27 named partiesârecalls large and complex cases of the
211:'keep asking till you get you want' feeling" he got from repeated case requestsâhe conceded that the situation was "spiraling out of control," thus necessitating a case. Despite hopes for an expedited case, it lasted for two months.
1022:
was an internet battle that happened to take place on
Knowledge (XXG). I'm glad ARBCOM has handed out the number of bans, admonishments, and the like; disagreements about content should not be allowed to get so far out of control.
432:
Similar to other editors, ArbCom issued a blanket warning against future disruption, including encouragement to avoid editing in contentious areas, the consequence of which (future disruption) could be a site ban
802:
has since published a correction, stating that "An earlier version gave the impression that the bans had been finalised, and a quotation suggested that no pro-gamergate editors had been banned from the site."
665:
He also erroneously claimed that aside from a few new single-purpose accounts, no GamerGate supporters were sanctioned, leaving them free to write their own page as ArbCom ostensibly ostracizes "liberals."
287:(nearly six). Of the various remedies, Davies said that no "silver bullet" would have resolved the issues raised in the case, but he suggested that the combination of "several related fixes, including
188:
173:
958:
620:". According to Bernstein, these editors were "active in preserving objectivity and in keeping scurrilous sexual innuendo out of the encyclopedia". He went on to call them feminists, complaining:
183:
One editor has been site-banned, while another twelve are subject to remedies ranging from admonishments to broad topic bans and suspended sitebans. In addition, the committee has authorised broad
763:
948:
923:
953:
943:
823:
stated that "The obvious mistake here is that the statement is wordy and lacks sound bites." Others approved of the statement but questioned a perceived lack of involvement from WMF, including
77:
984:
807:
933:
916:
1185:"the "GamerGate" hashtag, which was started in response to concerns about the proximity of relationships between some video game developers and the journalists reviewing their games."
910:
886:
877:
56:
45:
1093:, is one I will remember for future use. Arbcom now needs to take its own lead and be faster and sharper with new cases. We will see how the new committee handles them. --
277:
177:
1117:. I went straight to the Signpost, but of course, that was last week's issue. Ugly business, this, but perhaps an important reminder not to take out the knives around here. --
812:
1049:
938:
283:
169:
288:
165:
561:
1300:
374:
Passed in lieu of a site ban, promulgated by two arbitrators, one of whom noted previous ArbCom findings against Tarc; standard topic ban for this case imposed
21:
670:
seven editors who are widely seen as GamerGate supporters, four of whom were already topic-banned from the (narrower) GamerGate topic area through community
1275:
1247:
1270:
1265:
447:
Passed 10/4; arbitrator GorillaWarfare, a dissenter, commented, "Though there was poor behavior here, I don't think a formal admonishment is needed."
237:
232:
241:
671:
1260:
834:
224:
794:
article and its spin-offs contain inaccuracies, but there is still enough truth in the story for this to become quite as big a controversy as
762:. Their headlines largely reflected the perception that Knowledge (XXG) was banning feminist editors, echoing the complaints following the
697:
masculine make-up â just one in ten editors are thought to be female â which in turn contributes to which topics get featured on the site.
1150:-- If I had to speculate, my guess would be that even if the site ban is at some point overturned, the topic ban would remain in effect.
1172:
773:
s reporting, with one party to the case calling it "completely ridden with factual errors" and another calling it "clearly biased".
1255:
1225:
898:
385:
In wake of previous issues, ArbCom issued a blanket warning against future disruption, the consequence of which could be a site ban
50:
36:
17:
819:, for example, wrote that "If you are going to comment at all, and you just did, you need to address the actual criticisms", while
291:" available to administrators would help. In the light of criticism that the decision had little immediate effect, Davies told the
617:
517:
ArbCom endorsed community-imposed ban from editing under BLP enforcement, and converted it to standard topic ban for this case
1007:
had been trolled by the Internet. Small wonder that our usual consensus and resolution mechanisms failed -they were swamped!
1074:
a one-sided "story" during the Private Manning Case, too. Oh, wait, it was the same journalist. Wow, what a coincidence...
421:
Editor is restricted from editing any administrative noticeboards; passed as third restriction component to avoid site ban
699:
658:
692:
628:
564:
that Knowledge (XXG) "has banned five editors from making corrections to articles about feminism." It extensively quoted
766:
that the Committee was sanctioning both editors who had made transphobic comments and those who opposed transphobia.
203:
urged the committee to handle the case "in a highly expedited manner to avoid its becoming a complete circus," while
1070:
suddenly ran with an obscure and one-sided blog post distorting ArbCom's proposed decision. Of course, somebody fed
1137:
774:
275:
the case was concluded within two months, compared to the much longer durations of previous complex cases, such as
228:
816:
613:
1281:
1058:
1030:
597:
1233:
1216:
1196:
1178:
1141:
1126:
1102:
1083:
1061:
1037:
1016:
1165:
811:
wrote. "We would like to clarify the Committeeâs purpose, process, and preliminary findings." The community
1229:
199:
When ArbCom grudgingly accepted a GamerGate case in November (the third such request in quick succession),
1211:
1147:
1133:
220:
295:
he expected it would "probably take a week or two to work through" for the effects to be fully felt.
1054:
1024:
1012:
830:
1192:
1160:
565:
154:
568:, who wrote a series of blog posts commenting on the Arbitration Committee's pending decision. (
94:
1153:
1113:
1098:
1079:
980:
795:
736:
410:
Passed unanimously as part of a package of four remedies imposed against The Devil's Advocate
267:
192:
124:
184:
1203:
852:
649:
570:
Editor's note: Mark Bernstein was topic banned by Gamaliel and later blocked by HJ Mitchell.
503:
ArbCom endorsed community-imposed ban, and converted it to standard topic ban for this case
489:
ArbCom endorsed community-imposed ban, and converted it to standard topic ban for this case
475:
ArbCom endorsed community-imposed ban, and converted it to standard topic ban for this case
461:
ArbCom endorsed community-imposed ban, and converted it to standard topic ban for this case
200:
168:, whose sizeâinvolving 27 named partiesârecalls large and complex cases of the past such as
158:
104:
204:
134:
1008:
820:
637:
584:, received wide-spread attention on social media, including through the blogs of actor
1294:
1188:
1122:
856:
848:
787:
748:
724:
605:
324:
Passed in favor of a topic ban 9/3/2; for treating Knowledge (XXG) as a battleground
1094:
1075:
730:
640:
with a vengeance â not only do the GamerGaters get to rewrite their own page (and
601:
114:
577:
258:
191:)âbut concerns were raised about the sheer scope of some of the proposals. After
144:
681:
585:
581:
573:
718:
706:
The issue was also reported on by a number of other publications, most citing
645:
824:
754:
742:
641:
609:
215:
164:
The English Knowledge (XXG)'s Arbitration Committee has closed the colossal
1132:
he is banned from the whole site then what is the point of the topic ban?
1118:
593:
712:
589:
838:
editors of all backgrounds. We ask all our editors to do the same."
769:
A number of Knowledge (XXG) editors decried the inaccuracies in the
636:
feminist active in the area is to be sanctioned. This takes care of
815:
the statement for its length, minutia, and unintended obfuscation.
806:
Likely in response to that media attention, the committee released
1091:
Editor is restricted from editing any administrative noticeboards
616:, were targeted by supporters of GamerGate, who dubbed them the "
72:
Thirteen editors sanctioned in mammoth GamerGate arbitration case
1187:
is not really accurate without an "ostensibly" thrown in there.
399:
ArbCom unanimously imposed the standard topic ban for this case
55:
866:
Readers' responses and critical commentary are invited in the
689:
625:
1111:
report, even though I suspected it was fairly, shall we say,
556:
This case has even attracted media attention, including from
897:
545:
ArbCom unanimously imposed standard topic ban for this case
531:
ArbCom unanimously imposed standard topic ban for this case
35:
1146:
Thanks everyone for the positive feedback on this article.
1089:
confdence in the committee. In particular, one outcome:
996:
989:
969:
843:
Editor's note: In the interest of full disclosure, the
254:
250:
246:
851:
and regular arbitration report writer Harry Mitchell (
596:. Bernstein noted that five Knowledge (XXG) editors,
994:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
1107:Thank you both for this. I was alarmed by the
8:
297:
1301:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2015-01
281:(which took five months to resolve) and
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
997:
973:
71:
680:also quoted Wikipedian Abigail Brady (
652:âs, etc.); feminists are to be purged
1202:concerns as a smokescreen for abuse.
1052:, to be specific - on this topic. --
859:, this publication's editor emeritus.
29:
7:
833:of the Wikimedia Foundation wrote
57:
28:
979:These comments are automatically
139:
129:
119:
109:
99:
89:
990:add the page to your watchlist
189:last weekâs Arbitration report
1:
867:
1234:23:51, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
1217:02:16, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
1197:20:43, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
1179:18:58, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
1142:14:14, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
1127:03:48, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
1103:00:48, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
1084:04:21, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
1062:00:41, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
1038:04:05, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
1017:23:54, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
552:Media coverage and responses
1248:delivered to your talk page
1317:
572:) His three-part series,
289:existing and new sanctions
166:GamerGate arbitration case
1213:Penny for your thoughts?
389:
364:
328:
764:Manning arbitration case
214:The case stems from the
1066:It is no accident that
656:from the encyclopedia.
638:social justice warriors
185:discretionary sanctions
1048:has another article -
987:. To follow comments,
902:
847:'s co-editor-in-chief
632:By my informal count,
40:
901:
775:A Quest For Knowledge
710:s article, including
480:DungeonSiegeAddict510
221:GamerGate controversy
39:
983:from this article's
817:Georgewilliamherbert
390:The Devil's Advocate
808:a lengthy statement
598:NorthBySouthBaranof
560:, which mistakenly
315:NorthBySouthBaranof
216:"GamerGate" hashtag
974:Discuss this story
903:
831:Philippe Beaudette
798:did in 2013." The
782:Bernstein and the
46:â Back to Contents
41:
1158:Is that correct?
998:purging the cache
813:widely criticized
704:
703:
672:general sanctions
663:
662:
549:
548:
51:View Latest Issue
1308:
1284:
1243:Want the latest
1214:
1208:
1175:
1170:
1163:
1157:
1148:Little Professor
1134:Little Professor
1057:
1050:a pair of Op-Eds
1036:
1033:
1027:
1001:
999:
993:
972:
959:Featured content
921:
913:
906:
889:
881:
790:wrote "Yes, the
690:
650:Anita Sarkeesian
626:
592:, and biologist
298:
262:
244:
210:
174:Palestine-Israel
161:
143:
142:
133:
132:
123:
122:
113:
112:
103:
102:
93:
92:
63:
61:
59:
1316:
1315:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1280:
1278:
1273:
1268:
1263:
1258:
1251:
1240:
1239:
1212:
1204:
1173:
1166:
1161:
1151:
1095:Kudpung ŕ¸ŕ¸¸ŕ¸ŕ¸ŕ¸śŕšŕ¸
1053:
1031:
1025:
1023:
1003:
995:
988:
977:
976:
970:+ Add a comment
968:
964:
963:
962:
949:Recent research
924:From the editor
914:
911:28 January 2015
909:
907:
904:
893:
892:
887:
884:
879:
777:wrote that the
614:TheRedPenOfDoom
554:
508:Titanium Dragon
438:TheRedPenOfDoom
404:1RR restriction
235:
219:
208:
162:
152:
151:
150:
149:
140:
130:
120:
110:
100:
90:
84:
81:
70:
66:
64:
58:28 January 2015
54:
53:
48:
42:
32:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1314:
1312:
1304:
1303:
1293:
1292:
1279:
1274:
1269:
1264:
1259:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1242:
1241:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1181:
1144:
1129:
1105:
1086:
1064:
1055:John Broughton
1044:This issue of
1042:
1041:
1040:
1026:Chris Troutman
978:
975:
967:
966:
965:
961:
956:
954:Special report
951:
946:
944:Traffic report
941:
936:
931:
926:
920:
908:
896:
895:
894:
885:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
862:
861:
702:
701:
698:
694:
687:
661:
660:
657:
630:
623:
566:Mark Bernstein
553:
550:
547:
546:
543:
540:
537:
533:
532:
529:
526:
523:
519:
518:
515:
512:
509:
505:
504:
501:
498:
495:
491:
490:
487:
484:
481:
477:
476:
473:
470:
467:
463:
462:
459:
456:
453:
449:
448:
445:
442:
439:
435:
434:
430:
427:
423:
422:
419:
416:
412:
411:
408:
405:
401:
400:
397:
394:
391:
387:
386:
383:
380:
376:
375:
372:
369:
366:
362:
361:
359:
356:
353:
349:
348:
346:
343:
339:
338:
336:
333:
330:
326:
325:
322:
319:
316:
312:
311:
308:
305:
302:
278:Climate change
178:Climate change
159:Harry Mitchell
148:
147:
137:
127:
117:
107:
97:
86:
85:
82:
76:
75:
74:
73:
68:
67:
65:
62:
49:
44:
43:
34:
33:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1313:
1302:
1299:
1298:
1296:
1283:
1277:
1272:
1267:
1262:
1257:
1249:
1246:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1222:
1218:
1215:
1209:
1207:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1180:
1177:
1176:
1171:
1169:
1164:
1155:
1149:
1145:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1130:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1115:
1110:
1106:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1087:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1063:
1060:
1056:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1034:
1028:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1005:
1004:
1000:
991:
986:
982:
971:
960:
957:
955:
952:
950:
947:
945:
942:
940:
937:
935:
932:
930:
927:
925:
922:
918:
912:
905:In this issue
900:
891:
883:
871:
869:
864:
863:
860:
858:
854:
850:
844:
841:
840:
839:
836:
832:
828:
826:
822:
818:
814:
809:
804:
801:
797:
793:
789:
785:
780:
776:
772:
767:
765:
761:
757:
756:
751:
750:
749:ThinkProgress
745:
744:
739:
738:
733:
732:
727:
726:
725:De Volkskrant
721:
720:
715:
714:
709:
708:The Guardian'
695:
691:
688:
685:
683:
679:
675:
673:
667:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
624:
621:
619:
618:Five Horsemen
615:
611:
607:
603:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
578:"Thoughtless"
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
551:
544:
541:
538:
536:Willhesucceed
535:
534:
530:
527:
524:
521:
520:
516:
513:
510:
507:
506:
502:
499:
496:
493:
492:
488:
485:
482:
479:
478:
474:
471:
468:
465:
464:
460:
457:
454:
451:
450:
446:
443:
440:
437:
436:
431:
428:
425:
424:
420:
417:
414:
413:
409:
406:
403:
402:
398:
395:
392:
388:
384:
381:
378:
377:
373:
370:
367:
363:
360:
357:
354:
351:
350:
347:
344:
341:
340:
337:
334:
331:
327:
323:
320:
317:
314:
313:
309:
306:
303:
300:
299:
296:
294:
290:
286:
285:
280:
279:
273:
269:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
243:
239:
234:
230:
226:
222:
217:
212:
206:
202:
197:
194:
190:
186:
181:
179:
175:
171:
167:
160:
156:
155:Go Phightins!
146:
138:
136:
128:
126:
118:
116:
108:
106:
98:
96:
88:
87:
79:
60:
52:
47:
38:
23:
19:
1244:
1205:
1184:
1167:
1159:
1154:Roger Davies
1112:
1108:
1090:
1072:The Guardian
1071:
1068:The Guardian
1067:
1046:The Signpost
1045:
934:In the media
928:
917:all comments
890:"In focus" â
865:
846:
842:
829:
805:
799:
796:Categorygate
791:
783:
778:
770:
768:
760:The Mary Sue
759:
753:
747:
741:
735:
731:Der Standard
729:
723:
717:
711:
707:
705:
686:
678:The Guardian
677:
676:
668:
664:
653:
633:
622:
569:
558:The Guardian
557:
555:
441:Admonishment
355:Admonishment
292:
282:
276:
271:
268:Roger Davies
265:
213:
207:decried the
198:
193:Roger Davies
182:
163:
1282:Suggestions
1250:each month?
1226:95.90.52.88
1206:HJÂ Mitchell
1183:Sorry, but
981:transcluded
853:HJ Mitchell
835:a blog post
586:Wil Wheaton
415:Restriction
284:Scientology
266:Arbitrator
201:Newyorkbrad
170:Scientology
882:"In focus"
719:PandoDaily
646:Brianna Wu
582:"Careless"
574:"Infamous"
562:proclaimed
542:Indefinite
528:Indefinite
514:Indefinite
500:Indefinite
486:Indefinite
472:Indefinite
458:Indefinite
444:Indefinite
429:Indefinite
396:Indefinite
382:Indefinite
371:Indefinite
345:Indefinite
335:Indefinite
321:Indefinite
205:Beeblebrox
83:Share this
78:Contribute
22:2015-01-28
1276:Subscribe
1168:Phightins
1009:kencf0618
985:talk page
821:Jehochman
771:Guardian'
755:The Verge
743:Raw Story
642:Zoe Quinn
539:Topic ban
525:Topic ban
511:Topic ban
497:Topic ban
494:Xander756
483:Topic ban
469:Topic ban
455:Topic ban
418:12 months
407:12 months
393:Topic ban
368:Topic ban
332:Topic ban
318:Topic ban
270:told the
1295:Category
1271:Newsroom
1266:Archives
1245:Signpost
1189:DreamGuy
1114:amarilla
1109:Guardian
929:In focus
880:Previous
870:section.
868:comments
857:The ed17
849:Gamaliel
845:Signpost
800:Guardian
792:Guardian
788:Jayen466
784:Guardian
779:Guardian
606:TaraInDC
594:PZ Myers
522:Loganmac
466:ArmyLine
452:Tutelary
352:TaraInDC
342:Site ban
307:Duration
304:Sanction
293:Signpost
272:Signpost
125:LinkedIn
105:Facebook
69:In focus
20: |
1076:Carrite
737:Jezebel
654:en bloc
602:Ryulong
426:Warning
379:Warning
329:Ryulong
238:protect
233:history
115:Twitter
758:, and
713:Gawker
682:Morwen
612:, and
590:Tumblr
580:, and
310:Notes
301:Editor
242:delete
176:, and
135:Reddit
95:E-mail
1261:About
939:Forum
634:every
259:views
251:watch
247:links
31:past.
16:<
1256:Home
1230:talk
1193:talk
1138:talk
1123:talk
1099:talk
1080:talk
1059:(âŤâŤ)
1032:talk
1013:talk
888:Next
825:Shii
648:âs,
644:âs,
610:Tarc
365:Tarc
255:logs
229:talk
225:edit
180:.
157:and
145:Digg
1119:BDD
786:.
588:,
358:N/A
153:By
80:â
1297::
1232:)
1210:|
1195:)
1162:Go
1140:)
1125:)
1101:)
1082:)
1015:)
878:â
752:,
746:,
740:,
734:,
728:,
722:,
716:,
700:â
693:â
674:.
659:â
629:â
608:,
604:,
600:,
576:,
257:|
253:|
249:|
245:|
240:|
236:|
231:|
227:|
172:,
1228:(
1191:(
1174:!
1156::
1152:@
1136:(
1121:(
1097:(
1078:(
1035:)
1029:(
1011:(
1002:.
992:.
919:)
915:(
261:)
223:(
209:"
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
