522:, I agree that this has not damaged Knowledge (XXG) itself, and that the site continues on a good track in spite of the problems. I would characterize the issues mainly as lost opportunity; an organization that is not distracted by secret/fancy visions for the future, or by abysmal internal politics, would be a better partner for the community, and better positioned to help address issues like systemic bias, obstacles to participation, etc. I do think that if the kinds of problems we have seen recently continue, that sooner or later, we will see an existential threat to Knowledge (XXG), from the organization that is supposed to sustain it -- which is a big deal. But I don't think we're there yet, and there is much reason to believe things can turn around. The qualities you name are insightful.
222:, which emphasized technical and product development skills as the top qualification. The single most important quality for the Foundation's executive director should be an ability to work with broad and diverse groups of stakeholders. This skill is not unique to Wikimedia; it also applies to jobs like running a university or a hospital system, or working for change in a broad social movement. Neither technical proficiency nor Wikimedia experience should be regarded as requirements; and removing them from the "must-have" list will allow the foundation to cast a wider net and improve the candidate pool.
319:
262:
number of staff have expressed concern about frequently shifting strategic goals. A clear strategy can be a vital tool to help staff, various organizations, and numerous volunteers align their efforts and sustain a sense of shared purpose. And a good way to establish alignment is to build in community participation from the beginning: the
Foundation knew this in 2010 when it ran the previous process, and the approach has been
518:' removal, so I can't see a reason for any of them to consider leaving. It also seems very extreme for the rest to all leave; but I hope they are having some serious internal discussion of who played what role in the various big and costly mistakes. We should keep in mind that neither of the chapters-appointed trustees has sought reappointment, so presumably they will be departing in August -- and that includes the chair.
492:, and given the importance of volunteering, the unusually low importance of money in the WMF's case. It might be worth taking a look at the way stakeholders are analysed in systems engineering/requirements engineering, where multiple roles and implicit conflicts are the order of the day. A new ED, briefed in advance about the rare combination of job requirements, might be able to benefit from the outgoing ED's experience.
121:
111:
36:
131:
91:
534:, more or less at their own discretion, to work toward the mission as they understand it. I'm not sure how much value there would be in debriefing the outgoing ED's experience -- it probably couldn't hurt, but there are also a great many other people who might have stronger, better-informed insights into what worked and what didn't about her approach. -
141:
101:
277:
Recent communication among the
Wikimedia volunteer community and staff has been thoughtful and diplomatic. Even when critical, there has been a focus on forward progress and improvement. I am hopeful that this ethos can survive, and that as a movement, we can return to the spirit of collaboration and
261:
4. The
Foundation should continue its efforts to build a strategic plan and annual plans. It should pay particular attention to the dynamics that caused so much strife in recent months and consider whether adjustments to these documents would minimize the risk of similar problems. In recent months, a
235:
Are there members of the Board whose approach to the last job search, and/or whose engagement with the departing ED, pointed things in the wrong direction? If so, it might be best for them to step aside and make room for other
Trustees to try a different approach. Although several new Trustees have
242:
How are candidates recruited? How are they moved through the process? How are they evaluated? The organization can't afford to miss good candidates, or to lose them during an onerous or erratic interview period. It's important to define and maintain a consistent hiring process, to clearly identify
202:
With
Tretikov's departure, the hard work of getting back on track lies ahead. It would be too easy to pin the problems of Tretikov's tenure entirely on her, when her appointment and leadership drew strong and sustained support from the Board of Trustees. The Board has now chosen an interim ED, and
180:
from the community of volunteers who have built the bulk of
Knowledge (XXG). Skepticism only grew as the Foundation, under her direction, took actions that increasingly defied advice from longtime staff and volunteer leaders. Although her first year saw a substantial increase in the organization's
452:
Knowledge (XXG) at 15 is not in such bad shape, and tech support has recently been very promising. So let's not allow "internalist" issues to cloud that picture. That said, Pete is correct to point out that governance has now come to the fore. One would have to have close knowledge of the actual
225:
2. The Board should clearly establish that the interim ED position is not a fast-track to the long-term position. While it may be tempting to ease the search for a long-term ED, what the movement needs from an interim ED is a laser focus on re-establishing short-term stability and order. It's
457:
involves should come high on the list. Both
Commons and Wikidata matter there (I can speak for Wikidata from my own outreach work) and deserve full support; but further work needs to be done on Wikisource in order to "have a library", which (to me) seems currently to be a limiting factor for
285:
has been a
Knowledge (XXG) editor since 2006 and runs a Knowledge (XXG) training and consulting business, Wiki Strategies. He worked for the Wikimedia Foundation from 2009 to 2011. The views expressed in this editorial are the author's alone and do not reflect any official opinions of this
249:
The Board should thoroughly and publicly debrief the recent crises. Not only will this serve candidates for the position by enlightening them to the history and the challenges they may face, but it will serve to clear the air around the conflicts that led to
Tretikov's resignation. When
453:
content of debates to comment in detail; but let's say the issue is tension between "Silicon Valley" and "community" views of where we are heading. So those tensions should be addressed, by the WMF as non-profit. In terms of institutional relationships, a better understanding of what
514:, without knowing the internal dynamics of the board, it's tough to know who's responsible for what; but there are so many clues. Of course the whole board shouldn't resign; two of the current trustees were not even on the board from August to January, and one of them voted against
487:
volunteers to staff shops, etc, but not many, perhaps, work with such a large corps of experienced volunteers, who contribute such a large percentage of the essential effort needed to keep the show on the road. Pete is absolutely right to emphasize the diversity of the
462:
in a naive sense, and I include in that caveat the handling of explicitly educational material. I'd be looking in new leadership for folk who get the distinctive merits of what we do and how we do it; and can give a reasoned explanations of both
431:
This is a very thoughtful piece, Pete, and I really hope that the current Board of
Trustees will engage seriously with your recommendations. I agree that some (but not all) of them should consider resigning to facilitate moving on.
219:
226:
possible that a transition from interim to long-term will make sense, but a decision like that is an important one, and should only be made with eyes wide open, with other solid candidates in serious consideration.
204:
368:
358:
378:
363:
373:
343:
77:
526:, yes, the major reliance on volunteers is an important factor -- and it's always worth remembering, this is an odd kind of "volunteering." With other organizations, one typically volunteers
348:
336:
409:
559:
330:
55:
44:
297:
383:
458:
attracting both the science and humanities wings of academia. My point here is that the educational/metadata function of WMF projects has not yet been seen clearly:
215:
611:
21:
586:
191:
581:
576:
571:
177:
255:
483:
A particular requirement for the leader of the WMF is working with an exceptionally high percentage of volunteers. Many charities use
174:
566:
318:
49:
35:
17:
271:
207:. It should now take steps to ensure that its search for a long-term ED attracts good candidates, and doesn't drag out.
472:
592:
236:
been appointed recently, the ones who appear most closely tied to the problems of the last six months remain.
243:
who will narrow the field and make the final decision, and generally to respect candidates' time and effort.
497:
229:
3. The Board should set up the next long-term ED for success. Steps that would support this goal include:
543:
501:
476:
445:
539:
519:
468:
185:; and on a number of issues, the Foundation alienated volunteers, and ultimately many of its own staff.
263:
211:
190:
166:
438:
523:
493:
94:
405:
124:
464:
535:
282:
154:
197:
Wikimedia Foundation revenue; Lila Tretikov's first full fiscal year is highlighted in red.
104:
258:. The Foundation should heed its own advice, and invite expert critique of its practices.
30:
Hard work needed to address Wikimedia’s leadership challenges: The road ahead for the WMF.
134:
530:, and takes some direction from staff; but with Knowledge (XXG), most volunteers simply
183:
the role of volunteers is more central to Knowledge (XXG)'s long-term success than money
515:
467:
in the broad context, and the difference between reference and instructional material.
433:
214:
has not been updated since 2008, and much of the trouble of the past two years can be
605:
170:
251:
114:
144:
511:
489:
182:
254:
raised eyebrows through relatively benign activities, the Foundation ordered a
165:
After a tempestuous two-year stint as the executive director of the non-profit
210:
1. The Board should rethink the job description of the long-term ED. The
286:
publication. Responses and critical commentary are invited in the
54:
72:
Hard work needed to address Wikimedia’s leadership challenges
317:
189:
34:
173:
resigned in February. Her background and her early efforts
421:
414:
394:
274:
appears to be a strong step in the right direction.
419:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
272:current draft of the organization's strategic plan
8:
612:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2016-03
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
422:
398:
71:
510:Thanks all for sharing your thoughts.
278:service that has brought us together.
29:
7:
56:
28:
558:is written by editors like you –
404:These comments are automatically
256:review by an external consultant
139:
129:
119:
109:
99:
89:
415:add the page to your watchlist
1:
287:
233:Changes to Board composition:
240:Optimize the hiring process:
628:
544:19:45, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
502:12:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
477:09:18, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
446:07:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
220:version circulated in 2013
247:Evaluate what went wrong:
266:Harvard Business Review
412:. To follow comments,
379:Knowledge (XXG) Weekly
322:
194:
39:
455:being taken seriously
321:
264:endorsed in a recent
193:
38:
528:for the organization
408:from this article's
181:financial strength,
167:Wikimedia Foundation
399:Discuss this story
323:
195:
45:← Back to Contents
40:
423:purging the cache
369:Technology report
359:Discussion report
212:official document
50:View Latest Issue
619:
595:
532:use the platform
520:Charles Matthews
469:Charles Matthews
460:we are not media
443:
441:Let's discuss it
426:
424:
418:
397:
364:Featured content
341:
333:
326:
309:
301:
288:comments section
157:
143:
142:
133:
132:
123:
122:
113:
112:
103:
102:
93:
92:
62:
60:
58:
627:
626:
622:
621:
620:
618:
617:
616:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
591:
589:
584:
579:
574:
569:
562:
552:
551:
439:
428:
420:
413:
402:
401:
395:+ Add a comment
393:
389:
388:
387:
334:
329:
327:
324:
313:
312:
307:
304:
299:
293:
199:
198:
187:
162:
158:
152:
151:
150:
149:
140:
130:
120:
110:
100:
90:
84:
81:
70:
65:
63:
53:
52:
47:
41:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
625:
623:
615:
614:
604:
603:
590:
585:
580:
575:
570:
565:
564:
563:
554:
553:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
505:
504:
480:
479:
449:
448:
403:
400:
392:
391:
390:
386:
381:
376:
374:Traffic report
371:
366:
361:
356:
351:
346:
344:News and notes
340:
328:
316:
315:
314:
305:
296:
295:
294:
200:
196:
188:
163:
160:
148:
147:
137:
127:
117:
107:
97:
86:
85:
82:
76:
75:
74:
73:
68:
67:
66:
64:
61:
48:
43:
42:
33:
32:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
624:
613:
610:
609:
607:
594:
588:
583:
578:
573:
568:
561:
557:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
524:Chiswick Chap
521:
517:
513:
509:
508:
507:
506:
503:
499:
495:
494:Chiswick Chap
491:
486:
482:
481:
478:
474:
470:
466:
461:
456:
451:
450:
447:
444:
442:
437:
436:
430:
429:
425:
416:
411:
407:
396:
385:
382:
380:
377:
375:
372:
370:
367:
365:
362:
360:
357:
355:
352:
350:
347:
345:
342:
338:
332:
331:16 March 2016
325:In this issue
320:
311:
303:
292:
291:
289:
284:
279:
275:
273:
269:
267:
259:
257:
253:
248:
244:
241:
237:
234:
230:
227:
223:
221:
217:
213:
208:
206:
192:
186:
184:
179:
176:
172:
171:Lila Tretikov
168:
161:
156:
146:
138:
136:
128:
126:
118:
116:
108:
106:
98:
96:
88:
87:
79:
59:
57:16 March 2016
51:
46:
37:
23:
19:
556:The Signpost
555:
531:
527:
490:stakeholders
484:
459:
454:
440:
434:
353:
349:In the media
337:all comments
306:
283:Pete Forsyth
281:
280:
276:
265:
260:
252:Wikimedia UK
246:
245:
239:
238:
232:
231:
228:
224:
209:
201:
164:
159:
155:Pete Forsyth
593:Suggestions
406:transcluded
205:chosen well
178:skepticism
83:Share this
78:Contribute
22:2016-03-16
587:Subscribe
516:Doc James
410:talk page
310:"Op-ed" →
606:Category
582:Newsroom
577:Archives
560:join in!
300:Previous
125:LinkedIn
105:Facebook
20: |
465:WP:VOTE
302:"Op-ed"
218:to the
115:Twitter
512:Cullen
435:Cullen
270:. The
216:traced
135:Reddit
95:E-mail
572:About
354:Op-ed
268:paper
69:Op-ed
16:<
567:Home
540:talk
536:Pete
498:talk
485:some
473:talk
384:Blog
308:Next
203:has
175:drew
145:Digg
153:By
80:—
608::
542:)
500:)
475:)
298:←
169:,
538:(
496:(
471:(
427:.
417:.
339:)
335:(
290:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
