694:
and a lifetime to raise one. There has been precious little study about who the Very Active
Editors are in real life, partly because of a careless attitude on the part of WMF, who historically has viewed the 10,000 or so core volunteers across all projects as more or less disposable and replaceable "power users," partly due to Knowledge (XXG)'s profound (and I think misplaced) aversion to delving into real life identities, even in a data-protected way. What I believe to be true is this: core volunteers are older than many people think they are (median age: middle 30s running all the way to the 70-years-old-plus crowd). They share a commitment to education and the educative process. They are not afraid of learning the fairly simple mark-up language that we use and are not overly deterred by the lack of a true What You See Is What You Get editing process. They tend to work alone or in small groups. They tend to be subject experts about one or a few things, although willing to branch out into other fields to improve the encyclopedia and contribute to Something Greater Than Themselves. They are a precious commodity, a limited set of individuals. There are additions and subtractions to the core over time, to be sure, but growth is an organic process that is difficult to rush. WMF should start figuring out who we are, should start figuring out what we need, and should start making retention of its core volunteers a top priority rather than worrying overly about the fact that these people tend to have have white skin or penises or are middle class or live in cities and towns of the industrialized world. End transmission. —Tim Davenport, caucasian, M, 55, Corvallis, OR USA ///
546:
2016 there were 100 public wiki meetups and perhaps 30 private ones. On this scale of outreach we are recruiting new regular contributors, but many of those first attend multiple events and many people have only become regulars after considering it for 2+ years. Getting institutional partnerships has been key for us, and nowadays, most events have a nonprofit partner who advertises the event to their own community and brings them in as participants. The labor investment in all of this is huge, and I worry that it is not efficient or the most productive use of time, but there are probably 50 people in the city who have organized more than 3 events so at least the labor is dispersed. I struggle to imagine how outreach can work on a smaller scale without dependable, regular, workshops that are well attended and well supported by 10+ major institutions. The administrative burden on presenting any event is huge and I think throughout the Wiki community, there is a misjudgment in perceiving that event organization is easy even for a person acting alone when actually it is time consuming and challenging even for teams of professionals.
712:, but the task remains to find them and to show them that this is what they are born to do. In my case (a mediocre computer professional who, however, managed to make a living from it since the 1990s) it took 7 years from Knowledge (XXG)'s birth until I clicked 'edit' for the first time... hard to say how often I have used Knowledge (XXG) before without really knowing what it was. I find it perfectly reasonable that someone far away from the computer and Internet business might not have realised that Knowledge (XXG) is for them to edit. And, I found it in my mother tongue and only later moved to English due to the hostile atmosphere at de. The chance to bump into one of the 80-something OtjiHerero articles on the Incubator is pretty much zero. So what I was attempting to do with my workshop was searching for pretty much what you described,
431:
don't know any better recruitment method. We do need to try some different methods, perhaps brainstorm to come up with different methods. Purely online methods might work, but probably not in
Namibia. Photo uploading might be an easier way to attract interest and I'm sure there is no surplus of Namibia photos at Commons. Perhaps new editors just come to Knowledge (XXG) on their own when they are ready? Maybe, but you are helping by letting people know (maybe at 2nd, 3rd, or 4th hand) that new editors are wanted and needed. University Wikiclubs have been used in several places. There's a definite need to come up with several new approaches and just keep plugging away. Thanks again.
188:
240:
deletion request there. Alas, before my car left town editing dropped to zero, and no single edit has been performed on Wp/hz ever since. Which is, in a nutshell, the story of all my outreach in
Namibia. Operation successful, patient dead: A well-run workshop resulted in exactly zero new editors, zero subsequent edits, zero subsequent picture uploads. What I did get, however, were several SMS messages from attendees, asking to have such an enjoyable workshop again soon!
556:, could be funded part-time to assist in presenting Knowledge (XXG) events 4-6 times a year, then I think the regularity of that service would give more people time to think about contributing to Knowledge (XXG). When an organization puts its own reputation at stake to make a wiki event successful, then it is more likely to be successful, and having staff involvement in the actual organizing is the best way to get institutional buy-in.
266:
124:
114:
484:
produce more lasting results. It also helps very much to work with a predefined group who already know each other and have a purpose compatible with WP, and it helps to have people some of whom already edit WP. not just to teach but to produce some articles of their own. And it is very useful to have preselected articles to start or improve. and provide reference material that will be pertinent.
212:
information, plus some people that explicitly wanted to attend, and that knew about
Knowledge (XXG) at least in theory. Everyone was informed in advance, thanks to a local community activist who, for a small fee to cover his expenses, phoned after everyone and negotiated time and duration. Internet access was stable and reasonably fast, there were enough computers, and I even got my
36:
134:
94:
144:
104:
691:"I am convinced by now that recruiting Knowledge (XXG) editors by offering a workshop nearby is a terribly ineffective measure. We always easily get funding for such initiatives, and we might do them for the publicity. But to increase our editor base there is hardly any method less successful than running workshops."
654:
When I run edit-a-thons, I never recommend new biographies but instead old books. An editor's time can go much further by paraphrasing a section of a book for an article that won't be deleted (because a book has been written about the subject or subtopic). The activity of paraphrasing CVs and primary
576:
I'm a fan of editathons, providing we get back to the original idea of editathons as a meetup focused on improving or creating articles, ideally with experts on hand. They are effective ways to get existing editors to show each other quicker ways to do things, they can generate quality content - some
526:
the session—not very good for morale. I think the WMF, and possibly affiliates, could add great value to our spending on meetups by publishing material on how to structure and run them. Producing good material beforehand is essential (like exercises in referencing, and extracting paraphrased material
388:
This article is the second place in the last week or two that I've seen mention of the number of active
Knowledge (XXG) editors. I'm interested in learning more about that. Where are these numbers coming from? What is the best way to verify them? PS Thank you for the article, my friend. An insightful
551:
Personally I would like to see more funding being used to build minimal community infrastructure in underserved regions. There is a cost to organizing volunteer events and recruiting volunteers, and it might happen that the cost of outright paying an organizer to present regular events could be less
211:
This time everything was right. I had four half days instead of two or three, allowing for plenty of technical help, explanation, and revision. I had the right participants – teachers, a translator of indigenous languages, an employee of the local
Teachers' Resource Centre and one of a local tourist
734:
You're improving the future of
Knowledge (XXG). Even if edit-a-thon attendees don't becoem active editors, they have knowledge that they can and likely wil pass on to others. Most are now most concerned with earning a living wage and supporting their families. How many of us started by making an
606:
Excellent write up. Yes figuring out how to recruit long term editors is sort of the holy grail of
Knowledge (XXG). In Montreal during the medical pre conference we will be having a talk by a new Wikipedian (just recruited this year and making more than 100 edits a month her first three month). She
545:
Thanks for the candid report. So far as I know, the common wisdom is that no one has identified an outreach method which results in a conversion rate of more than 2% turning participants into regular Wiki contributors. Most outreach programs have lower conversion rates. In New York City in 2015 and
430:
Peter, thank you for your work in outreach and for this article. You probably have a similar success rate as most other workshop providers, or editathon sponsors (assuming you define success as recruiting future very active editors). Is this really "the worst possible method?" I'm not sure, but I
249:
that language. Per million speakers, this is about 2 very active and 20 active editors. Proportionally, Somalia has more doctors than the world has active
Wikipedians. There are more professional chess players in the world than very active Wikipedians. Knowledge (XXG) is a hobby of a tiny minority.
248:
Building on anecdotal evidence, outreach workshops have not been successful anywhere. Some simple number crunching gives you one idea why: English
Knowledge (XXG) has attracted about 3K very active editors (100+edits/month) and some 30K active editors (5+edits/month), out of 1.5 billion speakers of
693:
Do the powers that be notice? Do they care? Are they good stewards of donor dollars? We shall see. That said, I really believe that Wikipedians are born, not made. That sounds ridiculous on the face of it, but it is really true: it takes a mother a couple of hours to give birth to a geek or a nerd
502:
Thank you, Peter, for your extraordinarily frank and insightful exposé. Living and working here in Thailand on outreach, I'm very much aware of the challenges you are faced with even though Thailand is probably in many ways very much more developed than Namibia. It's always been a pleasure meeting
239:
And yes, we were reasonably productive, not by the quantity of produced content but by its variety. Participants wrote short articles and categorised them, sent messages to each other, helped an Incubator regular to translate a template. They found and linked pictures on Commons and even started a
256:
I am convinced by now that recruiting Knowledge (XXG) editors by offering a workshop nearby is a terribly ineffective measure. We always easily get funding for such initiatives, and we might do them for the publicity. But to increase our editor base there is hardly any method less successful than
252:
Otjiherero has roughly 250K speakers. Applying above statistics to it there might, or might not, be a future very active Wikipedian amidst them, and there should be about five potential active editors speaking Otjiherero. I haven't found them yet. Which is no wonder as, with 5–20 participants per
670:
Oh. We are often in a library so we can use its books to look up our bio subjects. No. Write about the book. Or about one of its topics, when it's about some little subfield of botany or Indonesian art or whatever, especially when it mentions a particular practitioner who is the focus of our
223:
From previous workshops I know that English Knowledge (XXG) is not an ideal place to practice. Although Namibia's national language, English is no Namibian's native tongue, and English Knowledge (XXG)'s 1001 rules make a basic introduction difficult. Some participants are embarrassed to write in
483:
This experience is not unusual. Some things we've learned in NYC: For a single isolated workshop the goal should be to help people understand WP by hands-on practice, not to produce content or inspire people to become active editors, but a series of workshops in which people can develop can
635:
Editathons here in NYC often have a theme of some underrepresented group of people. Most people indeed, thus most potential editors, are members of such groups, but the result is a concentration on new biographies. Such articles are subject to the harshest scrutiny. With experienced help,
762:
Very interesting article and the conclusion is in line with what I have after running dozens of courses in Norway. Lots of good comments about what can be done, but what about difference in editors per million speakers? They vary widely, even among countries close to each other, like
521:
articles, rather than how to edit them (and indeed in many language-WPs, how to improve translated articles). We have zillions of stub-articles in all languages, and I've been present at an editathon where a deletion notice has been slapped on a participant's new article
231:
on the other hand has a lot of advantages: Participants can write about whatever they wish, as there are just a few dozen existant articles. It doesn't matter for now that spelling in this indigenous language is still a matter of academic dispute, and if an article like
207:
we lost an entire day to a power outage and the attendees had little use for Knowledge (XXG) editing skills. On many other occasions something was wrong with the organisation, the workshop was too short, the computers too few, the venue too hot, et cetera.
414:. From there, you're a click away from the page showing (third line of data) that the English Knowledge (XXG) had 3340 very active editors in October. If instead you select the "About" tab, you'll see information about who compiles these statistics. --
636:
first-timers can get over the hurdles of notability and reliability. They come away cheered by their success, but feeling that they need expert guidance to make any progress. I wish I could recommend cutting their teeth on an easier kind of editing.
739:. What may look like a failure now may be the spark that brings a person back in a few years. Patient's not dead, just busy with other aspects of life right now and into the near future. Hold out hope for them years into the future.
325:
735:
occasional IP edit to fix punctuation or spelling, then singed up for an account that was rarely used and finally became active? Look at the activity timelines of the recent and current group at
320:
340:
330:
300:
295:
290:
80:
315:
655:
sources only to have the work deleted is doubly despiriting—we set editors up for failure by going for "gaps" (all so someone can compare a category count en masse) rather than quality.
283:
366:
799:
582:
305:
277:
55:
44:
517:
Just to add something I've found frustrating as a grant reviewer on Meta over the years: many workshops/editathons seem to have spent too much time showing participants how to
335:
852:
585:- that's a better retention rate than we get even by making people admins. Outreach editathons are a nut we've failed to crack, but that's been known for a while.
21:
553:
172:
716:, educators, life-long learners, subject experts. But that is not enough. How do I find the 'Knowledge (XXG) gene' without probing the entire population? --
827:
233:
822:
817:
175:
he also conducts research on the relationship of Knowledge (XXG) and indigenous knowledge, which has made him a frequent guest at Wikimedia conferences.
552:
than the price of recruiting a volunteer. Time is urgent also and wiki is generally underrepresented in Africa. If someone, perhaps a librarian at the
812:
30:
Operation successful, patient dead: Outreach workshops in Namibia: Even a well executed outreach event can yield disappointing results
807:
265:
49:
35:
17:
253:
workshop, it would require 2,000 workshops to skim 10% of the speaker base, and thus have a 50% chance of finding one of the five.
217:
578:
622:
527:
from a reliable source or two, which needs to be rather stratified in a workshop). It's really hard to design a good workshop.
458:
748:
626:
592:
187:
171:) has been a Wikipedian since 2008. He has done Knowledge (XXG) outreach work in Namibia since 2012. A lecturer at
775:(28) should have had a better ratio than the Nordic countries that only recently got functioning local chapters.
709:
833:
420:
503:
you and discussing your projects over the years - maybe we can work together on one of them one of the days.
676:
641:
784:
755:
725:
703:
680:
663:
645:
630:
601:
587:
569:
564:
540:
512:
495:
476:
462:
444:
423:
398:
577:
of the relationships established at the British Museum editathon in 2010 have been very longlasting, and
437:
583:
nine established Wikipedians who took part in the 2010 British Museum editathon are all still active
780:
618:
454:
416:
394:
721:
672:
637:
97:
744:
699:
557:
508:
362:
200:
127:
581:. What we didn't predict was the effect on editor retention, six and a half years later the
224:
English in public and under supervision, fearing that they might make a mistake. Editing in
752:
736:
107:
535:
432:
607:
will be discussing her experience of joining the community and becoming an active editor.
137:
776:
657:
610:
472:
450:
405:
390:
846:
717:
491:
168:
157:
671:
interest even though not the focus of the source. It finally dawns on me; thanks.
740:
713:
695:
504:
204:
117:
608:
772:
768:
764:
228:
147:
528:
225:
203:
I could not get sufficient accounts created and Internet access was too slow,
468:
579:
over six years later that editathon is still generating featured articles
486:
75:
Operation successful, patient dead: Outreach workshops in Namibia
194:
Some attendees of a Knowledge (XXG) workshop in Opuwo, Namibia.
54:
264:
186:
34:
410:
The official page for statistics for Wikimedia projects is
236:
is slightly promotional, that's not the end of the world.
449:
Really interesting. Peter, thanks for being so honest.
378:
371:
351:
199:
I have done many small outreach workshops in Namibia.
771:(38). Neither does it seems that money helps, then
376:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
411:
8:
554:Namibia University of Science and Technology
216:right back without hassle after it had been
173:Namibia University of Science and Technology
853:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2016-12
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
379:
355:
74:
29:
7:
689:First, let's review the money line:
181:Workshops—at least mine—don't work
56:
28:
361:These comments are automatically
142:
132:
122:
112:
102:
92:
244:Wikipedians are a tiny minority
710:Wikipedians are born, not made
372:add the page to your watchlist
1:
726:20:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
704:23:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
681:15:43, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
664:21:18, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
646:01:38, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
631:04:44, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
602:21:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
570:13:27, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
541:10:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
513:08:42, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
496:11:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
477:08:44, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
463:08:15, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
445:04:36, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
424:04:07, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
399:03:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
785:15:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
412:https://stats.wikimedia.org/
756:21:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
869:
369:. To follow comments,
269:
191:
39:
268:
190:
38:
365:from this article's
180:
257:running workshops.
356:Discuss this story
270:
192:
45:← Back to Contents
40:
380:purging the cache
326:Technology report
50:View Latest Issue
860:
836:
662:
660:
615:
599:
595:
590:
567:
562:
538:
533:
440:
419:
409:
383:
381:
375:
354:
321:Featured content
288:
280:
278:22 December 2016
273:
229:on the Incubator
220:shortly before.
215:
160:
146:
145:
136:
135:
126:
125:
116:
115:
106:
105:
96:
95:
62:
60:
58:
57:22 December 2016
868:
867:
863:
862:
861:
859:
858:
857:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
832:
830:
825:
820:
815:
810:
803:
791:
790:
658:
656:
611:
597:
593:
588:
565:
558:
536:
529:
505:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
443:
438:
415:
403:
385:
377:
370:
359:
358:
352:+ Add a comment
350:
346:
345:
344:
341:Recent research
281:
276:
274:
271:
259:
246:
213:
196:
195:
184:
183:
167:Peter Gallert (
162:
161:
155:
154:
153:
152:
143:
133:
123:
113:
103:
93:
87:
84:
73:
65:
63:
53:
52:
47:
41:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
866:
864:
856:
855:
845:
844:
831:
826:
821:
816:
811:
806:
805:
804:
793:
792:
789:
788:
787:
759:
758:
731:
730:
729:
728:
686:
685:
684:
683:
667:
666:
649:
648:
633:
604:
573:
572:
560:Blue Rasberry
548:
547:
543:
515:
499:
498:
481:
480:
479:
447:
435:
428:
427:
426:
417:John Broughton
360:
357:
349:
348:
347:
343:
338:
333:
331:Traffic report
328:
323:
318:
313:
308:
303:
301:Special report
298:
296:News and notes
293:
291:Year in review
287:
275:
263:
262:
261:
260:
245:
242:
214:accountcreator
197:
193:
185:
182:
179:
178:
177:
163:
151:
150:
140:
130:
120:
110:
100:
89:
88:
85:
79:
78:
77:
76:
71:
70:
69:
67:
64:
61:
48:
43:
42:
33:
32:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
865:
854:
851:
850:
848:
835:
829:
824:
819:
814:
809:
801:
797:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
766:
761:
760:
757:
754:
750:
746:
742:
738:
733:
732:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
707:
706:
705:
701:
697:
692:
688:
687:
682:
678:
674:
673:Jim.henderson
669:
668:
665:
661:
653:
652:
651:
650:
647:
643:
639:
638:Jim.henderson
634:
632:
628:
624:
620:
616:
614:
609:
605:
603:
600:
596:
591:
584:
580:
575:
574:
571:
568:
563:
561:
555:
550:
549:
544:
542:
539:
534:
532:
525:
520:
516:
514:
510:
506:
501:
500:
497:
493:
489:
488:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
465:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
446:
441:
434:
429:
425:
422:
418:
413:
407:
402:
401:
400:
396:
392:
387:
386:
382:
373:
368:
364:
353:
342:
339:
337:
334:
332:
329:
327:
324:
322:
319:
317:
314:
312:
309:
307:
304:
302:
299:
297:
294:
292:
289:
285:
279:
272:In this issue
267:
258:
254:
250:
243:
241:
237:
235:
230:
227:
221:
219:
209:
206:
202:
189:
176:
174:
170:
165:
164:
159:
158:Peter Gallert
149:
141:
139:
131:
129:
121:
119:
111:
109:
101:
99:
91:
90:
82:
68:
59:
51:
46:
37:
23:
19:
795:
690:
612:
586:
559:
530:
523:
518:
485:
316:In the media
310:
284:all comments
255:
251:
247:
238:
222:
210:
205:another time
198:
166:
66:
834:Suggestions
363:transcluded
798:. You can
794:It's your
433:Smallbones
226:Otjiherero
86:Share this
81:Contribute
22:2016-12-22
828:Subscribe
777:Ulflarsen
767:(66) and
613:Doc James
451:Clayoquot
439:smalltalk
406:Bobnorwal
391:Bobnorwal
367:talk page
847:Category
823:Newsroom
818:Archives
796:Signpost
718:Pgallert
623:contribs
598:Chequers
459:contribs
306:In focus
169:Pgallert
128:LinkedIn
108:Facebook
20: |
800:help us
773:Germany
769:Denmark
741:DocTree
714:Carrite
696:Carrite
537:(talk)
218:removed
118:Twitter
765:Norway
737:WP:RFA
566:(talk)
524:during
519:create
467:+1. --
389:read!
138:Reddit
98:E-mail
813:About
708:Yes,
627:email
594:Spiel
492:talk
311:Op-ed
72:Op-ed
16:<
808:Home
781:talk
749:ʇuoɔ
745:ʞlɐʇ
722:talk
700:talk
677:talk
659:czar
642:talk
619:talk
589:Ϣere
531:Tony
509:talk
473:talk
469:Gnom
455:talk
421:(♫♫)
395:talk
336:Blog
234:this
201:Once
148:Digg
753:WER
487:DGG
156:By
83:—
849::
783:)
751:)
724:)
702:)
679:)
644:)
629:)
625:·
621:·
511:)
494:)
475:)
461:)
457:|
397:)
802:.
779:(
747:·
743:(
720:(
698:(
675:(
640:(
617:(
507:(
490:(
471:(
453:(
442:)
436:(
408::
404:@
393:(
384:.
374:.
286:)
282:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
