381:, who packs so much right and so much wrong into so few sentences. "It is absolutely and always wrong for PR practitioners to break the PRCA Code of Conduct by posting fake pictures or fake facts on Knowledge (XXG). Sadly, it is also the case that Knowledge (XXG)’s procedures are opaque, confusing, and often self-defeating. While the organisation is correct to ask that its customers abide by its rules, it is completely at fault for ensuring that those rules remain quite frankly so strange and so confusing. Knowledge (XXG) would be a more reliable source of factual information if it engaged more constructively with those offering to provide those facts." So who is completely at fault?
710:, which contained some legitimate criticism of en.wp power-users by an en.wp admin and by the journalist, was mentioned neither in May or June. This is puzzling as it's very unlikely to have been an oversight: was it considered to be unreliable? impolitic? (I mean it does have someone making snide comments like: "It sounds like you have an issue with bold editing or perhaps the world is moving too fast for you." (The article mentions that the author would later be reprimanded for ignoring consensus.) I strongly encourage people to read that article to understand how reasonable outsiders view en.wp's problematic power users. 🌿
110:
130:
423:
567:
90:
120:
36:
140:
100:
150:
395:
quotes TNF Brazil's CEO Fabricio Luzzi's initial statement “Our mission is to expand our frontiers so that our consumers can overcome their limits. With the ‘Top of Images’ project, we achieved our positioning and placed our products in a fully contextualised manner as items that go hand in hand with
356:
gives a excellent summary of the hack itself, then focuses on a "highly meta" followup "a discussion taking place on
Knowledge (XXG) about whether Knowledge (XXG) should include information within that subject’s Knowledge (XXG) article about how that subject covertly and unethically edited Knowledge
858:
find plenty of time for
Cheetos runs, their misogynistic editorial pet projects, genital-scratching contests, and whatever else they typically engage in. ...I'd invite Toksvig to pitch in, since she's so misinformed about just how large a community there really is behind-the-scenes here, but if all
769:
it is a very good article. In my prep for this column there's a gap that you might help me fill. About 2-3 days before deadline I pretty much have to ignore new articles coming out, and for a couple of days after I take a break from reading about
Knowledge (XXG). It's just a time management thing.
448:
appear in this video about UW research into the reasons for
Knowledge (XXG)'s gender gap. Rosiestep says "Amanda Menking and Wanda Pratt's work is important, so I was happy to participate in this project, and the follow-up video... I'd be interested in hearing feedback from members of the Wikimedia
815:
I enjoy this regular column and am usually surprised by how much media coverage
Knowledge (XXG) still receives. I mean, it's not 2005-2006 coverage but still, magazines regularly find article subjects here within the editing community. Between this column and recent research, Knowledge (XXG) is
853:
sad, basement-dwelling men with too much time on their hands, all gung-ho on editing
Knowledge (XXG)?! Well, that's a bloody relief, I guess we can all relax and slack off a bit, with all those hands on deck! All those editors should be able to handle the workload and
774:. I'll probably be going for fewer articles and more topics, as well as longer write-ups, (do we need 12 articles on The North Face?), so they may be harder to fit in. Also I have a bias toward newer articles, which means I forget about the gap. Any help appreciated.
899:) from what I understand. Yes she was sadly mistaken. I didn't mean to make fun of her, but sometimes it's important to point out mistakes that good people make. I'm just wondering now upon review - should I have included this short blurb? Please let me know here.
479:. Good try, but she gets a few facts wrong. "There are about 350,000 uber-volunteers and they tend . . . to be the same kind of guy . . . sitting in his pants. They are actively editing women out and women’s achievements are not being inputted."
799:
You said you "just added it directly" but I can't see that edit; perhaps you left the window open? In any case, it's probably better to mention this article in the July issue, while explaining it was missed in May and June. —
180:
is all around us: photos in our encyclopedia meant to sell clothing, a spy possibly editing
Knowledge (XXG), company names that mean nothing, citogenesis. Is Knowledge (XXG) part of the solution or part of the problem?
881:: as well as repeating the claim that artices about women are being deleted, she has also claimed that articles about women are not being created, and that Knowledge (XXG) is 9% about women and 90% about men.
606:
318:, a global chain clothing store, paid their marketers to replace Knowledge (XXG)'s photos of parks, mountains and other nature sites with their advertisements. Media coverage of the scandal continues.
682:
636:
616:
591:
308:
631:
651:
626:
611:
596:
76:
495:
is the first of many articles that will likely appear on the Fram-ban. It's got all the pieces in place, harassment, ArbCom, editor revolt, the WMF, though "culture war" seems a long stretch.
350:
states that "moderators and the site itself may have to be more prepared for surreptitious plugs like this, even if they're unlikely to happen again in the near future." How unlikely is that?
554:
545:
584:
530:
646:
578:
55:
44:
641:
621:
656:
289:
222:
uses the "Knowledge (XXG) test" which asks whether finding out what a company actually does is easier to determine from its name, from its website, or from
Knowledge (XXG).
841:
Male
Knowledge (XXG) editors are deleting women, says Sandi Toksvig in The Times. Good try, but she gets a few facts wrong. "There are about 350,000 uber-volunteers..."
504:
336:
states "The North Face’s manipulation of
Knowledge (XXG) images is a form of native advertising and may be subject to the FTC’s advertising disclosure requirements."
1016:
There actually was some recent development on that crossword scandal, but it was a retrospective video by the fellow who caught the shenanigans in the first place:
392:
378:
1095:
469:
joins in with "Knowledge (XXG) Is Getting More Female Footballer Profiles, Thanks To This Much-Needed Initiative." The North Face could learn something from this.
225:
466:
93:
21:
368:
326:
tells it exactly like it is: "This seemingly cheeky move is actually at the vanguard of a pernicious emerging movement that we’ll call asshole advertising."
1071:
1066:
1061:
727:
526:
344:"If you want to market your product, don’t mess with Knowledge (XXG) to do it." We'd like to think so, but doesn't this kind of editing happen every day?
878:
1056:
329:
268:
882:
374:
730:, click "in the media", and present this however you like. This is a standing invitation and anyone would have told you the same earlier.
339:
1051:
566:
49:
35:
17:
873:
Sadly (because she is a national treasure, for whom I have had the greatest respect for many years) this is not the only time that
323:
472:
525:
Do you want to contribute to "In the media" by writing a story or even just an "in brief" item? Edit next week's edition in the
285:
212:
then compares the effectiveness of Knowledge (XXG)'s methods to combat disinformation with the efforts of Facebook, YouTube, etc.
517:
255:
492:
333:
259:
235:
454:
1028:
996:
958:
936:
912:
890:
868:
827:
804:
787:
756:
743:
714:
1077:
886:
430:
980:
360:
278:
406:
347:
738:
248:
describes the Wiki-battle by possibly paid editors over the old, and likely irrelevant question of who is
752:
Thanks, BR, but I've actually just added it directly since that seemed much simpler and more timely.🌿
703:
264:
204:– a Russian convicted in the United States of conspiracy to act as an unregistered foreign agent of the
384:
353:
989:
905:
780:
193:
226:'The case of an iconic watch: how lazy writers and Knowledge (XXG) create and spread fake "facts"'
215:
1024:
976:
954:
877:
has been badly misinformed, to use a charitable word, about Knowledge (XXG) in recent days. See
508:
294:
281:
rewarded readers who know the answer to a tussle between Wikieditors. (7 letters starting with E)
274:
205:
498:
103:
864:
731:
678:
123:
927:
249:
238:
points out Knowledge (XXG)'s errors in rap articles and how they spread across the internet.
241:
133:
1011:
984:
900:
794:
775:
764:
753:
721:
711:
173:
163:
833:
511:
shows how California politicians know how to write an article, having money really helps.
505:
Sacramento Report: The New Front in the SB 50 Battle Is Toni Atkins’ Knowledge (XXG) Page
153:
949:
The Forbes article on Parker is from 2016, as was the related edit war, for reference.
501:
shows how linguists really know how to throw an editathon: “having snacks really helps.”
315:
177:
1089:
1020:
965:
950:
874:
860:
201:
143:
208:– and how she possibly tried to edit the Knowledge (XXG) article about herself.
921:
113:
1017:
458:
426:
816:
continually getting scrutinized which I think usually benefits the project.
389:
emphasizes that TNF Brazil – a licensee, not a subsidiary – ran the program.
971:
818:
801:
879:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Women in Red#Mention on leading UK show
726:
It was an oversight. Feel free to include this in the next issue. Go to
194:
There's a lot Knowledge (XXG) can teach us about fighting disinformation
292:
after Parker is accused of plagiarizing crosswords from, among others,
455:
A Ridiculous Gender Bias On Knowledge (XXG) Is Finally Being Corrected
832:
I realize it was right in the setup that this isn't quite 100% up to
462:
473:
Male Knowledge (XXG) editors are deleting women, says Sandi Toksvig
917:
I'm a huge fan of Toksvig and I thought the blurb was still fair.
859:
of her sourcing is this fanciful then maybe that's a bad idea. --
449:
community as well as non-Wikimedians after they view the video."
440:
229:
983:
really was in June (We had an all night editing party. Sorry!)
444:
54:
896:
256:
Using Knowledge (XXG) for medical research? What to watch for
565:
269:
How Should Clinicians Engage With Online Health Information?
34:
461:
describes a women's football (soccer) project sponsored by
367:
mentions Burger King, SeaWorld and NBC News and links to
516:
For further coverage of Knowledge (XXG) in the news see
694:
687:
667:
30:
The disinformation age: or is it the information error?
322:
Of the dozens of articles covering the vandalism only
493:
The Culture War Has Finally Come For Knowledge (XXG)
692:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
427:
Exploring the gender gap in Knowledge (XXG) editors
415:
704:Donald Trump's Knowledge (XXG) Entry Is a War Zone
242:The battle for Craig Wright's Knowledge (XXG) page
330:The North Face’s Knowledge (XXG) Stunt Goes South
839:
379:Public Relations and Communications Association
377:quotes Francis Ingham, director general of the
369:Conflict-of-interest editing on Knowledge (XXG)
895:Yes and yes. She is a national treasure (and
8:
846:Wait, is she telling us that there are over
216:The sad decline of the sensible company name
1018:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aHfK8EUIzg
728:Knowledge (XXG):Wikipedia_Signpost/Newsroom
361:A History of Brands Hacking Knowledge (XXG)
1096:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2019-06
409:in the University of Washington's UW News
303:The North Face vandalizes Knowledge (XXG)
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
695:
671:
70:
836:standards, but I still had to laugh...
518:List of articles about Knowledge (XXG)
412:
228:a good case study of citogenesis from
770:If you see good articles in that gap
407:Video: The Knowledge (XXG) gender gap
29:
7:
56:
28:
702:Unless I am mistaken, Aaron Mak "
677:These comments are automatically
421:
286:Timothy Parker (puzzle designer)
148:
138:
128:
118:
108:
98:
88:
1046:: doing it for free since 2005.
688:add the page to your watchlist
188:Information and disinformation
1:
334:Manatt, Phelps & Phillips
260:American Medical Association
1112:
828:21:15, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
788:20:34, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
757:19:24, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
744:19:15, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
715:19:08, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
420:
401:Adding and deleting women
354:Stephen Harrison on Slate
1029:06:44, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
997:06:20, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
959:05:12, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
937:16:54, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
913:14:15, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
891:17:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
869:04:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
805:01:57, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
431:University of Washington
429:, 3:09, June 11, 2019,
843:
685:. To follow comments,
570:
529:or leave a tip on the
200:discusses the case of
71:The disinformation age
39:
569:
265:AMA Journal of Ethics
38:
681:from this article's
396:these destinations.”
288:erupts according to
262:includes a link to
977:The New York Times
772:please let me know
672:Discuss this story
607:On the bright side
571:
509:Voice of San Diego
295:The New York Times
275:The New York Times
206:Russian Federation
45:← Back to Contents
40:
696:purging the cache
637:From the archives
617:Technology report
592:Discussion report
535:
436:
435:
50:View Latest Issue
1103:
1080:
1015:
992:
970:Good catch, but
969:
935:
908:
826:
798:
783:
768:
741:
736:
725:
699:
697:
691:
670:
589:
581:
574:
558:"In the media" →
557:
549:
531:suggestions page
523:
499:Associations Now
447:
425:
424:
413:
250:Satoshi Nakamoto
166:
152:
151:
142:
141:
132:
131:
122:
121:
112:
111:
102:
101:
92:
91:
62:
60:
58:
1111:
1110:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1076:
1074:
1069:
1064:
1059:
1054:
1047:
1039:
1038:
1009:
995:
990:
963:
934:
918:
911:
906:
817:
792:
786:
781:
762:
739:
732:
719:
701:
693:
686:
675:
674:
668:+ Add a comment
666:
662:
661:
660:
632:Recent research
582:
577:
575:
572:
561:
560:
555:
552:
547:
541:
540:
536:
489:
439:
422:
416:External videos
403:
305:
284:An edit war at
220:Financial Times
190:
174:Information Age
168:
167:
161:
160:
159:
158:
149:
139:
129:
119:
109:
99:
89:
83:
80:
69:
65:
63:
53:
52:
47:
41:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1109:
1107:
1099:
1098:
1088:
1087:
1075:
1070:
1065:
1060:
1055:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1041:
1040:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
987:
946:
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
926:
903:
883:213.205.240.14
848:three hundred
838:
837:
830:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
790:
778:
747:
746:
734:Blue Rasberry
676:
673:
665:
664:
663:
659:
654:
652:Community view
649:
644:
639:
634:
629:
627:Special report
624:
619:
614:
612:Traffic report
609:
604:
599:
597:News and notes
594:
588:
576:
564:
563:
562:
553:
550:"In the media"
544:
543:
542:
538:
522:
521:
520:
513:
512:
502:
496:
488:
485:
483:
481:
480:
470:
451:
450:
434:
433:
418:
417:
411:
410:
402:
399:
398:
397:
390:
382:
372:
358:
351:
345:
337:
327:
316:The North Face
304:
301:
300:
299:
282:
271:
253:
239:
233:
223:
213:
189:
186:
184:
178:disinformation
170:
169:
157:
156:
146:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
85:
84:
81:
75:
74:
73:
72:
67:
66:
64:
61:
48:
43:
42:
33:
32:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1108:
1097:
1094:
1093:
1091:
1079:
1073:
1068:
1063:
1058:
1053:
1045:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1019:
1013:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
998:
993:
986:
982:
979:
978:
973:
967:
962:
961:
960:
956:
952:
948:
947:
938:
933:
931:
924:
923:
916:
915:
914:
909:
902:
898:
894:
893:
892:
888:
884:
880:
876:
875:Sandi Toksvig
872:
871:
870:
866:
862:
857:
852:
851:
845:
844:
842:
835:
831:
829:
825:
823:
822:
814:
813:
806:
803:
796:
791:
789:
784:
777:
773:
766:
760:
759:
758:
755:
751:
750:
749:
748:
745:
742:
737:
735:
729:
723:
718:
717:
716:
713:
709:
705:
698:
689:
684:
680:
669:
658:
655:
653:
650:
648:
645:
643:
640:
638:
635:
633:
630:
628:
625:
623:
620:
618:
615:
613:
610:
608:
605:
603:
600:
598:
595:
593:
590:
586:
580:
573:In this issue
568:
559:
551:
539:
534:
532:
528:
519:
515:
514:
510:
506:
503:
500:
497:
494:
491:
490:
486:
484:
478:
474:
471:
468:
464:
460:
456:
453:
452:
446:
442:
438:
437:
432:
428:
419:
414:
408:
405:
404:
400:
394:
393:Travel Weekly
391:
388:
387:
383:
380:
376:
373:
370:
366:
362:
359:
355:
352:
349:
346:
343:
342:
338:
335:
331:
328:
325:
321:
320:
319:
317:
313:
311:
302:
297:
296:
291:
287:
283:
280:
277:
276:
272:
270:
267:
266:
261:
257:
254:
251:
247:
243:
240:
237:
234:
231:
227:
224:
221:
217:
214:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
192:
191:
187:
185:
182:
179:
175:
165:
155:
147:
145:
137:
135:
127:
125:
117:
115:
107:
105:
97:
95:
87:
86:
78:
59:
51:
46:
37:
23:
19:
1043:
975:
929:
920:
855:
849:
847:
840:
820:
819:
771:
733:
707:
602:In the media
601:
585:all comments
579:30 June 2019
537:
524:
482:
476:
385:
364:
341:Deseret News
340:
332:by law firm
324:Fast Company
310:The Signpost
309:
307:In May 2019
306:
293:
273:
263:
245:
219:
209:
202:Maria Butina
197:
183:
171:
94:PDF download
68:In the media
57:30 June 2019
1078:Suggestions
679:transcluded
144:X (Twitter)
1012:Smallbones
985:Smallbones
901:Smallbones
795:SashiRolls
776:Smallbones
765:SashiRolls
754:SashiRolls
722:SashiRolls
712:SashiRolls
459:Refinery29
164:Smallbones
82:Share this
77:Contribute
22:2019-06-30
1072:Subscribe
991:smalltalk
981:crossword
925:(he/him)
907:smalltalk
782:smalltalk
683:talk page
477:The Times
441:Rosiestep
279:crossword
1090:Category
1067:Newsroom
1062:Archives
1044:Signpost
1021:SnowFire
966:SnowFire
951:SnowFire
850:thousand
647:In focus
548:Previous
527:Newsroom
487:In brief
445:FloNight
386:Outdoors
348:Engadget
312:reported
134:Facebook
124:LinkedIn
114:Mastodon
20: |
861:FeRDNYC
761:Thanks
642:Opinion
622:Gallery
507:in the
375:PR Week
357:(XXG)."
246:Decrypt
236:DJBooth
218:in the
172:In the
922:Bilorv
740:(talk)
467:Bustle
463:Adidas
290:Forbes
154:Reddit
104:E-mail
1057:About
856:still
834:WP:RS
708:Slate
657:Op-Ed
365:AdAge
314:that
210:Wired
198:Wired
16:<
1052:Home
1042:The
1025:talk
955:talk
930:talk
887:talk
865:talk
556:Next
443:and
230:KSNV
974:'s
972:Bri
897:OBE
802:JFG
706:",
475:in
457:on
363:in
244:on
232:TV.
196:in
162:By
79:—
1092::
1027:)
957:)
919:—
889:)
867:)
824:iz
546:←
465:.
258:,
176:,
1023:(
1014::
1010:@
994:)
988:(
968::
964:@
953:(
932:)
928:(
910:)
904:(
885:(
863:(
821:L
797::
793:@
785:)
779:(
767::
763:@
724::
720:@
700:.
690:.
587:)
583:(
533:.
371:.
298:.
252:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.