427:
going through a situation when all school students together were new or else when you have been the only new one to enter a group situation. In social life as psychology and own experience alike have found out any newcomers have to adapt gradually to the established group structures. Stranding is always possible! Some frustration is almost always part of it. The only real difference you can shift/soften a little bit is the degree of frustrations. The online scenario of
Knowledge (XXG) editing is a little bit more complicated than real life newbie conflicts because the persons involved aren't present (have no faces, no smiles, no facial warning signs). --
209:
of the page. In theory
Knowledge (XXG)'s barriers to entry are very low, but the barriers to making a meaningful contribution to the encyclopedia's contents are much, much higher. In some ways this is a good thing â Knowledge (XXG)'s exclusion of a lot of new additions helps it achieve the seemingly impossible task of presenting reliable, high-quality information on a wiki that anyone can edit. But it also means that Knowledge (XXG)'s base of contributors, the topics they choose to write about, the information they choose to include, and the way they choose to phrase their contributions is limited to the group of people who make it past these barriers.
244:
different ideas and opinions of how to interpret policy. When someone reverts your edit, it isnât
Knowledge (XXG), it's a certain Wikipedian. Unlike a top-down organization where there's someone who can decide what a policy means and how it's going to be interpreted, the application of policy on Knowledge (XXG) is a socially constructed reality built through a process of discussion, debate, and negotiation. The book explains this by invoking Steven Thorne's "culture-of-use" theory, which provides a conceptual framework that is likely to help people who are new to Knowledge (XXG) make sense of this sort of thing.
176:
112:
132:
292:
424:
I actually wasn't surprised by anything he described. BTW with one exception I have to point to: it isn't at all desirable to mislead any naive people to confuse an online encyclopedia with a place to edit willful private nonsense. Which misunderstanding is daily matter of procedure of our recent changes observers. Well, nothing new to any experienced people but nevertheless our policy texts don't communicate it down-to-earth.
92:
237:" was a way of telling potential contributors that they didnât need to ask anyone's permission to make Knowledge (XXG) better. But for a different audience, this means something different; the book quotes their students as saying they "ultimately felt more anxiety than boldness" and found themselves "afraid to upset, anger, or disappoint" the original authors of the work they were editing.
122:
36:
142:
102:
519:
of teaching is not the same as basic
Knowledge (XXG) training, along the lines of "what you type to get what you want on the page." The endless pressure to deliver such tutorials, with their clear value, should not mean that nobody addresses higher-order issues, and supports understanding that does not come from being on the wrong end of a case study.
451:. This work looks more like a sequel than anything I've seen in the meantime. Early on there is a heading "How Knowledge (XXG) Actually Works", which seems fair: the old joke being that WP only works in practice, not in theory. The authors make no bones about the amount of unpacking required to bridge those two, so +1 to them for that.
248:
very helpful for
Wikipedians who are interested in fixing its problems. The book is a critique of Knowledge (XXG), but it's written by people who love the project and are optimistic about its future. Far too often Knowledge (XXG) is written about either in purely positive terms or dismissed as hopelessly exclusionary and sexist.
152:
455:
which gets my vote, it is inherently messy (and at least intermittently frustrating, divisive and a time-sink). Readers of the book will probably get why, fairly soon. I didn't read further than to see that this basic point, related to the apocryphal
Bismarck-on-legislation-and-sausages quote, comes through.
627:
Seems to be a reasonably fair commentary, but also seems to skirt around the problem of how to remain reliable if there are no published reliable sources in the calls for wider inclusivity of content. As for "the encyclopedia that anyone can edit", "terms and conditions apply". Perhaps this should be
423:
Well, I didn't like the offered online presentation (fed up with talking heads like that) but appreciated the book review text very much. Ian
Ramjohn's statements about the gap between "policy as designed and as interpreted" are realistic, unpretentious and fair. I'm also an experienced wikipedian so
251:
As a person who has spent much of the last 17 years thinking about and interacting with
Knowledge (XXG) policy and its impact on knowledge, existing editors, and new ones, this book gave me a lot to think about. I didnât agree with everything they said in the book, but even when I disagreed it tended
208:
Knowledge (XXG) is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Making a change to its content is as simple as clicking the edit button and typing something in. And more often than not, what happens next for new editors is that their addition gets reverted and is hidden from everything but the edit history
518:
Or in other words, the guidelines have some wiggle room. The pedagogic point, I suppose, in line with what I said above, is to ask "why wiggle room?" Because (I suppose) it is clear enough, when the question is posed, that there should be discretion and negotiation in our mix. In any case, that kind
212:
For those of us who work on trying to expand the demographic profile of
Knowledge (XXG) contributors, it's important to understand the policies and processes that shape content inclusion and exclusion on Knowledge (XXG). But even a basic understanding of the key policies and processes can take years
602:
In a way that is not quite preaching to the choir, McDowell and Vetter present a refreshing reminder to those of us editors who think we know it all, and that despite its enormous cargo of bureaucracy
Knowledge (XXG) is still afloat and far from on the rocks - thousands of pages of policies, rules,
591:
Yes, an academic work but highly readable - for Wiki insiders. For anyone who has been around a long time and focused on the issues of notability, sources, and gender gaps, it offers an intellectual insight, but the average editor even if a mature adult with a reasonable education might already put
491:
that we need more books like this - and more books about Knowledge (XXG) in general. But ultimately newbies are only going to learn by diving in, learning by experience. It would be nice if there were short learning aids for newbies organized along the path from newby to established editor. Much of
547:
speedy deletion case study. A surprise here. Much indeed has been made of this event of March 2014. Looking at the nomination, it was for deletion under CSD G12, i.e. copyvio. Now, I can see that as an admin. But under "reliable sources", it seems that reportage has relied on hearsay. If perceived
426:
The marketing formula phrase "Knowledge (XXG) is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit" is not really a truthful communication. No, not everyone can do (and remain uncanceled), not everybody has learnt enough skills to easily adapt to the new situations. Just try to remember the difference between
481:
While I haven't read the book, I really appreciate the emphasis on the difference between the rules - or the way things are officially supposed to be done - and the application or interpretation of these official norms. These difference occur in all organizations, but it seems to me that they are
247:
By creating a framework for understanding Knowledge (XXG), I believe that the book will demystify Knowledge (XXG) for a wide range of people. The book is an academic work (albeit a very readable one) and should be a necessary primer for anyone interested in studying Knowledge (XXG). But it's also
228:
encyclopedia. Instead of explaining Knowledge (XXG) as an online encyclopedia, we now explain other encyclopedias in relation to Knowledge (XXG). While Knowledge (XXG)'s policies on inclusion and exclusion were meant to limit its coverage to reality and avoid hoaxes, the project has come to shape
220:
such a valuable addition to the growing collection of scholarly and popular writing around Knowledge (XXG). Zach McDowell and Matt Vetter are experienced members of the community of Wikipedians and educators who have been incorporating Knowledge (XXG) assignments into their teaching over the last
454:
That said, this is a deliberately discursive work, not the "primer" people often and hopefully request. It is based on teaching experience, and that is a good thing on which to draw. Whether you call the main WP activity "production of knowledge", "construction of reality", or simply "wiki work"
243:
By looking at the interplay between policy and the way that policy is applied, Zach and Matt manage to introduce readers to the importance of the community aspect of Knowledge (XXG). Many of Knowledge (XXG)'s readers donât understand that behind the text, there is a community of individuals with
255:
I highly recommend this book to anyone who wants to know more about how Knowledge (XXG) works, or who wants to make Knowledge (XXG) better. The fact that they were able to release it under an open license means it's freely available (either as a .pdf or through Amazon's Kindle store) and easily
495:
As a Signposter I ask that if anybody sees another book about Knowledge (XXG), please bring it to our attention or just go ahead and submit a book review! Even if the book is only about the Internet ecosystem with Knowledge (XXG)'s place in it - I'd love to see those reviews. Thanks!
570:
Gosh, such a notorious case, and it was a G12. It's a real pity that couldn't have been said some years back, indeed that it wasn't clearly displayed on the talk page. I don't know that it's actually damaged Knowledge (XXG) but it certainly didn't do the reputation any favours.
596:
only a one hour speech; their own meta could be reduced by a few hundred words, making this work even less than its 100 pages of content. Indeed, the phrase 'throughout his book' occurs no less than eleven times but fortunately the book falls short of being inherently
592:
it down after the lengthy preface. Somewhat repetitive yawn-inducing inside-baseball coverage of the Knowledge (XXG) back office, the authors frequently rephrase themselves in the manner of one delivering a paper at an conference to keep the audience awake - it
603:
guidelines and essays that would already require a lifetime to read them all and which would immediately scare away any newbie editors if they knew about them. I don't regret reading the 'book' - so thank you for the review,
232:
In the book, Zach and Matt take a careful look at key policies and try to tease out a lot of the underlying assumptions of the policy-writers. From the perspectives of the early techno-utopian Wikipedians, a statement like
371:
356:
336:
252:
to be over matters of interpretation rather than matters of fact. I love the fact that I finally have a source I can reference instead of feeling the need to explain everything from first principles.
402:
341:
316:
351:
346:
321:
78:
326:
482:
particularly obvious on Knowledge (XXG). Much of the time it seems like our rules don't determine the outcome in contentious cases, they only determine the starting point for the debate.
361:
309:
279:
270:
240:
These disconnects between policy as designed and as interpreted, between intent and effect, are the kinds of things that have kept Knowledge (XXG) from being what it was designed to be.
303:
55:
44:
331:
376:
548:
lack of notability had an impact on Strickland's inclusion in Knowledge (XXG), and who can say that it didn't, it was not on the surface the reason for the deletion.
202:
701:
21:
677:
95:
672:
667:
646:
662:
201:
is a new book by Zachary J. McDowell and Matthew A. Vetter that was published by Routledge this summer. The entire book is available for download
187:
has edited Knowledge (XXG) since 2004 and has been an administrator on enWiki since 2005. He is also Senior Knowledge (XXG) Expert at
657:
291:
213:
to grasp. A nuanced understanding of how they play out in practice â both the written and unwritten rules â is even more difficult.
49:
35:
17:
221:
decade. The authors have worked with Wiki Education for years both as instructors and, in Zach's case, as a research fellow.
229:
reality, or at least shape what's important for the many of its readers: if it isnât covered, is it really that important?
553:
524:
471:
192:
635:
620:
580:
557:
528:
509:
475:
436:
432:
683:
576:
443:
632:
549:
520:
488:
467:
502:
428:
234:
175:
224:
Over the two decades of its existence, Knowledge (XXG) has grown to the point where it has become
572:
105:
616:
398:
125:
629:
544:
458:
I once gave a pub talk on online communities and WP, in which I introduced a point made by
135:
497:
466:. If you applied it to WP, you might get a book like this; we need books plural, in fact.
459:
155:
604:
188:
184:
165:
695:
612:
145:
448:
30:
Knowledge (XXG) and the Representation of Reality: Or you could watch the video!
541:
What Counts as Knowledge: Notability, Knowledge Gaps and Exclusionary Practices
259:
You can watch a presentation about this book from WikiConference North America
115:
260:
462:
about art. You should ask not only what is done, and how it is done, but
608:
54:
607:- but personally, apart from a few recent statistics, which
290:
174:
34:
414:
407:
387:
492:
that path should cover material covered in this book.
412:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
218:Knowledge (XXG) and the Representation of Reality
199:Knowledge (XXG) and the Representation of Reality
72:Knowledge (XXG) and the Representation of Reality
195:on October 28, 2021 and is licensed CC-BY-SA.
8:
645:Explore Knowledge (XXG) history by browsing
191:. This review was originally published at
702:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2021-10
441:Go back 13 years, and I was busy writing
205:or as a free Kindle download from Amazon.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
415:
391:
256:accessible to anyone who has the time.
70:
611:, I didn't really learn anything new.
539:On to reading Chapter 3 of the book,
29:
7:
56:
28:
543:. On p. 46 it leads off with the
397:These comments are automatically
150:
140:
130:
120:
110:
100:
90:
408:add the page to your watchlist
1:
581:16:13, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
636:08:49, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
621:19:16, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
558:08:22, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
529:16:14, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
510:16:00, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
476:10:16, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
437:21:15, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
718:
182:
444:How Knowledge (XXG) Works
487:I certainly agree with
464:why it is done that way
203:free from the publisher
405:. To follow comments,
295:
179:
39:
294:
178:
38:
628:made clearer. ¡ ¡ ¡
609:one can get any time
401:from this article's
216:This is what makes
392:Discuss this story
372:WikiProject report
296:
180:
45:â Back to Contents
40:
416:purging the cache
357:Technology report
337:Discussion report
50:View Latest Issue
709:
686:
550:Charles Matthews
545:Donna Strickland
521:Charles Matthews
505:
489:Charles Matthews
468:Charles Matthews
419:
417:
411:
390:
314:
306:
299:
282:
274:
168:
154:
153:
144:
143:
134:
133:
124:
123:
114:
113:
104:
103:
94:
93:
62:
60:
58:
717:
716:
712:
711:
710:
708:
707:
706:
692:
691:
690:
689:
688:
687:
682:
680:
675:
670:
665:
660:
653:
642:
641:
630:Peter Southwood
613:Kudpung ŕ¸ŕ¸¸ŕ¸ŕ¸ŕ¸śŕšŕ¸
508:
503:
460:Jacob Bronowski
421:
413:
406:
395:
394:
388:+ Add a comment
386:
382:
381:
380:
342:Recent research
317:From the editor
307:
304:31 October 2021
302:
300:
297:
286:
285:
283:"Book review" â
280:
277:
272:
266:
265:
206:
181:
170:
169:
163:
162:
161:
160:
151:
141:
131:
121:
111:
101:
91:
85:
82:
69:
65:
63:
57:31 October 2021
53:
52:
47:
41:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
715:
713:
705:
704:
694:
693:
681:
676:
671:
666:
661:
656:
655:
654:
644:
643:
640:
639:
638:
624:
623:
599:
598:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
563:
562:
561:
560:
534:
533:
532:
531:
513:
512:
500:
493:
484:
483:
425:
396:
393:
385:
384:
383:
379:
374:
369:
364:
359:
354:
352:Traffic report
349:
347:Community view
344:
339:
334:
329:
324:
322:News and notes
319:
313:
301:
289:
288:
287:
278:
269:
268:
267:
197:
193:Wiki Education
189:Wiki Education
173:
172:
171:
159:
158:
148:
138:
128:
118:
108:
98:
87:
86:
83:
77:
76:
75:
74:
67:
66:
64:
61:
48:
43:
42:
33:
32:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
714:
703:
700:
699:
697:
685:
679:
674:
669:
664:
659:
651:
649:
637:
633:
631:
626:
625:
622:
618:
614:
610:
606:
601:
600:
595:
590:
589:
582:
578:
574:
573:Chiswick Chap
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
559:
555:
551:
546:
542:
538:
537:
536:
535:
530:
526:
522:
517:
516:
515:
514:
511:
506:
499:
494:
490:
486:
485:
480:
479:
478:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
456:
452:
450:
446:
445:
439:
438:
434:
430:
418:
409:
404:
400:
389:
378:
375:
373:
370:
368:
365:
363:
360:
358:
355:
353:
350:
348:
345:
343:
340:
338:
335:
333:
330:
328:
325:
323:
320:
318:
315:
311:
305:
298:In this issue
293:
284:
276:
275:"Book review"
264:
262:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
238:
236:
230:
227:
222:
219:
214:
210:
204:
200:
196:
194:
190:
186:
177:
167:
157:
149:
147:
139:
137:
129:
127:
119:
117:
109:
107:
99:
97:
89:
88:
80:
73:
59:
51:
46:
37:
23:
19:
648:The Signpost
647:
593:
540:
463:
457:
453:
442:
440:
422:
366:
327:In the media
310:all comments
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
239:
231:
225:
223:
217:
215:
211:
207:
198:
183:
96:PDF download
71:
684:Suggestions
449:User:Phoebe
399:transcluded
367:Book review
362:Serendipity
185:Ian Ramjohn
166:Ian Ramjohn
146:X (Twitter)
68:Book review
498:Smallbones
84:Share this
79:Contribute
22:2021-10-31
678:Subscribe
504:smalltalk
403:talk page
696:Category
673:Newsroom
668:Archives
650:archives
273:Previous
136:Facebook
126:LinkedIn
116:Mastodon
20: |
597:âmetaâ.
429:Just N.
332:Opinion
235:Be Bold
377:Humour
156:Reddit
106:E-mail
663:About
447:with
16:<
658:Home
617:talk
577:talk
554:talk
525:talk
472:talk
433:talk
281:Next
261:here
605:Ian
226:the
164:By
81:â
698::
634::
619:)
594:is
579:)
556:)
527:)
474:)
435:)
271:â
263:.
652:.
615:(
575:(
552:(
523:(
507:)
501:(
470:(
431:(
420:.
410:.
312:)
308:(
233:"
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
