Knowledge (XXG)

:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost/2021-11-29/Recent research - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

400:"In this paper authors analyzed over 40 million articles from the 55 most developed language versions of Knowledge (XXG) to extract information about over 200 million references and find the most popular and reliable sources. In the research authors presented 10 models for the assessment of the popularity and reliability of the sources based on analysis of meta information about the references in Knowledge (XXG) articles, page views and authors of the articles. For example, among the most popular scientific journals in references of English Knowledge (XXG) are: Nature, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Science, The Astrophysical Journal, Lloyd’s List, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Astronomical Journal and others." 272:, pageview numbers and other data from the English Knowledge (XXG), finding that "novice contributors’ participation has a direct negative effect on the quality of goods produced , but a positive indirect effect because it acts as a cue for expert contributors to improve the quality of those goods that consumers are most interested in." It found "that the positive direct effect of article consumption on expert editing patterns is fully mediated by novice contributions. Results support the theory that experts are unaware of demand but they are stimulated to respond to article consumption if consumers signal demand for that particular good through their contributions as novice producers." 337:"We test the hypothesis that the extent to which one obtains information on a given topic through Knowledge (XXG) depends on the language in which it is consulted. Controlling the size factor, we investigate this hypothesis for a number of 25 subject areas. at least in the context of the subject areas examined here different language versions differ so much in their treatment of the same subject area that it is necessary to know which area in which language someone is consulting if one wants to know how much the part of the IL he or she is traversing is biased." 252:, those contributing without an account, those contributing with an account for the first time, and those contributing with an account but having some prior edit history". Tor Browser edits are generally blocked automatically on Knowledge (XXG) and those in the dataset consists of edits that slipped through this mechanism, raising the question whether some or many of these edits might have involved the editor having to try several times to get around that block, setting them apart from less dedicated vandals in the other groups. 178: 636: 887:
record). Perhaps it'd only be worthwhile for topics where there is high potential for this: a TV show whose latest season just aired; any living person (who might gain increased media attention for any number of reasons) etc. But, as the paper finds, I do encounter in practice that inexperienced/new editors draw my attention to new developments by adding a basic description that needs expansion and good referencing. The most recent case of this for me happened today with
110: 130: 207:"Competing theories in criminology seek to explain the motivations for and causes of crime, ascribing criminal behavior to such factors as lack of impulse control, lack of morals, or to societal failure. Alternatively, rational choice theory proposes that behaviors are the product of rational choices. In order to apply rational choice theory to vandalism, this project seeks to understand vandal decision-making in terms of preferences and constraint" 711: 947:
superficial vandalism (racist comments, blanking etc.) in political topics is more a consequence of mainstream media manufacturing negative attention on a particular person or scapegoat. Most of it is fairly transient, but sometimes it amounts to long-term persistent attacks from what is undoubtedly the same group of people who will be sending death threats on social media and otherwise engaging in harassment and violence. —
90: 350:"In a social system individual actions have the potential to trigger spontaneous collective reactions. We measure the relationship between activity and response with the distribution of efficiency . Generalizing previous results, we show that the efficiency distribution presents a universal structure in three systems of different nature: Twitter, Knowledge (XXG) and the scientific citations network." 120: 36: 140: 100: 893:, which will have a sequel this year. As for editors being unaware of baseline levels of views, there's a possibility here for someone to write a bot to send a monthly opt-in personalised message saying "of the articles you've substantially contributed to , these are the ones with the highest pageviews that you might consider giving priority to". — 264:
welcoming them. However, Tor-based editors generally experience rejection." The resulting hypothesis is "(H3) Members of excluded groups are more likely to strike against the community targeting them," operationalized as a higher rate of vandalism in the "community-related" category (e.g. directly attacking Knowledge (XXG) norms or policies).
869:
because WD has the wrong coordinates. Editing WD coords correctly on the phone screen is difficult for me, but that's okay. I just edit the location incorrectly. It's seldom worse than before, and any watchers' watchlists will show it. And whose watchlist? Mine. Upon returning home I've got the big screen and can easily make it right.
150: 224:"Although the harm is clear, the benefit to the vandal is less clear. In many cases, the thing being damaged may itself be something the vandal uses or enjoys. Vandalism holds communicative value: perhaps to the vandal themselves, to some audience at whom the vandalism is aimed, and to the general public." 292: 941:
Working in political areas, it appears to me that much involved vandalism (something that took the vandal more than 30 seconds to write) arises from the vandal's perceived lack of political autonomy and a lack of representation of their views in mainstream media. Knowledge (XXG) merely repeats what
259:
Secondly, the author hypothesizes that "the least identifiable individuals are more likely to produce vandalism that has high-risk repercussions" (H2) because value expectancy theory "suggests that identifiability acts as a constraint on deviant behavior." The author finds this hypothesis partially
240:
Based on a sample of 141 vandalism edits (from the English Knowledge (XXG)), the author proposes an ontology of Knowledge (XXG) vandalism, extending classifications used in previous vandalism detection studies (e.g. blanking, misinformation, "image attack", "link spam") with a few new ones: "Attack
916:
Dissidents realize that they are outliers and their asocial behavior only finds voice when they can hide from the consequences. I suspect that many of the editors who protect IP editing know this as they, themselves, are deviants or are deviant-adjacent and support this asociality. (I deliberately
868:
I do something slightly similar myself. When in an urban place that I haven't seen in recent years, I bring up the Commons App map or sometimes the WikiShootMe site. It shows me any nearby unphotographed Knowledge (XXG) articles or Wikidata items, and I snap them. Sometimes the object isn't there,
267:
The paper contains various other interesting observations that might make it worth reading for Knowledge (XXG) editors spending time dealing with vandalism and related community policies. To pick just one example, the author highlights that vandalism can also have positive effects, referring to a
946:
is the most-cited example here); or market interests dictate that a news source should, in a hyperpartisan manner, manufacture sensationalised stories in whatever topics research indicates will be most-clicked on. Both types of narratives are exclusionary of many people in our society. The more
886:
I came here to highlight the exact same passage. It would be interesting if there was an opt-in tool where you could specify articles to "super-watchlist" and be notified of sudden pageview spikes (say, if a single day hits x10 of the previous monthly/yearly average, or x3 of the previous daily
379:
construction. We used data from Knowledge (XXG) and analysed links between over 20 million articles from 11 language editions. We extracted over 1.4 billion source-destination pairs of articles from SQL dumps and more than 700 million pairs from XML dumps. Based on real data, we discussed the
255:
The observation that contributing under an account requires more effort (i.e. creating that account, and logging into it) than contributing as IP editor motivates the author's first hypothesis: "(H1) users who have created accounts will vandalize less frequently". She finds it confirmed by the
263:
In motivating her third hypothesis, the author observes that "the groups under study differ by how they are treated by community policies. Newcomers are targeted for social interventions to welcome, train, and retain them. Knowledge (XXG) invites IP-based editors to create accounts as well as
847:
Very true. I think that article views can get away from some people, so someone randomly editing an article for the first time to try and fix some error (even if they are unable to) generally captures editor attention more often than no one actively doing anything.
260:
supported. Among other findings, "Tor-based users are substantially more likely than other groups to engage in large-scale vandalism and least likely to engage in the lowest risk type of vandalism, that which communicates friendly and sociable intent."
217: 211:
The author observes that "vandalism-related research has tended to focus on the detection and removal of vandalism, with relatively little attention paid to understanding vandals themselves" (which can be readily confirmed by
750: 844:
Results support the theory that experts are unaware of demand but they are stimulated to respond to article consumption if consumers signal demand for that particular good through their contributions as novice
385: 821: 770: 755: 236:
of a choice (such as that engaging in an act of vandalizing) as the sum over possible outcomes over the product of "the probability of some outcome O and the utility valuation U of that same outcome".
765: 760: 942:
the (fact-based) mainstream media say, but we are editable where other news sources are not. Media narratives arise from one of two places: the elite dictate what narrative to impose on the public (
745: 698: 689: 785: 780: 740: 76: 735: 775: 728: 320:
Other recent publications that could not be covered in time for this issue include the items listed below. Contributions, whether reviewing or summarizing newly published research,
310:, inviting "submissions from across research disciplines including but not limited to humanities, social sciences, computer science, education, and law" (deadline: January 3, 2022). 722: 55: 44: 795: 268:
2014 paper. That earlier study involved conducting interviews with editors and a quantitative analysis of a dataset that included edit numbers by editor experience level,
307: 872:
But hmm, editors are unaware of the amount of demand for their particular articles. Maybe there ought to be an option to make the monthly reader count more prominent.
380:
difference between standard PageRank, Cheirank, 2DRank and measures obtained based on our approach in separate languages and multilingual network of Knowledge (XXG)."
1029: 93: 21: 1005: 1000: 995: 990: 241:
graffiti" (i.e. "attack an individual or group") and "Community-related Graffiti" (expressing "opposition to community, norms, or policies").
619: 674: 985: 710: 437: 49: 35: 17: 921:(which isn't really neutral) perhaps we could include minority narratives to create a useful release valve for these dead-enders. 917:
edit under my real name.) Were Knowledge (XXG) to adapt some version of attributable point of view, as opposed to the farce of
342:"Universal structure" of collective reactions to invididual actions found in Twitter, Knowledge (XXG) and scientific citations 974: 458:
Gorbatai, Andreea D. (2014). "The Paradox of Novice Contributions to Collective Production: Evidence from Knowledge (XXG)".
216:; one exception being a 2018 study that asked students their guesses about why their classmates vandalize Knowledge (XXG): 183:
A monthly overview of recent academic research about Knowledge (XXG) and other Wikimedia projects, also published as the
218:"Only 4% of students vandalize Knowledge (XXG) – motivated by boredom, amusement or ideology (according to their peers)" 213: 960: 936: 906: 881: 863: 321: 587:"Novel Version of PageRank, CheiRank and 2DRank for Knowledge (XXG) in Multilingual Network Using Social Impact" 355:"Novel Version of PageRank, CheiRank and 2DRank for Knowledge (XXG) in Multilingual Network Using Social Impact" 282: 1011: 929: 478:"Multiple Texts as a Limiting Factor in Online Learning: Quantifying (Dis-)similarities of Knowledge Networks" 877: 635: 229: 529: 914:...value expectancy theory "suggests that identifiability acts as a constraint on deviant behavior." 923: 873: 625: 598: 586: 568: 184: 177: 103: 817: 616: 561: 545: 499: 462: 459: 434: 300: 123: 918: 388:
of related research that applied such ranking metrics to graphs of Knowledge (XXG) articles)
953: 899: 662: 608: 585:
CoquidĂ©, CĂ©lestin; Lewoniewski, WƂodzimierz (2020). Abramowicz, Witold; Klein, Gary (eds.).
552: 537: 489: 426: 372: 233: 445: 133: 153: 533: 30:
Vandalizing Knowledge (XXG) as rational behavior: And other recent research publications
943: 556: 517: 269: 1023: 889: 855: 628: 571: 376: 245: 476:
Mehler, Alexander; Hemati, Wahed; Welke, Pascal; Konca, Maxim; Uslu, Tolga (2020).
425:. SMSociety'20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 47–57. 143: 612: 293:
panel about "growing and supporting the Wikimedia research communities in Africa"
948: 894: 651:"Modeling Popularity and Reliability of Sources in Multilingual Knowledge (XXG)" 392:"Modeling Popularity and Reliability of Sources in Multilingual Knowledge (XXG)" 249: 541: 113: 494: 477: 296: 548: 502: 430: 163: 649:
Lewoniewski, WƂodzimierz; Węcel, Krzysztof; Abramowicz, Witold (May 2020).
564: 518:"Impact of individual actions on the collective response of social systems" 418: 232:(RCT) as applied in value expectancy theory (VET)". It conceptualizes the 850: 667: 650: 516:
Martin-Gutierrez, Samuel; Losada, Juan C.; Benito, Rosa M. (2020-07-22).
368: 364: 228:
The theoretical framework used to study such rational motivations is "
203:
studies possible rational motivations for Knowledge (XXG) vandalism:
375:
algorithm based on the use of clickstream and pageviews data in the
603: 248:
paper "examine vandalism from four groups: users of a privacy tool
419:"Characterizing Online Vandalism: A Rational Choice Perspective" 54: 329:
Language biases in Knowledge (XXG)'s "information landscapes"
709: 34: 291:
This month's "WikiIndaba" community conference included a
214:
searching the archives of this newsletter for "vandalism"
833: 826: 806: 970:
Get the latest headlines on your user page – just add
597:. Cham: Springer International Publishing: 319–334. 593:. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. 423:
International Conference on Social Media and Society
201:
International Conference on Social Media and Society
831:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try 328: 195:Vandalizing Knowledge (XXG) as rational behavior 71:Vandalizing Knowledge (XXG) as rational behavior 8: 288:for videos and slides of past presentations. 1030:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2021-11 666: 602: 555: 493: 308:"Wikimedia Research Fund" grants program 18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost 834: 810: 409: 70: 913: 843: 306:The Wikimedia Foundation announced a 29: 7: 363:"... we propose a new model for the 333:From the abstract and conclusions: 199:A paper presented last year at the 56: 28: 816:These comments are automatically 396:From the accompanying blog post: 634: 176: 148: 138: 128: 118: 108: 98: 88: 417:Champion, Kaylea (2020-07-22). 827:add the page to your watchlist 244:The quantitative part of this 1: 751:From a Knowledge (XXG) reader 185:Wikimedia Research Newsletter 961:23:51, 5 December 2021 (UTC) 937:20:41, 5 December 2021 (UTC) 907:23:51, 5 December 2021 (UTC) 882:01:13, 4 December 2021 (UTC) 864:07:45, 2 December 2021 (UTC) 613:10.1007/978-3-030-53337-3_24 591:Business Information Systems 285:Wikimedia Research Showcase 1046: 542:10.1038/s41598-020-69005-y 495:10.3389/feduc.2020.562670 315:Other recent publications 431:10.1145/3400806.3400813 824:. To follow comments, 714: 482:Frontiers in Education 402: 382: 352: 339: 230:rational choice theory 226: 209: 39: 975:Signpost-subscription 713: 398: 361: 348: 335: 222: 205: 38: 820:from this article's 668:10.3390/info11050263 283:page of the monthly 270:page watcher numbers 256:examined edit data. 702:"Recent research" → 534:2020NatSR..1012126M 359:From the abstract: 346:From the abstract: 220:). She notes that 811:Discuss this story 771:WikiProject report 756:Arbitration report 715: 522:Scientific Reports 322:are always welcome 45:← Back to Contents 40: 835:purging the cache 766:Technology report 761:Discussion report 694:"Recent research" 621:978-3-030-53337-3 50:View Latest Issue 1037: 1014: 979: 973: 956: 935: 932: 926: 902: 862: 853: 838: 836: 830: 809: 733: 725: 723:29 November 2021 718: 701: 693: 677: 672: 670: 646: 640: 639: 638: 632: 606: 582: 576: 575: 559: 513: 507: 506: 497: 473: 467: 466: 455: 449: 443: 414: 386:earlier coverage 234:expected utility 180: 166: 152: 151: 142: 141: 132: 131: 122: 121: 112: 111: 102: 101: 92: 91: 62: 60: 58: 57:29 November 2021 1045: 1044: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1010: 1008: 1003: 998: 993: 988: 981: 977: 971: 967: 966: 954: 930: 924: 922: 900: 851: 849: 840: 832: 825: 814: 813: 807:+ Add a comment 805: 801: 800: 799: 791:Recent research 746:Deletion report 726: 721: 719: 716: 705: 704: 699: 696: 691: 685: 684: 680: 648: 647: 643: 633: 622: 584: 583: 579: 515: 514: 510: 475: 474: 470: 457: 456: 452: 440: 416: 415: 411: 407: 394: 357: 344: 331: 317: 297:video recording 278: 197: 189: 181: 168: 167: 161: 160: 159: 158: 149: 139: 129: 119: 109: 99: 89: 83: 80: 69: 68:Recent research 65: 63: 53: 52: 47: 41: 31: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 1043: 1041: 1033: 1032: 1022: 1021: 1009: 1004: 999: 994: 989: 984: 983: 982: 969: 968: 965: 964: 963: 944:Rupert Murdoch 939: 925:Chris Troutman 911: 910: 909: 884: 870: 815: 812: 804: 803: 802: 798: 793: 788: 786:Traffic report 783: 781:News from Diff 778: 773: 768: 763: 758: 753: 748: 743: 741:WikiCup report 738: 732: 720: 708: 707: 706: 697: 688: 687: 686: 682: 679: 678: 641: 620: 577: 508: 468: 450: 438: 408: 406: 403: 393: 390: 356: 353: 343: 340: 330: 327: 316: 313: 312: 311: 304: 289: 277: 274: 196: 193: 191: 175: 174: 172: 170: 169: 157: 156: 146: 136: 126: 116: 106: 96: 85: 84: 81: 75: 74: 73: 72: 67: 66: 64: 61: 48: 43: 42: 33: 32: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1042: 1031: 1028: 1027: 1025: 1013: 1007: 1002: 997: 992: 987: 976: 962: 958: 957: 950: 945: 940: 938: 933: 927: 920: 915: 912: 908: 904: 903: 896: 892: 891: 890:Death to 2020 885: 883: 879: 875: 874:Jim.henderson 871: 867: 866: 865: 861: 859: 854: 846: 842: 841: 837: 828: 823: 819: 808: 797: 794: 792: 789: 787: 784: 782: 779: 777: 774: 772: 769: 767: 764: 762: 759: 757: 754: 752: 749: 747: 744: 742: 739: 737: 734: 730: 724: 717:In this issue 712: 703: 695: 683: 676: 669: 664: 660: 656: 652: 645: 642: 637: 630: 627: 623: 618: 614: 610: 605: 600: 596: 592: 588: 581: 578: 573: 570: 566: 563: 558: 554: 550: 547: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 512: 509: 504: 501: 496: 491: 487: 483: 479: 472: 469: 464: 461: 454: 451: 447: 441: 439:9781450376884 436: 432: 428: 424: 420: 413: 410: 404: 401: 397: 391: 389: 387: 381: 378: 377:google matrix 374: 370: 366: 360: 354: 351: 347: 341: 338: 334: 326: 325: 323: 314: 309: 305: 302: 298: 294: 290: 287: 286: 280: 279: 275: 273: 271: 265: 261: 257: 253: 251: 247: 246:mixed methods 242: 238: 235: 231: 225: 221: 219: 215: 208: 204: 202: 194: 192: 188: 186: 179: 173: 165: 155: 147: 145: 137: 135: 127: 125: 117: 115: 107: 105: 97: 95: 87: 86: 78: 59: 51: 46: 37: 23: 19: 952: 898: 888: 857: 790: 736:In the media 729:all comments 681: 658: 654: 644: 594: 590: 580: 528:(1): 12126. 525: 521: 511: 485: 481: 471: 453: 422: 412: 399: 395: 383: 362: 358: 349: 345: 336: 332: 319: 318: 284: 266: 262: 258: 254: 243: 239: 227: 223: 210: 206: 200: 198: 190: 182: 171: 164:Tilman Bayer 94:PDF download 1012:Suggestions 818:transcluded 776:Serendipity 655:Information 250:Tor Browser 144:X (Twitter) 845:producers. 661:(5): 263. 604:2003.04258 405:References 384:(see also 82:Share this 77:Contribute 22:2021-11-29 1006:Subscribe 822:talk page 675:blog post 673:See also 629:212649841 572:220682026 549:2045-2322 503:2504-284X 446:blog post 1024:Category 1001:Newsroom 996:Archives 692:Previous 565:32699262 369:CheiRank 365:PageRank 281:See the 134:Facebook 124:LinkedIn 114:Mastodon 20:‎ | 919:WP:NPOV 557:7376036 530:Bibcode 463:1949327 276:Briefly 949:Bilorv 895:Bilorv 796:Humour 373:2DRank 301:tweets 154:Reddit 104:E-mail 991:About 626:S2CID 599:arXiv 569:S2CID 16:< 986:Home 955:talk 931:talk 901:talk 878:talk 858:Talk 700:Next 617:ISBN 562:PMID 546:ISSN 500:ISSN 460:SSRN 435:ISBN 371:and 852:MJL 663:doi 609:doi 595:389 553:PMC 538:doi 490:doi 427:doi 162:By 79:— 1026:: 978:}} 972:{{ 959:) 905:) 880:) 690:← 659:11 657:. 653:. 624:. 615:. 607:. 589:. 567:. 560:. 551:. 544:. 536:. 526:10 524:. 520:. 498:. 488:. 484:. 480:. 448:) 433:. 421:. 367:, 303:). 299:, 980:. 951:( 934:) 928:( 897:( 876:( 860:‐ 856:‐ 848:– 839:. 829:. 731:) 727:( 671:. 665:: 631:. 611:: 601:: 574:. 540:: 532:: 505:. 492:: 486:5 465:. 444:( 442:. 429:: 324:. 295:( 187:.

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
2021-11-29
The Signpost
← Back to Contents
View Latest Issue
29 November 2021
Contribute
PDF download
E-mail
Mastodon
LinkedIn
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Reddit
Tilman Bayer

Wikimedia Research Newsletter
searching the archives of this newsletter for "vandalism"
"Only 4% of students vandalize Knowledge (XXG) – motivated by boredom, amusement or ideology (according to their peers)"
rational choice theory
expected utility
mixed methods
Tor Browser
page watcher numbers
page of the monthly Wikimedia Research Showcase
panel about "growing and supporting the Wikimedia research communities in Africa"
video recording
tweets
"Wikimedia Research Fund" grants program
are always welcome

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑