110:
130:
314:
90:
221:
couple other editors and some friends, and I remember that my first reaction was one of genuine shock. Initially I thought it to be just another troll, but soon it became clear it was a veteran editor and administrator, and that made me upset, not because of what was said, but because of who was saying it. Having a trusted user say those things was deeply hurtful, not only to me, but to other editors too, I'm sure.
120:
36:
140:
100:
150:
496:
I wonder if it might be sensible for the editing block to be re-set to a specific length of time such as one full year, rather than remaining indefinite. More than a month has passed since it began, and it seems possible (even likely, after so much commentary and discussion) that the offender has at
477:
Damn I didn't know that happened. I think I remember seeing the ANI report relating to it (yes i watch ANI, I don't remember why though) but didn't know it was this bad. On a more positive note, I'm really loving these reviews with people who have had RFAs. It's interesting to see what the new admins
539:
I looked at their user pages and saw things like the signature gallery and lists of articles created, and their logs show literally thousands of spam pages removed from
Knowledge (XXG), and it strikes me that they had a lot invested in the good of this place. I wouldn't be surprised if they haven't
244:
While the discussion showed a vast amount of support by the community, and I'm deeply grateful for all the kind words people left in my talk page, it also showed me some editors don't quite understand why a comment like the one made by
Athaenara is problematic, regardless of venue. Had she said this
230:
Yes, both indirect and direct. As someone who spends a lot of time patrolling recent changes, it's not uncommon to see edits to the biographies of trans people that attempt to deny their queerness, or who flat out attack them. My talk page also has plenty of insults thrown by these kinds of editors.
206:
or contentious areas, but that didn't come to pass. On the other hand, I knew it would attract some trolls, but I never expected to get attacked in the manner I was. In general, it was a very stressful period, compounded by the issues surrounding it, and I was very happy when it came to a close, so
436:
My goodness me, I missed that drama. Before other editors head to the RfA to see what was said, note that it's been reverted (and you'll have to go fishing in the page's history to get to it, but I don't recommend it – it's vile). Athaenara, an admin and an editor of 16 years, has been permanently
192:
Thanks for the congratulations! I can positively say that a big part of it was my nominators, partially due to the trust the community has put into them, which was then translated to trust in me as an editor, and partially due to their help in preparing me for my RfA. I feel very lucky to have had
220:
I decided not to participate in the various discussions that occurred after the vote mostly because whatever I'd say at the time would be influenced by my emotions, and considering how stressed I was, it wouldn't be a net positive. I did discuss these events with my nominators, as well as with a
245:
on any other space on
Knowledge (XXG), the result would have been just as damaging to the trust queer editors put into the community. It's also hard for me to ignore that some editors took this opportunity to tacitly share their support for this kind of bigotry.
254:
My advice would be the same that
Barkeep gave me when he first approached me, which is to wait until you are ready. This will vary widely between editors, but for me it was when I felt like I could be doing more with the tools, be it clearing backlogs at
358:
263:, or closing contentious discussions where the trust of the community was seen as needed. Don't be afraid to contact an administrator that you trust and ask them for an opinion on your readiness, either.
388:
348:
373:
363:
414:
383:
343:
76:
338:
353:
378:
331:
202:
Well, it's hard for me to say. On one hand, it was definitely better than I expected; I was sure I would receive a fair amount of opposition based on my not participating too much in
301:
292:
325:
55:
44:
180:
211:
during the RfA and some user seeing that as unadvisable move, so I decided to stay away from doing anything that could cause controversy for the remainder of the RfA).
697:
574:
I just think total termination forever or a death sentence goes too far because it doesn't take into account that they may be learning something from all this.
21:
673:
668:
663:
193:
Barkeep and TNT as my noms. Not to toot my own horn, but I imagine my time patrolling recent changes, closing discussions and mentoring helped somewhat.
545:
Looking at their talk page, discovered a template I hadn't known about that notifies people that someone else has joined a discussion they began! So,
93:
658:
605:
575:
498:
702:
283:
216:
3. An administrator appears to have opposed you simply because you use they/them pronouns. Is there anything you'd like to say about this?
653:
313:
49:
35:
17:
272:
I see my RfA as an anomaly, in that nothing exciting happened until something did, and most people forgot about the RfA itself.
461:
And I was beginning to think that
Knowledge (XXG)'s most 'horrible and broken process' was on the mend. Silly me...
609:
579:
502:
679:
644:
626:
613:
599:
583:
530:
506:
489:
470:
454:
525:
240:
5. Do you think the community reacted correctly to the previously mentioned administrator's tasteless !vote?
30:
Isabelle Belato on their
Request for Adminship: The newest sysop speaks on the process that got them there.
437:
banned for that attack. Atrocious behaviour. Totally unacceptable. I'm sorry you had to put up with this,
594:
484:
438:
176:
448:
569:
516:
103:
621:
466:
410:
123:
260:
235:
due to comments that are considered to be transphobic, though thankfully that's much rarer.
256:
232:
208:
203:
133:
589:
562:
479:
198:
2. How was the RfA process for you overall? Was it about what you expected, better, worse?
163:
153:
548:
443:
188:
1. Congratulations on your nearly unanimous RfA. Why do you think it was so successful?
691:
555:
462:
143:
497:
least begun to undergo some sort of learning curve which leads to enlightenment.
183:(RfA) saw 237 votes and all but one of which supporting their being made a sysop.
250:
6. What advice, if any, do you have for editors considering running the gauntlet?
226:
4. Have you encountered transphobia elsewhere on
Knowledge (XXG) before your RfA?
113:
540:
done a lot of thinking and re-thinking in the two weeks since their last post.
268:
7. Does your experience give you any ideas on how to improve the RfA process?
207:
that I could return to my normal editing habits (I remember closing an
478:
who got nominated through RFA thought of their RFA. Keep it going! ―
604:
Sorry, Blaze Wolf, I see now your post was about something else!
54:
312:
34:
231:
On occasion, more experienced users will be reported at
618:
512:
426:
419:
399:
424:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
511:Person in question has shown zero remorse. Made a
515:that re-stated the things that got her blocked. –
71:Isabelle Belato on their Request for Adminship
8:
698:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2022-10
642:Make sure we cover what matters to you –
284:Category:Knowledge (XXG) RfA debriefings
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
596:
486:
427:
403:
70:
29:
7:
56:
28:
409:These comments are automatically
148:
138:
128:
118:
108:
98:
88:
703:Knowledge (XXG) RfA debriefings
420:add the page to your watchlist
1:
627:20:49, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
614:22:01, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
600:21:59, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
584:21:57, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
531:19:41, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
507:16:50, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
490:13:01, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
471:08:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
455:04:12, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
513:recent comment on talk page
719:
588:Why did you ping me. ―
417:. To follow comments,
317:
39:
359:Disinformation report
316:
181:Request for Adminship
38:
413:from this article's
645:leave a suggestion
404:Discuss this story
318:
45:← Back to Contents
40:
625:
529:
428:purging the cache
389:From the archives
349:News from the WMF
50:View Latest Issue
710:
682:
647:
624:
573:
566:
559:
552:
523:
521:
451:
446:
431:
429:
423:
402:
374:Featured content
336:
328:
321:
304:
296:
166:
152:
151:
142:
141:
132:
131:
122:
121:
112:
111:
102:
101:
92:
91:
62:
60:
58:
718:
717:
713:
712:
711:
709:
708:
707:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
678:
676:
671:
666:
661:
656:
649:
643:
639:
638:
622:Isabelle Belato
606:173.228.123.198
598:
597:Blaze Wolf#6545
576:173.228.123.198
567:
560:
553:
546:
517:
499:173.228.123.198
488:
487:Blaze Wolf#6545
463:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
449:
444:
439:Isabelle Belato
433:
425:
418:
407:
406:
400:+ Add a comment
398:
394:
393:
392:
364:Recent research
329:
326:31 October 2022
324:
322:
319:
308:
307:
302:
299:
294:
288:
287:
281:
177:Isabelle Belato
175:sits down with
168:
167:
161:
160:
159:
158:
149:
139:
129:
119:
109:
99:
89:
83:
80:
69:
65:
63:
57:31 October 2022
53:
52:
47:
41:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
716:
714:
706:
705:
700:
690:
689:
677:
672:
667:
662:
657:
652:
651:
650:
641:
640:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
542:
541:
536:
535:
534:
533:
493:
492:
474:
473:
458:
457:
408:
405:
397:
396:
395:
391:
386:
384:Traffic report
381:
376:
371:
366:
361:
356:
351:
346:
344:News and notes
341:
335:
323:
311:
310:
309:
300:
291:
290:
289:
280:
277:
275:
266:
248:
238:
224:
214:
196:
186:
170:
169:
157:
156:
146:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
85:
84:
81:
75:
74:
73:
72:
67:
66:
64:
61:
48:
43:
42:
33:
32:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
715:
704:
701:
699:
696:
695:
693:
681:
675:
670:
665:
660:
655:
646:
628:
623:
620:
617:
616:
615:
611:
607:
603:
602:
601:
595:
593:
592:
587:
586:
585:
581:
577:
571:
570:Novem Linguae
564:
557:
550:
544:
543:
538:
537:
532:
527:
522:
520:
519:Novem Linguae
514:
510:
509:
508:
504:
500:
495:
494:
491:
485:
483:
482:
476:
475:
472:
468:
464:
460:
459:
456:
453:
452:
447:
440:
435:
434:
430:
421:
416:
412:
401:
390:
387:
385:
382:
380:
377:
375:
372:
370:
367:
365:
362:
360:
357:
355:
352:
350:
347:
345:
342:
340:
339:From the team
337:
333:
327:
320:In this issue
315:
306:
305:"Interview" →
298:
286:
285:
278:
276:
273:
270:
269:
264:
262:
258:
252:
251:
246:
242:
241:
236:
234:
228:
227:
222:
218:
217:
212:
210:
205:
200:
199:
194:
190:
189:
184:
182:
179:whose recent
178:
174:
165:
155:
147:
145:
137:
135:
127:
125:
117:
115:
107:
105:
97:
95:
87:
86:
78:
59:
51:
46:
37:
23:
19:
590:
518:
480:
442:
368:
354:In the media
332:all comments
282:
274:
271:
267:
265:
253:
249:
247:
243:
239:
237:
229:
225:
223:
219:
215:
213:
201:
197:
195:
191:
187:
185:
173:The Signpost
172:
171:
94:PDF download
680:Suggestions
411:transcluded
379:Serendipity
297:"Interview"
144:X (Twitter)
692:Categories
591:Blaze Wolf
563:Blaze Wolf
481:Blaze Wolf
164:FormalDude
82:Share this
77:Contribute
22:2022-10-31
674:Subscribe
549:Schwede66
415:talk page
369:Interview
68:Interview
669:Newsroom
664:Archives
295:Previous
279:See also
134:Facebook
124:LinkedIn
114:Mastodon
20: |
556:Kudpung
445:Schwede
154:Reddit
104:E-mail
659:About
16:<
654:Home
610:talk
580:talk
526:talk
503:talk
467:talk
303:Next
261:RFPP
204:AfDs
259:or
257:AIV
233:ANI
209:RfC
162:By
79:—
694::
619:🤔
612:)
582:)
505:)
469:)
450:66
441:.
293:←
648:.
608:(
578:(
572::
568:@
565::
561:@
558::
554:@
551::
547:@
528:)
524:(
501:(
465:(
432:.
422:.
334:)
330:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
