196:
204:
130:
150:
502:
386:, who had not yet decided on his vote, gives several reasons not to ratify. He notes that the length of members' terms have not been specified, nor are there any term limits, or even rules on extending members' terms once they've been elected. There are also no clear provisions for removing someone from the Global Council or the GCB. And "while there is lip service to diversity, equity, and inclusion, there is nothing concrete."
110:
140:
36:
160:
120:
283:(GCB), that is selected by the Global Council (GC) from its members. The GCB would start with five members, but may grow to twenty as the GC grows. Given the powers of the GC, it is clear that the GCB will be one of the most important institutions in the overall movement, rivaling or even surpassing the WMF Board of Trustees in influence.
170:
450:
It all comes down to three possibilities when you are voting. Your choices are "Yes" (to support ratification), "No" (if you don’t), or "--" (to which you can supply your own interpretation). No matter which one you choose, you can write a comment on your digital ballot which will be published after
376:
The liaisons believe that the costs and risks of the charter's current approach outweigh the value it adds to the movement and ask for concrete recommendations. Reflecting on the current state of the proposed charter, they don't understand how the purposes outlined in the draft charter actually align
356:
They believe that the current state of concentrating all power in 12 WMF board members is not equitable and that "the vast majority of (WMF board) seats has always been in the hands of people from North
America and Europe and attempts to change that have failed." So that ratification of the proposed
471:
Here is a referendum not just on this specific text, but on whether we are willing to evolve our institutions in response to a rapidly changing and challenging world – in addition to saying "yes" or "no", we urge you to take advantage of the write-in comment to express what you like and dislike, and
434:
that the current "draft has lots of rough edges, and yet is designed to make amendment almost impossible." He also criticizes that "It delegates a lot of power to affiliates with few checks and balances, without addressing either the potential double-counting of affiliate members in governance, or
269:
A final version was submitted for the ratification vote on June 10. To pass, the charter must receive 55% of the votes of individual
Wikipedians, 55% of affiliates votes, and approval of the WMF board. Since the two liaisons have recommended that the board reject the proposed charter, it might be
726:
Further clarity around costs of this new structure is required. The WMF board has an entire legal and finical team which we spend many millions of dollars on a year. I am not seeing duplicating this being a good use of funds, but would such teams be legally permitted to advise the Global
Counsel?
282:
includes a section on the movement's purposes and values, and some material on the mechanisms that will govern the Global
Council’s operations. It will start with 25 elected or selected members, but may later grow to 100 members. It will have a steering committee, called the Global Council Board
467:
Each of the three voting stakeholder groups (Wikimedia
Foundation, affiliates, and communities) has their own valuable perspective on advancing our shared vision of free knowledge, and naturally believes theirs is the wisest course and pace of change, and it has been the drafters' rocky path to
753:
Duplication of legal and financial staff is not at all proposed in the charter. Of course WMF staff would be permitted to advise the Global
Council, as indeed they advised heavily the MCDC in drafting the charter and making sure it met with all of the WMF's legal requirements.
253:
decision-making on Fund dissemination, decision-making on
Affiliate recognition and strategy, and advice on Product & Technology. We (the WMF) shall also soon be sharing considerable trust and safety work with the upcoming Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee.
405:
412:, "In general, this Charter seems to treat onwiki communities as the underdog of the Wikimedia Movement, when in fact they are the core of the whole thing, where it all starts and where almost all Wikimedia funding comes from."
195:
389:
He also believes that the three-part ratification process does not set a high enough bar, even though three groups (individual
Wikipedians, affiliates, and the WMF Board) must all ratify the proposed charter.
622:
424:
of a formal new legal structure and government system. IMHO, it has the drawbacks of both a core formal government process, and an informal grassroots process, and none of the benefits of either one."
541:
447:
With such a lengthy process behind us and an ongoing lively discussion during a possible turning point in the
Knowledge (XXG) movement’s governance, Wikipedians may be confused about how to vote.
591:
551:
339:"Resource distribution" – GCB manages the "funds of the Wikimedia Movement", including the budget of the Wikimedia Foundation. All fund distributions to affiliates will be determined by the GCB.
596:
526:
489:
480:
232:
96:
294:
546:
519:
242:
of
Wikimedia community volunteer representatives. The result of this vote could permanently make this document a fundamental basis of Knowledge (XXG) governance, and difficult to amend.
435:
the challenge of the Affiliates as a bloc being made up primarily of small, informal user groups which were not intended to be units of governance." Sj has also drafted an alternative "
286:
Much of the material that would normally be included in such an important document – such as the length of a GC member’s term – has been divided off from the proposed charter into 14
370:
576:
556:
536:
513:
55:
44:
586:
566:
561:
581:
571:
671:
There’s a commitment that certain demographics not dominate the Global Council, so there will most likely be quotas for certain regions, but there are no guarantees.
327:
There’s a commitment that certain demographics not dominate the Global Council, so there will most likely be quotas for certain regions, but there are no guarantees.
870:
687:
GCB election processes are similar to how the WMF board of Trustees is elected, with the same problems of being dominated by members from Europe and North America.
472:
if you support the principle but not the final product, tell us to "try again", as this unique opportunity for change will fade away without your continued voice.
333:
GCB election processes are similar to how the WMF board of Trustees is elected, with the same problems of being dominated by members from Europe and North America.
683:
This is asking for trouble. The constitutional document should not be able to be modified solely by the body it governs, but only by the ratifying constituency.
373:
that the board not ratify the charter, which would force another round of feedback starting with written comments that can be included in the ratification vote.
350:
113:
290:. These documents are not subject to ratification in the current vote. The GC could presumably change the policies in these documents after the GC is formed.
21:
451:
the results are known, with your name or user ID removed. These comments may be the most important result of the vote, so that the process can move forward.
846:
263:
841:
836:
706:
831:
297:
of the important points of the proposed charter. Some of these are included below and may include personal comments from the original authors.
647:
An "Independent Dispute Resolution function" will be put in place to resolve conflicts among movement bodies, theoretically including the WMF.
306:
An "Independent Dispute Resolution function" will be put in place to resolve conflicts among movement bodies, theoretically including the WMF.
651:
That needs to be in place from the beginning. I would recommend a mediation procedure be specified, not just the creation of a "function."
778:
366:
336:
The relationship between the WMF Board of Trustees and the GCB is still not mentioned, but the GCB is assigned the decision-making role.
216:
826:
501:
49:
35:
17:
287:
740:
408:
say that the charter would let affiliates have a strong advantage for gaining control of the Global Council. Later Darwin told
815:
799:
259:
68:
File:Storm op het Meer van Galilea Leven van Christus (serietitel) Vita I. Christi (serietitel), RP-P-1980-56 (cropped).jpg
30:
Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board: Will we weather the storm?
436:
246:
803:
763:
748:
744:
718:
700:
420:
gives an overall negative view. "I think the Movement Charter is not a good idea. The voting process gives it the
258:
The drafting process for this charter started in 2021 and was part of the same overall process that drafted the
852:
203:
238:, the Movement Charter would guide many governance decisions in the Wikimedia Movement by establishing a
696:
679:
The Global Council defines itself, i.e. its own processes, structures, membership(!) and accountability.
330:
The Global Council defines itself, i.e. its own processes, structures, membership(!) and accountability.
321:
GC is responsible for global strategy development and to “shape the future … of the Wikimedia movement”.
249:, two WMF board members who are liaisons with the Movement Charter Drafting Committee (MCDC), including
782:
270:
expected that it will not be ratified, but that can’t be certain until all the votes are announced.
736:
794:
714:
380:
Others make major criticisms of the proposed charter, some of which overlap with the liaisons':
123:
618:
143:
225:
91:
Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board
759:
692:
643:
I say "No" because the following issues, from the bullet points above, need to be resolved:
153:
279:
183:
357:
charter "is a good first step" and that "it is good enough for now, safe enough to try."
239:
173:
728:
245:
There is widespread agreement that many functions of the WMF should be decentralized,
864:
790:
710:
315:
The WMF will still distribute resources, but at the direction of the Global Council.
163:
755:
383:
439:" that is "focusing on coordination and making specific collective decisions".
133:
312:
The WMF is supposed to align its strategic direction with the Global Council.
667:
Without resolution in advance, this could be a source of endless headaches.
218:
You can click here to vote now at meta:Movement Charter/Ratification/Voting.
187:
707:
m:Talk:Movement_Charter#Inconsistency_about_maximum_number_of_GCB_members
231:
The voting period started June 25 and goes to July 9, 2024 at 23:59 UTC.
786:
427:
400:
705:
The number of maximum GBC members (20, 15, …) is still open, see
54:
675:
Please specify the quotas in advance and make them binding.
500:
455:
416:
394:
202:
34:
655:
There’s no mention of how long the terms of GC members are.
318:
There’s no mention of how long the terms of GC members are.
459:, a member of the MCDC, speaking only for himself, told
634:
627:
607:
431:
349:
The Supervisory Board of Wikimedia Deutschland (WMDE)
811:
Get the latest headlines on your user page – just add
228:
be the governing document of the Wikimedia Movement?
365:
The WMF Board of Trustees liaisons have recommended
632:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
663:Unclear if Global Council members are to be paid.
324:Unclear if Global Council members are to be paid.
353:their decision to support the proposed charter.
264:Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee
309:Governance structures of the WMF stay the same.
789:. Only board member opposed was Mike Peel. --
774:WMF Board has voted not to ratify the charter
465:
303:
251:
247:according to Nataliia Tymkiv and Lorenzo Losa
8:
871:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2024-07
659:Absolutely need term lengths and limits.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
635:
611:
224:Should the 10 June 2024 version of the
90:
233:As reported in the previous issue of
29:
7:
377:with the mechanisms included in it.
56:
28:
617:These comments are automatically
293:The Central and Eastern European
430:(WMF Trustee from 2009 to 2015)
210:A lively discussion on Meta-Wiki
194:
168:
158:
148:
138:
128:
118:
108:
367:on the Wikimedia-l mailing list
274:What’s in the proposed charter?
628:add the page to your watchlist
1:
361:The case against ratification
301:has edited these for length.
262:and its enforcement arm, the
691:As above, need firm quotas.
887:
406:Portuguese Knowledge (XXG)
804:12:15, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
345:The case for ratification
260:Universal Code of Conduct
764:16:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
749:14:48, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
719:10:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
701:23:48, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
288:supplementary documents
625:. To follow comments,
505:
474:
342:
295:Hub has given its view
256:
207:
39:
816:Signpost-subscription
504:
468:reconcile all these.
206:
38:
621:from this article's
612:Discuss this story
506:
493:"Special report" →
437:Minimalist charter
208:
45:← Back to Contents
40:
802:
717:
636:purging the cache
542:Discussion report
50:View Latest Issue
878:
855:
820:
814:
797:
793:
783:board resolution
733:
713:
639:
637:
631:
610:
524:
516:
509:
492:
485:"Special report"
484:
458:
419:
403:
397:
280:proposed charter
226:Movement Charter
221:
219:
198:
190:
172:
171:
162:
161:
152:
151:
142:
141:
132:
131:
122:
121:
112:
111:
62:
60:
58:
886:
885:
881:
880:
879:
877:
876:
875:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
851:
849:
844:
839:
834:
829:
822:
818:
812:
808:
807:
795:
776:
729:
641:
633:
626:
615:
614:
608:+ Add a comment
606:
602:
601:
600:
592:Recent research
552:Sister projects
517:
512:
510:
507:
496:
495:
490:
487:
482:
476:
475:
454:
445:
443:What to do now?
415:
399:
393:
363:
347:
276:
222:
217:
215:
212:
211:
199:
192:
191:
181:
180:
179:
178:
169:
159:
149:
139:
129:
119:
109:
103:
100:
89:
85:
84:
81:
78:
75:
72:
69:
65:
63:
53:
52:
47:
41:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
884:
882:
874:
873:
863:
862:
850:
845:
840:
835:
830:
825:
824:
823:
810:
809:
806:
775:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
689:
688:
681:
680:
673:
672:
665:
664:
657:
656:
649:
648:
616:
613:
605:
604:
603:
599:
597:Traffic report
594:
589:
584:
579:
574:
569:
564:
559:
554:
549:
544:
539:
534:
532:Special report
529:
527:News and notes
523:
511:
499:
498:
497:
488:
479:
478:
477:
444:
441:
362:
359:
346:
343:
341:
340:
337:
334:
331:
328:
325:
322:
319:
316:
313:
310:
307:
275:
272:
240:Global Council
214:
213:
209:
201:
200:
193:
177:
176:
166:
156:
146:
136:
126:
116:
105:
104:
101:
95:
94:
93:
92:
88:Special report
87:
86:
82:
79:
76:
73:
70:
67:
66:
64:
61:
48:
43:
42:
33:
32:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
883:
872:
869:
868:
866:
854:
848:
843:
838:
833:
828:
817:
805:
801:
798:
792:
788:
787:board minutes
784:
780:
773:
765:
761:
757:
752:
751:
750:
746:
742:
738:
734:
732:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
716:
712:
708:
703:
702:
698:
694:
686:
685:
684:
678:
677:
676:
670:
669:
668:
662:
661:
660:
654:
653:
652:
646:
645:
644:
638:
629:
624:
620:
609:
598:
595:
593:
590:
588:
585:
583:
580:
578:
575:
573:
570:
568:
565:
563:
560:
558:
555:
553:
550:
548:
545:
543:
540:
538:
535:
533:
530:
528:
525:
521:
515:
508:In this issue
503:
494:
486:
473:
469:
464:
462:
457:
452:
448:
442:
440:
438:
433:
429:
425:
423:
418:
413:
411:
407:
402:
396:
391:
387:
385:
381:
378:
374:
372:
368:
360:
358:
354:
352:
344:
338:
335:
332:
329:
326:
323:
320:
317:
314:
311:
308:
305:
304:
302:
300:
296:
291:
289:
284:
281:
273:
271:
267:
265:
261:
255:
250:
248:
243:
241:
237:
236:
229:
227:
220:
205:
197:
189:
185:
175:
167:
165:
157:
155:
147:
145:
137:
135:
127:
125:
117:
115:
107:
106:
98:
59:
51:
46:
37:
23:
19:
779:mailing list
730:
704:
690:
682:
674:
666:
658:
650:
642:
547:In the media
531:
520:all comments
470:
466:
461:The Signpost
460:
453:
449:
446:
426:
421:
414:
410:The Signpost
409:
392:
388:
382:
379:
375:
364:
355:
348:
299:The Signpost
298:
292:
285:
277:
268:
257:
252:
244:
235:The Signpost
234:
230:
223:
114:PDF download
853:Suggestions
693:WaikikiVice
619:transcluded
514:4 July 2024
164:X (Twitter)
71:Rijksmuseum
57:4 July 2024
401:Danilo.mac
184:Smallbones
102:Share this
97:Contribute
22:2024-07-04
847:Subscribe
731:Doc James
709:. Best, —
623:talk page
577:Crossword
384:Joe Mabel
371:Meta-Wiki
865:Category
842:Newsroom
837:Archives
741:contribs
711:DerHexer
557:Obituary
537:In focus
483:Previous
422:illusion
266:(U4C).
154:Facebook
144:LinkedIn
134:Mastodon
20: |
791:Andreas
587:Cobwebs
567:Gallery
562:Opinion
463:that –
404:at the
369:and on
756:Pharos
715:(Talk)
582:Humour
456:Pharos
417:Sm8900
395:Darwin
351:posted
174:Reddit
124:E-mail
832:About
745:email
572:Op-Ed
432:warns
16:<
827:Home
777:See
760:talk
737:talk
697:talk
491:Next
398:and
278:The
188:HaeB
186:and
800:466
182:By
99:—
83:325
74:CC0
867::
819:}}
813:{{
796:JN
785:,
781:,
762:)
747:)
743:·
739:·
699:)
481:←
428:Sj
80:31
77:15
821:.
758:(
735:(
695:(
640:.
630:.
522:)
518:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
