222:
207:
373:
international media source outside the jurisdiction of Indian government control to disregard the government request. Arguments opposed to publishing the name include respect for the expertise of those courts, respect for national decision making to know what is best for local culture, anticipation of a good future of peaceful collaboration with the government of India by granting this request, and concern for the burden on
Knowledge editors in India if they bear the responsibility of an online global decision including non-Indian Knowledge editors.
130:
150:
394:
286:) are among the many sources to report on the court's order. In this case, and as often happens when institutions make requests of Knowledge, the court made its request with some presumption that Knowledge has an editorial leader who can issue binding orders. As is known among Knowledge editors, there is no such person: even the Wikimedia Foundation does not control the content of articles under Knowledge's policies.
110:
123:
318:
examine both the consensus and discussion. It will not come as a surprise to
Knowledge editors that Wikipedians value their editorial independence. The closing statement emphasizes that Knowledge editors did not arrive at that decision at the behest of the court, but rather because community deliberation found reasons for doing so and because a supermajority of editors supported the decision.
192:
140:
36:
160:
120:
237:, India's courts have demanded that Knowledge remove of the name of a victim from an article on the crime. While some national and local media outlets reported the name of the victim at the time, as did various international media sources, the laws of India, prohibit media from publicizing the names of victims of especially heinous crimes.
170:
366:
352:
policy. The argument in favor of publishing the name is that maximal freedom in publishing is the preferred position. The argument opposed is that naming the victim is not a censorship issue, as
Knowledge will definitely have an article on the crime, and that article does not benefit significantly by
317:
The final decision was to exclude the name from the article. While closing statements typically are descriptions written by
Knowledge editors and for Knowledge editors, Tamzin included a summary explanation of the overall process in anticipation that the court, media, and public observers may wish to
372:
A final set of arguments is on the practicality of collaboration between
Knowledge and the government of India. The argument in favor of publishing the name assumes that other arguments establish that Knowledge editors should publish the name, and in that context, it is best for Knowledge as an
360:
and reputable journalists who are publishing the name. Arguments opposed to publishing the name make various claims, including that sources publishing the name are mistaken, or that they have since removed the name, or that the higher quality sources do not publish the name while lower quality
244:
whether to mention the victim's name. On 16 August, that debate became part of a discussion on how to title the article, which was ongoing until 9 September, when the disagreement about including the name split into its own discussion. All of this was part of the
221:
479:
334:, "On 9 August 2024, a 31-year-old female postgraduate trainee doctor at R. G. Kar Medical College and Hospital in Kolkata, West Bengal, India, was raped and murdered in a college building."
206:
337:
One set of arguments about the name relates to victims' rights and women's rights. The argument in favor of naming the victim is that her story becomes known and enables activism to reduce
448:
341:. The argument opposed is that in some cases, and this case in particular, naming the victim greatly endangers and disturbs their family, social network, colleagues, and supporters.
453:
438:
96:
418:
273:
428:
411:
508:
405:
55:
44:
443:
433:
263:
302:
and "explain clearly why you feel the balance of interests lies one way or the other, in order to reach consensus accordingly". Knowledge editors did that, and
240:
The incident was widely reported on 10 August, the day after it occurred; English
Knowledge editors created the article a day after that. By 13 August, editors
113:
560:
299:
30:
Indian courts order
Knowledge to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus: WMF Legal on the scene, Tamzin makes big RfC close
21:
356:
Another set of arguments is about following the lead of what other media outlets do. Arguments in favor of publishing the name point to seeming
536:
214:
531:
526:
327:
234:
565:
249:
usual and familiar to editors, where editorial decisions are reached by group discussion about how to implement policies and guidelines.
521:
241:
331:
311:
303:
295:
516:
393:
49:
35:
17:
357:
542:
191:
345:
338:
258:
253:
349:
362:
246:
278:
91:
Indian courts order
Knowledge to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
475:
378:
183:
143:
294:
In response to the court decision, the legal department of the
Wikimedia Foundation posted
153:
173:
554:
163:
307:
228:
A large group of protesters, one of whom holds a sign reading, "We want justice"
133:
283:
268:
54:
392:
220:
205:
34:
310:, a volunteer editor, closed the discussion and authored
491:
484:
464:
489:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
369:and reported which ones do not publish the name.
235:high-profile sexual assault in Kolkata last month
68:File:Supreme Court of India - 200705 (edited).jpg
304:reached a decision to exclude the victim's name
8:
200:Indian high court demands name be taken down
322:Arguments for and against name inclusion
296:a notice on the talk page of the article
492:
468:
90:
256:ordered Knowledge to remove the name.
215:R. G. Kar Medical College and Hospital
328:2024 Kolkata rape and murder incident
29:
7:
344:Another set of arguments relates to
561:Knowledge Signpost archives 2024-09
298:, encouraging Knowledge editors to
353:including the name of the victim.
71:Legaleagle86 at English Knowledge.
56:
28:
474:These comments are automatically
300:deliberate carefully on the issue
190:
168:
158:
148:
138:
128:
118:
108:
509:putting together the next issue
213:Protestor demanding justice at
485:add the page to your watchlist
1:
361:sources do. Knowledge editor
290:Knowledge editor deliberation
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
566:Knowledge Signpost RSS feed
582:
247:consensus-building process
346:censorship of Knowledge
312:the consensus statement
482:. To follow comments,
397:
363:User:Fowler&fowler
339:violence against women
259:The Free Press Journal
254:Supreme Court of India
225:
210:
39:
396:
252:On 16 September, the
224:
209:
38:
478:from this article's
348:and Knowledge's own
358:WP:Reliable sources
469:Discuss this story
398:
279:The Times of India
226:
211:
45:← Back to Contents
40:
493:purging the cache
406:26 September 2024
233:In the wake of a
57:26 September 2024
50:View Latest Issue
573:
545:
507:needs your help
496:
494:
488:
467:
416:
408:
401:
381:
194:
186:
172:
171:
162:
161:
152:
151:
142:
141:
132:
131:
122:
121:
112:
111:
62:
60:
58:
581:
580:
576:
575:
574:
572:
571:
570:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
541:
539:
534:
529:
524:
519:
512:
501:
500:
498:
490:
483:
472:
471:
465:+ Add a comment
463:
459:
458:
457:
449:Recent research
409:
404:
402:
399:
387:
386:
377:
367:various sources
326:The article is
324:
292:
230:
229:
218:
217:
203:
202:
195:
188:
187:
181:
180:
179:
178:
169:
159:
149:
139:
129:
119:
109:
103:
100:
89:
85:
84:
81:
78:
75:
72:
69:
65:
63:
53:
52:
47:
41:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
579:
577:
569:
568:
563:
553:
552:
540:
535:
530:
525:
520:
515:
514:
513:
503:
502:
499:
473:
470:
462:
461:
460:
456:
454:Traffic report
451:
446:
441:
439:News and notes
436:
431:
426:
424:Community view
421:
415:
403:
391:
390:
389:
388:
384:
350:WP:NOTCENSORED
323:
320:
291:
288:
242:began debating
231:
227:
219:
212:
204:
201:
198:
197:
196:
189:
177:
176:
166:
156:
146:
136:
126:
116:
105:
104:
101:
95:
94:
93:
92:
88:Community view
87:
86:
82:
79:
76:
73:
70:
67:
66:
64:
61:
48:
43:
42:
33:
32:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
578:
567:
564:
562:
559:
558:
556:
544:
538:
533:
528:
523:
518:
510:
506:
495:
486:
481:
477:
466:
455:
452:
450:
447:
445:
442:
440:
437:
435:
432:
430:
427:
425:
422:
420:
417:
413:
407:
400:In this issue
395:
385:
382:
380:
374:
370:
368:
364:
359:
354:
351:
347:
342:
340:
335:
333:
329:
321:
319:
315:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
289:
287:
285:
281:
280:
275:
271:
270:
265:
261:
260:
255:
250:
248:
243:
238:
236:
223:
216:
208:
199:
193:
185:
175:
167:
165:
157:
155:
147:
145:
137:
135:
127:
125:
117:
115:
107:
106:
98:
59:
51:
46:
37:
23:
19:
505:The Signpost
504:
423:
419:In the media
412:all comments
383:
375:
371:
355:
343:
336:
325:
316:
293:
277:
267:
257:
251:
239:
232:
184:Bluerasberry
114:PDF download
74:CC BY-SA 3.0
543:Suggestions
476:transcluded
429:Serendipity
308:User:Tamzin
164:X (Twitter)
555:Categories
102:Share this
97:Contribute
22:2024-09-26
537:Subscribe
480:talk page
332:it begins
269:The Hindu
532:Newsroom
527:Archives
365:checked
154:Facebook
144:LinkedIn
134:Mastodon
20: |
444:Gallery
434:Opinion
276:), and
330:, and
284:report
274:report
264:report
174:Reddit
124:E-mail
522:About
16:<
517:Home
266:),
314:.
182:By
99:—
83:500
77:108
557::
379:BR
376:–
306:.
80:17
511:.
497:.
487:.
414:)
410:(
282:(
272:(
262:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
