Knowledge

:Knowledge doesn't care how many friends you have - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

166: 113: 24: 98: 219:
Being "verified" on a social media platform can mean a whole variety of things: it can be a status symbol, a means to prevent account impersonation, a way to assure users that posts are associated with a widely known brand or media outlet... or that the account owner has paid money to have a special
230:
As an aside, it is worth remembering that just because an account is verified, it doesn't mean that it is actually the person named who is posting to it. Posts could very well be made by a ghost writer paid by the celebrity's agent or by brands sponsoring the celebrity.
192:, not because of how many followers he has. The fact that a reality show contestant has lots of Instagram likes doesn't mean they have enduring historical and cultural significance in the same way 180:
on a page may be an indication that a subject is notable but does not in itself make a subject notable: the standard notability criteria apply interpreted through the lens of community
212:
Businesses, celebrities, bands and other groups are often given some special kind of account: Facebook allow "Pages" in addition to personal accounts; X (formerly Twitter) has
131:
sense of the word) the subject of a biographical article has accumulated is brought up as an argument. This information is irrelevant and citing it ought to be considered
274:
manner what reliable sources have had to say about the world. Knowledge is not here to help "media disruptors" challenge the dominance of traditional media. Why? Because
359: 294:
and other social media sites are allowing a new breed of Internet celebrities to exist. Playing the YouTube social game doesn't mean Knowledge
43:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
44: 106:
The number of fans or followers a subject has is irrelevant in a deletion discussion. Notability determines if an article is kept.
326:
Whether the public figure or one of their staff performed certain actions on their social media account has been the subject of
306:
help your cause and is unlikely to give even the most sympathetic inclusionists a sudden urge to hunt down reliable sources to
220:
mark on their profile. Some of these things may correlate with Knowledge's notability criteria, but they do not always do so.
189: 223:
As with having a lot of fans or followers, being verified or given some other special status on a social networking service
266:
here to change (or indeed disrupt) the world's existing media structure, nor even to analyse the world (that would be
227:
be an indication that the person might meet the notability guidelines, but it is not a sufficient condition for it.
247:, the term "disruptive" is used, often with approval. Numerous companies and services are said to be "disrupting" 275: 151: 36: 290:
if you prefer—many new types of celebrities, entertainers and public voices are coming to the fore.
181: 48: 58: 299: 177: 116: 327: 197: 159: 147: 32: 201: 155: 143: 271: 169: 353: 307: 132: 124: 51:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. 267: 244: 185: 165: 139: 112: 193: 248: 259: 184:. Having lots of people willing to read your posts may be because you are 128: 302:
of barely literate twelve-year olds to participate in a deletion debate
138:
Being notable on Knowledge requires significant coverage in independent
291: 252: 240: 213: 176:
Having thousands or hundreds of thousands of people willing to click
216:. This also doesn't change whether someone is notable a single jot. 164: 111: 276:
Knowledge is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
92: 18: 255:
is often said to be disrupting television, for instance.
158:
and there's a reason you shouldn't create articles about
188:, but the reason Obama is notable is because he was the 343:
a side effect of Knowledge and other Wikimedia projects
80: 73: 66: 154:, it's an encyclopedia. There's a reason why you need 127:, the number of fans, followers or "friends" (in the 208:Knowledge doesn't care about your Verified account 156:more than just a one-off event to make you notable 235:Being disruptive doesn't make you notable either 207: 328:a widely publicised High Court defamation trial 8: 319: 234: 270:) but simply to try and document in a 144:not a random collection of information 7: 49:thoroughly vetted by the community 45:Knowledge's policies or guidelines 14: 360:Knowledge essays about notability 96: 22: 190:President of the United States 1: 251:or newspapers or education. 239:In a lot of discussions of " 142:. Why? Because Knowledge is 339:Although that occasionally 152:web or blog hosting service 376: 56: 16:Essay on editing Knowledge 119:isn't popular on TikTok. 104:This page in a nutshell: 286:As media changes—gets 173: 120: 282:New media celebrities 168: 160:crap you just made up 115: 47:, as it has not been 133:an argument to avoid 125:deletion discussions 172:is not on Facebook. 174: 148:business directory 121: 268:original research 214:verified accounts 117:Winston Churchill 110: 109: 91: 90: 367: 344: 337: 331: 324: 298:you an article. 198:Jawaharlal Nehru 140:reliable sources 100: 99: 93: 83: 76: 69: 26: 25: 19: 375: 374: 370: 369: 368: 366: 365: 364: 350: 349: 348: 347: 338: 334: 325: 321: 316: 284: 262:, Knowledge is 237: 210: 202:John F. Kennedy 97: 87: 86: 79: 72: 65: 61: 53: 52: 23: 17: 12: 11: 5: 373: 371: 363: 362: 352: 351: 346: 345: 332: 318: 317: 315: 312: 300:Sending hordes 283: 280: 236: 233: 209: 206: 170:Virginia Woolf 108: 107: 101: 89: 88: 85: 84: 77: 70: 62: 57: 54: 42: 41: 29: 27: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 372: 361: 358: 357: 355: 342: 336: 333: 329: 323: 320: 313: 311: 310:the article. 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 281: 279: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 232: 228: 226: 221: 217: 215: 205: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 171: 167: 163: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 141: 136: 134: 130: 126: 118: 114: 105: 102: 95: 94: 82: 81:WP:NUMFRIENDS 78: 75: 71: 68: 64: 63: 60: 55: 50: 46: 40: 38: 34: 28: 21: 20: 340: 335: 330:, after all. 322: 303: 295: 287: 285: 263: 256: 245:social media 238: 229: 224: 222: 218: 211: 186:Barack Obama 175: 137: 122: 103: 74:WP:NOFRIENDS 30: 194:Jane Austen 67:WP:NFRIENDS 31:This is an 249:television 37:notability 314:Footnotes 288:disrupted 182:consensus 59:Shortcuts 354:Category 129:Facebook 123:In many 292:YouTube 272:neutral 253:YouTube 241:Web 2.0 308:rescue 257:Contra 243:" and 178:"Like" 304:won't 150:or a 146:or a 33:essay 296:owes 260:Marx 204:do. 264:not 225:may 200:or 196:or 35:on 356:: 341:is 278:. 162:. 135:. 39:.

Index

essay
notability
Knowledge's policies or guidelines
thoroughly vetted by the community
Shortcuts
WP:NFRIENDS
WP:NOFRIENDS
WP:NUMFRIENDS

Winston Churchill
deletion discussions
Facebook
an argument to avoid
reliable sources
not a random collection of information
business directory
web or blog hosting service
more than just a one-off event to make you notable
crap you just made up

Virginia Woolf
"Like"
consensus
Barack Obama
President of the United States
Jane Austen
Jawaharlal Nehru
John F. Kennedy
verified accounts
Web 2.0

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑