312:
to keep almost all criticism of Prem Rawat out of all of the PR (Prem Rawat) related articles. They argue that some scholars cannot be used because they are christian, but then add quotes from other premies. They chip away at well sourced material until it's either too vague to be meaningful, and then remove it as unsourced, or they claim BLP violation, or undue weight, and remove it outright. We've even had to go outside the article to get an opinion on whether the LA times and NY times were credible sources or not (they still don't all agree that it is!). Regarding the merging of articles, we have a "Teachings of Prem Rawat" article, yet the techniques are secret, not to be shared with others, why does this need its own article? Several other articles can be merged as well, imo, however the pro-Rawat editors have a strong opposing viewpoint. These discussions/similar problems have spilled across most of the
1340:", was published by a mainstream publisher and received some critical praise. Editors of articles related to Prem Rawat and the DLM would like to use the book as a source for various assertions concerning the woman's emotional perceptions of the movement and its methods, objective facts concerning the management of the movement, and the words and deeds of other people, both named and unnamed, some of which include material that could be regarded as derogatory or exceptional. The question is under what circumstances and for what material can this book be considered a reliable source?
1239:, that they prefer a fresh set of eyes. As both a MedCab coordinator and a member of the formal Mediation Committee, Steve can talk to me about the case in confidance for assistance, advice or a sounding board and expect me to treat confidential details as such. I'm really and truly disappointed that this turned into such a distraction. Unless you have serious objections to Steve, in whom I place trust and respect for the record, can the above conversation please be archived and the case move forward into addressing the substantive content disagreements?
143:
editors, and I won't assume there was any bad faith involved. But if the mediation had gone ahead with 3/5 of the participants sharing a POV then NPOV results would have been harder to achieve. The aim of mediation isn't to prove past problems, it's to find future solutions. I mention the article ownership simply as background for how we got to the present situation. We're not going to solve it here, but the solution needs to take that problem into account.
416:. It's a ground rule I lay down before I take on any case. Other than that, I won't open the case until the ArbCom has closed the case, to prevent any conflicts in decisions. As this appears to be a highly complex dispute, I will need a day or so, perhaps more, to go through the ArbCom case and all prior discussion. Cheers,
247:
before the
Arbitration Committee, so I suppose I'll have to read through the ArbCom case. I'm rather thorough in my mediations. However, I won't open this case until the ArbCom case has been closed. Can someone please give me more details on this dispute? In a secton below this one will be fine. Cheers,
1165:
When
Vassyana volunteered and asked if anyone objected I wrote him a note thanking him but saying that I prefer to have a different mediator this time. Vassyana replied that he understood and would help find someone else. I'm glad that Steve has volunteered and look forward to his help in mediating.
844:
It seems to me that
Vassyana, in his trademark, even-handed way, has stated and clarified the points on both sides of the debate, and that has won him an accusation of "bowing out." I hope that accusation was made in good faith, but I am forced to wonder sometimes. Anyway, it just underlines that he
246:
Okay, I understand this is still under active discussion, as to who will mediate this. However, as it's possible I might be asked to mediate, I'd like to know more about this case, and where all the central discussion has been. Now, as it's been mentioned, something related to this case is currently
311:
Wow, pull up a chair, this could take a while! Boiled down to the essence, as I see it. There are 3 pro-Rawat editors, I believe they have all publicly acknowledged that they are premies (roughly, students of Prem Rawat, disciples?). Through effective coordination of their efforts they have managed
1109:
Can we have an informal mediation team consisting of Steve
Crossin AND Vassyana? Steve would be the front man, Vassyana can be available in the wings and help out where Steve runs into trouble. Is that a problem for anyone? I'm not saying I'll look in too, yet, btw. (I need to get some deadlines
349:
article, which BTW, is the what this mediation is all about (together with other articles as listed in the top-left corner of this page. The attitude that is expected is one of collaboration and accepting the kind help of mediators. Throwing some more mud beyond what was thrown in the ArbCom case
142:
Mediation isn't intended to settle behavioral problems. But often it's behavioral problems that make solving content disputes more difficult. Jossi structured this mediation initially to include five participants - three students of Prem Rawat, Jayen and me. I don't know why he excluded the other
76:
I suppose jossi, it depends on what you would like as "evidence", I'm fairly certain that nothing less than quotes from editors saying they are going to tag-team an article would do it for you. The fact that one editor "suggests" something, and others jump up to do it, repeatedly, probably isn't
268:
the
Arbitration Committee makes a binding decision. I will be actively discussing our options as mediators within the next day or so, and reviewing evidence and discussion. We may also contact ArbCom. It's still undecided, but we will most likely open the case before ArbCom makes a decision.
948:
Many? (note to self, 3-4 now equals "many"...) Also, I do not see anyone saying they prefer
Vassyana over Steve. Why do you object to Steve? (who is, I'm sure, also a member of fascinating commitees). He's already expressed an interest, and noted that Vassyana is very busy right now. --
316:
related articles, largely in his own article though. That, and the talk page for the article under discussion here, are a pretty good place to start to get an idea of the issues I think. Also, you'll likely notice, the wikilawyering becomes pretty tedious after a while. --
166:, regardless of stated or unstated affiliation. Not sure about the other editors you added. And BTW, our ability to reach NPOV is unrelated to our stated or unstated POVs, unless you believe different, of course, which is your right but antithetical on how WP works.
362:
after the ArbCom case is closed. Note that, wisely, the mediators have made it clear that they will not start mediating until the case is closed. Let's focus this mediation on what it is for: to get help with the content disputes that have been listed in talk.
385:
It helps because it was a direct response to Steve's question/request. Very simple. Thanks for the additional policy references though, I always forget to leave a few of those for you. Also, in case you missed it, we are making some progress in the
1336:(Prem Rawat) in 1971 at age 16 and left the movement four years later. Immediately after leaving she wrote her memoirs which recount in great detail her experiences with the movement, its members and officials, and even its leader. The book, "
354:. I would even say more: Attempts to keep bringing behavioral issues up that are being covered at the arbCom case are utterly disruptive. If any editor has a behavioral concern, it would be best to raise it with that editor, or to use
1002:, when you reference me saying it? Yes, it certainly is getting silly, please stop. And I don't speak for Will. I prefer to have a fresh pair of eyes on this, that means I feel it would be more helpful to have Steve look at this. --
1377:
The mediator thinks it would be helpful. If no one has any suggestions for improvements I'll post it. As you can see, the request is not for a blanket approval or disapproval, but for input about how and when the source is usable.
228:
I'd suggest that it be waited until the
Arbitration Committee makes their final decision before starting this case. If the Arbitration Committee doesn't come to a decision that ends this dispute, I'll consider mediating this case.
98:
Id there is such a thing as "tag teaming", then it is pervasive on both sides of the dispute. I would prefer to frame this on the basis that debates in talk pages and editing of pages by multiple editors is how this project works.
436:
And regarding the role of mediators, yes, we mediate on content, not behaviour. I still haven't decided exactly how I will mediate this case. I'm still thinking it over. Am I right to assume that you will accept me as a mediator?
1420:
I don't think we can avoid mentioning that she admits she was highly experimental with LSD at the time she was in the ashram. One would think that might alter her memories or feelings on the matter. --
966:
Did I object to Steve? I haven't! I am waiting to hear if there is an objection to
Vassyana. So far, it is not clear and this is becoming silly. Do you object to Vassyana? Does Will object to Vassyana?
1280:
654:
That was not a bowing out. I find this attitude quite disconcerting, yet again. Not a very good faith effort to come to mediation, is it? Let's put it this way: if there is an objection to
Vassyana,
934:
Well, it seems that many others prefer
Vassyana. What we need is a clear statement: do you object to Vassyana, who is the coordinator of the MedCab and a member of the Mediation Committee, or not?
1361:
It is, thanks, but not sure we will get what we need from this. After all, as I have argued extensively, we cannot and should not make blanket assessments of sources. But see my proposal
594:
person (Maelefique) who made a comment about "fresh eyes", and that person did not object. You never commented. All other editors that responded were very happy with Vassyana's offer.
1124:(formally, all medcab mediation efforts are informal. medcom is for formal tasks, formally. Informally, sometimes things get a little mixed up). Are you formally confused yet? ;-)
819:
Jossi may not have understood my position. I wrote on the talk page, "I'm among those who think that a fresh approach is best" in regard to Vassyana's offer to mediate again.
1480:
Well, seems that we're making some progress with the Prem Rawat related stuff, and with the proposals page. I think we will just run with that idea for the time being.
1048:
Thanks Steve, but my only point there was that it's irrelevant what comittees Vassyana belongs to (but wouldn't that make you a member of the mediation committee?) --
40:? There is no evidence of that, and in any case, mediation is not for resolving behavioral disputes (see current open ArbCom case, the proposed article probation and
345:, and helping us finding common ground on disputes that we have not been able to resolve on our own. In case you have missed it, we are making some progress in the
865:
Seems Vassyana is preferred here. I really don't mind to be honest, I just know he has a lot of cases right now. Oh well, it's really up to you people.
454:
Yes, I will. It is not going to be easy as you can probably can gather, but I know you can get good help from other medCab members in case you need it.
552:
Ahh, very well. Vassyana is our co-ordinator, if anyone can resolve a dispute, he can. I'll leave it to him. Best of luck, I hope all goes well.
1488:
1405:
1306:
1078:
1038:
907:
873:
806:
773:
628:
560:
445:
424:
277:
255:
237:
1465:
What's the status of this page? We had started discussing Collier, and that branched out into a discussion of Randi. Are those on hold now?
882:
Hang on Steve, wait a little... We may need your kind offer to assist. If there is no agreement on Vassyana, we will still need a mediator!
21:
573:
Actually, Vassyana bowed out because some editors would like a mediator with a "fresh set of eyes". So Steve's help would be appreciated.
658:. Do you object to Vassyana's involvement? You did not comment, Will Beback, do you, or do you not object to Vassyanas's involvement?
1466:
1439:
1379:
1346:
1284:
1167:
1089:
822:
782:
Before we consider a new proposal, Steve, we need to know where we stand with the first one. After that we can consider your offer.
640:
574:
487:
181:
144:
60:
27:
81:. I understand that. If we could get rid of the behavioural disputes, we'd probably have a lot less content disputes as well. --
1110:
this weekend, but who knows, after that?). This sounds like a case where a team would be helpful, to unwind all the threads. --
1130:
I think a team is a good idea, I think if Steve and Vassyana want to do it that way, I don't see any objection on my part. --
17:
1492:
1475:
1448:
1433:
1409:
1388:
1372:
1355:
1310:
1293:
1263:
1248:
1218:
1204:
1190:
1176:
1156:
1142:
1119:
1098:
1082:
1060:
1042:
1014:
976:
961:
943:
928:
911:
891:
877:
854:
831:
810:
791:
777:
759:
698:
684:
667:
649:
632:
603:
583:
564:
517:
496:
463:
449:
428:
402:
372:
329:
306:
281:
259:
241:
190:
175:
153:
125:
108:
93:
69:
53:
1397:
Exactly, I've previously pointed out that the RSN usageis merely at my discretion, and is just to get a broader opinion.
479:
475:
59:
The heading is "What's going on?" I filled in part of what I think is "going on". You're welcome to your own views too.
1281:
Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#Momento_edit-warring_over_criticism_section_at_Prem_Rawat
486:. Also, most of the talk pages have automatic archiving and some relevant threads may have been archived already.
712:
536:
292:
337:
And how that exactly helps? Mediators are not involved in behavior issues, for that we have an arbCom case, and
180:
Are you an active editor of "Divine Light Mission"? I listed those who were active on the talk page recently.
1485:
1402:
1303:
1075:
1035:
904:
870:
803:
770:
625:
557:
442:
421:
412:
I'm presently going through details, as we speak. As with all my mediations, a simple requirement I have is
274:
252:
234:
916:
I'm not sure how many times I have to say it to clear up confusion. I would prefer Steve over Vassyana. --
1472:
1445:
1385:
1352:
1290:
1200:
1173:
1115:
1095:
828:
646:
580:
493:
187:
150:
66:
672:
I also would prefer to see Steve on this mediation, so if it's not premature, welcome aboard Steve! --
1430:
1329:
1235:
I decline to actively and directly participate in this case. Multiple editors have made clear to me,
1139:
1057:
1011:
958:
925:
681:
514:
399:
387:
346:
326:
163:
122:
90:
1482:
1399:
1300:
1244:
1072:
1032:
901:
867:
800:
767:
622:
554:
439:
418:
271:
249:
231:
765:
Just commenting, I'm not phased either way. Whether you want me as a mediator or not, I'm fine.
264:
After discussion with a few members of the Mediation Cabal, it is likely we will open the case
850:
1469:
1442:
1382:
1349:
1337:
1287:
1196:
1170:
1111:
1092:
825:
734:
643:
577:
490:
184:
147:
63:
1422:
1368:
1333:
1259:
1214:
1186:
1152:
1131:
1049:
1003:
972:
950:
939:
917:
887:
787:
755:
740:
694:
673:
663:
599:
544:
506:
483:
459:
413:
391:
368:
318:
302:
171:
114:
104:
82:
49:
798:
Fine by me. This page is on my watchlist, so I'll keep an eye on the discussion. Thanks.
1325:
355:
1240:
718:
532:
1067:
1027:
846:
730:
722:
359:
338:
41:
1364:
1255:
1210:
1182:
1148:
1088:
If you're good at handling disputes then your participation would be welcome.
968:
935:
883:
783:
751:
726:
690:
659:
595:
540:
455:
364:
313:
298:
167:
100:
45:
617:
637:
It's Vassyana's second comment in the thread linked above. Here's the diff:
474:
Note: the content disputes extend to some related articles. In particular,
1030:. I'm a mediator yes, but, I'm not a member of any fascinating committee.
1026:
For the record, Vassyana is the MedCab coordinator. I merely co-ordianate
1181:
So let's be clear, please. Do you accept Kim's proposal, yes, or no.
297:
The talk page has all the relevant discussions in separate sections.
44:
will take care of that), but to assist editors in content disputes.
28:
Knowledge talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-04-20 Divine Light Mission
539:. If that does not work out, your assistance will be most welcome.
981:
Did I object to Vassyana? In fact, did I not specifically say "
590:
That is incorrect, Vassyanna did not bowed out. There was only
113:
But you just said there is no evidence of tag teaming... --
1070:. I'm just an editor who is good with handling disputes.
750:
So. if that has changed, it needs to be stated clearly.
1362:
1209:
I am sure it is, just that I do not like ambiguity. :)
999:
990:
986:
982:
820:
638:
293:
Talk:Divine_Light_Mission#Pending_issues_to_be_mediated
38:
Article ownership, tag teaming, and tendentious editing
1481:
1398:
1299:
1071:
1031:
900:
866:
799:
766:
621:
553:
438:
417:
270:
248:
230:
390:
article, and that's what mediation is all about. --
341:if there are any restrictions imposed. This is for
291:A summary of what is in dispute is available here:
1254:Yes, of course. Let's archive and move forward.
745:while I don't object, I'd prefer someone else.
8:
620:where he said that? I just want to be sure.
713:Talk:Divine_Light_Mission#MedCab_assistance
537:Talk:Divine_Light_Mission#MedCab_assistance
211:
689:Do you object to Vassyana's involvement?
214:
7:
899:Alright, I'll keep an eye on this.
35:
1237:without any disrespect whatsoever
995:when you even quote me saying it
1345:Is that inclusive and neutral?
1298:Yep, already saw this. Thanks.
845:is the right man for this job.
18:Knowledge talk:Mediation Cabal
1:
1320:Here is a draft for the RSN:
656:it needs to be stated as such
505:I accept you as mediator. --
480:talk:Criticism of Prem Rawat
476:talk:Teachings of Prem Rawat
535:has offered to assist. See
352:not helpful in this context
1508:
1099:21:28, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
1083:16:54, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
1061:16:49, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
1043:16:41, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
989:?!?! Or do we count it as
977:19:41, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
962:16:18, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
944:14:53, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
929:14:51, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
912:14:48, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
892:14:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
878:12:48, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
855:12:43, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
832:10:20, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
811:09:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
792:09:33, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
778:09:28, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
760:09:25, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
699:09:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
685:08:23, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
668:09:11, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
650:06:10, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
633:05:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
604:09:06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
584:05:25, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
565:04:48, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
343:mediating content disputes
242:02:39, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
191:00:19, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
176:00:03, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
154:23:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
126:22:46, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
109:15:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
94:15:27, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
70:08:58, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
54:04:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
1493:07:58, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
1476:05:10, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
1449:09:25, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1434:05:28, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1410:05:52, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1389:04:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1373:03:12, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1356:01:52, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1311:04:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1294:04:25, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1264:14:57, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
1249:13:17, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
1219:02:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
1205:02:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
1191:21:40, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
1177:19:16, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
1157:14:19, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
1143:11:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
1120:11:46, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
1015:01:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
737:: No objections raised
518:04:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
497:04:34, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
464:04:34, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
450:04:28, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
429:04:26, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
403:04:21, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
373:03:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
330:02:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
307:02:08, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
282:14:41, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
260:01:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
1195:It's ok, Jossi. :-) --
77:definitive enough for
1231:Decline from Vassyana
1330:Divine Light Mission
388:Divine Light Mission
347:Divine Light Mission
164:Divine Light Mission
207:Archived Discussion
616:Mind getting me a
1432:
1371:
1271:
1270:
1262:
1217:
1189:
1155:
1141:
1126:
1059:
1013:
975:
960:
942:
927:
890:
790:
758:
697:
683:
666:
602:
547:
516:
462:
401:
371:
328:
305:
174:
124:
107:
92:
52:
26:(Redirected from
1499:
1491:
1429:
1426:
1408:
1367:
1338:Soul Rush (book)
1309:
1258:
1213:
1185:
1151:
1138:
1135:
1122:
1105:Mediator choices
1081:
1056:
1053:
1041:
1010:
1007:
971:
957:
954:
938:
924:
921:
910:
886:
876:
809:
786:
776:
754:
735:User:Will Beback
693:
680:
677:
662:
631:
598:
563:
543:
513:
510:
458:
448:
427:
398:
395:
367:
325:
322:
301:
280:
258:
240:
216:Extended content
212:
170:
158:I simply listed
121:
118:
103:
89:
86:
48:
31:
1507:
1506:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1463:
1424:
1334:Guru Maharaj Ji
1318:
1277:
1272:
1233:
1133:
1107:
1051:
1005:
983:I don't object"
952:
919:
741:User:Maelefique
675:
528:
508:
484:talk:Prem Rawat
393:
320:
289:
287:Dispute Details
226:
217:
209:
116:
84:
33:
32:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1505:
1503:
1462:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1413:
1412:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1343:
1342:
1326:Sophia Collier
1317:
1314:
1276:
1273:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1232:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1207:
1160:
1159:
1145:
1106:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1064:
1063:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
897:
896:
895:
894:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
837:
836:
835:
834:
814:
813:
796:
795:
794:
748:
747:
738:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
670:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
568:
567:
549:
548:
527:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
500:
499:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
378:
377:
376:
375:
288:
285:
225:
224:Mediator notes
222:
219:
218:
215:
210:
208:
205:
204:
203:
202:
201:
200:
199:
198:
197:
196:
195:
194:
193:
160:active editors
133:
132:
131:
130:
129:
128:
73:
72:
34:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1504:
1495:
1494:
1490:
1487:
1484:
1483:Steve Crossin
1478:
1477:
1474:
1471:
1468:
1460:
1450:
1447:
1444:
1441:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1431:
1428:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1411:
1407:
1404:
1401:
1400:Steve Crossin
1396:
1395:
1390:
1387:
1384:
1381:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1363:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1354:
1351:
1348:
1341:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1315:
1313:
1312:
1308:
1305:
1302:
1301:Steve Crossin
1296:
1295:
1292:
1289:
1286:
1282:
1274:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1230:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1175:
1172:
1169:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1144:
1140:
1137:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1104:
1100:
1097:
1094:
1091:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1077:
1074:
1073:Steve Crossin
1069:
1066:Nope, not on
1062:
1058:
1055:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1040:
1037:
1034:
1033:Steve Crossin
1029:
1028:a wikiproject
1016:
1012:
1009:
1001:
997:
996:
992:
988:
984:
980:
979:
978:
974:
970:
965:
964:
963:
959:
956:
947:
946:
945:
941:
937:
933:
932:
931:
930:
926:
923:
914:
913:
909:
906:
903:
902:Steve Crossin
893:
889:
885:
881:
880:
879:
875:
872:
869:
868:Steve Crossin
864:
863:
856:
852:
848:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
833:
830:
827:
824:
821:
818:
817:
816:
815:
812:
808:
805:
802:
801:Steve Crossin
797:
793:
789:
785:
781:
780:
779:
775:
772:
769:
768:Steve Crossin
764:
763:
762:
761:
757:
753:
746:
742:
739:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
719:User:Jayen466
717:
716:
715:
714:
700:
696:
692:
688:
687:
686:
682:
679:
671:
669:
665:
661:
657:
653:
652:
651:
648:
645:
642:
639:
636:
635:
634:
630:
627:
624:
623:Steve Crossin
619:
615:
614:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
582:
579:
576:
572:
571:
570:
569:
566:
562:
559:
556:
555:Steve Crossin
551:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
533:User:Vassyana
530:
529:
525:
519:
515:
512:
504:
503:
502:
501:
498:
495:
492:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
472:
465:
461:
457:
453:
452:
451:
447:
444:
441:
440:Steve Crossin
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
426:
423:
420:
419:Steve Crossin
415:
404:
400:
397:
389:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
374:
370:
366:
361:
357:
353:
348:
344:
340:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
327:
324:
315:
309:
308:
304:
300:
295:
294:
286:
284:
283:
279:
276:
273:
272:Steve Crossin
267:
262:
261:
257:
254:
251:
250:Steve Crossin
244:
243:
239:
236:
233:
232:Steve Crossin
223:
221:
220:
213:
206:
192:
189:
186:
183:
179:
178:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
156:
155:
152:
149:
146:
141:
140:
139:
138:
137:
136:
135:
134:
127:
123:
120:
112:
111:
110:
106:
102:
97:
96:
95:
91:
88:
80:
75:
74:
71:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
56:
55:
51:
47:
43:
39:
29:
23:
19:
1479:
1464:
1344:
1324:
1319:
1316:RSN: Collier
1297:
1278:
1236:
1234:
1123:
1108:
1065:
1025:
994:
993:
915:
898:
749:
744:
731:User:Momento
723:User:Rumiton
710:
655:
591:
411:
351:
350:evidence is
342:
310:
296:
290:
265:
263:
245:
227:
159:
78:
37:
36:
1470:Will Beback
1443:Will Beback
1383:Will Beback
1350:Will Beback
1328:joined the
1288:Will Beback
1197:Kim Bruning
1171:Will Beback
1112:Kim Bruning
1093:Will Beback
991:three times
826:Will Beback
644:Will Beback
578:Will Beback
491:Will Beback
185:Will Beback
148:Will Beback
64:Will Beback
1000:four times
727:User:Jossi
531:Note that
526:Discussion
314:Prem Rawat
1365:≈ jossi ≈
1332:(DLM) of
1256:≈ jossi ≈
1211:≈ jossi ≈
1183:≈ jossi ≈
1149:≈ jossi ≈
969:≈ jossi ≈
936:≈ jossi ≈
884:≈ jossi ≈
784:≈ jossi ≈
752:≈ jossi ≈
691:≈ jossi ≈
660:≈ jossi ≈
596:≈ jossi ≈
541:≈ jossi ≈
456:≈ jossi ≈
365:≈ jossi ≈
299:≈ jossi ≈
168:≈ jossi ≈
101:≈ jossi ≈
46:≈ jossi ≈
1489:(review)
1406:(review)
1307:(review)
1241:Vassyana
1079:(review)
1039:(review)
908:(review)
874:(review)
807:(review)
774:(review)
743:stated:
629:(review)
561:(review)
446:(review)
425:(review)
414:civility
278:(review)
256:(review)
238:(review)
20: |
998:?!! Or
847:Rumiton
356:WP:AN/I
1486:(talk)
1461:Status
1438:Done.
1403:(talk)
1369:(talk)
1304:(talk)
1260:(talk)
1215:(talk)
1187:(talk)
1153:(talk)
1076:(talk)
1068:MedCom
1036:(talk)
973:(talk)
940:(talk)
905:(talk)
888:(talk)
871:(talk)
804:(talk)
788:(talk)
771:(talk)
756:(talk)
711:From:
695:(talk)
664:(talk)
626:(talk)
600:(talk)
558:(talk)
545:(talk)
482:, and
460:(talk)
443:(talk)
422:(talk)
369:(talk)
303:(talk)
275:(talk)
266:before
253:(talk)
235:(talk)
172:(talk)
105:(talk)
50:(talk)
1427:fique
1279:FYI:
1275:WP:AE
1147:Aye!
1136:fique
1054:fique
1008:fique
987:Twice
955:fique
922:fique
678:fique
511:fique
396:fique
360:WP:AE
339:WP:AE
323:fique
119:fique
87:fique
42:WP:AE
22:Cases
16:<
1467:·:·
1440:·:·
1423:Mael
1380:·:·
1347:·:·
1285:·:·
1245:talk
1201:talk
1168:·:·
1132:Mael
1116:talk
1090:·:·
1050:Mael
1004:Mael
951:Mael
918:Mael
851:talk
823:·:·
674:Mael
641:·:·
618:diff
575:·:·
507:Mael
488:·:·
392:Mael
319:Mael
182:·:·
145:·:·
115:Mael
83:Mael
61:·:·
1473:·:·
1446:·:·
1386:·:·
1353:·:·
1291:·:·
1174:·:·
1096:·:·
985:?!
829:·:·
647:·:·
592:one
581:·:·
494:·:·
358:or
188:·:·
162:of
151:·:·
79:you
67:·:·
1283:.
1247:)
1203:)
1118:)
853:)
733:,
729:,
725:,
721:,
478:,
1425:e
1243:(
1199:(
1134:e
1114:(
1052:e
1006:e
953:e
920:e
849:(
676:e
509:e
394:e
321:e
117:e
85:e
30:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.