128:
187:
159:
251:
173:
704:
779:
in India. Considering the issue in this regard, when i used to remove timings or list of train services on station pages, certain editors do the challenge the edit as wrongful attempt. But apart from the rule some editors understand even logically to remove such information but some despite repeated
646:
It may be considered that if enough attributable information exists about a station or railway line to write a full and comprehensive article about it, it may make sense for the subject to have its own article. If some source material is available, but is insufficient for a comprehensive article, it
322:
sufficient? Adding subject-specific guidelines tends to create drama that outweighs the benefits - especially if the subject-specific notability threshold is set lower, because it encourages rote creation of really low-quality pages. (They may well get a neat structure of templates and categories
431:"Notability" decides whether we can have a separate article on something. The threshold for mentioning it in a different article (ie. mentioning demand for new trains in an article about the town) is a bit lower, and it's not exactly a notability problem. I think the best approach is to ask for
655:
Consensus on
Knowledge is that if enough attributable information is available about a station to verify that it exists, it generally is appropriate for the subject to have its own article. For proposed or planned stations, historic railways stations that only existed briefly, or stations on
641:
that despite GNG, that "the only time verifiably real rail transport stations end as anything other than "keep" is when articles about a group of stations are merged and redirected to an article about the line or system they're on. For heavy rail stations on a main system (i.e. not a heritage
897:
above. It was changed in 2016 after there was no response on this talk page. It remains to this day the last edit on the page. This is clearly not a very well watched page. It is frequently claimed at AFD that there is consensus that existence of a railway station is enough to justify a
407:
the most, since almost every city/town has its own demand of introduction of new trains/buses or construction of new lines, these are either speculative and unconfirmed. Those demands may or may not happen or even keep lingering for a indefinite period of time. Hence a concrete
545:
As like for railway stations in UK and Poland, is there any naming convention exist for railway stations in India? One common guideline followed was "XXXXX railway station", i.e., Name of the railway station suffixed by "railway station" in lower caps. What about
749:
Distinguish between stating, for example, that a station is served by a certain number of trains per hour, and specifying the times of those trains. The former is information about the significance of the station; the latter is timetable information.
647:
is better to mention the subject under the article for its parent locality or parent company. If no source material, or only directory-type information (location, function, name, address) can be provided, the subject may not merit mention at all.
611:. I should have given a link, instead of posting at multiple places. I'd avoid posting in multiple places in future. Actually i did so to draw more editors to discuss the issue. Anyway we can discuss and come to consensus in one place. --
566:
difference of opinion erupts between article creators of primary/major contributor of the article, as there exist no specific guideline(s) on relevant project page. How should they be named? If any guideline framed it'll helpful.
39:
780:
explanations that, if they reinstate such things will lead to other registered or unregistered (IP) user to add more on that. For which, editors cite that mentioning number of trains is not at all an issue per
98:
859:
It may be considered that if enough attributable information is available about a station on a main system to verify that it exists, it generally is appropriate for the subject to have its own article.
551:
638:
264:
1013:
231:
676:
lines, if insufficient source material is available for a comprehensive article, it is better to mention the station in an article about the line or system that the station is on.
784:
and continue to add such things despite requests and suggestions by giving it high priority than adding other key info of the station. The incidence of such issue is more in
338:
24:
944:
Hi all. It may have not been observed here, however an RFC on this essay was recently closed by myself. The discussion, and outcome of that discussion can be found at
776:
642:
railway) the latter almost always happens only if the stations are simply proposed/planned, or existed only briefly many years ago." Therefore, should we replace:
312:
772:
562:
of such pages. Articles on junction stations in India either has "XXXXX railway station" or "XXXXX Junction railway station"? In such cases, while editing or
583:
453:
But if the issue features in a town or city related article with resources it may not be a problem, what if its presence in station articles? It seems like
1023:
332:
74:
838:
are two irrelevant bits. Just because they are available doesn't mean that they should be included. I suggest that guidance be added to the essay.
303:? Someone is arguing that a train up for AfD right now should be kept, even though its sources are two self-published websites and one timetable.
241:
461:
194:
80:
984:
341:"is not intended to be used as minimum requirements" then why do we have this page at all? The GNG already sets a baseline for notability.
1018:
486:
has a much larger audience, and is probably a better venue for the topic as well. Such threads have been raised there in the past. --
808:
203:
830:
National railway station databases often include information that is not of interest or useful to a WP reader. I suggest that
763:
pages rather than it allows number of train serving the station. As far as the Indian scenario is considered, the network of
20:
788:
pages as it handles more trains. Hence an appropriate changes shall be made effectively at earliest in the best interest. --
752:
172:
69:
745:
355:
Quite apart from the GNG problem, this essay really ought to be brought in line with the results of the RfC a while ago.
164:
139:
996:
978:
961:
931:
913:
880:
847:
820:
797:
726:
695:
620:
602:
576:
528:
498:
473:
444:
425:
364:
350:
60:
93:
945:
899:
207:
107:
955:
404:
308:
111:
973:
967:
I've updated one sentence (actually reverted to a previous version) to make it more in line with the close.
908:
288:
260:
737:
388:
296:
387:, i was removing some contents like "Demand for new trains, Extension of trains, etc.," on the basis of
145:
925:
874:
950:
793:
616:
598:
572:
524:
516:
494:
483:
469:
440:
421:
360:
346:
328:
50:
968:
903:
555:
392:
304:
292:
112:
65:
992:
454:
412:
can be made on adding/removal of such informations in future, else such actions may result in
396:
46:
987:
is a direct link to that interesting archived RfC about the notability of train stations. --
584:
Knowledge talk:Naming conventions (stations)#Naming convention for railway stations in India
843:
816:
785:
716:
685:
673:
547:
199:
109:
920:
888:
869:
768:
764:
760:
608:
587:
482:(an admin can see just how few there are) so you won't get many participants. A page like
202:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
789:
612:
591:
568:
563:
520:
487:
465:
436:
417:
400:
356:
342:
324:
1007:
864:
781:
657:
634:
409:
319:
988:
863:
Why is it read as: a station is always notable? De normal appropriate rule here is
669:
432:
413:
300:
839:
812:
712:
681:
661:
250:
186:
158:
399:. These kind of information is present in quite a lot of articles related to
559:
759:
which by far assumably discourages the use of timings of train services in
946:
Wikipedia_talk:Notability#Request_for_comment_on_train_station_notability
900:
Knowledge talk:Notability#Request for comment on train station notability
769:
it was forced to change its numbering system from 4-digits to 5-digits
558:
and ended without a clear consensus, which resulted in existence of
902:
to establish whether or not there actually is such a consensus.
665:
198:, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of
742:
121:
113:
15:
809:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Trains#RfC_India_railway_stations
249:
733:
List of trains with/without timings in Indian station pages
479:
384:
380:
637:
for stations. However, it was made pretty clear to me
339:Knowledge:Notability (Railway lines and stations)
775:which is quite voluminous. Also there are about
826:Available information is not useful information
541:Naming convention for railway stations in India
711:, since it appears there are no objections. --
1014:Low-impact WikiProject Knowledge essays pages
287:Can we get a guideline added on trains? Like
8:
633:Currently, this essay basically says to use
323:&c but they're bereft of sourced prose)
267:on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.
898:standalone page. I have opened an RFC at
153:
138:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
590:, please can we discuss in one place? --
478:This page doesn't have many watchers -
155:
25:Notability (Railway lines and stations)
7:
803:Discussion of India railway stations
127:
125:
857:The section about Stations states:
375:Adding about new unannounced trains
144:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1024:WikiProject Knowledge essays pages
222:WikiProject Knowledge essays pages
206:. For a listing of essays see the
14:
867:, not a self-invented something.
773:runs about 10000+ trains everyday
192:This page is within the scope of
807:There is discussion going on at
702:
460:But i have raised another issue
185:
171:
157:
126:
40:Click here to start a new topic.
379:With reference to the edits at
836:elevation above mean sea level
696:16:38, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
550:in India? Earlier there was a
1:
894:
385:Aruppukkottai railway station
37:Put new text under old text.
918:Thanks, I will take a look.
881:18:07, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
848:14:54, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
821:13:23, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
727:15:39, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
529:19:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
499:15:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
474:06:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
445:04:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
426:03:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
365:20:43, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
236:This page has been rated as
216:Knowledge:WikiProject Essays
195:WikiProject Knowledge essays
979:12:01, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
962:04:23, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
832:distance to nearest airport
798:22:53, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
582:You already posted this at
381:Thoothukudi railway station
219:Template:WikiProject Essays
45:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1040:
313:16:23, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
1019:NA-Class Knowledge essays
997:20:21, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
811:, which may return here.
257:
235:
180:
152:
75:Be welcoming to newcomers
940:RFC result on this essay
932:23:21, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
914:19:05, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
621:20:50, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
603:20:20, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
577:20:00, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
337:Speaking of which... If
351:23:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
333:23:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
289:Flying Scotsman (train)
777:7000+ railway stations
678:
649:
480:there are less than 30
297:Speed Merchant (train)
261:automatically assessed
254:
242:project's impact scale
70:avoid personal attacks
653:
644:
607:Mea culpa. Just read
403:articles particulary
259:The above rating was
253:
552:similar issue raised
767:is very vast that
556:India notice board
401:transport of India
293:Royal Scot (train)
255:
140:content assessment
81:dispute resolution
42:
757:
756:
548:junction stations
280:
279:
276:
275:
272:
271:
268:
120:
119:
61:Assume good faith
38:
1031:
983:For convenience
960:
958:
953:
930:
923:
892:
879:
872:
786:junction station
743:
723:
710:
706:
705:
692:
674:heritage railway
594:
490:
433:reliable sources
258:
224:
223:
220:
217:
214:
200:Knowledge essays
189:
182:
181:
176:
175:
174:
169:
161:
154:
131:
130:
129:
122:
114:
16:
1039:
1038:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1004:
1003:
956:
951:
949:
942:
921:
919:
886:
870:
868:
855:
828:
805:
765:Indian railways
761:railway station
738:WP:NOTTIMETABLE
735:
717:
703:
701:
686:
631:
592:
543:
488:
405:Indian Railways
389:WP:NOTTIMETABLE
377:
285:
221:
218:
215:
212:
211:
208:essay directory
170:
167:
116:
115:
110:
87:
86:
56:
12:
11:
5:
1037:
1035:
1027:
1026:
1021:
1016:
1006:
1005:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
941:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
854:
851:
827:
824:
804:
801:
755:
754:
751:
747:
734:
731:
730:
729:
720:
689:
630:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
542:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
458:
448:
447:
376:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
284:
281:
278:
277:
274:
273:
270:
269:
256:
246:
245:
234:
228:
227:
225:
190:
178:
177:
162:
150:
149:
143:
132:
118:
117:
108:
106:
105:
102:
101:
89:
88:
85:
84:
77:
72:
63:
57:
55:
54:
43:
34:
33:
30:
29:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1036:
1025:
1022:
1020:
1017:
1015:
1012:
1011:
1009:
998:
994:
990:
986:
982:
981:
980:
977:
976:
972:
971:
966:
965:
964:
963:
959:
954:
947:
939:
933:
929:
928:
924:
917:
916:
915:
912:
911:
907:
906:
901:
896:
890:
885:
884:
883:
882:
878:
877:
873:
866:
861:
860:
852:
850:
849:
845:
841:
837:
833:
825:
823:
822:
818:
814:
810:
802:
800:
799:
795:
791:
787:
783:
778:
774:
770:
766:
762:
748:
744:
741:
740:states that
739:
732:
728:
724:
722:
714:
709:
700:
699:
698:
697:
693:
691:
683:
677:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
652:
648:
643:
640:
636:
628:
622:
618:
614:
610:
606:
605:
604:
600:
596:
589:
585:
581:
580:
579:
578:
574:
570:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
540:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
500:
496:
492:
485:
481:
477:
476:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
456:
452:
451:
450:
449:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
429:
428:
427:
423:
419:
416:in future. --
415:
411:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
374:
366:
362:
358:
354:
353:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
335:
334:
330:
326:
321:
317:
316:
315:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
282:
266:
262:
252:
248:
247:
243:
239:
233:
230:
229:
226:
209:
205:
201:
197:
196:
191:
188:
184:
183:
179:
166:
163:
160:
156:
151:
147:
141:
137:
133:
124:
123:
104:
103:
100:
97:
95:
91:
90:
82:
78:
76:
73:
71:
67:
64:
62:
59:
58:
52:
48:
47:Learn to edit
44:
41:
36:
35:
32:
31:
26:
22:
18:
17:
974:
969:
943:
926:
909:
904:
875:
862:
858:
856:
835:
831:
829:
806:
758:
736:
718:
707:
687:
679:
670:people mover
654:
650:
645:
632:
544:
515:Been raised
414:edit warring
378:
305:I'm Tony Ahn
286:
237:
193:
146:WikiProjects
136:project page
135:
92:
19:This is the
393:WP:NOTGUIDE
301:Fleche d'Or
1008:Categories
948:. Cheers,
922:The Banner
889:The Banner
871:The Banner
662:light rail
397:WP:CRYSTAL
318:Isn't the
238:Low-impact
204:discussion
168:Low‑impact
895:#Stations
560:ambiguity
437:bobrayner
357:bobrayner
343:bobrayner
325:bobrayner
83:if needed
66:Be polite
21:talk page
970:Spinning
905:Spinning
853:Stations
629:Stations
609:WP:MULTI
588:WP:MULTI
410:decision
94:Archives
51:get help
989:Lockley
957:Crossin
519:too. --
484:WT:RAIL
455:crystal
240:on the
952:Steven
865:WP:GNG
840:Rhadow
813:Rhadow
782:WP:NTT
771:as it
713:Ahecht
682:Ahecht
651:with:
635:WP:GNG
595:rose64
586:; per
564:moving
491:rose64
283:Trains
263:using
213:Essays
165:Essays
142:scale.
975:Spark
910:Spark
794:ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ
672:, or
658:metro
617:ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ
573:ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ
525:ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ
517:there
470:ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ
462:there
422:ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ
299:, or
295:, or
291:, or
134:This
79:Seek
27:page.
993:talk
985:here
927:talk
893:See
876:talk
844:talk
834:and
817:talk
790:βα£α
721:PAGE
719:TALK
708:Done
690:PAGE
688:TALK
680:? --
666:tram
639:here
613:βα£α
599:talk
569:βα£α
521:βα£α
495:talk
466:βα£α
464:. --
441:talk
418:βα£α
395:and
383:and
361:talk
347:talk
329:talk
309:talk
265:data
68:and
593:Red
554:at
489:Red
320:GNG
232:Low
1010::
995:)
846:)
819:)
796:)
753:”
746:“
725:)
694:)
668:,
664:,
660:,
619:)
601:)
575:)
567:--
527:)
497:)
472:)
443:)
435:.
424:)
391:,
363:)
349:)
331:)
311:)
49:;
991:(
891::
887:@
842:(
815:(
792:(
715:(
684:(
615:(
597:(
571:(
523:(
493:(
468:(
457:.
439:(
420:(
359:(
345:(
327:(
307:(
244:.
210:.
148::
99:1
96::
53:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
