533:
respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator, clerk, or functionary, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.
915:
differ from his own, and his reaction to this case (making a case statement implying that once they review the whole evidence ArbCom will find no wrongdoing and refusing to further engage or show any self-reflection on his previous actions) shows how futile this entire process is. I don't see this case ending with a desysop, because I don't think that would be warranted or justified. But anything less will just be dismissed as a meaningless sanction brought on by people holding grudges.
199:
39:
919:
personal attack, is something that I roll my eyes at but doesn't affect me in any other way. It would just be nice for administrators to take constructive criticism seriously. I certainly try to when it is directed toward me. But I have no answers for how to make it a more widespread practice. The battleground mentality is very deeply entrenched. --
959:
737:
DGG, are you planning to recuse? Your name is mentioned as an active arb but I note that you had not commented any uptill now. As a long-term colloborator with K, I don't think that you are suff. unbiased. There are other much more credible off-wiki stuff, but I think this issue can be amicably dealt
918:
This also isn't something that particularly concerns me. I've received far more direct threats and insults from other people here, not even including death threats by email from various banned users. Kudpung vaguely threatening to oppose my confirmation, or calling legitimate and founded criticism a
914:
I've been thinking for a couple of days now on what evidence I want to submit, and I don't think I'll submit any. The case is relatively clear; what's less clear is what this case will do to resolve any trends of negative behaviour. The main issue is how
Kudpung reacts to criticism or opinions that
857:
If (as a purely hypothetical example) I thought he was being railroaded and therefore wanted to help him keep admin regardless of anything else, I would have recused, because I would have been able to make a much stronger argument about that while recused , than anything I would have been able to
532:
Arbitration case pages exist to assist the
Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to
654:
I simply do not accept the case for anonymous case naming based on the notion of "anchoring". To me, a simple fellow living in the real world, we need to be honest enough to call a spade a spade. A case is usually about a person's behavior and we do not need to hide that.
579:, administrator conduct cases are conventionally named after the administrator in question. In the past 2 years we have had 7, all named in this fashion. If we want to change this convention we would have to have a conversation at a slightly broader venue. –
712:
If the case name isn't changed I predict it'll end with some kind of sanction for
Kudpung. Granted that might happen anyway even if the case name is changed, but if it isn't, I think the chances of sanctions are well above 50%.
115:
110:
420:
605:
457:
289:
52:
104:
93:
222:
451:
99:
88:
415:
447:
243:
235:
1014:
We are almost finished drafting the proposed decision for this case and expect to post it for discussion and voting in the next couple of days. Apologies for the delay. –
698:
I'm not opinionated on the matter of anchoring. I only enabled a way to refer to cases by a sequence number (currently supported back to 2015), for anyone who wants to.
601:
389:
670:
627:
409:
254:
232:
77:
66:
442:
380:
299:
227:
59:
861:
But in this situation, even though I know it would not affect me, to avoid any appearance of doubt , I have notified the committee that I am recusing.
385:
25:
395:
375:
258:
400:
313:
294:
516:
434:
325:
358:
669:
In addition, if the case were to be renamed, surely RHaworth would deserve the same courtesy? The case that concerns him was recently opened at
284:
213:
21:
350:
190:
823:
789:
749:
336:
279:
271:
321:
219:
331:
249:
17:
813:
779:
739:
509:
370:
474:
986:
943:
1025:
990:
976:
947:
928:
889:
872:
850:
825:
807:
791:
773:
751:
722:
707:
691:
677:
664:
649:
595:
571:
554:
209:
660:
502:
858:
do as one among 11 judges on the committee, where I have to act judiciously rather than as an advocate.
938:
I have sent an email to ArbCom, but not received a response. Can someone confirm the email address? -
884:
845:
143:
541:
Among the possible names for the case, "Kudpung" has to be one of the worse ones, since it leads to
982:
939:
924:
132:
714:
683:
576:
560:
546:
699:
656:
641:
168:
1020:
718:
687:
550:
157:
703:
645:
635:
612:
476:
1005:
971:
878:
839:
590:
179:
138:
479:
920:
674:
127:
868:
803:
771:
569:
163:
1015:
1009:
152:
478:
198:
835:
966:
580:
174:
542:
796:
I have not yet decided, and I hope it will not be necessary to decide. .
863:
831:
798:
766:
760:
564:
51:
To request an amendment or clarification of an arbitration decision, see
46:
This case is now closed and pages relating to it may no longer be watched
53:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and
Amendment
480:
33:
830:
I want to echo Winged Blades of Godric here. Your talk page
965:. Possibly the email has not been processed yet. Regards
836:
routine editor, administrator or arbitrator interactions
626:. Anyone should feel free to refer to this case as case
490:
405:
363:
239:
65:
To request the assistance of an arbitration clerk, see
563:, I have passed your feedback on to the mailing list.
58:
To report a violation of an arbitration decision, see
838:that ARBPOL speaks of. Would you please recuse? --
671:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/RHaworth
67:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks
60:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
510:
8:
618:template to support an alias in the form of
517:
503:
186:
640:syntax to get a link to the case page).
189:
738:with w/o going into all those areas.
7:
290:Clarification and Amendment requests
953:The email address for this case is
537:Is it too late to rename the case?
32:
957:
197:
37:
18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Arbitration
757:Since no ping was sent above,
606:last discussion on case naming
1:
1026:14:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
991:13:53, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
977:10:34, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
948:08:59, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
934:ArbCom private communication
929:17:20, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
890:18:49, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
873:18:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
851:16:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
826:05:42, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
808:05:29, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
792:05:15, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
774:05:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
752:05:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
723:00:06, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
708:21:30, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
692:00:06, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
678:14:24, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
665:13:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
650:05:49, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
596:04:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
572:04:03, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
555:04:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
421:Conflict of interest reports
250:Search archived proceedings
191:Knowledge (XXG) Arbitration
1041:
295:Arbitrator motion requests
958:
530:Behaviour on this page:
491:Track related changes
351:Arbitration Committee
602:previously discussed
300:Enforcement requests
228:Guide to arbitration
149:Drafting arbitrators
322:Contentious topics
220:Arbitration policy
1024:
999:Proposed decision
877:Thank you, DGG --
527:
526:
494:
462:
332:General sanctions
280:All open requests
210:About arbitration
183:
172:
161:
147:
136:
119:
111:Proposed decision
108:
97:
86:
75:
74:
1032:
1018:
1013:
974:
969:
964:
962:
961:
960:
887:
881:
848:
842:
837:
834:goes beyond the
821:
816:
787:
782:
769:
764:
747:
742:
682:It should, yes.
639:
617:
611:
608:, I updated the
604:, following the
593:
588:
567:
519:
512:
505:
493:
488:
481:
460:
416:Clerk procedures
408:
366:
337:Editor sanctions
314:Active sanctions
272:Open proceedings
242:
201:
187:
177:
166:
155:
141:
130:
113:
102:
91:
80:
41:
40:
34:
1040:
1039:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1003:
1001:
972:
967:
956:
954:
936:
912:
885:
879:
846:
840:
817:
814:
783:
780:
767:
758:
743:
740:
735:
733:Recusal Request
633:
615:
609:
591:
581:
565:
539:
523:
489:
483:
482:
477:
467:
466:
465:
454:
437:
427:
426:
425:
412:
404:
392:
367:
362:
353:
343:
342:
341:
316:
306:
305:
304:
274:
264:
261:
246:
238:
216:
185:
48:
38:
30:
29:
28:
12:
11:
5:
1038:
1036:
1000:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
983:Chris.sherlock
940:Chris.sherlock
935:
932:
911:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
859:
734:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
710:
696:
695:
694:
598:
574:
538:
535:
525:
524:
522:
521:
514:
507:
499:
496:
495:
485:
484:
475:
473:
472:
469:
468:
464:
463:
455:
450:
445:
439:
438:
433:
432:
429:
428:
424:
423:
418:
413:
403:
398:
393:
388:
383:
378:
373:
368:
361:
355:
354:
349:
348:
345:
344:
340:
339:
334:
329:
318:
317:
312:
311:
308:
307:
303:
302:
297:
292:
287:
282:
276:
275:
270:
269:
266:
265:
263:
262:
257:
252:
247:
237:
230:
225:
217:
212:
206:
203:
202:
194:
193:
78:Main case page
76:
73:
72:
71:
70:
63:
56:
44:
42:
31:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1037:
1028:
1027:
1022:
1017:
1011:
1007:
998:
992:
988:
984:
980:
979:
978:
975:
970:
963:wikimedia.org
952:
951:
950:
949:
945:
941:
933:
931:
930:
926:
922:
916:
910:Some thoughts
909:
891:
888:
882:
876:
875:
874:
870:
866:
865:
860:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
849:
843:
833:
829:
828:
827:
824:
822:
820:
811:
810:
809:
805:
801:
800:
795:
794:
793:
790:
788:
786:
777:
776:
775:
772:
770:
762:
756:
755:
754:
753:
750:
748:
746:
732:
724:
720:
716:
711:
709:
705:
701:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:
680:
679:
676:
672:
668:
667:
666:
662:
658:
657:Leaky caldron
653:
652:
651:
647:
643:
637:
631:
630:
625:
621:
614:
607:
603:
599:
597:
594:
589:
587:
586:
578:
575:
573:
570:
568:
562:
559:
558:
557:
556:
552:
548:
544:
536:
534:
531:
520:
515:
513:
508:
506:
501:
500:
498:
497:
492:
487:
486:
471:
470:
459:
456:
453:
449:
446:
444:
441:
440:
436:
431:
430:
422:
419:
417:
414:
411:
407:
402:
399:
397:
394:
391:
387:
384:
382:
379:
377:
374:
372:
369:
365:
360:
357:
356:
352:
347:
346:
338:
335:
333:
330:
327:
323:
320:
319:
315:
310:
309:
301:
298:
296:
293:
291:
288:
286:
285:Case requests
283:
281:
278:
277:
273:
268:
267:
260:
256:
253:
251:
248:
245:
241:
236:
234:
231:
229:
226:
224:
221:
218:
215:
211:
208:
207:
205:
204:
200:
196:
195:
192:
188:
184:
181:
176:
170:
165:
159:
154:
150:
145:
140:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
112:
106:
101:
95:
90:
84:
79:
68:
64:
61:
57:
54:
50:
49:
47:
43:
36:
35:
27:
23:
19:
1002:
937:
917:
913:
862:
818:
797:
784:
744:
736:
628:
623:
619:
584:
582:
540:
529:
528:
148:
123:
122:
120:
82:
45:
955:arbcom-en-b
632:(using the
255:Ban appeals
233:Noticeboard
124:Case clerks
1006:Guerillero
981:Thanks! -
886:Parlez Moi
880:Guerillero
847:Parlez Moi
841:Guerillero
461:(pre-2016)
448:Statistics
381:Procedures
139:Miniapolis
921:Ajraddatz
675:FlyingAce
638:|2020-1}}
543:anchoring
386:Elections
128:CodeLyoko
778:Thanks!
164:Casliber
100:Workshop
89:Evidence
24: |
22:Requests
20: |
1010:Kudpung
715:Banedon
684:Banedon
636:ArbCase
613:ArbCase
577:Banedon
561:Banedon
547:Banedon
458:Reports
396:History
376:Members
371:Contact
359:Discuss
223:(CU/OS)
153:Joe Roe
812:Wot?!
700:isaacl
642:isaacl
629:2020-1
624:number
401:Clerks
259:Report
173:&
162:&
137:&
869:talk
804:talk
673:... –
600:As I
435:Audit
175:SoWhy
16:<
1021:talk
1008:and
987:talk
944:talk
925:talk
719:talk
704:talk
688:talk
661:talk
646:talk
620:year
583:brad
551:talk
452:Talk
443:Talk
410:Talk
390:Talk
244:Talk
214:Talk
180:Talk
169:Talk
158:Talk
144:Talk
133:Talk
116:Talk
105:Talk
94:Talk
83:Talk
26:Case
1016:Joe
973:Why
864:DGG
832:DGG
819:WBG
799:DGG
785:WBG
768:SQL
761:DGG
745:WBG
566:SQL
326:Log
989:)
968:So
946:)
927:)
883:|
871:)
844:|
806:)
765:.
721:)
706:)
690:)
663:)
648:)
634:{{
616:}}
610:{{
592:🍁
553:)
545:.
151::
126::
109:—
98:—
87:—
1023:)
1019:(
1012::
1004:@
985:(
942:(
923:(
867:(
815:∯
802:(
781:∯
763::
759:@
741:∯
717:(
702:(
686:(
659:(
644:(
622:-
585:v
549:(
518:e
511:t
504:v
406:+
364:+
328:)
324:(
240:+
182:)
178:(
171:)
167:(
160:)
156:(
146:)
142:(
135:)
131:(
118:)
114:(
107:)
103:(
96:)
92:(
85:)
81:(
69:.
62:.
55:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
