Knowledge (XXG)

talk:List of policies and guidelines - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

186:, so after making amends and awaiting whatever punishment I deserve, I wish to ask a very important question: Should there be clearer guidelines about Template deletion for editors to rely upon? I know we got guidelines detailing the options for deletion for articles, but I wonder whether templates should have clearer guidelines, especially about nominating a template that already came out of a template deletion discussion with either "no consensus" or "keep". Like, should editors be advised not to nominate them again if they recently had been already. If I had found clearer guidelines, I think I would have saved a serious amount of headache for myself and others. 91: 64: 32: 206:
opinion I went to a different page to make an edit, again similar to other pages and the user stalked me there through my contributions to revert any edits I make. That’s very creepy and abusive behavior to do to anyone and should not be allowed to be done as that can make people feel uncomfortable as it has me and that needs to be respected.
205:
Knowledge (XXG) editors shouldn’t be allowed to abuse the section that shows contributions to stalk an ip address or other users who edit on Knowledge (XXG). I had made an edit similar to other Knowledge (XXG) pages and because another user decided they didn’t like my edit based on their personal
162:
The header writes: "Changing this page does not change policy." So the possibility exists, the text on this page does not reflect the right policies. Edit request is, to link to a source where users can find the official text of the policies that do have official status. So users can go sure what
164: 207: 112: 107: 46: 168: 233:
for an outline of how this works. Posting messages on a user's talk page accusing that person of "biased editing", "harassing" and "stalking" may, however, be seen as
211: 42: 38: 41:
on Knowledge (XXG). Policies have wide acceptance among editors and are considered a standard for all users to follow. Please review
225:, it's legitimate editing. You are entitled to disagree with your edit being reverted, and you should discuss this rationally on the 70: 145: 124: 50: 246: 222: 215: 195: 172: 128: 17: 226: 130: 237:, so you might want to tread more lightly here if you want to make any progress. Best of luck. 183: 191: 126: 90: 230: 242: 234: 158:"Changing this page does not change policy." Where are official policies published? 63: 187: 163:
rules they have to follow, to be in line with the Terms of Use. Thanks! WillTim
238: 182:
I recently did myself no favors acting in a manner that some could call
45:
before making any substantive change to this page. Always remember to
31: 37:
The project page associated with this talk page is an official
131: 84: 58: 26: 75: 201:Stalking - There Needs to Be a Policy Against This 229:and hopefully work out a solution. Please see 73:discussions and keep related topics together, 139:This page has archives. Sections older than 8: 165:2001:16B8:8C13:FF01:196F:BE90:43F6:9FEA 208:2601:806:8300:D0D0:A197:355A:8C2A:6569 76:Knowledge (XXG) talk:List of policies 18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:List of policies 7: 221:Reverting problematic edits is not 178:TfDs - Guideline when it is closed 25: 143:may be automatically archived by 89: 62: 30: 227:Downton Abbey article talk page 43:policy editing recommendations 1: 173:16:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC) 247:18:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC) 216:14:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC) 263: 196:15:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC) 146:Lowercase sigmabot III 47:keep cool when editing 153: 152: 118: 117: 83: 82: 57: 56: 16:(Redirected from 254: 235:personal attacks 148: 132: 104: 103: 93: 85: 78: 66: 59: 34: 27: 21: 262: 261: 257: 256: 255: 253: 252: 251: 203: 180: 160: 144: 133: 127: 98: 79:redirects here. 74: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 260: 258: 250: 249: 202: 199: 179: 176: 159: 156: 151: 150: 138: 135: 134: 129: 125: 123: 120: 119: 116: 115: 110: 100: 99: 94: 88: 81: 80: 67: 55: 54: 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 259: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 228: 224: 220: 219: 218: 217: 213: 209: 200: 198: 197: 193: 189: 185: 177: 175: 174: 170: 166: 157: 155: 147: 142: 137: 136: 122: 121: 114: 111: 109: 106: 105: 102: 101: 97: 92: 87: 86: 77: 72: 68: 65: 61: 60: 52: 48: 44: 40: 36: 33: 29: 28: 19: 204: 181: 161: 154: 140: 95: 51:don't panic 223:harassment 71:centralise 113:Archive 2 108:Archive 1 96:Archives 69:To help 184:WP:IDHT 141:90 days 231:WP:BRD 188:GUtt01 49:, and 39:policy 239:Cnbrb 243:talk 212:talk 192:talk 169:talk 245:) 214:) 194:) 171:) 241:( 210:( 190:( 167:( 149:. 53:. 20:)

Index

Knowledge (XXG) talk:List of policies

policy
policy editing recommendations
keep cool when editing
don't panic

centralise
Knowledge (XXG) talk:List of policies

Archive 1
Archive 2
Lowercase sigmabot III
2001:16B8:8C13:FF01:196F:BE90:43F6:9FEA
talk
16:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
WP:IDHT
GUtt01
talk
15:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
2601:806:8300:D0D0:A197:355A:8C2A:6569
talk
14:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
harassment
Downton Abbey article talk page
WP:BRD
personal attacks
Cnbrb
talk
18:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑