3951:
2307:, anything that reduces the "catch-all" status of G6 is a win. Yes, technically we could have literally nothing but G6 as criterion, and argue that all other criteria count as "uncontroversial maintenance", but having precise criteria allows for more specificity, and spells out what kind of stuff is already known to be uncontroversial deletions. This is a very good example of a criterion that is both uncontroversial (these categories are never going to be populated again) and precise enough to be formulated as a criterion of its own.
3679:: Grouping this into F2 is more appropriate since F2 is about file pages that are broken in some way while G8 is about pages depending on non-existent/deleted pages. The move should make the criteria easier to learn and apply for newcomers. To address the concern that Graeme raised, we could have a grace period where we allow tagging and deletion under either category for a while and a clear date for when we fully switch over.
624:
32:
111:. These processes are more discriminating because they treat articles case-by-case, and involve many points of view; CSD sacrifices these advantages in favor of speed and efficiency. If a situation arises only rarely, it's probably easier, simpler, and fairer to delete it with one of the other methods instead. This also keeps CSD as simple and easy to remember as possible, and avoids
1803:
833:
696:
654:
3777:. I just want to comment on the last few comments. G8 and F2 both apply to these pages. While there are some changes proposed, there is no need to add a prohibition for continuing to use G8. It's more a proposed change in examples, and the deletion template, than the actual criteria. Talk of grace periods and 'allowing deletion' is a bit misplaced, IMO. --
1570:, splitting G6 is generally a good idea if we want to clarify that it is not "clearly unnecessary pages that should be deleted". Category pages almost never have any interesting history; everything about categories is on other pages, so there is very little harm in deleting any empty categories as long as there is no limit on undeletion or recreation. —
1788:
1773:
1758:
814:
799:
784:
3721:: F2 is the cleanest and narrowest CSD for this type of deletion, and it makes no sense to have fully-redundant clauses. Re Graeme's oppose, people will learn, and there is no need or expectation of immediate awareness. Re qwerty, I don't think a formal grace period is required, just don't bite anyone who uses the old criterion inadvertently.
2029:
different criteria meaningful is that A) you can show that a given criterion is known to be uncontroversial; B) users can easily tell why a given page was deleted, and if they care, find the underlying discussions why it's uncontroversial; C) you can list what kinds of things that, while superficially meeting a criterion (such as "
3103:- you pick something banal for the log comment like G7 or F5. (And if the file was at File:Omg_child_corn.jpg or whatever, go ahead and revdelete your deletion log too.) Then you mail oversight and block the uploader and it's not your problem anymore, at least once they're out of sleeper socks.And if you insist on playing
2083:-speedy deletions where a specific consensus was formed at TFD, and "Hooray, we've finally cleared the backlog of unreferenced pages! (up until December 2004, anyway)", in a speedy deletion criterion that was created for temporary deletions made as part of history merges, makes it impossible to find such abuses. —
3547:
There is a consensus to move the language of: "File pages without a corresponding file" from G8 to F2 on the grounds that this circumstance better fits the nature of F2 than G8. This is not a major or important change, but editors would be pleased to see such deletions cited to F2 instead of G8 going
1360:
Has this ever actually been a problem? A careful admin applying this criterion would have to look at the history to see when (and hence why) the category was removed. and if there's some hairy dispute involved they won't delete it. On the other hand non-careful admins will just use G6 for this anyway
738:
Hi all. I am thinking of drafting a new category CSD, which would cover unused maintenance categories. It would cover two related situations. The first is it would split from G6 empty dated maintenance categories from the past, and thereby lessen the load G6 is bearing. The second case is maintenance
3157:
Incredibly problematic ("illegal") content should not be CSD'd. The
Oversight team should be contacted directly. If a page must be quickly and expediently deleted, contact an admin directly (IRC, Discord, email to an admin you know is active, etc). That being said, it's not the end of the world if a
2636:
on them at one point, actually, because they were maintainenance categories of the sort that were exempt from C1, and then something changed to make them no longer populated. There should be a separate template listing the templates that claim to use a category, so the C4-deleting admin can validate
2051:
get blamed when the move turns out to be controversial, and sometimes my brain's too fried to deal with G11s but I have some spare time I could spend deleting empty maintenance cats if they weren't mixed in with those untouchable db-moves.Worse, the controversial and incorrect uses of G6 are getting
1504:
on all potentially empty categories because it stops the category from appearing in the C1 report. And I agree that both including the insource search link on the tag and an encouragement to note which templates use the category should be sufficient. The worst case scenario is a category needs to be
3217:
I mean, assuming I send somebody a message or whatever, it's still going to be a few minutes before they get it; am I just supposed to refrain from deleting it during this interval and leave the goat sex pics/etc sitting there untouched until they get around to formally OSing it? This feels like it
3139:
Certainly in terms of child pornography and similar, anything that is not the uploader's own work will almost certainly either be a copyright violation (the normal laws around copyright are not impacted by it being illegal), or the free license claimed will be unverifiable. Claims that material of
2208:
While we're at it, let's explicitly include empty "Knowledge (XXG) sockpuppets of
Example"/"Suspected Knowledge (XXG) sockpuppets of examples" categories. Last time I did a G6 taxonomy they were one of the more common kinds of G6, and, assuming we're fine with them being deleted instantly when they
1339:
I have a bit of a concern with respect to the template rewrite part namely if consensus is required for it or not otherwise for non protected templates anyone could rewrite them and the category ends up being deleted. Maybe the dependant on template part should be added to C1 to allow a week before
3509:
G14 currently does not apply to set indexes. My first thought is that there isn't a good reason why it shouldn't but then I realised that some set indexes can have viable prose or list content so there would need to be some qualification. Thinking a bit more on this I'm not convinced that spending
2056:
criteria of G6 that are only included in G6 because it was too much of a hassle to get an independent criterion passed. Empty maintenance categories are the single largest identifiable group of G6s, accounting for more than one in six out of every deletion mentioning "G6" anywhere in the deletion
3240:
If you are an admin delete or revdel it with a bland summary. If you aren't and it's a busy page revert the edit/blank the page with a bland summary. If you aren't an admin and it's a page with few likely readers just leave it - especially if you aren't autopatrolled. The goal is to avoid drawing
2109:
to old mainspace pages. In the unlikely event I decide to attempt either of those again, having this subcriterion split out won't make the G6 classification runs any easier (dated maintenance category runs were among the easiest to filter out there), and won't make the G8 classification runs that
2067:
where the closest thing to a test was "OK, so you tried to create an autobiography of yourself without anybody noticing. Your test failed, and I noticed and now I'm going to get an admin to delete it!" and I'll show you an admin who hasn't performed enough speedy deletions to talk knowledgeably
130:
If you do have a proposal that you believe passes these guidelines, please feel free to propose it on this discussion page. Be prepared to offer evidence of these points and to refine your criterion if necessary. Consider explaining how it meets these criteria when you propose it. Do not, on the
3439:
If it has to be a CSD (revdel doesn't work well for whatever reason), I'd delete under the broadest criterion with the most vanilla summary (G6-Housekeeping or G3 - Vandalism or something). The core takeaways should be to follow up with the appropriate functionaries immediately, do not tag it,
2028:
maintenance categories is uncontroversial maintenance. Deleting user subpages when their user says they're done with them is uncontroversial maintenance. Deleting disambiguation pages after everything linked from them has already been deleted is uncontroversial maintenance.What makes having
3140:
this nature is the uploader's own work will also almost certainly be unverifiable (by us, the relevant law enforcement body may be interested though) - I would also argue that it is not credible someone would openly claim images that are illegal to create were created by them if it were true.
3085:
don't really play nicely with revision deletion.JPxG, you were made an admin because people had confidence in your good judgment, not in how well you're able to ruleslawyer in order to argue you're permitted to take an action that makes the encyclopedia better. This is the sort of thing
3807:
without discussion I can find, so no help there. I was kind of surprised that edit's so late, since I don't remember this happening much after 2007 or so; but then, all my deletions mentioning "F2" were in 2015 or later, so if that's really the case, it wasn't me cleaning them up.
124:
If the deletion can be accomplished using a reasonable interpretation of an existing rule, just use that. If this application of that rule is contested, consider discussing and/or clarifying it. New rules should be proposed only to cover situations that cannot be speedily deleted
1270:: "All it seems to do is shift these deletions from one category to another, and while I agree that G6 is overused, the proper solution is to talk with admins who are using it incorrectly (and go to DRV if necessary), not to make a new criterion for something that undeniably
1324:
per Crouch, Swale and Pppery. Stretching criteria on a regular basis is something that we strive to avoid and adding making G6 larger and more complicated is not a solution we should even contemplate undertaking. The nom presents a good case that a new criterion is needed.
1933:
dated maintenance categories look like the definition of "uncontroversial maintenance". This will add extra complexity (more CSD cats to watch) without changing the end result (the cats always get deleted). I'm not sure that adopting this would solve any problems.
1809:
I guess it could be a part of G6, but the last thing we need is to shove more deletion reasons into G6. And obviously dated maintence categories are already part of G6, but G6 is already overloaded and decreasing that burden is a feature, not a
3302:
I don't see how that CSD would draw any attention to the oversightable material. Much like RD4, admins would never invoke it by name, they would put some other bland reason in the field and contact oversight, just like you said they should.
3889:
I'd also add that most of this was previously in G6 so apart from the new part of template categories from a rewrite authors could previously remove such tags and its clearly not the same as the likes of A7 or G11 that we shouldn't allow.
2528:
shows that a category is still in use. Therefore this should make it ineligible for C4. Can we make this more explicit? (Asking because I just had some categories deleted under C4 which clearly had this template on them.) — Martin
3661:
as a situation that rarely comes up, and you cannot expect taggers and deleters to suddenly be aware of a change. Basically I oppose most changes as unnecessary and changing criteria causes people to not know what they are doing.
2104:
to find questionable G8s largely out of spite at someone arguing G8 applied in a case where I felt it clearly didn't. Neither went anywhere because there were too many "other" for me to have the will to look at, and today I limit
2561:
template, along with trouting the administrators/taggers who are clearly not reading the actual text of the CSD (if they aren't reading the details of C4 they probably aren't reading the details of the other criteria either).
3440:
either straight delete it or leave it, and do not draw attention to the nature of the material in whatever documentation you leave. (I could be misinformed here, I have zero experience and this is a peanut gallery comment)
3760:- F2 is the natural fit for an issue where the file is somehow broken or not there. Changes to the CSD criteria are advertised in various appropriate places and any mistagging can be dealt a good dose of common sense. --
3094:
for, for all that it's usually poorly-regarded when it comes to deletion.That said, you don't want to have something like "02:42, 31 July 2024 JPxG (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Me and Joey at
Disneyland.jpg
771:– it just no longer populates that category. (Note that empty != unused: categories which happen to be empty are not necessarily unused. I am talking about categories a template does not populate under any circumstances.)
3786:
I was about to close and implement this but have a question. F2 already speaks of "files that are missing"; does this refer to a different scenario from "File pages without a file"? They sound like the same thing to me.
2037:), are nonetheless widely considered to be controversial; D) you can find specific instances where deletion is controversial, and E) you can find the sorts of deletions you're willing to make: I don't act on third party
3343:
use it in their log comments even if it says not to. Source: there's one deletion, two log deletions, and 135 revision deletions that mention "RD4". (With the false positives like "prod contested by
Richard44306 at
2351:
be empty". It's not at all rare for empty dated maintenance cats to get temporarily repopulated, such as when a redirection is reverted or somebody recreates an article with a cut-and-paste of a predeletion version.
2468:
2100:. I found a very large number of different uses, some of which IMO met the criteria and some of which didn't, and then an unclassified "other" which made up a third of the entire set. I also made an attempt once at
2935:
I would say that there is, in fact, no CSD category for them, since every category is very rigorously defined and does not include illegal content. All possible options smell strongly of bullshit rules-lawyering.
2078:
s that amount to the same thing. Lumping them in with automatic deletions made as part of a page move that don't require you to push a delete button or provide a deletion summary or even be an admin, and with
2165:. No one seems to know how to nominate this type of page (C1, G6, G8, etc) so putting these into a dedicated and specific group will ease the burden not only on the nominator but also on the patrolling admin.
1479:
notice on them. Additionally we should strongly encourage category descriptions to link to all the templates that populate that category. These won't quite solve the issue completely but it very nearly will.
2068:
about the subject. Or maybe one who just doesn't give a fuck and will happily twinkle-delete anything you put in front of them.That, of course, is a (terrible) example of a G2, not a G6; but I've declined
839:
I guess case two could be a part of G6, but the last thing we need is to shove more deletion reasons into G6. And obviously case one is currently part of G6, but getting this out of G6 is a feature, not a
93:
be deleted, according to consensus. CSD criteria should cover only situations where there is a strong precedent for deletion. Remember that a rule may be used in a way you don't expect, unless you word it
3158:
page is tagged (as
Thryduulf suggests above) for G3, but keep in mind that throws it into multiple well-viewed categories so it will likely draw more attention. As much as it might seem like a good idea,
1817:
In sum, this would decrease the burden on both CFD and G6 while also saving editor time rubber-stamping pro forma discussions. One note that did come up in the above discussion is that we can program the
3572:
G8 currently includes "File pages without a corresponding file". I would suggest moving this unchanged to F2 instead, as it seems to fit better there with all of the other ways a file can be malformed.
2983:
The only remotely plausible thing I can think of is to manually enter it in as a G9, which I am pretty sure creates an actual urgent issue for WMF Legal, so I do not think it is a good idea to do this.
2106:
176:
1298:. I guess that could be described as uncontroversial maintenance, but stretching G6 even further is unappealing. Nor is stretching G8 to cover cases in which the "dependent" page still exists, imo.
255:
3081:
selecting anything from the dropdown, right? Revision deletion doesn't work if there isn't a good version to revert to anyway; and the particular cases raised are likely to be files, which
1217:, which more or less petered out due to lack of participation. I'm all in favor, with mild preference towards merging the main case into C1 (without a timeout) rather than a separate C4. —
3510:
the time to craft that is worthwhile for the number of times situations like this arise (NEWCSD point 3). An alternative would be to adjust A3 so that it applies to lists with no entries.
4093:
2097:
1267:
1214:
821:
611:
607:
603:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
59:
Contributors frequently propose new (or expansions of existing) criteria for speedy deletion. Please bear in mind that CSD criteria require careful wording, and in particular, need to be
1400:
I think we should also allow the creator to remove the CSD tag, because they are the person who best understands whether the category is being used or not. Comments? Suggestions? Typos?
3847:
I suggest like G14 that we allow authors to remove C4 tags given that most such authors will be experienced and this may allow someone who disagrees with a template rewrite to object.
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
1113:
Is this something people would be inclined to support? Are there other related cases which should be included? If so, we can work on wording, but I wanted to get others' input first.
3385:" to the lead without assigning a criterion number would work, but honestly, it might be better to have it be an unspoken rule, so some admin doesn't delete with reason "oversight".
2464:
1680:) or tracking categories no longer used by a template after a rewrite. Note that empty maintenance categories are not necessarily unused—this criterion is for categories which will
1389:) or tracking categories no longer used by a template after a rewrite. Note that empty maintenance categories are not necessarily unused—this criterion is for categories which will
1101:
1091:
1081:
1071:
1061:
1051:
1041:
1031:
1021:
1011:
1001:
991:
981:
971:
961:
951:
941:
931:
921:
911:
901:
891:
881:
871:
861:
2585:
does not show that a category is still in use; it just shows that it was in use at one point in time. Things like template rewrites are not automatically reflected by the use of
3381:
Damn. I didn't know RD4 was misused so much. Maybe just adding some text that says "admins can delete oversightable material while waiting for oversight per the instructions at
138:
615:
1972:
1688:
empty. If you are unsure whether a category is still being used by a template, consider asking the creator of the category or at the template's talk page before tagging.
1397:
empty. If you are unsure whether a category is still being used by a template, consider asking the creator of the category or at the template's talk page before tagging.
1288:
Another thing that I should've made more clear: case two is currently not (at least in my understanding) covered by any CSD criteria. They were in my CSD log because of
1948:
Per above, the "what's wrong" is that G6 is overloaded and splitting some would make it easier for reviewers. It also lessens the potential hassle of typing a reason.
4017:
3624:
No. When it comes to changes to policies like CSD it's always better not to rush things. The question is less than two days old, let's give people at least a week.
1700:
1047:
1252:
this as well - turns a deletion people (including myself) are doing anyway by stretching G6 and G8 in areas they don't quite into a clear and objective criterion.
1097:
740:
3200:. I know I wasn't; I was responding directly to and advising another admin. For a non-admin, yes, tagging oversightable material is a bad idea - not only is
1067:
712:
211:
3364:) in violation of ban or block" filtered out, but I haven't looked at most of the actual deletions except for their log comments. All the ones labeled like "
1057:
1077:
2391:
again be populated, i.e. dated maintenance categories that have become empty, this criterion allows for specificity and clear guidance to any admins. —
1087:
2694:
Lots of very scintillating conversation above, unfortunately none of it seems to address a rather simple core issue: what actual category is it under?
1727:. As a regular closer at CfD, I have only ever seen them get unanimously deleted and it is a fairly regular occurance (you can see the collapsed list
1699:
is carrying. However, the primary reason that I came here is to allow for speedy deletion of additional unused maintenance categories. As an example,
3489:
670:
161:
3164:
as suggested above is a bad idea, primarily because it increases the chances of that showing up in the deletion log itself (and therefore requiring
2110:
much easier (the biggest problem I had there is that there's no way to find out that a redirect was broken without looking at the deleted history).
1426:
3800:
217:
724:
682:
1585:
997:
1733:
List of entries in just my own CSD log since June 1 for unused maintenance categories (it is possible I missed some, but I think I got them all)
849:
List of entries in just my own CSD log since June 1 for unused maintenance categories (it is possible I missed some, but I think I got them all)
3983:
There are two types of template /doc pages that have been sent to TfD and always deleted. Navigation templates that had their doc converted to
3697:
3123:→ "using any image in a way that is disruptive". Genuinely illegal imagery can't fall under the "if they have encyclopedic value" clause. —
937:
857:
2493:
977:
887:
1037:
1433:
in detail might help, but even that doesn't rule out that some other template somewhere is using it. I suppose I could run a search like
1027:
947:
4065:
4026:
3399:
I think at most we need something (a hatnote perhaps) that points to the instructions elsewhere, perhaps "For material that needs to be
987:
897:
3799:
My understanding is that the intent there is for images that 404 (or equivalent), like what was happening with a specific file version
3136:
article it definitely cannot elsewhere, but uploading an image that you know it is illegal for the WMF to host is unarguably vandalism.
967:
3873:
2666:
2610:
2321:
2232:
1907:
1837:
1677:
1523:
1405:
1386:
1303:
1177:
1118:
3955:
3943:
1860:
927:
104:
3288:
Absolutely not! The goal is to avoid drawing attention to oversightable material, not putting up a bright red arrow pointing to it!
2198:
1017:
2744:
2331:
1612:
1007:
957:
917:
157:
1172:), not redirected to a different template. I was just using the shortcut because that is what the categories used in their names.
907:
2630:
2589:
2579:
2555:
2522:
877:
206:
2705:
2914:
3029:
2057:
summary. There's so many that they make it near-impossible to find genuine abuses. Show me an admin who's never declined a
3551:
3100:
2891:
2251:. I think that falls under "unused maintenance categories" but there is no harm and possible benefit to making it explicit.
1640:
197:
108:
2551:. I suggest putting something like "This category is ineligible for speedy deletion under criterion C4" in the text of the
2330:
This is the sort of thing that would be uncontroversial post-enactment, but as long as we're still discussing, can we link
1425:
be empty can be challenging, and I'm not convinced we should just let admins figure it out unilaterally. If someone tagged
3987:
3838:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2509:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
3087:
2465:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_July_24#Category:Technology_articles_with_topics_of_unclear_notability
1193:
Ah, my misunderstanding. I would still argue that if the template is not populating the category, it is eligible for G8.
3259:
should be created so it's obvious to admins that they should do what
Thryduulf wrote above. I'm thinking something like:
3132:
Crypic has it almost spot on. It is arguable that an image of child pornography could serve an encyclopaedic use on the
1653:
1446:
1279:
1663:
Should C4 (unused maintenance categories) be enacted as a new criterion for speedy deletion? 03:09, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1676:
This applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past (e.g.
1385:
This applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past (e.g.
3372:: Personal and non-public information: real name and harassment" that I've spot-checked were the real deal though.) —
2814:
3425:
3325:
3226:
3063:
2992:
2944:, we've already had deletion discussions that reached consensus to delete all videos of men having sex with horses"
623:
250:
3607:
1429:, for instance, what would be due diligence for me as a reviewing admin? Examining the source code and history of
3667:
634:
4085:
4078:
4046:
when making an edit request to ensure it is seen. However, I do not understand what change you are requesting.
2488:
2334:
here to make it crystal clear which cats are covered and which need to go through the week-long C1 process? —
867:
4062:
4023:
3968:
3899:
3856:
3499:
2373:
1878:
1498:
1473:
1442:
1349:
1275:
1238:
4043:
3701:
2837:
3880:
3804:
3744:
3684:
2673:
2655:
2617:
2317:
2239:
1980:
1939:
1914:
1844:
1717:
1707:
1530:
1412:
1310:
1184:
1125:
754:
3263:
3120:
3114:
3016:
2735:
1926:
187:
4119:
4049:
3820:
3790:
3558:
2194:
638:
4130:
4068:
4053:
4029:
4006:
3973:
3935:
3921:
3905:
3884:
3862:
3824:
3812:
3794:
3781:
3769:
3748:
3730:
3713:
3688:
3671:
3647:
3633:
3619:
3597:
3582:
3562:
3519:
3503:
3449:
3434:
3412:
3394:
3376:
3334:
3312:
3297:
3283:
3250:
3235:
3212:
3177:
3152:
3127:
3072:
3042:
3001:
2677:
2646:
2621:
2571:
2541:
2499:
2455:
2428:
2399:
2379:
2356:
2338:
2325:
2297:
2279:
2260:
2243:
2218:
2203:
2174:
2157:
2140:
2119:
2087:
2002:
1984:
1962:
1943:
1918:
1864:
1848:
1657:
1597:
1579:
1552:
1534:
1489:
1464:
1450:
1416:
1370:
1355:
1334:
1314:
1283:
1261:
1244:
1221:
1202:
1188:
1154:
1129:
227:
202:
42:
4086:
Template talk:Keep local#RfC: Limit usage of this template to files which are fully or partly own work
4079:
Template talk:Keep local#RfC: Limit usage of this template to files which are fully or partly own work
3726:
3663:
3602:
Seems that no one is opposing the move/merge, and I don't mind the changes as well. Shall the change
3445:
1929:
maintenance" – including, but not limited to, empty dated maintenance categories. Permanently empty
1455:
Can't the deletion tag have an insource search link built into it so all you have to do is click it?
3603:
2926:
103:
Speedy deletion is intended primarily as a means of reducing load on other deletion methods such as
3917:
3709:
3643:
3629:
3615:
3593:
3515:
3408:
3293:
3246:
3148:
2567:
2476:
2449:
2285:
2275:
2256:
2153:
1998:
1958:
1832:
search to make it easy for the patrolling admin to double-check that the category is in use. Best,
1593:
1548:
1485:
1430:
1330:
3382:
3345:
3269:
3052:
3037:
2786:
2701:
asking whether I should contact the functionaries — which of these do I select from the dropdown?
1746:
727:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
685:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
4059:
4037:
4020:
3959:
3892:
3849:
3495:
3173:
3048:
3025:
2396:
2366:
2293:
2170:
2015:
1870:
1342:
1231:
1215:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 86#Empty monthly maintenance categories
1198:
1162:
1150:
774:
NEWCSD checklist (I am only focusing on case two, because case one is already eligible for CSD):
761:
747:
639:
3357:
2766:
2266:
112:
1695:
as proposer. There are two benefits that I see from this change. One, it lessens the load that
3870:
3740:
3680:
3133:
2704:
The actual options that I get in the dropdown menu when I delete a page (e.g. the contents of
2663:
2607:
2308:
2229:
2072:
1990:
1976:
1935:
1904:
1834:
1520:
1402:
1300:
1174:
1115:
183:
3033:
2920:
4127:
4002:
3930:
3577:
3390:
3308:
3279:
2641:
2213:
2185:
2135:
2114:
2061:
2041:
1649:
1505:
REFUNDed, and at that point we can make a note on the category itself saying something like
1460:
1365:
1256:
636:
4089:
3369:
3365:
3353:
3349:
3256:
3108:
3012:
3008:
2902:
2896:
2883:
2874:
2868:
2864:
2853:
2842:
2833:
2829:
2820:
2810:
2805:
2801:
2797:
2791:
2782:
2776:
2770:
2762:
2757:
2753:
2749:
2740:
2731:
2725:
2715:
1779:
As a regular CFD closer, I have only seen these get deleted unanimously (see my list below)
1169:
805:
As a regular CFD closer, I have only seen these get deleted unanimously (see my list below)
72:
whether a page meets the criterion. Often this requires making the criterion very specific.
4115:
3722:
3441:
1739:
1575:
1292:
3400:
2824:
2719:
2472:
1696:
1137:
1975:
currently contains two (2) pages. What makes you think that two pages is "overloaded"?
1144:, so a redirected template that no longer uses a cat would make the cat eligible for G8.
4111:
4099:
3997:. Can these be tagged with G6? Sending them to TfD really adds nothing to the process.
3913:
3765:
3705:
3639:
3625:
3611:
3589:
3588:
Good idea. These are arguably "missing" files anyway so it makes sense to merge there.
3511:
3430:
3404:
3330:
3289:
3242:
3231:
3186:
3144:
3068:
2997:
2599:
2563:
2536:
2439:
2269:
2252:
2149:
1994:
1968:
1952:
1898:
1822:
1633:
to adopt C4. The argument that this criterion would be duplicative of G6 and would not
1589:
1544:
1481:
1437:, but it's not realistic to expect a deleting admin to do that. If it's possible to be
1326:
17:
2887:
2878:
2549:
this criterion is for categories which will always be empty, not just currently empty.
3169:
3021:
2423:
2392:
2289:
2166:
1894:
1194:
1146:
1469:
We can (and maybe do?) encourage categories that may be sometimes empty to have the
4103:
3809:
3373:
3361:
3209:
3124:
2353:
2335:
2084:
1874:
1511:
1361:
so in neither case does the waiting period help. And undeletions are cheap anyway.
1218:
3101:
Knowledge (XXG):Revision deletion#Hiding oversightable material prior to
Oversight
1794:~20 in the past two months at CFD, and many more which are currently handled by G6
1274:'uncontroversial maintenance'" Per the closure there, this would require an RfC.
4124:
4058:
Thank you for the information. For the edit request, someone else corrected it.
3998:
3927:
3778:
3574:
3386:
3304:
3275:
3195:
2638:
2605:
and create a new template which does indicate which templates use the category.
2210:
2132:
2111:
1890:
1882:
1645:
1456:
1362:
1253:
3993:
and WikiProject banners that had their doc converted to the automatic one with
3208:
mirror the pages in it, the better to fight the Evils of
Rampant Deletionism. —
4094:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 89#F8 and keep local
3182:
I don't think
Thryduulf was suggesting that non-admins tag material like this
3099:" in your deletion log, for the same reason as the bolded text midway through
1886:
1701:
Category:EstcatCountry — used with year parameter(s) equals year in page title
1571:
1048:
Category:EstcatCountry — used with year parameter(s) equals year in page title
4107:
3761:
3419:
3319:
3220:
3057:
2986:
2532:
3204:
highly visible on
Knowledge (XXG), there are some... fine... projects that
3055:
does not explicitly mention actual page deletions anywhere that I can see.
3268:
This applies if every revision of a page is eligible for suppression. See
3241:
attention, and most OS requests get actioned in much less than 5 minutes.
2929:: Nominated for seven days with no reliable sources present in the article
1098:
Category:Eiei-year — used with year parameter(s) equals year in page title
741:
Category:Eiei-year — used with year parameter(s) equals year in page title
3739:
Good point, there. Simply asking people not to bite is probably simpler.
3700:. Additionally if it is enacted then it can (and should) be announced in
2951:, anybody who posts a video of a man having sex with a horse is blocked."
2409:
2101:
2093:
1068:
Category:EstcatCountry — used with year parameter(s) ≠ year in page title
4092:. Since the proposal there is very similar to the recent discussion at
3201:
1377:
Alright, before starting a formal RfC here is my draft wording of C4:
1058:
Category:EstcatCountry — used on page without a year in the page title
3912:
I can't think of any good reason not to allow author removal for C4.
2890:
in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at
2469:
Category:Articles_that_need_to_differentiate_between_fact_and_fiction
2034:
2030:
1856:
1078:
Category:Eiei-year — used with year parameter(s) ≠ year in page title
1266:
I continue to think this is not a good idea, for the reasons I gave
2463:
In addition to the ones that are currently handled in CfD, such as
2436:: seems like it'd be useful per nom, Primefac, & Chaotic Enby.
2098:
Wikipedia_talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 83#New taxonomy
3143:
All of this means that such material is covered under G3 and G12.
3104:
2626:
Yeah, agreed with HouseBlaster. I would say most C4 deletions had
2387:- By explicitly limiting this to maintenance categories that will
1993:
it is overloaded in the sense of doing too many different things.
1088:
Category:Eiei-year — used on page without a year in the page title
3956:
Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (policy) § CSD X4 criterion proposal
3944:
Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (policy) § CSD X4 criterion proposal
3047:
Hmm -- but the revdel criteria don't show up in the dropdown on
3488:
Should G14, or another clause, apply to empty set indexes? See
1713:, but no longer did so after a rewrite. It is not a G8 because
1229:
I'd agree this makes sense similar to G14 and R4 splits of G6.
2905:: Redirect with no space before a parenthetical disambiguation
2785:: One author who has requested deletion – to retrieve it, see
1427:
Category:Technology articles with topics of unclear notability
1421:
Does that really meet NEWCSD #1? Proving that a category will
690:
648:
640:
152:
26:
1764:
Obviously objective: either a category is in use or it is not
790:
Obviously objective: either a category is in use or it is not
2467:, dated maintenance categories (such as the monthly ones in
753:, but that template no longer populates that category after
4096:, I'm also pinging the people involved in that discussion:
2092:
I've made several attempts to do what Cryptic suggested at
1439:
unsure whether a category is still being used by a template
998:
Category:European Microstates articles with deprecated tags
3383:
WP:REVDEL#Hiding oversightable material prior to Oversight
3270:
WP:REVDEL#Hiding oversightable material prior to Oversight
1925:
What's wrong with leaving it at G6? G6 says "This is for
666:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion/Speedy/Criteria
2690:
No, really, what category does illegal stuff fall under?
2107:
WP:Database reports/Possibly out-of-process deletions#G6
739:
categories no longer used by a template. As an example,
2972:, it's trying to convince me to have sex with a horse."
1728:
1434:
1142:
Categories populated by deleted or retargeted templates
720:
716:
707:
702:
678:
674:
665:
660:
235:
142:
50:
2779:: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup
2343:
Separately, suggest "categories which are expected to
1441:, this probably isn't straightforward enough for CSD.
938:
Category:Channel Islands articles with deprecated tags
858:
Category:Cricket articles needing attention to tagging
2958:, it's not very controversial to delete that, is it?"
2020:
All speedy deletions are uncontroversial maintenance
978:
Category:Southeast Asia articles with deprecated tags
888:
Category:Czech Republic articles with deprecated tags
3540:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
1611:
The following discussion is an archived record of a
1038:
Category:United States articles with deprecated tags
2697:If I see something illegal, such as "child corn" —
1621:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1028:
Category:Vatican City articles with deprecated tags
948:
Category:Central Asia articles with deprecated tags
820:case one is the most common reason G6 is used (see
38:
Read this before proposing new or expanded criteria
2284:For reference, these categories are generated via
988:Category:Catholicism articles with deprecated tags
898:Category:South Sudan articles with deprecated tags
4088:that seems relevant to this policy, specifically
2794:: Page dependent on a deleted or nonexistent page
1973:Category:Candidates for technical speedy deletion
968:Category:Montenegro articles with deprecated tags
131:other hand, add it unilaterally to the CSD page.
1867:. Pinging participants in the above discussion:
1678:Category:Articles lacking sources from July 2004
1604:RfC: enacting C4 (unused maintenance categories)
1387:Category:Articles lacking sources from July 2004
713:Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion/Speedy
4018:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as spam
3339:It will draw attention because clueless admins
2595:. I think we need to add the insource magic to
928:Category:Slovakia articles with deprecated tags
2347:be empty", rather than "categories which will
1018:Category:Fantasy articles with deprecated tags
3543:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
1624:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
1378:
1008:Category:Africa articles with deprecated tags
958:Category:Serbia articles with deprecated tags
918:Category:France articles with deprecated tags
677:on 20:38, 4 December 2013. The former page's
8:
3490:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Hepnar
2979:, horses can't release content as CC-BY-SA."
2923:: Nominated for seven days with no objection
2856:: Talk page of a nonexistent or deleted page
908:Category:Italy articles with deprecated tags
708:Knowledge (XXG):Criteria for speedy deletion
671:Knowledge (XXG):Criteria for speedy deletion
3979:Template doc pages that have been converted
3368:, serious BLP vio" and "RD4/WP:YOUNG" and "
2899:: Redirect to a deleted or nonexistent page
878:Category:Iran articles with deprecated tags
3954:You are invited to join the discussion at
1586:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Templates
1584:I've left a note about this discussion at
844:
694:
652:
3698:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Files for discussion
3526:"File pages without a corresponding file"
3077:You do know you can type something there
2131:per my comments in the previous section.
68:Most reasonable people should be able to
1735:; n.b. they were only CSD candidates as
701:Text and/or other creative content from
659:Text and/or other creative content from
4016:Change the number for spam to 1 as per
4012:Extended-confirmed-protect edit request
3272:for when and how to use this criterion.
2651:I have added insource functionality to
2148:per proposer and my previous comments.
2052:drowned out by formulaic, well-defined
2033:" not being a plausible misspelling of
719:on 16 November 2016. The former page's
3994:
2548:
2102:https://quarry.wmcloud.org/query/62274
2094:https://quarry.wmcloud.org/query/61527
1732:
1634:
1506:
1438:
1141:
3803:. The specific wording was added in
3704:, improving awareness of the change.
1861:Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (policy)
105:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
3534:The following discussion is closed.
2209:become empty, should put them here.
3696:I've advertised this discussion at
160:for discussing improvements to the
2915:Knowledge (XXG):Copyright problems
2722:, meaningless, or incomprehensible
1340:deletion to allow for objections.
734:C4 – unused maintenance categories
25:
3255:Perhaps a G15 that is similar to
2845:: Unnecessary disambiguation page
2836:submission – to retrieve it, see
2773:user in violation of block or ban
1673:C4. Unused maintenance categories
1381:C4. Unused maintenance categories
182:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
109:Knowledge (XXG):Proposed deletion
3949:
3834:The discussion above is closed.
3638:A week has passed since the OP.
3015:(any of RD1-4 would apply) then
2965:, it's defamatory to the horse."
2877:: Recently created, implausible
2752:: Recreation of a page that was
2712:General (can apply to any page)
2637:whether they in fact do use it.
2505:The discussion above is closed.
1801:
1786:
1771:
1756:
831:
812:
797:
782:
622:
177:Click here to start a new topic.
81:It must be the case that almost
30:
2706:MediaWiki:Deletereason-dropdown
4131:00:24, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
4084:Someone has created an RFC at
4069:02:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
4054:22:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
4030:12:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
3825:14:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
3813:13:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
3795:12:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
3563:18:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
2977:uh, if you think about it, man
2970:uh, if you think about it, man
2963:uh, if you think about it, man
2956:uh, if you think about it, man
2949:uh, if you think about it, man
2942:uh, if you think about it, man
2547:They already are ineligible -
743:was at one point populated by
1:
4044:one of the relevant templates
4007:08:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
3974:21:49, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3936:21:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
3922:19:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
3906:18:27, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
3885:18:19, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
3863:17:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
3782:20:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
3770:19:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
3749:16:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
3731:15:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
3714:13:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
3689:11:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
3450:04:02, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
2678:15:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
2647:15:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
2622:15:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
2572:08:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
2542:08:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
824:), and see below for case two
174:Put new text under old text.
3121:WP:Vandalism#Image vandalism
2471:) are routinely deleted per
1703:was previously populated by
162:Criteria for speedy deletion
3672:22:19, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
3648:15:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
3634:06:37, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
3620:06:03, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
3598:10:08, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
3583:03:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
3520:22:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
3504:21:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
1658:02:45, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
89:be deleted using the rule,
4146:
3817:That makes sense, thanks.
3702:Knowledge (XXG):Admin news
3435:11:25, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
3413:10:05, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
3395:02:06, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
3377:00:59, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
3335:00:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
3097:(omg iar child corn HALP!)
2661:; thoughts on the design?
2500:06:35, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
2456:07:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
2364:per my previous comments.
1539:In which case this has my
225:
40:
3805:this edit in October 2015
3606:done right away then per
3484:G14 and empty set indexes
3313:23:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3298:23:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3284:23:35, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3251:18:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3236:18:03, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3213:13:54, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3178:12:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3153:11:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3128:03:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3115:Knowledge (XXG):Vandalism
3073:02:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3043:02:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3002:02:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
2475:when they become empty. –
2429:22:11, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
2400:19:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
2380:05:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
2357:00:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
2339:00:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
2326:00:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
2298:13:20, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
2280:04:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
2261:22:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
2244:22:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
2219:20:36, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
2204:19:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
2175:12:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
2158:08:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
2141:05:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
2120:05:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
2088:04:24, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
2003:11:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
1985:04:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
1963:04:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1944:03:33, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1919:03:15, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1849:03:09, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1598:14:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1580:08:24, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1553:14:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1535:14:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1507:This category is used by
1490:12:01, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1465:08:50, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1451:03:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1417:03:06, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1371:18:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
1356:18:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
1335:07:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
1315:00:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
1284:18:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
1262:17:25, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
1245:17:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
1222:17:16, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
1203:17:13, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
1189:17:11, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
1155:17:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
1130:17:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
757:. It is not a G8 because
711:was copied or moved into
669:was copied or moved into
212:Be welcoming to newcomers
3836:Please do not modify it.
3537:Please do not modify it.
3161:{{db-reason|Child corn}}
2869:Cross-namespace redirect
2518:Marking a category with
2507:Please do not modify it.
1631:near unanimous consensus
1618:Please do not modify it.
822:Taxonomy of G6 deletions
2631:possibly empty category
2590:possibly empty category
2580:possibly empty category
2556:possibly empty category
2523:possibly empty category
2332:WP:Maintenance category
868:Category:NRISref errors
18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:SD
3274:
2825:copyright infringement
2804:or negative unsourced
2407:per nom and Primefac.
2182:per nom and Primefac.
1637:was roundly rejected.
1399:
1268:in the last discussion
207:avoid personal attacks
3843:C4 and author removal
3260:
3113:Further information:
2975:"It's a G12 because,
2968:"It's a G11 because,
2961:"It's a G10 because,
2834:Articles for Creation
2832:: Abandoned draft or
1136:Just to be pedantic,
616:Auto-archiving period
3988:Navbox documentation
3218:cannot be the case.
2954:"It's a G6 because,
2947:"It's a G5 because,
2940:"It's a G4 because,
2265:inb4 someone argues
2047:s anymore because I
3088:WP:Ignore all rules
2917:for over seven days
2758:deletion discussion
2286:Template:Sockpuppet
1684:be empty, not just
1613:request for comment
1431:Template:Notability
1393:be empty, not just
725:provide attribution
683:provide attribution
3868:Definitely agree.
3107:, G3 is closest.
2514:Eligibility for C4
2024:. Deleting empty
1879:Extraordinary Writ
1828:tag to include an
1635:solve any problems
1443:Extraordinary Writ
1276:Extraordinary Writ
1213:Last discussed at
218:dispute resolution
179:
4066:What have I done?
4027:What have I done?
3972:
3555:
3552:non-admin closure
3134:Child pornography
2892:Wikimedia Commons
2540:
2447:
2019:
1921:
1644:
1641:non-admin closure
1110:
1109:
731:
730:
689:
688:
647:
646:
198:Assume good faith
175:
149:
148:
113:instruction creep
16:(Redirected from
4137:
4122:
4120:The Summum Bonum
4052:
4050:Compassionate727
4041:
3996:
3992:
3986:
3966:
3964:
3953:
3952:
3902:
3895:
3876:
3859:
3852:
3823:
3821:Compassionate727
3793:
3791:Compassionate727
3608:WP:EDITCONSENSUS
3561:
3559:Compassionate727
3549:
3539:
3502:
3199:
3191:
3185:
3163:
3162:
3041:
2765:: Creation by a
2669:
2660:
2654:
2635:
2629:
2613:
2604:
2598:
2594:
2588:
2584:
2578:
2560:
2554:
2530:
2527:
2521:
2496:
2491:
2454:
2452:
2445:
2442:
2427:
2426:
2420:
2419:
2416:
2413:
2376:
2369:
2314:
2313:
2272:
2235:
2202:
2191:
2188:
2077:
2071:
2066:
2060:
2046:
2040:
2013:
1955:
1910:
1902:
1854:
1840:
1831:
1827:
1821:
1808:
1805:
1804:
1793:
1790:
1789:
1778:
1775:
1774:
1763:
1760:
1759:
1744:
1738:
1722:
1716:
1712:
1706:
1638:
1620:
1526:
1516:
1510:
1503:
1497:
1478:
1472:
1408:
1352:
1345:
1306:
1297:
1291:
1241:
1234:
1180:
1167:
1161:
1121:
845:
838:
835:
834:
819:
816:
815:
804:
801:
800:
789:
786:
785:
766:
760:
752:
746:
710:
698:
697:
691:
668:
656:
655:
649:
641:
627:
626:
617:
238:
153:
126:
116:
95:
73:
53:
34:
33:
27:
21:
4145:
4144:
4140:
4139:
4138:
4136:
4135:
4134:
4097:
4082:
4047:
4042:You should use
4035:
4014:
3990:
3984:
3981:
3960:
3950:
3947:
3933:
3932:it has begun...
3900:
3893:
3874:
3857:
3850:
3845:
3840:
3839:
3818:
3788:
3664:Graeme Bartlett
3580:
3579:it has begun...
3570:
3556:
3535:
3528:
3493:
3486:
3352:: Created by a
3193:
3189:
3183:
3160:
3159:
3020:
2910:Other criteria
2861:Redirect pages
2720:Patent nonsense
2692:
2667:
2658:
2652:
2644:
2643:it has begun...
2633:
2627:
2611:
2602:
2596:
2592:
2586:
2582:
2576:
2558:
2552:
2525:
2519:
2516:
2511:
2510:
2494:
2489:
2450:
2440:
2437:
2422:
2417:
2414:
2411:
2410:
2408:
2374:
2367:
2311:
2309:
2270:
2233:
2216:
2215:it has begun...
2189:
2186:
2183:
2138:
2137:it has begun...
2117:
2116:it has begun...
2075:
2069:
2064:
2058:
2044:
2038:
1953:
1927:uncontroversial
1908:
1868:
1838:
1829:
1825:
1819:
1806:
1802:
1791:
1787:
1776:
1772:
1761:
1757:
1742:
1736:
1720:
1714:
1710:
1704:
1689:
1660:
1616:
1606:
1524:
1514:
1508:
1501:
1495:
1476:
1470:
1406:
1368:
1367:it has begun...
1350:
1343:
1304:
1295:
1289:
1259:
1258:it has begun...
1239:
1232:
1178:
1168:was moved (per
1165:
1159:
1140:currently says
1119:
1111:
850:
836:
832:
817:
813:
802:
798:
787:
783:
764:
758:
750:
744:
736:
706:
695:
664:
653:
643:
642:
637:
614:
244:
243:
242:
241:
234:
230:
223:
193:
145:
123:
102:
80:
67:
57:
56:
49:
45:
31:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
4143:
4141:
4081:
4077:Discussion at
4075:
4074:
4073:
4072:
4071:
4013:
4010:
3980:
3977:
3946:
3942:Discussion at
3940:
3939:
3938:
3931:
3924:
3910:
3909:
3908:
3844:
3841:
3833:
3832:
3831:
3830:
3829:
3828:
3827:
3784:
3772:
3754:
3753:
3752:
3751:
3734:
3733:
3716:
3691:
3674:
3656:
3655:
3654:
3653:
3652:
3651:
3650:
3578:
3569:
3568:
3567:
3566:
3565:
3530:
3529:
3527:
3524:
3523:
3522:
3485:
3482:
3481:
3480:
3479:
3478:
3477:
3476:
3475:
3474:
3473:
3472:
3471:
3470:
3469:
3468:
3467:
3466:
3465:
3464:
3463:
3462:
3461:
3460:
3459:
3458:
3457:
3456:
3455:
3454:
3453:
3452:
3337:
3267:
3215:
3206:preferentially
3141:
3137:
3049:Special:Delete
2981:
2980:
2973:
2966:
2959:
2952:
2945:
2933:
2932:
2931:
2930:
2924:
2918:
2908:
2907:
2906:
2900:
2894:
2881:
2872:
2871:from mainspace
2859:
2858:
2857:
2848:
2847:
2846:
2840:
2827:
2823:: Unambiguous
2818:
2813:: Unambiguous
2808:
2795:
2789:
2780:
2774:
2760:
2747:
2738:
2729:
2723:
2691:
2688:
2687:
2686:
2685:
2684:
2683:
2682:
2681:
2680:
2642:
2515:
2512:
2504:
2503:
2502:
2458:
2431:
2402:
2382:
2359:
2350:
2346:
2341:
2328:
2302:
2301:
2300:
2282:
2263:
2246:
2214:
2206:
2177:
2160:
2143:
2136:
2126:
2125:
2124:
2123:
2122:
2115:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2005:
1923:
1922:
1851:
1815:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1795:
1780:
1765:
1726:
1687:
1683:
1670:
1667:Proposed text:
1661:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1607:
1605:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1582:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1499:empty category
1474:Empty category
1396:
1392:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1366:
1337:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1264:
1257:
1247:
1224:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1095:
1085:
1075:
1065:
1055:
1045:
1035:
1025:
1015:
1005:
995:
985:
975:
965:
955:
945:
935:
925:
915:
905:
895:
885:
875:
865:
852:
851:
848:
843:
842:
841:
825:
806:
791:
770:
735:
732:
729:
728:
723:now serves to
699:
687:
686:
681:now serves to
657:
645:
644:
635:
633:
632:
629:
628:
246:
245:
240:
239:
231:
226:
224:
222:
221:
214:
209:
200:
194:
192:
191:
180:
171:
170:
167:
166:
165:
147:
146:
133:
128:
127:
117:
96:
74:
55:
54:
46:
41:
35:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4142:
4133:
4132:
4129:
4126:
4121:
4117:
4113:
4109:
4105:
4101:
4095:
4091:
4087:
4080:
4076:
4070:
4067:
4064:
4061:
4057:
4056:
4055:
4051:
4045:
4039:
4038:Anonymous1261
4034:
4033:
4032:
4031:
4028:
4025:
4022:
4019:
4011:
4009:
4008:
4004:
4000:
3989:
3978:
3976:
3975:
3970:
3965:
3963:
3962:Novem Linguae
3957:
3945:
3941:
3937:
3934:
3929:
3925:
3923:
3919:
3915:
3911:
3907:
3903:
3897:
3896:
3894:Crouch, Swale
3888:
3887:
3886:
3882:
3878:
3877:
3872:
3867:
3866:
3865:
3864:
3860:
3854:
3853:
3851:Crouch, Swale
3842:
3837:
3826:
3822:
3816:
3815:
3814:
3811:
3806:
3802:
3798:
3797:
3796:
3792:
3785:
3783:
3780:
3776:
3773:
3771:
3767:
3763:
3759:
3756:
3755:
3750:
3746:
3742:
3738:
3737:
3736:
3735:
3732:
3728:
3724:
3720:
3717:
3715:
3711:
3707:
3703:
3699:
3695:
3692:
3690:
3686:
3682:
3678:
3675:
3673:
3669:
3665:
3660:
3657:
3649:
3645:
3641:
3637:
3636:
3635:
3631:
3627:
3623:
3622:
3621:
3617:
3613:
3609:
3605:
3601:
3600:
3599:
3595:
3591:
3587:
3586:
3585:
3584:
3581:
3576:
3564:
3560:
3553:
3546:
3545:
3544:
3541:
3538:
3532:
3531:
3525:
3521:
3517:
3513:
3508:
3507:
3506:
3505:
3501:
3497:
3496:Voice of Clam
3491:
3483:
3451:
3447:
3443:
3438:
3437:
3436:
3433:
3432:
3429:
3428:
3423:
3422:
3416:
3415:
3414:
3410:
3406:
3402:
3398:
3397:
3396:
3392:
3388:
3384:
3380:
3379:
3378:
3375:
3371:
3367:
3363:
3359:
3355:
3351:
3347:
3342:
3338:
3336:
3333:
3332:
3329:
3328:
3323:
3322:
3316:
3315:
3314:
3310:
3306:
3301:
3300:
3299:
3295:
3291:
3287:
3286:
3285:
3281:
3277:
3273:
3271:
3265:
3264:Oversightable
3258:
3254:
3253:
3252:
3248:
3244:
3239:
3238:
3237:
3234:
3233:
3230:
3229:
3224:
3223:
3216:
3214:
3211:
3207:
3203:
3198:|child corn}}
3197:
3188:
3181:
3180:
3179:
3175:
3171:
3167:
3156:
3155:
3154:
3150:
3146:
3142:
3138:
3135:
3131:
3130:
3129:
3126:
3122:
3118:
3116:
3110:
3106:
3102:
3098:
3093:
3089:
3084:
3080:
3076:
3075:
3074:
3071:
3070:
3067:
3066:
3061:
3060:
3054:
3050:
3046:
3045:
3044:
3039:
3035:
3031:
3027:
3023:
3018:
3014:
3010:
3006:
3005:
3004:
3003:
3000:
2999:
2996:
2995:
2990:
2989:
2978:
2974:
2971:
2967:
2964:
2960:
2957:
2953:
2950:
2946:
2943:
2939:
2938:
2937:
2928:
2925:
2922:
2919:
2916:
2912:
2911:
2909:
2904:
2901:
2898:
2895:
2893:
2889:
2885:
2882:
2880:
2876:
2873:
2870:
2866:
2863:
2862:
2860:
2855:
2852:
2851:
2849:
2844:
2841:
2839:
2838:WP:REFUND/G13
2835:
2831:
2828:
2826:
2822:
2819:
2816:
2812:
2809:
2807:
2803:
2799:
2796:
2793:
2790:
2788:
2784:
2781:
2778:
2775:
2772:
2768:
2764:
2761:
2759:
2755:
2751:
2748:
2746:
2742:
2739:
2737:
2733:
2730:
2727:
2724:
2721:
2717:
2714:
2713:
2711:
2710:
2709:
2707:
2702:
2700:
2695:
2689:
2679:
2675:
2671:
2670:
2665:
2657:
2656:Db-c4/sandbox
2650:
2649:
2648:
2645:
2640:
2632:
2625:
2624:
2623:
2619:
2615:
2614:
2609:
2601:
2591:
2581:
2575:
2574:
2573:
2569:
2565:
2557:
2550:
2546:
2545:
2544:
2543:
2538:
2534:
2524:
2513:
2508:
2501:
2497:
2492:
2486:
2485:
2482:
2479:
2474:
2470:
2466:
2462:
2459:
2457:
2453:
2443:
2435:
2432:
2430:
2425:
2421:
2406:
2403:
2401:
2398:
2394:
2390:
2386:
2383:
2381:
2377:
2371:
2370:
2368:Crouch, Swale
2363:
2360:
2358:
2355:
2348:
2344:
2342:
2340:
2337:
2333:
2329:
2327:
2323:
2319:
2315:
2306:
2303:
2299:
2295:
2291:
2287:
2283:
2281:
2277:
2273:
2268:
2264:
2262:
2258:
2254:
2250:
2247:
2245:
2241:
2237:
2236:
2231:
2226:
2222:
2221:
2220:
2217:
2212:
2207:
2205:
2200:
2196:
2192:
2181:
2178:
2176:
2172:
2168:
2164:
2161:
2159:
2155:
2151:
2147:
2144:
2142:
2139:
2134:
2130:
2127:
2121:
2118:
2113:
2108:
2103:
2099:
2095:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2086:
2082:
2074:
2063:
2055:
2050:
2043:
2036:
2032:
2027:
2023:
2022:by definition
2017:
2016:edit conflict
2012:
2011:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1987:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1970:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1960:
1956:
1951:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1941:
1937:
1932:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1911:
1906:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1884:
1880:
1876:
1872:
1871:Crouch, Swale
1866:
1862:
1858:
1853:
1852:
1850:
1846:
1842:
1841:
1836:
1824:
1816:
1814:
1799:
1796:
1784:
1781:
1769:
1768:Uncontestable
1766:
1754:
1751:
1750:
1748:
1741:
1734:
1730:
1724:
1719:
1718:EstcatCountry
1709:
1708:EstcatCountry
1702:
1698:
1694:
1691:
1690:
1685:
1681:
1679:
1675:
1674:
1669:
1668:
1664:
1659:
1655:
1654:contributions
1651:
1647:
1642:
1636:
1632:
1625:
1622:
1619:
1614:
1609:
1608:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1569:
1566:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1527:
1522:
1517:
1513:
1500:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1475:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1409:
1404:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1388:
1383:
1382:
1376:
1372:
1369:
1364:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1353:
1347:
1346:
1344:Crouch, Swale
1338:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1323:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1307:
1302:
1294:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1263:
1260:
1255:
1251:
1248:
1246:
1242:
1236:
1235:
1233:Crouch, Swale
1228:
1225:
1223:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1211:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1181:
1176:
1171:
1164:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1145:
1143:
1139:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1122:
1117:
1103:
1099:
1096:
1093:
1089:
1086:
1083:
1079:
1076:
1073:
1069:
1066:
1063:
1059:
1056:
1053:
1049:
1046:
1043:
1039:
1036:
1033:
1029:
1026:
1023:
1019:
1016:
1013:
1009:
1006:
1003:
999:
996:
993:
989:
986:
983:
979:
976:
973:
969:
966:
963:
959:
956:
953:
949:
946:
943:
939:
936:
933:
929:
926:
923:
919:
916:
913:
909:
906:
903:
899:
896:
893:
889:
886:
883:
879:
876:
873:
869:
866:
863:
859:
856:
855:
854:
853:
847:
846:
829:
826:
823:
810:
807:
795:
794:Uncontestable
792:
780:
777:
776:
775:
772:
768:
763:
756:
749:
742:
733:
726:
722:
718:
714:
709:
704:
700:
693:
692:
684:
680:
676:
672:
667:
662:
658:
651:
650:
631:
630:
625:
621:
613:
609:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
254:
252:
248:
247:
237:
233:
232:
229:
219:
215:
213:
210:
208:
204:
201:
199:
196:
195:
189:
185:
184:Learn to edit
181:
178:
173:
172:
169:
168:
163:
159:
155:
154:
151:
144:
140:
136:
132:
121:
118:
114:
110:
106:
100:
97:
92:
88:
84:
78:
77:Uncontestable
75:
71:
65:
62:
61:
60:
52:
48:
47:
44:
39:
36:
29:
28:
19:
4083:
4015:
3982:
3961:
3948:
3891:
3869:
3848:
3846:
3835:
3774:
3757:
3741:QwertyForest
3718:
3693:
3681:QwertyForest
3676:
3658:
3571:
3542:
3536:
3533:
3487:
3426:
3420:
3418:
3417:Yeah, that.
3340:
3326:
3320:
3318:
3261:
3227:
3221:
3219:
3205:
3192:, let alone
3165:
3112:
3096:
3091:
3082:
3078:
3064:
3058:
3056:
3017:WP:OVERSIGHT
2993:
2987:
2985:
2982:
2976:
2969:
2962:
2955:
2948:
2941:
2934:
2817:or promotion
2703:
2698:
2696:
2693:
2662:
2606:
2517:
2506:
2483:
2480:
2477:
2460:
2433:
2404:
2388:
2384:
2365:
2361:
2304:
2248:
2228:
2224:
2179:
2162:
2145:
2128:
2080:
2053:
2048:
2025:
2021:
1991:WhatamIdoing
1977:WhatamIdoing
1949:
1936:WhatamIdoing
1930:
1903:
1833:
1798:Nonredundant
1797:
1782:
1767:
1752:
1692:
1672:
1671:
1666:
1665:
1662:
1630:
1623:
1617:
1610:
1567:
1540:
1519:
1422:
1401:
1384:
1380:
1379:
1341:
1321:
1299:
1271:
1249:
1230:
1226:
1173:
1135:
1114:
1112:
828:Nonredundant
827:
808:
793:
778:
773:
737:
703:this version
661:this version
619:
249:
156:This is the
150:
134:
129:
120:Nonredundant
119:
98:
90:
86:
82:
76:
69:
63:
58:
37:
4063:Talk to me!
4024:Talk to me!
3883:• he/they)
3401:oversighted
3266:information
3011:case, it's
3007:It's not a
2850:Talk pages
2815:advertising
2802:Attack page
2728:: Test page
2676:• he/they)
2620:• he/they)
2242:· he/they)
2227:that, too.
2079:unarguably-
1917:· he/they)
1847:· he/they)
1749:checklist:
1629:There is a
1533:· he/they)
1415:· he/they)
1313:· he/they)
1187:· he/they)
1128:· he/they)
135:this header
85:pages that
4116:Nikkimaria
3928:* Pppery *
3723:Tazerdadog
3575:* Pppery *
3442:Tazerdadog
3403:see ...".
2927:WP:BLPPROD
2913:Listed at
2743:: Blatant
2639:* Pppery *
2211:* Pppery *
2133:* Pppery *
2112:* Pppery *
1855:Notified:
1494:We do use
1363:* Pppery *
1254:* Pppery *
1102:discussion
1092:discussion
1082:discussion
1072:discussion
1062:discussion
1052:discussion
1042:discussion
1032:discussion
1022:discussion
1012:discussion
1002:discussion
992:discussion
982:discussion
972:discussion
962:discussion
952:discussion
942:discussion
932:discussion
922:discussion
912:discussion
902:discussion
892:discussion
882:discussion
872:discussion
862:discussion
125:otherwise.
94:carefully.
4112:Marchjuly
4100:Asclepias
4090:WP:CSD#F8
4060:Who am I?
4021:Who am I?
3995:|DOC=auto
3914:Thryduulf
3706:Thryduulf
3640:George Ho
3626:Thryduulf
3612:George Ho
3604:be boldly
3590:Thryduulf
3548:forward.
3512:Thryduulf
3405:Thryduulf
3346:WP:REFUND
3290:Thryduulf
3243:Thryduulf
3168:hiding).
3145:Thryduulf
3109:WP:CSD#G3
3053:WP:REVDEL
2787:WP:REFUND
2736:Vandalism
2564:Thryduulf
2271:Aaron Liu
2253:Thryduulf
2150:Thryduulf
1995:Thryduulf
1969:Aaron Liu
1954:Aaron Liu
1899:Thryduulf
1830:insource:
1753:Objective
1747:WP:NEWCSD
1686:currently
1590:Thryduulf
1545:Thryduulf
1482:Thryduulf
1395:currently
1327:Thryduulf
1163:eiei-year
779:Objective
762:eiei-year
755:a rewrite
748:eiei-year
717:this edit
675:this edit
220:if needed
203:Be polite
158:talk page
64:Objective
51:WP:NEWCSD
3926:Agreed.
3170:Primefac
3022:Headbomb
2888:Redirect
2879:redirect
2393:Jkudlick
2322:contribs
2310:Chaotic
2290:andrybak
2267:WP:CREEP
2199:contribs
2167:Primefac
2073:db-error
1895:Primefac
1783:Frequent
1745:s). The
1435:this one
1195:Primefac
1147:Primefac
809:Frequent
251:Archives
228:Shortcut
188:get help
99:Frequent
43:Shortcut
4118:, and
4104:Fastily
3875:Blaster
3810:Cryptic
3775:Comment
3758:Support
3719:Support
3677:Support
3374:Cryptic
3362:Ford489
3358:blocked
3348:" and "
3210:Cryptic
3202:CAT:CSD
3125:Cryptic
3090:really
3079:without
2921:WP:PROD
2767:blocked
2754:deleted
2708:) are:
2668:Blaster
2612:Blaster
2478:Laundry
2461:Support
2446:he/they
2434:support
2405:Support
2385:Support
2362:Support
2354:Cryptic
2336:Cryptic
2305:Support
2249:Support
2234:Blaster
2225:support
2180:Support
2163:Support
2146:Support
2129:Support
2085:Cryptic
2062:db-test
2042:db-move
1950:Support
1909:Blaster
1897:, and
1875:Cryptic
1839:Blaster
1693:Support
1568:Support
1541:support
1525:Blaster
1407:Blaster
1322:Support
1305:Blaster
1250:Support
1227:Support
1219:Cryptic
1179:Blaster
1120:Blaster
721:history
679:history
620:30 days
4125:Anomie
3999:Gonnym
3779:zzuuzz
3659:oppose
3387:Nickps
3360:user (
3354:banned
3305:Nickps
3276:Nickps
3257:WP:RD4
3119:... →
3013:WP:CRD
3009:WP:CSD
2771:banned
2756:per a
2441:sawyer
2397:(talk)
2349:always
2345:always
2187:python
2049:always
2035:Africa
2031:AfricA
1891:Pppery
1883:Gonnym
1865:WT:CFD
1863:, and
1857:T:CENT
1740:db-xfd
1725:exists
1723:still
1682:always
1646:voorts
1457:Gonnym
1423:always
1391:always
1293:db-xfd
1170:WP:TPN
769:exists
767:still
236:WT:CSD
91:should
3871:House
3500:talk)
3262:G15.
3187:db-g3
3105:Nomic
2664:House
2608:House
2600:db-c4
2481:Pizza
2389:never
2230:House
2190:coder
1905:House
1887:Kusma
1835:House
1823:db-c4
1729:above
1697:WP:G6
1572:Kusma
1521:House
1403:House
1301:House
1175:House
1138:WP:G8
1116:House
715:with
673:with
256:Index
216:Seek
164:page.
87:could
70:agree
4108:JPxG
4003:talk
3969:talk
3958:. –
3918:talk
3901:talk
3881:talk
3858:talk
3801:here
3766:talk
3762:Whpq
3745:talk
3727:talk
3710:talk
3694:Note
3685:talk
3668:talk
3644:talk
3630:talk
3616:talk
3594:talk
3516:talk
3446:talk
3409:talk
3391:talk
3341:will
3317:G▉?
3309:talk
3294:talk
3280:talk
3247:talk
3174:talk
3166:more
3149:talk
3083:also
3051:and
2745:hoax
2674:talk
2618:talk
2568:talk
2537:talk
2533:MSGJ
2451:talk
2438:...
2375:talk
2318:talk
2312:Enby
2294:talk
2288:. —
2276:talk
2257:talk
2240:talk
2223:I'd
2195:talk
2171:talk
2154:talk
1999:talk
1981:talk
1959:talk
1940:talk
1915:talk
1845:talk
1810:bug.
1650:talk
1594:talk
1576:talk
1549:talk
1531:talk
1486:talk
1461:talk
1447:talk
1413:talk
1351:talk
1331:talk
1311:talk
1280:talk
1240:talk
1199:talk
1185:talk
1151:talk
1126:talk
840:bug.
205:and
143:edit
139:view
107:and
3904:)
3861:)
3431:🗯️
3370:RD4
3366:RD4
3356:or
3331:🗯️
3232:🗯️
3117:and
3069:🗯️
3019:.
2998:🗯️
2843:G14
2830:G13
2821:G12
2811:G11
2806:BLP
2798:G10
2769:or
2699:not
2378:)
2081:non
2054:sub
2026:non
1731:at
1512:foo
1354:)
1243:)
705:of
663:of
83:all
4123:.
4114:,
4110:,
4106:,
4102:,
4005:)
3991:}}
3985:{{
3920:)
3768:)
3747:)
3729:)
3712:)
3687:)
3670:)
3646:)
3632:)
3618:)
3610:?
3596:)
3518:)
3494:—
3492:.
3448:)
3421:jp
3411:)
3393:)
3350:G5
3321:jp
3311:)
3296:)
3282:)
3249:)
3222:jp
3196:db
3194:{{
3190:}}
3184:{{
3176:)
3151:)
3111:→
3092:is
3059:jp
3036:·
3032:·
3028:·
2988:jp
2903:X3
2897:G8
2886::
2884:R4
2875:R3
2867::
2865:R2
2854:G8
2800::
2792:G8
2783:G7
2777:G6
2763:G5
2750:G4
2741:G3
2734::
2732:G3
2726:G2
2718::
2716:G1
2659:}}
2653:{{
2634:}}
2628:{{
2603:}}
2597:{{
2593:}}
2587:{{
2583:}}
2577:{{
2570:)
2559:}}
2553:{{
2535:·
2526:}}
2520:{{
2498:)
2495:c̄
2484:03
2473:G6
2448:*
2444:*
2424:💬
2395:⚓
2324:)
2320:·
2296:)
2278:)
2259:)
2197:|
2173:)
2156:)
2076:}}
2070:{{
2065:}}
2059:{{
2045:}}
2039:{{
2001:)
1983:)
1971:,
1961:)
1942:)
1931:un
1893:,
1889:,
1885:,
1881:,
1877:,
1873:,
1859:,
1826:}}
1820:{{
1800::
1785::
1770::
1755::
1743:}}
1737:{{
1721:}}
1715:{{
1711:}}
1705:{{
1656:)
1615:.
1596:)
1588:.
1578:)
1551:)
1543:.
1518:.
1515:}}
1509:{{
1502:}}
1496:{{
1488:)
1477:}}
1471:{{
1463:)
1449:)
1333:)
1296:}}
1290:{{
1282:)
1272:is
1201:)
1166:}}
1160:{{
1153:)
830::
811::
796::
781::
765:}}
759:{{
751:}}
745:{{
618::
612:89
610:,
608:88
606:,
604:87
602:,
600:86
598:,
596:85
594:,
592:84
590:,
588:83
586:,
584:82
582:,
580:81
578:,
576:80
574:,
572:79
570:,
568:78
566:,
564:77
562:,
560:76
558:,
556:75
554:,
552:74
550:,
548:73
546:,
544:72
542:,
540:71
538:,
536:70
534:,
532:69
530:,
528:68
526:,
524:67
522:,
520:66
518:,
516:65
514:,
512:64
510:,
508:63
506:,
504:62
502:,
500:61
498:,
496:60
494:,
492:59
490:,
488:58
486:,
484:57
482:,
480:56
478:,
476:55
474:,
472:54
470:,
468:53
466:,
464:52
462:,
460:51
458:,
456:50
454:,
452:49
450:,
448:48
446:,
444:47
442:,
440:46
438:,
436:45
434:,
432:44
430:,
428:43
426:,
424:42
422:,
420:41
418:,
416:40
414:,
412:39
410:,
408:38
406:,
404:37
402:,
400:36
398:,
396:35
394:,
392:34
390:,
388:33
386:,
384:32
382:,
380:31
378:,
376:30
374:,
372:29
370:,
368:28
366:,
364:27
362:,
360:26
358:,
356:25
354:,
352:24
350:,
348:23
346:,
344:22
342:,
340:21
338:,
336:20
334:,
332:19
330:,
328:18
326:,
324:17
322:,
320:16
318:,
316:15
314:,
312:14
310:,
308:13
306:,
304:12
302:,
300:11
298:,
296:10
294:,
290:,
286:,
282:,
278:,
274:,
270:,
266:,
262:,
258:,
186:;
141:•
137::
122::
101::
79::
66::
4128:⚔
4098:@
4048:—
4040::
4036:@
4001:(
3971:)
3967:(
3916:(
3898:(
3879:(
3855:(
3819:—
3808:—
3789:—
3764:(
3743:(
3725:(
3708:(
3683:(
3666:(
3642:(
3628:(
3614:(
3592:(
3557:—
3554:)
3550:(
3514:(
3498:(
3444:(
3427:g
3424:×
3407:(
3389:(
3327:g
3324:×
3307:(
3292:(
3278:(
3245:(
3228:g
3225:×
3172:(
3147:(
3065:g
3062:×
3040:}
3038:b
3034:p
3030:c
3026:t
3024:{
2994:g
2991:×
2672:(
2616:(
2566:(
2539:)
2531:(
2490:d
2487:(
2418:A
2415:F
2412:C
2372:(
2352:—
2316:(
2292:(
2274:(
2255:(
2238:(
2201:)
2193:(
2184:—
2169:(
2152:(
2096:/
2018:)
2014:(
1997:(
1989:@
1979:(
1967:@
1957:(
1938:(
1913:(
1901:.
1869:@
1843:(
1807:Y
1792:Y
1777:Y
1762:Y
1652:/
1648:(
1643:)
1639:(
1592:(
1574:(
1547:(
1529:(
1484:(
1459:(
1445:(
1411:(
1348:(
1329:(
1309:(
1278:(
1237:(
1197:(
1183:(
1149:(
1124:(
1104:)
1100:(
1094:)
1090:(
1084:)
1080:(
1074:)
1070:(
1064:)
1060:(
1054:)
1050:(
1044:)
1040:(
1034:)
1030:(
1024:)
1020:(
1014:)
1010:(
1004:)
1000:(
994:)
990:(
984:)
980:(
974:)
970:(
964:)
960:(
954:)
950:(
944:)
940:(
934:)
930:(
924:)
920:(
914:)
910:(
904:)
900:(
894:)
890:(
884:)
880:(
874:)
870:(
864:)
860:(
837:Y
818:Y
803:Y
788:Y
292:9
288:8
284:7
280:6
276:5
272:4
268:3
264:2
260:1
253::
190:.
115:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.