31:
When I suggested a page like this, I wanted us to have a place where reviewers could nominate articles that they feel are needed for
Version 0.5 that might have been overlooked in the original work. I propose we limit this to active reviewers, otherwise it becomes in effect another nominations page.
36:- not a country, but definitely we should have it on importance. It's only B with a cleanup tag, but it looks perfectly usable, and it's on BozMo's CD.
68:
and we hope to include as many of those as possible - one reviewer has already covered several sections of the top 200 list. Thanks for your help!
65:
51:
17:
64:
Most definitely, as long as the articles are of decent quality (at least B, without serious flaws). In fact, we are going through the
72:
58:
40:
54:
to help
Maureen. I have done so but the articles weren't added to the project. Will they be?
33:
69:
37:
55:
50:
I was asked to help with the assessment of some biographies at
52:
Wikipedia_talk:Version_0.5_Nominations#Biographies_to_add
8:
18:Knowledge talk:Version 0.5 Nominations
7:
24:
73:15:33, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
59:15:25, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
41:05:04, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
89:
66:top 200 "core biographies"
32:I now have an example -
80:
27:Late nominations
88:
87:
83:
82:
81:
79:
78:
77:
48:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
86:
84:
76:
75:
47:
44:
34:United Nations
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
85:
74:
71:
67:
63:
62:
61:
60:
57:
53:
45:
43:
42:
39:
35:
26:
19:
49:
30:
46:Assessment
70:Walkerma
38:Walkerma
56:Lincher
16:<
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.